Higher learning? Hardly. Watch as these “educated” college students regurgitate the “Trump bad” mantra and then turn right around and praise the Trump tax plan when they think it came from Bernie Sanders.
It would be pretty funny if it wasn’t so sad. It’s this kind of ignorance that all totalitarian regimes have been built on.
Good work if you can get it, huh? While Hillary Clinton was using her position as then-Secretary of State to coordinate a deal that allowed Russia to take control of 20% of America’s uranium stock, Moscow was paying Bill Clinton a half-million dollars for a one-hour speech.
Russian intelligence targeted Hillary Clinton before she became secretary of state in 2009, FBI documents show.
New FBI information about corruption in a Clinton-approved uranium deal with Russia raises questions about Clinton’s actions after the FBI broke up a deep-cover Russian spy ring in 2010.
For a decade, the FBI ran an operation called Ghost Stories to monitor and rip apart a deep-cover Russian agent network. Ghost Stories tracked a ring Russian spies who lived between Boston and Washington, D.C., under false identities. It was one of the FBI’s most elaborate and successful counterintelligence operations in history.
After the FBI arrested 10 of the spies in June, 2010, Secretary of State Clinton worked feverishly to return the Russian agents to Moscow in a hastily arranged, lopsided deal with Putin.
It all happened as the uranium deal was in play: An arrangement to provide Moscow’s state Rosatom nuclear agency with 20 percent of American uranium capacity, with $145,000,000 to pour into the Clinton Family Foundation and its projects.
For the Clintons, the FBI’s biggest counterintelligence bust in history couldn’t have come at a worse time.
The day the FBI arrested the Russian agents, on June 28, 2010, the day before the secretary of state’s husband, Bill Clinton, was to give a speech in Moscow. A Kremlin-connected investment bank, Renaissance Capital, paid the former president $500,000 for the hour-long appearance.
(THE CONNECTION BETWEEN MOSCOW AND THE CLINTONS THEN GOES MUCH-MUCH DEEPER)
…So Hillary Clinton was mining Kremlin cash for her personal benefit while secretary of state, at the exact time Putin’s SVR spies were targeting her and penetrating her inner circle. She had every personal motivation to make the spy problem disappear and deny that she had been a target.Once the FBI broke the ring on June 28, 2010, attorney general Eric Holder said that the sudden arrests were to prevent one of the spies from fleeing the United States. FBI counterintelligence chief Frank Figliuzzi later shared a different reason: “We were becoming very concerned they were getting close enough to a sitting US cabinet member that we thought we could no longer allow this to continue.”
…Hillary wanted the spy ring issue to disappear fast
Clinton didn’t want leverage. She wanted the issue to go away. She toiled feverishly to get the 10 Ghost Stories spies back to Moscow as quickly as possible. She accepted whatever Putin would give her to pass off as a face-saving swap.
She folded America’s strong hand of cards. The US had ten relatively young, highly trained Russian spies in custody with immense, fresh knowledge of SVR statecraft. A normal secretary of state would bide her time and get the best deal.
The State Department coordinated quickly with the Kremlin to return the spies in a lopsided swap over a busy Fourth of July weekend, when few in Washington were paying attention.
As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had been acting as a foreign agent working for Moscow interests – not the United States. THAT is what the Moscow spy ring investigation uncovered – and it linked directly to the Obama White House and Mr. Obama himself. In comes Eric Holder, the long-standing Obama firewall, to help clean it all up. Mr. Holder, along with Hillary, expedited the release of the Russian spies. All ten were quickly sent back to Moscow in order to bury the mountain of evidence showing how self-interest was the #1 policy of the entirety of the Obama administration and most certainly the Clinton-run State Department.
So how much was American security worth to the Clintons? Apparently about a half-million dollars per hour…
Iran and North Korea are rogue nations that have repeatedly threatened America and her allies. Iran has made wiping out Israel a foundation of its government. Both of these terrorist nations have desired a nuclear weapons arsenal for decades.
