Did General Flynn Scare The Hell Out Of Robert Mueller?

BACK OFF OR ELSE.

The liberal media spun the NO PRISON TIME recommendation from Special Counsel Robert Mueller regarding former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn as evidence Flynn must be working with Mueller to go after President Trump.

Ah, but are things truly what the Establishment Media would have you all believe?

Image result for Flynn and Mueller

Flynn, the former military general noted for a particularly tough amount of grit in times of crisis, was the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency – an institution that is far more murky and powerful than either the CIA or the FBI. (It is no accident the media has neglected to share this bit of information much with the public. Such an omission is likely at the direction of Mr. Mueller himself.)

Check out this synopsis of the very interesting push and pull likely going on for the last two years between Flynn and Mueller via Zero Hedge:

…Gen. Flynn may actually have the goods on the fraud behind his own prosecution — namely, proof of exactly how he was set up by Mr. Obama, in particular his own tapes of conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that would show something different than the transcripts Mr. Mueller used to entrap him on Lying-to-Federal-Prosecutors rap. That theory raises the question: why did he not use it in his own defense. The answer may simply be that he didn’t want to rack up $2.5 million in billable hours for defense attorneys and chose instead to tough it out for nearly two years until he could use the information he has. And that means he must wait until final sentencing when his case is complete.

Mr. Comey will be making a return visit to the House committee where, last week, he weaseled his way through seven hours of forgetfulness, and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch will make her long-overdue first appearance to do some ‘splainin’ about the fishy confab she held with Bill Clinton on the Tarmac in Phoenix around the time that Mr. Comey was preparing to drop the “matter” involving Mrs. Clinton in July of 2016.

Backstage for the moment, there are two other vectors in motion: whatever Mr. Huber is up to in his mission to examine all those FBI / DOJ ? CIA operations against Mr. Trump, and the parallel inquiry of Mr. Horowitz, the DOJ Inspector general. Mr. Huber will be heard from for the first time this week, and Mr. Horowitz’s report is expected soon, too.

Finally, there is the Trump card, so to speak: the president’s power to declassify reams of documents that will shed light in all of the dark chambers of this fairy-tale castle. Wait for it….


 

BREAKING: Radical Code Pink Activist Kyrsten Sinema Just Took Lead In Arizona 2 Days After Polls Closed

Seems lots of ballots were suddenly being discovered in Arizona as radical Code Pink Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, who was trailing Republican Martha McSally after the polls closed, has suddenly taken the lead two days after the polls closed. Weird how Democrats always seem to be the ones to find ‘missing/uncounted’ ballots in close races. It’s also weird how a state that President Trump won comfortably in 2016 would then vote in 2018 for a radical, anti-American activist over a former Air Force fighter pilot. That’s some very odd math.

Hmmm…

Image result for sinema code pink

 

Via The Gateway Pundit:

Democratic candidate Kyrsten Sinema took the lead in the Arizona Senate race in new numbers released by the state Thursday night, flipping the race from what had appeared to be a GOP hold.
Republican Martha McSally led the vote after the polls closed Tuesday, but hundreds of thousands of ballots were still uncounted, officials said.
As the count comes in, Ms. Sinema has overcome a sizable gap.
The latest numbers give her 914,243 votes to Ms. McSally’s 912,137. Earlier in the day, the tally had stood at 856,848 for Ms. McSally and 839,775 for Ms. Sinema.

——————-

That is quite a shift in the voting tally – especially two days after the polls closed.  In the weeks leading up to Midterm Election Arizona was among a handful of states where voter fraud abuse was considered a primary concern. Interestingly, those same concerns were also voiced in Florida where yet more Democrat votes are now being “found” as well.

If the ‘finding lots of Democrat ballots’ trend holds it appears Arizona will be a Senate pickup for Democrats, leading some to believe the Democrat Machine’s typical voter fraud machine has been kicked up a notch following their stunning presidential defeat in 2016.


 

Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff Promises Russia Investigations x1000 If Dems Take The House

Despite multiple Congressional investigations already, and the still ongoing Mueller-led investigation into allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 Election which is costing tens of millions of taxpayer dollars with nothing significant to show for it, Democrat Adam Schiff is urging voters to give Democrats the House so that yet more anti-Trump investigations can be launched on the taxpayer dime. 

Image result for Crazy Adam Schiff

(ABOVE: Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff is promising many more anti-Trump investigations if his party wins control of the House after tonight’s elections.)

