FBI Director Hints That Barack Obama Was Source Of Illegal Leaks (VIDEO)

The Mainstream Media is once again scrambling to cover for Barack Obama. During the hearing yesterday between members of Congress and FBI Director James Comey, Mr. Comey made clear there has been ZERO evidence of collusion between the Russian government and the then-Trump campaign. What Director Comey did suggest is that Barack Obama himself (which would of course involve Valerie Jarrett as well) was a likely source of some, if not all, of the classified information leaks that now continue to plague Washington D.C.:

Congressman Trey Gowdy sets up the Obama-as-the-source scenario at the start of the video when he asks Director Comey if he personally briefed the then-President Michael Flynn/Russian-tied surveillance, etc. Comey refuses to answer. Then later in the video, we see Congressman Tom Rooney detailing just how dangerous to national security these Obama-era leaks have become. Comey follows this up by indicating the leaks coming out of D.C. now are “unusually active.”

The above video reaffirms there is ZERO evidence of any collusion between the then-Trump campaign and Russian officials. Those are the FACTS – facts the Mainstream Media continues to ignore as it works to try and damage the Trump administration and protect the previous Obama administration – and Barack Obama himself.

There is far more evidence to suggest the Obama White House orchestrated the leaks in question, and has Obama-era government officials who to this day, continue to engage in that same activity. Remember, nearly every major Establishment Media outlet was pushing the Russia-Trump narrative just prior to the November election. Hillary Clinton herself was more than hinting at the story. Here is her tweet from October 2016:

All of the above information would have to be obtained via classified information.

Second, the “link” between the Trump Organization server and the Russian bank appears to have been nothing more than spam, as detailed in this Daily Mail report:

FBI bows to Clinton supporters’ demands to probe Trump links with Russia – but comes up blank

 

  • Federal law enforcement officials combed over possible links between Donald Trump and the Russia and came up with nothing
  • The FBI found no evidence that Trump was involved in Russian hacking of Democratic Party officials’ emails 
  • A server at the Trump Organization that supposedly communicated with a Russian bank in secret was a dead end
  • None of the queries Hillary Clinton’s campaign pushed for turned up evidence that the billionaire, or his company, is working with Russia
  • A computer scientist says he found exchanges between Russia’s Alfa Bank in Moscow and the Trump Organization, but the FBI believes it was spam 
  • Alfa Bank and Trump’s campaign deny using the servers to communicate

Now here is where things get particularly interesting. What if the Obama government was the one to initiate the spam linking the Trump Organization’s server with the Russian Alfa Bank and then used that link to initiate surveillance? From there, it leaked information to the Clinton campaign, favored media sources, etc. – all in serious violation of the law.

With that in mind, it becomes very clear why so many in the media have no interest in pursuing the potential truth regarding this situation – that truth would involve their own complicity in violating the law and putting national security at risk.

Add that scenario to a D.C. Whispers report from yesterday:

James Comey Just Explained How Establishment Media Legally Creates Fake News

The ruse becomes even more clear as does the likelihood it was the Obama White House, working side-by-side with the Clinton campaign and using government operatives within the U.S. Intelligence agencies, to create a Trump-Russia story meant to help secure Election Day victory for Mrs. Clinton. That victory was denied, but the fake Russian story continues as a now-frightened media (and some politicians who were also involved) become more desperate to cover their own tracks.

Donald Trump wasn’t supposed to win. He wasn’t supposed to be President and have the power to investigate THEM.

As for Barack Obama, the entire episode is yet another example of his true legacy. A man who cares little for national security and far more about highly divisive and dangerous ideological politics.

——————————–

 

James Comey Just Explained How Establishment Media Legally Creates Fake News

Check out this quote from FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to Congress today:

“…It’s perfectly legal for someone attending a classified briefing to LIE TO THE PRESS about what they heard in that meeting. The FBI cannot go out and correct the record because then they’d be “commenting on Classified information…”

The New York Times or the Washington Post, or CNN, etc., come out with an anti-Trump story based on “government sources” which bolster the anti-Trump slant, and/or attempts to discredit the Trump White House’s take on events such as the bogus investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Election.