North Korea is believed to already have them. Iran will soon be next. Over the last thirty years two U.S. politicians did more to arm these anti-American countries than anyone else – Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Iran set to receive huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia amid lawmakers’ concerns
Iran is set to receive a massive shipment of natural uranium from Russia — enough, potentially, for several bombs, diplomats said Monday, highlighting a move that could give the Islamic Republic major leverage if the U.S. tries dismantling the controversial nuclear deal.
And how did Russia become so uranium-wealthy? Check out this graphic:
In exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton awarded Russia control of 20% of America’s known uranium holdings. Now Russia is selling a “massive” shipment of uranium to Iran.
Now check out this excerpt from a recent GlobalNews report:
The Soviets even helped North Korea set up its first nuclear reactor in 1964. The reactor was used to produce radioactive isotopes for medicinal, industrial and research purposes.
Russia has been selling technology, and now uranium, to North Korea for decades. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton helped to facilitate that exchange and now we have Russia likely selling American uranium to countries that have vowed to destroy America.
Repeat that to yourself please: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton helped to facilitate that exchange and now we have Russia likely selling American uranium to countries that have vowed to destroy America.
Stop with the foolish right vs left and Republican vs Democrat nonsense. This is about the safety and security of every U.S. citizen – safety that was terribly compromised by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in a $145 million dollar pay to play scheme. Iran arms jihadi terrorists – terrorists who have long dreamed of being able to use a nuclear weapon.
Congress knows this. The Mainstream Media knows this. Then why the silence? Well, $145 million leaves plenty on the table to buy a lot of silence, right? And if that approach fails, there’s always another as outlined in this headline from earlier this week:
Jobless claims decreased by 22k to 222k (est. 240k), the lowest since March 1973
Period included Columbus Day holiday, giving people one less day to file claims
Continuing claims fell by 16k to 1.89m in week ended Oct. 7 (data reported with one-week lag)
Four-week average of initial claims, a less-volatile measure than the weekly figure, dropped to 248,250 from 257,750
The latest period also encompasses the reporting week that the Labor Department surveys for its October employment figures. Claims are at the lowest level in more than four decades, indicating employers have little desire to cut staffing levels amid a shortage of qualified workers.
An internal audit commissioned by the Clinton Foundation in 2011 revealed that the Clinton’s family charity may have misled the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) when it claimed, under penalty of perjury, that it was enforcing a policy against conflicts of interest.
The audit — apparently requested by Chelsea Clinton, revealed by Wikileaks, and postedby the Daily Caller — was conducted by the law firm Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett. It addressed deficiencies in the Clinton Foundation’s structure and oversight, including the potential for conflicts of interest due to the Hillary Clinton’s role as Secretary of State.
The auditors noted that “some interviewees reported conflicts of those raising funds or donors, some of whom may have an expectation of quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.” They also flagged a potential problem in the charity’s IRS filing:
… the IRS Form 990, which is signed under penalties of perjury and is publicly available, asks (a) whether the Foundation has a written conflict-of-interest policy, (ii) whether directors, officers, and key employees are required to annually disclose interests that could give rise to conflicts of interest, and (iii) whether the Foundation regularly and consistently monitors and enforces compliance with its conflict-of- interest policy. The Foundation indicated on its 2010 Form 990 that it has a written conflict-of- interest policy, requires annual disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, and monitors and enforces compliance with the policy. However, we did not find evidence of that enforcement.
The auditors concluded with a recommendation (original emphasis): We recommend that the Foundation establish a gift acceptance policy and procedures to ensure that all donors are properly vetted and that no inappropriate quid pro quos are offered to donors in return for contributions.
However, a report compiled in August 2013 on the internal review, published on the Clinton Foundation’s website, implies that the new gift acceptance policy and procedures had not yet been adopted. Hillary Clinton had already left the State Department earlier that year.
