“CNN Is A Super PAC For The Democrat Party.”

Tucker Carlson lays out a very compelling case for how CNN has devolved into outright partisan hackery throughout its “news” lineup. Where other cable news outlets make a clear distinction between its news and commentary hours, CNN is all opinion all the time so long as that opinion trashes the current President of the United States which makes it seem plausible that CNN should have to file as a Super PAC.

Check it out:

The Democrat Party is running on ideological fumes. It suffers from no ideas beyond the astonishingly ignorant rollout of the laughable “New Green Deal” that would pay people for choosing not to work and wage a war on cow farts.

Enter CNN. After the collapse of the Trump-Russia hoax CNN quickly attempted to hide their own part in that two-year-long series of lies by following Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s lead and talking up the healthcare issue. Both the Democrats and CNN are now hoping to remove the stench of an attempted coup of a sitting president from themselves. That will work on some Americans. There are likely 30% or so who will hate President Trump no matter how successful his administration proves to be and given their tanking ratings it appears, for now, that CNN is fine with that.

One has to wonder, though, if there are some at CNN who have grown weary of having to carry the Democrat Party’s water for so long. Who want the opportunity to actually be real journalists.

We shall see. Until then the ratings will continue to decline, the once-great news network will continue to be the butt of many a “fake news” jokes, and President Trump will continue to do the work of the American people.

Image result for CNN is fake news


 

SHAME! Democrats & Far Left Media Must Be Made To Answer For Russia Collusion Hoax (VIDEO)

After two long and very expensive years the Mueller report is finished and early indications are it concludes with zero evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. 

Zip. Zero. Nada. 

What few indictments were handed down earlier were procedural crimes and/or tax issues that had nothing to do with the 2016 Election, Donald Trump, his family, or his business. The anti-Trump liberal media has been throwing out claims of collusion, conspiracy, obstruction, and impeachment for months. None of it was true.

Which of course means this same media and its D.C. Democrats cohorts have perpetrated a dangerously divisive hoax upon the American people of epic proportions. It’s why weeks ago Democrats in Congress shifted from the Mueller report to a rash of yet more numerous and expensive investigations launched against the president. They knew the Mueller report was about to be a dead so scrambled to generate yet more fake investigative headlines to distract enough Americans so as to avoid widespread (and rightful) condemnation for what they’ve done. 

Will they get away with it?

That’s up to YOU. 

Via RedState:

For now, we’d like to take a second to put this entire, sprawling story in perspective. Our job on this show is to remember things, to create a record of what’s happened in this country over the past few years, and what’s happened to it. Our grandchildren will want to know. If the left has its way, they will never see the details. It will all be whitewashed, like so much else in our history. So let’s recall, for the record, what the Robert Mueller investigation is about, why we got a special counsel in the first place. The point wasn’t to discover whether the president fudged deductions on his tax returns thirty years ago. It wasn’t to find out whether he wanted to build another hotel in foreign country. From its first day, the Mueller investigation was justified by a single question: Did Donald Trump collude with the Russian government to steal the 2016 presidential election? Did the president betray his country? For close to three years, Democrats have told us that, yes, he did:

BETO: It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that if there was not collusion, there was at least the effort to collude

ADAM SCHIFF: I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight

MAXINE WATERS: There’s more to be learned about it. I believe there has been collusion.

JOHN PODESTA: It’s starting to smell more and more like collusion

NANCY PELOSI: We saw cold, hard evidence of the Trump campaign, the Trump family eagerly intending to collude possibly with Russia.

If you grew up in this country, it’s hard to shrug off charges like the ones you just heard. Maxine Waters is an irrelevant person, a living sideshow. But Nancy Pelosi is hardly that. She is the speaker of the House of Representatives. She’s third in line to the presidency. Adam Schiff is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He’s privy to the most highly-classified information our government possesses. John Podesta was the Chief of Staff in one White House and a senior advisor in another. Beto O’Rourke has raised more money than anyone else running for president in 2020. These are not peripheral figures. They are the most serious people in the modern Democratic Party. We took them seriously. We felt we had a duty to understand why they were calling the president of the United States a traitor.