That very scenario has been happening time and time again and James Comey just admitted to Congress the FBI cannot come out and correct the record because they would then be in violation of publicly speaking about classified information.

The media is protected because it is spinning a lie, and therefore NOT classified information, even as that lie becomes fact in the minds of the media’s audience. Once again, here are FBI Director James Comey’s words on that very subject as spoken to Congress today:

“…It’s perfectly legal for someone attending a classified briefing to LIE TO THE PRESS about what they heard in that meeting. The FBI cannot go out and correct the record because then they’d be “commenting on Classified information…”

Don’t listen to anything the Establishment Media is telling you. They are not doing the bidding of truth. Rather, they are the willing denizens of the lie.

—————————

Did NYT Make Up FBI’s Comey Wiretap Denial?

Late yesterday, a New York Times report indicated FBI Director James Comey asked that a statement be made from the DOJ to repudiate President Trump’s claims that Mr. Trump’s home and offices were under surveillance by the Obama government during the 2016 Election. The NYT claim was then quickly repeated by other Mainstream Media outlets in order to turn a claim into a fact.

That’s how fake news works, because guess what? As of this writing, James Comey has actually said no such thing. At least not publicly.

The NYT piece cited “senior U.S. officials” as the source for their quickly assembled story to provide push-back against the president’s claims of Obama wiretapping.

There was no actual statement or quote from Director Comey himself. In fact, both the FBI and the DOJ refused to comment.

What the New York Times did was cite anonymous sources, create a headline that made it appear Comey had said his comments publicly, and then push it out to its fellow leftist news organizations so that by Monday morning, the “Comey denies Trump claims of wiretapping” becomes fact in the minds of the people.

That is NOT fact. That is fake news courtesy of the New York Times and all others who repeated the misrepresentation of comments Mr. Comey never actually said. (certainly not publicly/officially)

The Trump White House is now actually encouraging Mr. Comey to come forward to share what he knows regarding the Obama surveillance of then-candidate Donald Trump:

Additionally, The Hill reports that Trump aide Kellyanne Conway also called for Comey to share any information he might have on Trump’s allegations.

 
 

“If Mr. Comey has something he’d like to say I’m sure we’re all willing to hear it,” Conway said on Fox News. “All I saw was a published news report. I didn’t see a statement from him. I don’t know what Mr. Comey knows.

 

“If he knows, of course he can issue a statement,” Conway said. “We know he’s not shy.”

————————

Tight-Jawed Obama Ignores Media Questions About FBI’s Hillary Clinton Investigation (VIDEO)

And note how the shouted question includes a reference to FBI Director James Comey being, “fit to serve.”

It would appear irony is lost upon the Mainstream Media…

This could prove a very long weak for Team Hillary and the Obama White House.

Then again, rats are most dangerous when cornered.

———————–

LOL: Pathetic Democrats Now Claim FBI Director Comey Controlled By Putin

When FBI Director James Comey declared he would not seek prosecution against Hillary Clinton for her illegal private email server, claiming then that she had been negligent, but not criminally so, Democrats applauded Comey’s decision. Now, with Director Comey announcing the investigation has suddenly been re-opened due to new evidence, these same Democrats are actually forwarding the conspiracy theory that Comey is being controlled by Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

THESE PEOPLE ARE NUTS.

What these same Democrat operatives fail to account for is the fact it was Hillary Clinton who, as Secretary of State, sold a stunning amount of uranium rights to Putin’s Russia, and in turn, received millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation, as reported just last year by none other than the New York Times:

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

If there is anyone being controlled by the Russian Putin-government, it’s Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party, not FBI Director James Comey.

And is it any wonder America’s standing has fallen so much throughout the world? Our government is being run by the criminally insane.