Other problems with the Clinton Foundation at the time included that its board did not have a chair, and was not very involved in running the charity. In a footnote, the audit commented: “We were also told that at CHAI [the Clinton Health Access Initiative], [CEO] Ira Magaziner set his own salary.”
In short, auditors warned the Clinton Foundation it was likely involved in multiple conflicts of interest violations. That warning was ignored for the entire time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State as tens of millions of dollars continued to pour into the foundation’s coffers.
The Clintons knew. The Obama White House knew. Top-ranking members of Congress knew as did various media institutions. Nothing was done. The corruption continued – and continues still to this day.
This comes from the left-leaning The Hill so as bad as it already sounds here, it is likely much-much worse.
Here’s the real takeaway quote, the one that should be repeated over and over again:
Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.
They also obtained an eyewitness account – backed by documents – indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton‘s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.
Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.
Barack Obama as President of the United States and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State were fully engaged in a global pay-to-play scheme which greatly expanded Russia’s nuclear capability.
The far left complains repeatedly about POTUS Trump saying “mean things” while very recent history shows Obama and Clinton put the balance of power throughout the world at risk and grew richer while doing so.
$33.6 BILLION. That is the amount then-President Barack Obama had shipped under cover of darkness to the world’s #1 state sponsor of terrorism. It was literally pallets of cash and gold that was part of the shockingly one-sided nuclear agreement between Iran and the Obama administration.
That amount was nearly 10% of Iran’s entire economy paid out between 2015 and 2016, an unprecedented cash windfall for what had been up to then an economically struggling Iranian regime.
Now consider this. Prior to 2016 North Korea’s missile testing capability was sporadic at best and prone to high failure rates. This was due in great part to budget constraints. The isolated military nation was cash poor and couldn’t afford a more expansive nuclear testing program.
And yet just two years after Barack Obama’s nearly 34 billion dollar cash and gold payment to Iran we see this headline:
In 2016, North Korea tested 26 missiles; 16 were successful and 10 failed, according to a database maintained by the Nuclear Threat Initiative. That’s an approximately 62 percent success rate. There have been 18 tests in all so far this year: 12 successes, five failures, and one unknown. That’s a 67 percent success rate. Those figures underscore what Pollack said about North Korea being “determined to break through.” Another thing to consider—the number of tests so far this year.“The fact that they are willing to test missiles so frequently suggests they are not really worried about supply,” Narang said. “And if you didn’t have the ability to produce so many missiles, then you might be a little more reluctant to test.”
The astounding acceleration of North Korea’s program has more than a few in the intelligence community thinking it is Iranian investment that has allowed North Korea to move so quickly forward with its nuclear program. The Iranians want that weaponized technology so an agreement is believed to have been struck between both rogue nations. Iran was suddenly rich with tens of billions sent its way by Barack Obama. Some of those billions were then given to North Korea to accelerate its nuclear weapons program in return for that technology then being shared by North Korea with Iran. It is one evil regime helping the other – both of which openly call for the destruction of the United States.
Soon America and the world will have nuclear missiles pointing at it from both North Korea and Iran – courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama. Many remarked at the time how odd Mr. Obama’s Iranian deal seemed, particularly regarding how much it gave Iran and how little it gave back to the United States. He didn’t require Iran improve its atrocious human rights record. (Women, minorities, and homosexuals are routinely killed in Iran) The president didn’t even ask for the release of U.S. citizens being held inside of Iranian prisons prior to delivering those billions to the terrorist regime. That judgement was looking through the wrong set of eyes, though.
What if the Obama-Iran deal was never meant to strengthen the United States but rather weaken it and its place in the world by strengthening and emboldening its most dangerous enemies? Then, and only then, does that deal make any sense.
The timeline doesn’t lie. $33.6 billion in untraceable cash and gold to Iran between 2015 and 2016 and within a year North Korea’s nuclear program is moving ahead at an unprecedented pace. One hand washing the other – with both those hands belonging to this guy:
The damage Mr. Obama inflicted upon America will not be measured in years but decades.