There’s a lot more in the 11 minute clip, including breathless media coverage of false stories such as Cohen in Prague and commentators comparing Trump to Benedict Arnold, openly suggesting he should be hung.

None of this was accidental or a mistake. From the moment Donald Trump took office, Democrats and the media have run with a narrative they desperately wanted to be true. They weren’t actually concerned about the country. Instead, it was simply an excuse to get Trump out of office because they didn’t like the outcome of the 2016 election.

Now that the narrative is falling apart, there should be repercussions. Tucker goes on to make that point.

There need to be consequences for this. Once the Mueller report appears and it becomes incontrovertible that, whatever his faults, Donald Trump did not collude with the Russians, the many people who’ve persistently claimed on the basis of no evidence that he did collude with the Russians must be punished. Not indicted or imprisoned, but thoroughly shamed and forced to apologize. If Republicans spent three full years falsely claiming that Barack Obama colluded with the government of Iran, would those who claimed it, ever work in politics or media again? That’s a rhetorical question.

I’m not suggesting they should be forced off the air. But these people should have no credibility after this. Any media member, Democrat politician, or former CIA official that perpetuated this and refuses to admit their mistake should never be taken seriously again. There should also be a real investigation in to how much of what occurred was actually legal and who leaked classified information to feed this farce. If John Brennan and Adam Schiff were leaking to CNN, as has been long suspected, they should be held accountable with the full force of the law. If Obama administration officials used a false pretense and improperly unmasked individuals to force a partisan investigation, there should be real consequences for that. If FBI and DOJ officials lied to a FISA court, that can’t just be brushed aside.

None of this is asking to prosecute political enemies. It’s asking for our justice system to be evenly and fairly applied. This sad episode in our nation’s history has been profoundly damaging. It’s hamstrung foreign affairs, caused incredible division, and even led to violence as #resistance members lashed out in public, egged on by a narrative that never had factual backing. Fully 67% of Democrats believe Trump not only colluded with Russia but that Russia changed vote totals. That’s completely insane and it’s a direct result of people lying on a daily basis about things they had no evidence of.

When the Mueller report finally drops, it’s going to be important to remember who pushed us so close to the edge and to point clearly to their political motivations to do so.

Image result for Russia Collusion hoax


 

REPORT: Why Do Democrats Want To Take American Back To The 1930’s?

The 1930’s were a particularly tough time that saw the frightening rise of Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini, the terrible difficulties of the Great Depression, and the subsequent deaths of tens of millions to war and the enslavement of hundreds of millions to authoritarian regimes. 

With that said, why in the world do Democrats today seem so determined to push America back to the 1930’s?

Image result for democratic presidential candidates 2020 meme

Via The American Conservative:

Democrats Set the Wayback Machine to the 1930s
From court-packing to Weimar Monetary Theory, their new ideas feel distinctly retro.

For a party that prides itself on its appeal to the young, the Democrats sure have a lot of old ideas. Of course, no conservative would automatically gainsay an old idea, but the Democrats are supposed to be, you know, progressive.

So let’s look at some of their oldies.

First up: an idea straight out of 1937. In that year, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, fresh from a landslide re-election (he carried 46 of 48 states), which gifted him more-super-than-supermajorities in Congress, also resolved to build a supermajority on the Supreme Court. In previous years, the court, dominated by conservatives, had derailed many of Roosevelt’s New Deal programs. And so the re-elected 32nd president, feeling hubristic, sent to Congress a plan to expand the body from nine to 15 justices—with the idea being, of course, that he could appoint the new six.