———————

Comey Goes Rogue: Obama/Clinton/AG Lynch Furious

Rumors are now circulating that FBI Director James Comey has gone rogue. His decision to inform members of Congress (both Democrats and Republicans) that new and potentially critical evidence has surfaced related to the months-ago concluded Hillary Clinton illegal server/private email scandal, has sent ripples of stunned shock throughout the entirety of the Obama administration, and left the Clinton campaign bracing for what could be stunning pre-Election Day fallout.

As of now, the still-developing story goes something like this:

Comey recently learned of new information linked to the infamous FBI Hillary Clinton investigation concluded last summer. He acted quickly to inform leading members of Congress on what he found, telling Attorney General Loretta Lynch he felt “compelled” to do so. That act was in direct violation of Lynch’s wishes that no such public revelation be forthcoming prior to the presidential election.

In fact, some are suggesting Lynch had already promised both President Obama, and Hillary Clinton, that the Comey decision would not be made public before Election Day.

And then it was – leaving Obama, Lynch, and Clinton furious.

Media reports now indicate the Comey announcement centers upon “thousands” of newly discovered emails found on devices Hillary Clinton’s longtime aide, Huma Abedin, shared with her now-disgraced husband and former Democrat Congressman, Anthony Wiener.

Abedin is now in hiding, but not before this image was taken of her crying as Hillary gives her aide an icy stare just moments after the campaign learned of the Comey announcement, and Abedin was removed from the plane.

The D.C. Establishment is at this very moment, turning on Director Comey while at the same time, President Obama and Hillary Clinton are applying enormous pressure upon Attorney General Loretta Lynch for not keeping Comey under control.

Mr. Comey’s public announcement at re-opening the case into Hillary Clinton’s private server scandal better be backed up with critical and substantive information, or his career will not survive the moment.

————————

CAUGHT! FBI Colluded With Clinton State Department To Cover Up Email Scandal

The foxes were guarding the hen house. 

Officials within both the FBI and the Obama/Clinton State Department were engaged in tit for tat proposals that included altering evidence in order to protect Hillary Clinton, and expand the FBI presence in the Middle East.

The above image is of but one of the many communications between high-ranking State Department personnel and the FBI. These communications are a direct line between the Clinton  campaign, the Obama/Clinton State Department, and personnel who were supposed to be impartially investigating Hillary Clinton and her staff’s role in what many feel was widespread malfeasance and resulting cover-up.

The above outlines the intent of the proposal – to protect the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s pending presidential aspirations. It is why when others have done far less than Hillary Clinton by way of mishandling classified information, those individuals have received jail time. Hillary Clinton benefited from high-ranking government officials giving her a nod and a wink, and only pretending to carry out an investigation, while behind the scenes, those “investigators” were lobbying for future benefits via a possible Clinton administration.

And THAT is why the American voters is so disgusted with their own government, for it is a government for government and certainly not one for the people.

A vote for Hillary Clinton in November is a vote for more of the same.

—————–

Relates story: HERE

—————-

See The Email That Proves Hillary Clinton KNOWINGLY Violated Federal Law…

Today, FBI Director James Comey indicated no charges would be recommended against Hillary Clinton and her use of a private email server due in great part, because she did not willfully violate federal law, but rather she was merely,”extremely careless” in her repeated violations of federal classified information protocols.

Putting aside the use of gross negligence as a justifiable excuse for breaking the law, below is but one of likely several communications showing Hillary Clinton willfully violating federal law – the very thing Director Comey claims she did not do. She is instructing staff to remove the classified heading and then send the classified communication unsecured. It is an indication of the arrogant recklessness that likely permeated the entirety of the Clinton State Department – recklessness that for example, led to the deaths of four American in Benghazi, Libya:

——————-

In Hillary Clinton’s World, Rules Are For Little People…

The FBI called her actions, “extremely careless” and noted Mrs. Clinton was repeatedly in direct violation of security protocols. FBI Director Comey also indicated Mrs. Clinton failed to turn over work-related emails as directed by the investigation into her private email server, and that classified information was repeatedly sent and shared via an unsecured server.