Her name was Daphne Caruana Galizia, an online blogger who was relentless in uncovering widespread financial corruption by some of the world’s richest and most powerful. (While the Establishment Media largely ignored the scandal) The Panama Papers investigation linked current and former leaders of Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, Argentina, Qatar, Ecuador, Sudan, Italy, Australia, Iceland, Iraq, Jordan, and Pakistan, among others in a massive money laundering/tax shelter scheme built upon a convoluted mountain of offshore accounts, boards, foundations, and trusts.
On Monday, she had written: “There are crooks everywhere you look now.
“The situation is desperate.
“In another entry last year, she wrote: “Malta’s public life is afflicted with dangerously unstable men with no principles or scruples.”
Maltese Prime Minister Joseph Muscat, who was himself part of the Panama Papers scandal, publicly denounced the attack and promised to bring those responsible to justice. Months earlier he had claimed Caruana Galizia’s claims against him were fabrication and was in the process of suing her for defamation.
Apparently someone believed what Caruana Galizia knew was far more than baseless. She was murdered because of it.
His name is Cole McCafferty and he has had enough of spoiled millionaire NFL players subjecting fans to their own personal anti-American political displays. Young Mr. McCafferty urges these players to respect the flag and play ball or quit the NFL and the millions of dollars it pays them.
This video is now going viral. Check it out here and if you agree with this young man’s message to those anti-American NFL players, share with others:
“We cannot in good conscience do anything but advise our clients to stand on their constitutional privileges, the attorney work product doctrine and contractual obligations,” wrote Fusion GPS counsel Josh Levy in response to subpoenas issued earlier this month by the committee’s chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes.
Levy argued that complying with the subpoenas would violate “the First Amendment rights” of the cofounders — Glenn Simpson, Thomas Catan, and Peter Fritsch — “and would chill any American running for office … from conducting confidential opposition research in an election.”
It must be noted that Fusion GPS has already been accused of acting as a foreign agent that has repeatedly meddled with election outcomes including those here in the United States. The false Trump Dossier was itself largely created by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence agent. The dossier was intended to be used by the then-Hillary Clinton campaign to counter the email leaks from top members of Mrs. Clinton’s own campaign. Those emails showed campaign operatives mocking minorities, the poor, as well as proving direct collusion with the media. In effect, Team Clinton was seeing their own factual words repelling voters so it attempted to create a false narrative about Donald Trump as a means of fighting back.
He promised voters “America First” and Donald Trump appears to be doing all he can to accomplish just that even as a globalist-agenda-driven Congress, the media, and corporations continue to work against him nearly every step of the way.
Harvey Weinstein has been bumping ugly with the globalist elite for a very long time and so it is not too hard to suggest Mr. Weinstein, who personally made tens of millions of dollars each year churning out anti-American crap in Hollywood, is a globalist communist who took every opportunity he could to lie about and demean America and its people.
Harvey Weinstein—Shameless Communist Propagandist to Boot
You will be astounded to hear that the late Stalinist dictator Fidel Castro hailed Michael Moore as “an outstanding American, ” and his movies were repeatedly shown for free throughout the Castro-Family-Fiefdom.
Michael Moore claims that Cuba’s Stalinist regime played it as straight with him during the filming of “Sicko” (executive–produced by Harvey Weinstein) as he plays it with its viewers. “I asked them to give us the same care they give their own Cuban citizens,” Moore assured his viewers. “No more, no less. And that’s what they did.”
So let’s go ahead and allow Dr. Julio Cesar Alfonso, who worked within Cuba’s health-care system for years, to remind America of something that should be blatantly obvious: “The treatment Moore and the rescue workers receive in the film was done specifically for them, because the regime knew it would make great propaganda.”
Ninety-nine percent of Cubans have no more experience with a hospital like the one featured in “Sicko” than Michael Moore or Harvey Weinstein has with a Soloflex. Most Cubans view a hospital like the one featured in “Sicko” the way teenage boys used to view Playboy magazine: “WOW! — If only!”