Republican opponents immediately dubbed the initiative “court-packing,” and the label stuck. Soon, conservative and moderate Democrats peeled away. And so, despite Roosevelt’s strenuous efforts—including an attempted purge of recalcitrant Dems—the court-packing plan died. Even worse from the White House’s point of view, the public, alarmed by visions of “Caesarism,” punished FDR’s party in the 1938 midterm elections, handing the GOP a massive victory. Indeed, the result was the formation of a bipartisan “conservative coalition” that dominated Capitol Hill for the next quarter century. In other words, the court-packing plan was the most consequential legislative and political failure of the Roosevelt administration.

Image result for Roosevelt court packing

So perhaps it’s a bit strange that now, eight decades later, “court-packing” is making a comeback in Democratic circles. A March 18 headline in Politico lays it out: “2020 Dems warm to expanding Supreme Court.” As the article details, presidential hopefuls Pete Buttigieg, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, and Elizabeth Warren are all at least somewhat supportive of court-packing.

In the meantime, the rest of us would do well to remember that if one side can pack the Supreme Court, the other side can, too. And so maybe both sides ought to agree to give the Constitution a respite from that sort of drama.

Speaking of the 1930s, we can point to other ideas from that decade that are being dusted off. One is the New Deal—oops, I mean, the Green New Deal. As pitched by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a swelling chorus of Democratic presidential wannabes, the Green New Deal seems to consist of one part concern over CO2 and another part desire to remake the rest of our society. Thus, in addition to the goal of defeating carbon, an early but revealing draft aims at providing free health care, eliminating racism, and guaranteeing “economic security to all who are unable or unwilling to work” [emphasis added].

Image result for san francisco slums

Or as The Economist put it, “Utopia now.”

If it’s impossible to find a conservative who thinks utopia is doable—or that the Green New Deal is utopia—it’s also hard to find a moderate who thinks such an earthly paradise is feasible. So maybe that’s one reason why Ocasio-Cortez’s national unfavorable rating is now substantially higher than her favorable rating. In the meantime, election-minded Democrats hope without much hope that AOC and her zealous allies will learn to chill.

Image result for ocasio cortez crazy

A second and related blast from the past is the idea of a Universal Basic Income (UBI). This is being pushed most notably by long-shot presidential aspirant Andrew Yang—who, we might note, has accumulated 65,000 donors and thus seems destined to get into the Democratic debates. So a March 15 Washington Post headline wasn’t wrong when it pronounced of Yang, “Haven’t heard of him? You will soon.”

Under Yang’s UBI plan, every American citizen would get $12,000 a year, no matter what. (And yes, were a UBI ever to get near enactment, you can bet there’d be a strong push to get rid of the requirement that one be a citizen to get the money.)

In the meantime, UBI has the support of many prominent lefties, such as former labor secretary Robert Reich. And yes, even some libertarians support UBI. In the meantime, the rest of us can say: if you like welfare dependency, you’ll really love UBI dependency.

Here again, UBI is an idea with a ’30s pedigree. Back then, the Townsend Plan was popular, and so was the Ham and Eggs Movement, and so were Senator Huey Long’s slogans of “every man a king” and “share our wealth.” Fortunately for the fisc, those ideas all stalled before enactment. Interestingly, FDR, while okay with providing government benefits, never wanted to sever the connection between work and reward. As he said in 1935, money-for-nothing schemes are “a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.”

A third idea from the wayback machine is ultra-high income tax rates. Ocasio-Cortez has talked about pushing the top rate to 70 percent; she notes correctly that the top rate was that high or higher for much of the 20th century. Specifically, the top rate was raised from 25 percent to 63 percent in 1932, then to 79 percent in 1936, and then to 94 percent in 1944. Today, prominent economists on the left, including the New York Times’ Paul Krugman, agree that such high rates should be reimposed.

We can say that the rich should pay more—here’s looking at you, carried-interest loophole!—and still be aware that raising rates is not the same thing as actually collecting revenues. That is, behavioral effects kick in, as earners and investors adjust their activity—and their accounting—to beat the rate. That’s the lesson of the Laffer Curve, which has guided Republican economics since the Reagan era.