—————

Via KTLA 5:

Rep. Schiff: If Democrats Flip House, Renewing Probe on Russia’s Election Meddling Will Be Top Priority

Schiff, ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said he was feeling optimistic about Democrats’ chances of netting the 23 seats they need to take back control of the House. If they succeed, Schiff is widely expected to take over as chair of the committee tasked with investigating Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

“We’re not taking anything for granted,” Schiff said, but laid out his priorities as the committee’s chair if control of the House flips. Reviving the investigation into Russia’s election meddling is at the top of the list, Schiff said, and also probing whether Russia has financial leverage over President Trump through his business interests.

“The president has sought to keep that off limits, but if that’s the leverage Russians pose that’s a real threat to our country,” Schiff told The Times.

—————–

Logic indicates that after nearly two years of multi-million dollar investigations that Congress, Mueller, and/or the anti-Trump media powers would have come up with something substantive.

They haven’t.

So, what does Congressman Schiff offer to an America benefitting from the Trump economic miracle happening now?

To attack that miracle in favor of highly partisan, abusive, and ultimately destructive, politics.


 

BREAKING: FBI Agent Confirms The Plot To Remove Trump Is Real

The Deep State Media Complex is working hard to bury this report.

Don’t let them.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

October 09, 2018 – 05:59 AM EDT
Former FBI lawyer: Plot to record, remove Trump not a joke

Don’t tell former FBI general counsel James Baker that those now-infamous discussions about secretly recording President Donald Trump and using the tapes to remove him from office were a joke.

He apparently doesn’t believe it. And he held quite the vantage point – he was on the inside of the bureau’s leadership in May 2017, when the discussions occurred.
Baker told Congress last week that his boss – then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe – was dead serious about the idea of surreptitiously recording the 45th president and using the evidence to make the case that Trump should be removed from office, according to my sources.

Baker told lawmakers he wasn’t in the meeting that McCabe had with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which the subject came up. But he did have firsthand conversations with McCabe and the FBI lawyer assigned to McCabe, Lisa Page, about the issue.

“As far as Baker was concerned, this was a real plan being discussed,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation. “It was no laughing matter for the FBI.”
Word of Baker’s testimony surfaces just days before Rosenstein is set to be interviewed in private on Thursday by House Judiciary Committee lawmakers.

Since The New York Times first reported the allegations, Rosenstein, the No. 2 Department of Justice (DOJ) official, has tried to downplay his role in them. His office has suggested that he thought the discussions were a joke, that Rosenstein never gave an order to carry out such a plot, and that he does not believe Trump should be removed from office.
But making those statements through a spokesperson is a bit different than having Rosenstein himself face Congress and answer the questions under penalty of felony if lawmakers think he is lying

Baker’s account to lawmakers this month clearly complicates an already complicated picture for Rosenstein before Congress, assuming he shows up for Thursday’s interview.
But even more so, Baker’s story lays bare an extraordinary conversation in which at least some senior FBI officials thought it within their purview to try to capture the president on tape and then go to the president’s own Cabinet secretaries, hoping to persuade the senior leaders of the administration to remove the president from power.
Even more extraordinary is the timing of such discussions: They occurred, according to Baker’s account, in the window around FBI Director James Comey’s firing. Could it be that the leaders of a wounded, stunned FBI were seeking retribution for their boss’ firing with a secret recording operation?

I doubt this is the power that Congress intended to be exercised when it created the FBI a century ago or the circumstances in which the authors of the 25th Amendment imagined a president’s removal could be engineered.

This wasn’t a president who was incapacitated at the time. He was fully exercising his powers – but in a way the FBI leadership did not like.
And that makes the FBI’s involvement in the tape-record-then-dump-Trump conversations overtly political – even if Rosenstein believed the whole idea was farcical.

Keep in mind, this is the same FBI that, a few months earlier during the 2016 election, had its top counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok talking to Page – his lover and the top lawyer to McCabe – about using their official powers to “stop” Trump in the election and having an “insurance policy” against the GOP nominee. That insurance policy increasingly looks like an unverified dossier created by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele – a Trump hater himself – that was bought and paid for by the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign through their mutual law firm.

“You walk away from the Baker interview with little doubt that the FBI leadership in that 2016-17 time-frame saw itself as far more than a neutral investigative agency but actually as a force to stop Trump’s election before it happened and then maybe reversing it after the election was over,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation.
Baker provided some other valuable insights in his congressional interview. As I reported last week, he revealed that he accepted information in the Russia investigation from a lawyer for the Democratic National Committee.

And my sources also confirm Baker admitted he received a version of Steele’s dossier from left-leaning reporter David Corn of Mother Jones magazine, and then forwarded it to Strzok’s team. Corn says that occurred in November 2016, right after the election.