Among the many items Michael Moore and Harvey Weinstein “overlooked” in their communist propaganda video is that in 1958 (the year prior to Castroism), Cuba ranked 13th from the top, worldwide with regards to infant mortality. This meant that robustly capitalist Cuba had the 13th lowest infant-mortality rate in the world.This put her not only at the top in Latin America but atop most of Western Europe, ahead of France, Belgium, West Germany, Israel, Japan, Austria, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. Today all of these countries leave Communist Cuba in the dust, with much lower infant mortality rates.
And even plummeting from 13th (Capitalist) to 44th (Communist), Cuba’s “impressive” infant mortality rate is kept artificially low by Communist chicanery with statistics and by a truly appalling abortion rate of 0.71 abortions per live birth. This is the hemisphere’s highest, by far. Any Cuban pregnancy that even hints at trouble gets “terminated.” (And how much you want to bet a higher percentage of those are female babies. That’s a common thread with authoritarian regimes – the demeaning of girls and women is institutionalized. Guess Harvey and Michael had no issue with that.)
…A few years ago, Cuban doctor Dr. Dessy Mendoza was on the phone with a Miami radio station reporting an outbreak of Dengue fever in eastern Cuba near Guantanamo when Castro’s police stormed his house and arrested him. He was charged and sentenced for “spreading enemy propaganda.” The Cubans who collaborated with Michael Moore and Harvey Weinstein are obviously immune to this charge.
Harvey Weinstein, Michael Moore, Hillary Clinton, CNN, NBC, etc., – they are all the same. They lecture everyone on making do with less while they grow rich, coddle tyrants, ignore abuses, and accumulate more.
The great American Middle Class is waking up, though.
Bypassing a Republican do-nothing Congress (whose leadership remains firmly anti-Trump & anti-Middle Class) POTUS Trump signed an Executive Order that greatly expands healthcare choice in America which is the opposite of what the failed, insanely expensive, and now crumbling, Obamacare legislation did.
Obamacare made it impossible for people to sign up for low-cost, short-term plans. Those plans then went away leaving millions having to choose between an Obamacare plan they couldn’t afford, or going without health insurance. Most chose to go without. Donald Trump has now given those people another choice, a better choice, and a far more affordable choice as explained so well by The New York Post:
…Trump is removing Obama’s 90-day limit, reopening that low-cost option. That’s good news for 8 million people currently getting whacked with an ObamaCare tax penalty for not having insurance, and another 11 million uninsured who avoided the penalty by pleading hardship. Count on many of them to buy coverage when they have an affordable option. That will reduce the number of uninsured.
…A less detailed part of Trump’s announcement gives the green light to so-called association plans, which would allow small employers and perhaps even individuals to group together across state lines, giving them the same purchasing clout as large multi-state employers. Time will tell whether these work out.
Trump has now seized the initiative, after congressional Republicans fell flat on their faces and failed to address the pain ObamaCare is inflicting on consumers stuck in the individual insurance market.
The president should keep going. What’s next? Trump should use his discretion to stop enforcing the tax penalty on those who don’t buy ObamaCare-compliant plans, including buyers of short-term plans.
Then he should cancel the sweetheart deal his predecessor weaseled for members of Congress and their staff members. Even though the Affordable Care Act requires them to buy coverage on ObamaCare exchanges, Obama arranged for them to have a choice of 57 gold plans and have John Q. Public pick up most of their costs. It’s an outrage.
Once members of Congress are feeling the same pain as everyone else, they’ll be more focused on repealing and replacing the dysfunctional health law. In the meantime, Trump is wisely providing relief where it counts the most — in people’s wallets.
More choice and lower cost for Middle Class Americans = the media & political establishment freaking out. Obamacare was never about providing healthcare. It was always about centralized government control over your life. Donald Trump just gave Americans a big push-back against that kind of control. It will take a bit of time for those new Trump-provided choices to kick in, but kick in they will.
The media attacks will be off the charts yet POTUS Trump simply marches on.