The issue is that money, especially at the high end, is so, well, liquid that it’s easy for fatcats to push their reported income down below whatever the desired threshold might be—or to channel it overseas.

We can observe that for most of the 20th century, the specters of war, fascism, and communism had the effect of trapping American capital in the U.S.; that is, money just wasn’t safe in most places. And yet today, thanks, ironically enough, to U.S. victories in various hot and cold wars, easily 20 countries and jurisdictions around the world qualify as not just tax havens, but plausible places to hold citizenship, and perhaps even to inhabit.

So while one can lament the ingratitude of tax exiles, what one can’t do—at least not without an extraordinary amount of effort—is collect money from them. To be sure, it’s possible to imagine an international regime in which enforcement and harmonization make tax exiling and other kinds of tax avoidance more difficult, even dangerous. But as we have learned, it’s hard to get the world to agree on much of anything. Moreover, there’s always the concern about killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

So perhaps the better answer is to set reasonable rates and then seek to truly collect revenues from rich individuals and profitable companies that never seem to pay anything. For instance, earlier this year, we learned that Amazon made a profit of $11.2 billion in 2018, yet paid zero federal income tax. Does that seem fair to you? Not to me either. So again, before we go raising rates that chase economic activity out of the country, let’s reform the system such that billion-dollar people and trillion-dollar companies pay at least something.

Moving right along, if we continue our look into the Democrats’ 20th-century memory book—if we delve back even further back, in fact, to the 1920s—we come upon an antecedent to Modern Monetary Theory. MMT, of course, is the voguish notion pushed by Stephanie Kelton, a longtime associate of Senator Bernie Sanders, which holds that countries with their own currency can print all the money they want without ill effect.

Yet Modern Monetary Theory might just as well be called Weimar Monetary Theory, as we recall, without affection, the German hyperinflation of 1921-23. Historians regard that monetary debacle, which wiped out Germany’s middle class, as one of that country’s stepping stones on the road to Nazism.

Image result for germans burning money

More recently, the Weimar-ish fate of Venezuela—another country with the freedom to print all the fiat currency it wishes—is also, shall we say, a discouraging indicator.

It does seem that spending and deficits matter less than we were initially told. After all, in the wake of the 2008 meltdown, the Federal Reserve pumped $4 trillion into the economy, and inflation did not tick up. Why not? It appears that in slack times, as we saw during the last decade, the extra money just gets socked away—perhaps in Chinese mattresses. In other words, we could have spent a lot more on, say, productive infrastructure and not paid a price in higher prices.

Yet even if we’ve been over-cautious, fiscally and monetarily, in recent years, the ultimate reality of inflation—that too much money chasing too few goods causes higher prices—is never going to change.

So yes, for many hip Democrats, old ideas are new again. But that doesn’t make them good.


 

APPALLING: Democrat Leader Defends Anti-Semitic Member Saying Her Feelings Are More Important Than Holocaust Survivors’

What is going on with the Democrat Party? And how equally appalling to see the Establishment Media so unwilling to call out what is clearly blatant racism on the part of Democrats. Today Democrat House Whip James Clyburn, one of the most senior and powerful members of Congress, actually stated that the concerns of Holocaust survivors and their children was secondary to the opinions and experiences of Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and her repeatedly shocking anti-Semitic comments.

Image result for james clyburn

Via The Washington Examiner:

Jim Clyburn’s defense: Ilhan Omar’s experience is ‘more personal’ than Jews who had parents in the Holocaust

As Democrats line up to defend Rep. Ilhan Omar and come up with her excuses for her anti-Semitism, House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., tried to minimize her comments by arguing that she escaped violence in Somalia, so her experience was “more personal” than Jews who merely had parents survive the Holocaust.

The Hill reports, “Clyburn came to Omar’s defense Wednesday, lamenting that many of the media reports surrounding the recent controversy have omitted mentioning that Omar, who was born in Somalia, had to flee the country to escape violence and spent four years in a Kenyan refugee camp before coming to the United States.”