That transaction is significant for two reasons. First, at the time Steele had just been fired from the FBI probe for leaking to the media and he wasn’t supposed to be further assisting the probe. So Corn essentially acted as a back door to allow information to continue to flow.

Secondly, the FBI was using the news media as an investigative source outside the normal chain of evidence.
Whatever you think of Rosenstein or the Russia probe, the statements Baker made to Congress have implications for all Americans.

The FBI was created to investigate crimes and stop foreign intelligence and terrorism threats. It was never designed to be a broker in the political process of elections or the execution of the 25th Amendment.

SOURCE


 

CONFESSIONS OF A CONGRESSIONAL STAFFER: Mueller Working With Russian Operatives To Bolster Anti-Trump Investigation?

The following are the insights and opinions of a former senior congressional staffer who is now enjoying what he calls the “…happy uncertainty of a self-imposed semi-retirement.” He spent nearly eleven years working on Capitol Hill, arriving there shortly before Barack Obama became president, and then leaving shortly after Donald Trump succeeded him. His extended family’s ties to prior administrations go back decades – at the highest levels. Now approaching middle-age, (ancient by D.C. staffer standards) and despite all that time in the belly of the “D.C. beast” he still manages to look younger than his years. He’s quick to laugh, slow to anger, and enjoys the occasional (and most often inappropriate) joke while also being an occasional (and always highly valued) D.C. Whispers’ source. His contact list is an impressive who’s-who of D.C. power players (a benefit of his political pedigree of which he readily admits he had nothing to do with) including both active and retired politicians, staffers, and (too many) lobbyists. (He feels most lobbyists are decent people working in what he calls an epically f*cked up system.) He has attended two inauguration balls, four Congressional retreats, (to which he says members of Congress drink – a lot) and seven State of the Union addresses.

He’s also good friends with a since-departed network news/entertainment television talent who has been more than willing of late to spill the goods on any number of subjects and says he might be convinced to share some of those stories here as well.

First and foremost, though, is his deepening concern over what is taking place in the city he used to call home, Washington D.C., and the country he loves – America.

——————

CONFESSION #2:

Plenty knew it was coming, including the Trump White House. Mueller has been slow-playing it for a while. I’m talking about the Russian operatives move – the indictments. They are largely baseless, a big overreach that amounts to allegations of talking down Hillary Clinton and talking up Donald Trump. If that were suddenly illegal almost the entire media complex would have to be indicted, right?

Mueller is trying to paint a grand conspiracy picture here. A list of names will be leaked. Each will come with a prepackaged background story. The media will blast the news far and wide over the weekend: SCANDAL-SCANDAL-SCANDAL – even though nothing has actually been proven to implicate Trump. 

Here’s the deal. It’s been done before. On a smaller scale, but it’s coming from a very old playbook that Mueller has likely read a thousand times over.

Oh, and the Russians are cooperating with Mueller at least to some degree. You never really know with them and I have to think he’s experienced enough to know that.

This “breaking news” drop was coordinated by Mueller with help from these Russian operatives.

Hold on tight. This ride is just starting to climb.


 

REPORT: Media & Politicians Admitting They Lied About Russia

The Establishment Media and their political co-conspirators are pond scum – and they know it.

So goes this report out today via MEDIUM :

Pundits And Politicians Are Tacitly Admitting That They Lied About Russia

It has been nearly three weeks since The Nation pushed an explosive memo from the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity into mainstream consciousness with an article detailing the evidence that the DNC leaks last year could not have been the result of a Russian hack. By continuing to ignore it, the US intelligence community and all the pundits and politicians who have advanced the Russian hacking narrative are tacitly admitting that they lied.

…Far from addressing the massive, gaping plot holes that have suddenly emerged in its frenzied narrative, the mass media has all but ghosted from the scene. Russia gets an occasional mention now and again, but the fever-pitch shrieking panic has unquestionably been dialed down by several orders of magnitude.

This is unacceptable. You don’t get to lie to the American people for nine months, terrify them with fact-free ghost stories that their nation has been taken over by a hostile foreign body, use their terror to manufacture support for a new cold war, and then change the subject to Nazis and Joe Arpaio as soon as evidence emerges that you’ve been reporting blatant falsehoods. That is not a thing. You need to either thoroughly refute every single argument against the narrative you’ve been spinning or admit publicly that you’ve been catastrophically wrong. You need to either (A) prove that you have not knowingly and/or unknowingly deceived the world, or (B) do everything you can to fix the damage that you have done.

READ ENTIRE REPORT  HERE

——————-