While Establishment Republicans in the Senate will attempt to publicly dismiss it as grassroots silliness, behind closed doors they are far more worried. The same populist movement that put Donald Trump into the White House is now coming for them and first on that list is current Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Conservative Leaders Urge Mitch McConnell to Resign
The Tea Party Patriots, FreedomWorks, and the Senate Conservatives Fund called on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and the rest of Senate leadership to resign over their inability to pass President Donald Trump’s agenda, which includes repealing and replacing Obamacare, confirming federal judges, and funding a southern border wall.
The grassroots conservative leaders chastised the members of Senate leadership, which includes Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO), Sen. John Thune (R-SD), and Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY). The conservatives argued that the Senate leadership should resign to make way for more effective lawmakers who will enact the president’s populist agenda.
…David Bozell of For America explained that McConnell remains incredibly unpopular, elaborating to say that McConnell has a 9 percent popularity in his home state of Kentucky, 18 percent popularity nationwide, and 40 percent net negative unpopularity among Trump supporters. He added, “The time is now for a leadership change.”
A few reporters asked the panel of conservatives whom they would support to replace McConnell as majority leader of the Senate. Martin of Tea Party Patriots and Ken Cuccinelli of the Senate Conservatives Fund suggested that Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) could serve as a great replacement. Martin said that Perdue was “CEO of a Fortune 500 company; he knows how to lead.”
Cuccinelli explained that his Senate Conservatives Fund plans to target seven out of the eight Republicans who will run for re-election in 2018, which includes Sens. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Dean Heller (R-NV), Roger Wicker (R-MS), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), and John Barrasso (R-WY), a member of Senate leadership. Cuccinelli revealed, “We’re targeting everyone except for Ted Cruz.”
It is Trump Republicans vs Establishment Republicans.
The now”breaking” Harvey Weinstein story has been around for decades. His abusive behavior, his penchant for singling out and intimidating up-and-coming talent, his threats, intimidations, payoffs, it has long been a running inside joke among the Hollywood elite.
So why now?
And what of the longstanding financial links between Mr. Weinstein and Washington D.C.? Some readers might recall the shocking claims of child sex trafficking abuses that are said to be rampant among the globalist elites, stretching from private clubs in London, to high-rise New York, and yes, the scripted caverns of PedoWood and all points between.
Mr. Weinstein bounced around often from LA to New York to London, Italy, Germany, and Paris, among other places. He has longstanding connections to China’s ruling class, billionaire Saudi investors, and of course, U.S. politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. (Mr. Obama even sent his young daughter to intern with the Weinstein company)
Weinstein was among Hollywood’s most fanatical fundraisers for Democrat/globalist causes each and every election cycle for the past twenty years. Whispers of him forcing himself upon young starlets and then demanding they remember to donate to the Democrat cause are legion. Everyone who was anyone knew.
They didn’t care.
Why is that? Could it be that Harvey was merely a more robust example of what is considered everyday life among his fellow elites? That the human carnage that takes place regularly in Hollywood is merely an extension of the very same carnage taking place in D.C. and elsewhere?
Last summer during the heated fray of a presidential election an odd and disturbing story began to circulate about Hillary Clinton’s then-campaign chair and longtime D.C. operative, John Podesta, and Mr. Podesta’s rumored links to child sex trafficking. It quickly became known as “PizzaGate” named so due to speculation of a D.C. pizza parlor being used as one of the locations for any number of horrific acts against carried out in secret against children. The Mainstream Media attacked the claims in force. It was in fact a remarkably unified effort – a circling of the media wagons if you will.
It didn’t help those who wanted to squash the rumors when video of a woman associated with Mr. Podesta was uncovered showing her performing what appeared to be a Satanic ritual. Yes, the story really did get that bizarre and yet one had to remind themselves that what they were seeing was real. John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair and a man who has walked among the D.C. elite for many-many years, was involved in an act known as “Spirit Cooking” – a ritual involving blood, semen, and breast milk.