For those not named Clinton, these violations would at the very least, result in sanctions, and quite possibly jail time.

For Hillary Clinton? 

Nothing but a declaration she didn’t mean to do what she did.

Comey’s primary reasoning for not filing charges appears to be his view that Mrs. Clinton didn’t intend to break the law, therefore, no prosecutor would likely proceed with charges. Said view is in direct contrast to countless similar cases whereby people were charged for doing far less than Mrs. Clinton was guilty of.

Again, the difference there is that those people did not have the name Clinton.

For example, former CIA Director, General David Petraeus, was charged by the Obama Justice Department for mishandling classified information in the form of personal notes he gave to his biographer (and mistress). Petraeus initially lied to the FBI about those notes, leading to him facing a potential five-year prison sentence. Perhaps not coincidentally, the investigation proceeded with considerable haste at a time when Petraeus was being considered as a potential 2012 Republican presidential candidate against Barack Obama. Once the scandal broke, the threat of such a campaign against Mr. Obama was eliminated.

Hillary Clinton’s violations didn’t include mere personal notes but the entirety of her communication apparatus. She purposely set up a private email server, sent and received countless classified communications, instructed staff to eliminate classified headers on emails to bypass security protocols, lied, REPEATEDLY, about never having sent or received classified information, and about handing over all specifically requested, work-related emails.

It should not be forgotten, Mrs. Clinton also deleted tens of thousands of emails during the initial phases of the investigation as well, and then attempted to destroy her server’s hard drive. 

The primary difference between the two investigations is this: the FBI stated that Hillary Clinton didn’t intentionally mislead while General Petraeus did – though a mountain of evidence clearly suggests otherwise.

It is in effect, the single most powerful investigative agency in the United States suddenly declaring that ignorance is a justifiable offense for breaking the law. 

Hillary Clinton is shockingly ignorant, therefore she is also innocent.

That is the culminating statement of the Hillary Clinton email scandal, which in turn, apparently makes her qualified to be the next President of the United States.

——————

Obama Snarls Against FBI’s Immigration Suggestion: “YOU SOUND LIKE TRUMP!”

President Obama met today with his national security team in a highly staged and publicized event at the  Virginia-based National Counterterrorism Center. Shortly before that meeting officially commenced, there is said to have been a brief but heated rebuke by Barack Obama against a “top FBI official” assumed to be Director James Comey.

That rebuke, described as a “snarl” was apparently initiated by Director’s Comey’s alleged suggestion a “temporary pause” be initiated over immigration from certain regions of the world known to be primary breeding grounds for Islamic-based terror. It is in fact a policy suggested earlier by Republican presidential candidates, Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

The president, who until then is said to have appeared both bored and irritated at having to attend the meeting that was primarily part of a Jarrett-initiated public relations campaign intended to show Mr. Obama remains “strong on terror” preceding what will be an Executive Order gun control measure due to be unleashed by the White House very soon, did a “double-take” following the suggested immigration pause in the face of what is a very real and ongoing terror threat.

“YOU SOUND LIKE TRUMP!”

Mr. Obama apparently sat at the head of the table clearly unhappy for the remainder of the meeting over the immigration policy suggestion and then made certain that Director Comey stood farthest from him (so far in fact Comey was not even shown by the news cameras) as Mr. Obama addressed the nation – no small feat given Director Comey stands six-foot-eight and thus towers over Barack Obama.

Likely the FBI’s attempt to sway the president’s determination to actually accelerate Muslim immigration into the United States was influenced at least in part by testimony this week from Homeland Security Secretary, Jeh Johnson who admitted when questioned by members of Congress the following:

“We do have to be concerned about the possibility that a terrorist organization may seek to exploit our refugee resettlement process…This is true of this country, that’s true of every other country that accepts refugees.”

It seems there are those affiliated with his own administration who think Mr. Obama is far more concerned with maintaining his focus on defending Muslims even when that focus appears to run counter to protecting Americans from terrorist attack. What appears even more clear at this point is the increasingly icy relationship between the FBI Director and the current President of the United States.