The article quotes Clyburn as saying, “There are people who tell me, ‘Well, my parents are Holocaust survivors.’ ‘My parents did this.’ It’s more personal with her … I’ve talked to her, and I can tell you she is living through a lot of pain.”

This has to be one of the more bizarre efforts to protect somebody who has repeatedly peddled the worst anti-Semitic tropes, despite multiple interventions by people explaining exactly why her words were offensive. The implication is that because Omar fled Somalia she gets a free pass to target another religious minority.

It also in itself is deeply offensive. Remembering the Holocaust, and the oft repeated phrase “Never Again,” is about making sure we’re proactive about combating anti-Semitism before it manifests in ways that lead to mass slaughter.

—————–

The article above makes a valid and chilling point. This rush to excuse Congresswoman Omar’s anti-Semitism is the very same type of justification for the treatment of Jews during Nazi Germany. The German people had experienced hardship during and after WWI and the Jews became an easy target of blame. Now, within the United States Congress, something very similar is happening.

This is so wrong on so many levels and yet most within the media and the Democrat party continue to grant cover for Congresswoman Omar’s racism.

The word ‘troubling’ doesn’t do this situation justice. Let’s hope Democrats realize the dangerous path they have been taking on this, turn around, and work to make it right starting with a unified condemnation of the congresswoman’s words.

We shall see.


 

Illegal Immigration Increasing By 300% Over 2017 Rate

Democrats opposed to any and all common sense border security clearly wanted chaos on America’s southern border.

Well, they got it.

Migrants, mostly Hondurans, run along the Tijuana river near the El Chaparral border crossing in Mexico Photograph: Guillermo Arias/AFP/Getty

Via: Breitbart

Illegal immigration this year is on pace to more than triple the levels of just two years ago, new projections reveal.

In the month of February, there were more than 76,000 illegal border crossings and inadmissible foreign nationals, the most in this month in 12 years — a record for President Trump’s administration.

Princeton Policy Advisor Steven Kopits now projects that illegal border crossings for this calendar year will be more than three times what they were in 2017 and nearly double last year’s total crossings. The projection predicts there will be more than 840,000 illegal border crossings this year, though Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen predicts about 900,000 crossings.

Should illegal immigration reach this level, as Kopits projects, it would mean that border crossings in Trump’s third year in office outpace every single year of illegal immigration under former President Obama.

“Crossings are now clearly at crisis levels, and the pressure will be on Democrats in Congress to tighten asylum laws if they intend to hold the House in 2020,” Kopits notes. “I would note that migrants are also certainly aware of this, and therefore apprehension numbers could rise substantially heading into the summer months as migrants rush to cross the border before new legislation can be prepared.”

While Nielsen receives praise from her close allies in the Washington, D.C. beltway and political establishment, her tenure has been marked with overseeing the largest illegal immigration surge not seen since former President George W. Bush.

———————-

That last point above is an important one that is purposely ignored by most in the media. The illegal immigration crisis has become a fixture of the Democrat Party playbook during Republican presidencies. The result is border chaos, including dangerous violence, but also more and more Democrat-controlled illegal votes come election time.

Anyone who doubts this fact need only look at the voting habits of Texas by district and note how the largest pocket of pro-Democrat votes clearly comes from border communities where illegal immigration is at its worst. Coincidence? Hardly.

Image result for texas going blue

Consider that without Texas no candidate who is not a Democrat would likely ever win a presidential election in America again. Now look at that map above. It clearly details what the Democrats are up to in fomenting the ongoing crisis at the southern border and also why they are so aggressive in their fight to keep President Trump from improving border security. 

Tens of thousands of illegals pouring into Texas every month which then turn into hundreds of thousands more Democrat votes come Election Day.

It will be sooner, not later, that Texas tips blue for good and then it’s lights out for a safe, sovereign, and thriving, America. 