And let’s not forget the sexting scandal of Anthony Weiner, a former high-ranking congressman and husband to Hillary Clinton’s longtime #2. (who is herself the daughter of Muslim activists) One of the more disturbing imgages of this scandal, (and there were many) was when Weiner sent a picture of himself while his child lay sleeping next to him:
Weiner had known the Clintons and John Podesta for years. Some have described that relationship as almost intimate in nature. They all partied/fundraised with Weinstein who himself was connected to nearly everyone else of note in Hollywood.
And now report after report indicates everyone knew. Some in PedoWood have been speaking out for some time but their careers were soon silenced. They told stories of young actors, male and female, being passed around like toys between studio executives, directors, producers, and other powerful and influential “friends of friends.”
Is it all mere coincidence of association?
Or could it be something else – something horrific, widespread and institutionalized both in PedoWood and Washington D.C.?
America’s relationship with North Korea remains a diplomatic one, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis said Monday, but he urged members of the military to be prepared in case the situation breaks down.
Mattis also used his keynote speech at the annual AUSA conference in Washington, D.C., to thank allies who have stood with the U.S. through the ages.
“It is right now a diplomatically, economic-sanctions-buttressed effort to try and turn North Korea off of this path,” Mattis told the audience. “What does the future hold? Neither you nor I can say.”
“There is one thing the U.S. Army can do, and that is you have to be ready to ensure we have military options that our president can deploy if needed,” Mattis said. “The international community has spoken, but that means the U.S. Army must stand ready.”
“So if you’re ready, that’s your duty at this point and time, and I know the Army will always do its duty.”
“What we want to do is be so ready and be very much aware that we fight the way we come, that everybody in the world wants to deal with Secretary Tillerson and the Department of State, not the Department of Defense and the United States Army,” Mattis told the audience to applause.
For Some reason I feel compelled to speak my mind on this….
Oct 06, 2017
I do not know all the women who have come forward per the New York Times piece on Harvey Weinstein and I am not a fan of many of them, in many ways, especially of their politics (I am certain they are not too fond of me or mine as well!). But I applaud their courage to come forward and support them all 100%. Most of us in the entertainment business have heard of these disgusting stories for years about these scumbag heads of studios, record labels, Fortune 500 companies, etc and how they prey on young women and men, especially in Hollywood, where most show up with stars in their eyes and are viewed / treated as nothing more than a toy by many of these assholes. I do not want to condemn all – I know there are good people in Hollywood, but I do condemn a great deal of these folks, especially the ones who know about this stuff first hand and have stayed silent for so many years or turned a blind eye. It is no secret Hollywood has a don’t ask, don’t tell policy if you wanna work, and the same goes for their views and opinions of how this country and the world should work. The public knows at this point that these people also have big time publicists and lawyers who can sway the narrative, but the majority of us Americans do not buy your bullshit anymore. Best of luck to you victims and know that even though we do not see eye to eye on most things, folks like me still support, care and admire your courage to speak out. I hope Harvey gets the help he seeks, but I do not buy any of it at this point as I believe he is only going down this path because he cannot cover his own shit up any longer.
Why even comment on this and put my own neck out there in a fight that’s not mine?
For my granddaughter, my sisters, my mother, my fiancé, but mostly for the people who have no voice. And I am also not beholden or scared of anyone!
Once again, I support you ladies and I am sure you will not be the last to come forward now that the dam has burst. I do wish for the most positive outcomes for all involved and for some real change in this disgusting space.
If only politicians were so open to contradiction by reality.
With so many people insisting that the Las Vegas massacre confirms what they’ve always thought about gun control, it is refreshing to hear from someone who changed her mind on the subject after considering the evidence. “My colleagues and I at FiveThirtyEight spent three months analyzing all 33,000 lives ended by guns each year in the United States,” Leah Libresco, a statistician who used to work for the data journalism site, writes in TheWashington Post. “We looked at what interventions might have saved those people, and the case for the policies I’d lobbied for crumbled when I examined the evidence.”