—————————–

FREE OFFER!

“ARE YOU PREPARED TO PROTECT FAMILY & FRIEND FROM A WORLD GONE MAD?”

Apocalyptic Fiction: RACE WARS: Episodes 1-2: An Apocalyptic Fiction SHTF Prepper Survival Series...

GET THE FIRST TWO EPISODES OF THE EPIC RACE WARS SERIES FOR FREE  HERE

 

BREAKING: Obama/Jarrett Warn FBI Director Over Anti-Muslim Tone (UPDATED)

If true, this is a scenario that appears to pit the Obama White House against FBI Director James Comey over what reports suggest is an increasingly divisive conflict between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Jarrett and federal law enforcement officials regarding feared pending ISIS terror threats inside of the United States.

(ABOVE: Barack Obama is said to be “furious” with his FBI Director, James Comey.)

———————-

FBI Director Comey just finished a briefing to the American public. It was a briefing said to have required the full and prior approval by Valerie Jarrett of Director Comey’s public comments.

Apparently Comey initially balked at the direct influence of the White House upon the operational freedoms FBI Directors are normally granted. This response initiated counter-measures by Valerie Jarrett herself who then dispatched Attorney General Loretta Lynch to the public briefing.

Lynch’s role is alleged to be the Obama White House’s watchdog over FBI Director Comey’s statements and subsequent response following the most recent Islamic terrorist attack. The impetus for this scenario is said to be two-fold:

**Mr. Obama and Ms. Jarrett are increasingly concerned over anti-Muslim rhetoric not only among the general population and politicians, but among federal, state, and local law enforcement officials who are increasingly concerned further threats to public safety might very well be imminent. They want this tone “corrected” immediately.

**Barack Obama is said to have asked during an earlier meeting regarding the San Bernardino terrorist attack how best they, “control the message on this.” Jarrett operatives have apparently already reached out to and continue to then remind supportive media figures to describe San Bernardino as a “shooting” and not connect it to Islamic terror.

It seems the administration’s motivation will continue to demand the terror attack be used as yet another tool for further calls for federal gun control laws despite ever-increasing evidence the attack in San Bernardino was exclusively the result of Muslim terrorism. FBI Director James Comey appears increasingly unwilling to play along with the Obama White House’s insistence the actual terror threat be downplayed while the push for gun control be expanded.

—————-

UPDATE: Rumors now circulating that Barack Obama recently stood over Director Comey, who was seated at the time, and inquired whose side the FBI Director was on. Apparently the two men have been at odds for months, including Comey’s repeated repudiation of the Black Lives Matter movement and its highly negative impact upon law enforcement morale.

UPDATE #2: Watch the video below and see how tense FBI Director Comey appears at the outset. Then watch at the end of the video (app 6:00 mark) as the live feed is abruptly cut off when it gets to the question and answer portion. Both Lynch and Comey give their Jarrett -approved statements on the San Bernardino terror attack, and then the transmission is terminated thus ensuring no Americans can hear Mr. Comey’s non-Jarrett approved commentary.

NOTE: The original PBS News video that was posted earlier today was then subsequently EDITED in which the abrupt “cutting off” of the Comey question and answer request was removed. Other media outlets such as C-SPAN made the very same edit  likely at the request of the Obama  White House.

Here then is a still-unedited version. You can fast-forward to the six-minute mark and watch as Director Comey asks for questions a voice from the back interjects and the video feed is abruptly terminated. The video then repeats itself and shows the edited version.

(Apologies for the low sound quality)

——————

FREE OFFER!

“ARE YOU PREPARED TO PROTECT FAMILY & FRIEND FROM A WORLD GONE MAD?”

Apocalyptic Fiction: RACE WARS: Episodes 1-2: An Apocalyptic Fiction SHTF Prepper Survival Series...

GET THE FIRST TWO EPISODES OF THE EPIC RACE WARS SERIES FOR FREE  HERE