 

OH MY: Radical Democrat Linda Sarsour Attacks Speaker Pelosi For Speaking Out Against Anti-Semitism

The Democrat Party today has a problem—democrats. Namely democrats who are so hardline in their extremist anti-American views that the party as a whole is being pushed into the trash bin of history. In response to some Democrat members of Congress communicating some very questionable and seemingly anti-Jewish views, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi understandably attempted some quick damage control by bringing forward a resolution condemning anti-Semitism. Speaker Pelosi is now being attacked by the extremist wing of her own party for doing so.

The Democrat Party is now in a full on sprint to the bottom due to its unwise earlier embracing of radicalized ideology and now finds itself unable to control the messaging which sadly has repeatedly devolved into outright racism.


 

REPORT: America On Verge Of Another Civil War?

It’s been a long time since America has been so divided politically, culturally, and spiritually. Two political commentators representing opposing sides found one thing they can both agree on—the country is coming very close to another civil war. As improbable as that still seems to most, more and more are willing to concede things are getting increasingly intense as people watch and wait to see what Washington D.C. tries to do next.

Related image

Via LMTonline:

In America, talk turns to something unspoken for 150 years: Civil war

…First came former U.S. attorney Joseph diGenova, a Fox News regular and ally of President Trump. “We are in a civil war,” he said. “The suggestion that there’s ever going to be civil discourse in this country for the foreseeable future is over. . . . It’s going to be total war.”

The next day, Nicolle Wallace, a former Republican operative turned MSNBC commentator and Trump critic, played a clip of diGenova’s commentary on her show and agreed with him – although she placed the blame squarely on the president.

Trump, she said, “greenlit a war in this country around race. And if you think about the most dangerous thing he’s done, that might be it.”

With the report by special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly nearly complete, impeachment talk in the air and the 2020 presidential election ramping up, fears that once existed only in fiction or the fevered dreams of conspiracy theorists have become a regular part of the political debate. These days, there’s talk of violence, mayhem and, increasingly, civil war.

A tumultuous couple of weeks in American politics seem to have raised the rhetorical flourishes to a new level and also brought a troubling question to the surface: At what point does all the alarmist talk of civil war actually increase the prospect of violence, riots or domestic terrorism?

Speaking to conservative pundit Laura Ingraham, diGenova summed up his best advice to friends: “I vote, and I buy guns. And that’s what you should do.”

…The concerns about a civil war, though, extend beyond the pundit class to a sizable segment of the population. An October 2017 poll from the company that makes the game Cards Against Humanity found that 31 percent of Americans believed a civil war was “likely” in the next decade.

More than 40 percent of Democrats described such a conflict as “likely,” compared with about 25 percent of Republicans. The company partnered with Survey Sampling International to conduct the nationally representative poll.

Some historians have sounded a similar alarm. “How, when, and why has the United States now arrived at the brink of a veritable civil war?” Victor Davis Hanson, a historian with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, asked last summer in an essay in National Review. Hanson prophesied that the United States “was nearing a point comparable to 1860,” about a year before the first shots were fired on Fort Sumter, South Carolina.

Around the same time Hanson was writing, Robert Reich, a former (Clinton)secretary of labor who is now a professor at the University of California at Berkeley, imagined his own new American civil war, in which demands for Trump’s impeachment lead to calls from Fox News commentators for “every honest patriot to take to the streets.”

“The way Mr. Trump and his defenders are behaving, it’s not absurd to imagine serious social unrest,” Reich wrote in the Baltimore Sun. “That’s how low he’s taken us.”

(And yet it must be noted that it’s Democrats who have been calling for the impeachment of President Trump since he won the election in 2016 because they were the ones who refused to accept the election’s outcome, a fact Mr. Reich neglects to admit to. And it’s more Democrats, not Republicans, who are now calling for a civil war in America because to date they’ve been unable to force Trump from office.)