Regarding the much-touted gun control laws of Britain and Australia, Libresco found that “neither nation experienced drops in mass shootings or other gun-related crime that could be attributed to their buybacks and bans.” Looking into bans on so-called assault weapons, she concluded that the category is an arbitrary construct with little practical significance.
What about the silencers that Hillary Clinton thinks could have raised the death toll in Las Vegas if they had been used there? “In real life,” Libresco writes, “silencers limit hearing damage for shooters but don’t make gunfire dangerously quiet. An AR-15 with a silencer is about as loud as a jackhammer.”
Libresco notes that “two-thirds of gun deaths in the United States every year are suicides,” and “almost no proposed restriction would make it meaningfully harder for people with guns on hand to use them.” But she argues that “older men, who make up the largest share of gun suicides, need better access to people who could care for them and get them help.” She also recommends targeted measures aimed at protecting women from domestic violence and preventing deadly disputes among young men.
“A reduction in gun deaths is most likely to come from finding smaller chances for victories and expanding those solutions as much as possible,” Libresco concludes. “We save lives by focusing on a range of tactics to protect the different kinds of potential victims and reforming potential killers, not from sweeping bans focused on the guns themselves.”
Libresco says she still does not endorse gun ownership, “but I can’t endorse policies whose only selling point is that gun owners hate them.” The distinction seems to be lost on politicians like Clinton, who define good policy as whatever the NRA doesn’t want.
Dog Whistle politicians like Hillary Clinton spout falsehoods over and over again and are allowed to get away with it by a compliant media. You can counter that by sharing the above truths.
The era of the Mainstream Media can come to an end with your participation.
The Kellogg Foundation. The Ford Foundation. The Open Society Foundation. (G. Soros) The California Endowment. The Marquerite Casey Foundation. Fidelity Charitable Gift. The open borders-promoting National Immigration Law Center.
These are some of the very deep pocket groups that have donated MILLIONS to the far-left, militant Center for Community Change which has been described as follows:
The Center for Community Change, a Washington, D.C.-based 501 (c)(3) progressive community organizing group that does not reveal its donors, has been involved in direct action against President Donald Trump and Republicans before and after the November elections. The organization’s members sit on the boards of other prominent liberal activist groups. LINK
You want to know why so few members of Congress are willing to work with POTUS Trump? Look no further than the above list which in turn represents a powerhouse lobbying effort to keep the Trump White House isolated and the American people suffering because the America-first Trump agenda is being stifled.
At the very same time the Ford Foundation was collaborating with The Center for Community Change it was seeking to exert its influence much more directly upon the Establishment Media as outlined via this report last summer:
…According to the Washington Post, the Ford Foundation has given the newspaper some $500,000 to hire four new staff – a lucrative $125,000 per job deal. The goal: to try “new approaches to preserve and advance high-quality journalism.”
The above scenario is being played out among media outlets all across the country and is a critical part of the “eliminate Trump” effort that began as soon as he won the 2016 Election.
And you want to know who some of the powerful Establishment Republicans are who have been taking cash from these far-left anti-American groups? Here is a partial list that went public nearly two years ago:
Records: Soros Fund Execs Funded Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John McCain, John Kasich, Lindsey Graham in 2016
…The biggest recipient of Soros-connected cash in the GOP was none other than House Speaker Paul Ryan, who repeatedly attempted to undermine Trump over the course of the election. (And continues to do so now via obstruction and support of ongoing Congressional investigations.)
A coup took place in American in 2008. If you didn’t know that it’s simply because the Establishment Media has lied about it ever since – because it too was part of the overthrow of power.
The 2016 Election was a conscious and subconscious effort by millions of American voters to fight back. There were some who voted for Donald Trump simply because their gut informed them he was different. He was not part of the D.C. political cabal. Theirs was not a vote for a party or a specific ideology. They simply wanted to be part of saving the country.
2016 was a battle won but the war very much rages on.