Image result for crazy democrat protestors

 


 

 

Dreamers Rage Against Do-Nothing Democrats – “They Threw Us Under The Bus!” (VIDEO)

President Trump wanted to do what neither the Republican or Democrat leadership wanted to do – help clarify the immigration status of millions of DACA recipients. 

Congress opposed the president, refused to make a deal, and now some Dreamers are realizing they were played by Democrats who apparently care nothing for them beyond using them as political pawns. 

Image result for Hispanics for Trump

Via The Daily Caller:

DACA recipient Hilario Yanez invited The Daily Caller to shadow him as he walked around the U.S. Capitol in Washington D.C. to meet with elected officials. He wants more discussion on the future of those who have DACA status.

Yanez, who is known for being a pro-Trump, pro-wall Dreamer, says he had a hard time setting up appointments with Democrats during the border budget negotiation process. But he was able to get a few Republican congressmen to hear him out, including Rep. Sean Duffy of Wisconsin, who allowed the Caller to sit in for the meeting.

Democrats threw us under the bus and they’re using us as a 2020 issue and that’s very disappointing,” said Yanez.

The federal budget deal didn’t include anything for those protected by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, despite Republicans signaling they would be willing to include protections for the “Dreamers” in exchange for the full amount needed for President Donald Trump’s planned border wall.

Yanez says he’s not happy with the way Democrats handled the border wall negotiations; he says it shows Democratic politicians aren’t serious about helping “Dreamers.”


 

Leading Democrats Now Hinting They Won’t Accept The Mueller Report If It Finds No Collusion.

Yet another Banana Republic moment for the Democrat Party. As the Mueller investigation winds down and various leaks from that investigation suggesting it will fall far short of doing any kind of significant damage to President Trump, leading Democrats are now declaring they will likely ignore the Mueller conclusions and continue spending yet more taxpayer dollars to harass and attack the president. Shame on anyone who supports this version of the modern Democrat party.

Image result for Crazy adam schiff


 

REPORT: Democrats Are Now The Party Of Death…

Many lifelong Democrats, upon hearing the accounts coming out of both New York and Virginia, thought it impossible. Surely the story was wrong. Surely it was some terrible version of fake news. Democrat officials aren’t actually advocating for terminating the life of a 9-month old child under the guise of protecting a “woman’s right to choose” are they?

Then they learn that is EXACTLY what is going on right now in America. The once-great Democrat Party has veered off into the dark and dangerous wilderness of total radicalization where human life means little and common sense even less.

Image result for RIP Democrats

Via Real Clear Politics:

…Last week New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, himself a Catholic, ordered the spire above the One World Trade Center illuminated in pink to commemorate passage of the most permissive abortion law in America, which allows the procedure to be performed all the way up to birth. In response, Albany Bishop Edward Scharfenberger wrote to Cuomo that “your advocacy of extreme abortion legislation is completely contrary to the teachings of our pope and our Church.” Politically speaking, Cuomo’s position is also contrary to overwhelming public opinion, as only 13 percent of Americans, per Gallup, support legal third-trimester abortion, including only 18 percent of Democratic voters.

Image result for BABY HANDS

But compared to the Democrats in Virginia, Cuomo actually seemed restrained. House Democrats there submitted an abortion bill that sponsor Kathy Tran admitted would permit pregnancy termination even once delivery of the baby begins. Gov. Ralph Northam — who is a physician — responded to the uproar by going even further, stating that “if a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and family desired.” Apparently, the extremist governor of Virginia thinks that making a fully delivered newborn baby “comfortable” while his or her right to live is determined represents … compassion?

The Democratic Party has traversed from acceptance of early-stage abortion as something that is “safe, legal, and rare” to a wholesale celebration of abortion throughout pregnancy, and even beyond. In addition, Democratic protestations about protecting the health of mothers fall flat because their inclusion of a mother’s mental and emotional well-being allows for nearly anyone to abort at any point during pregnancy. This absolutist position amounts to an infanticide stance that makes even Roe v Wade supporters understandably queasy.

…President Trump, at last invited to deliver the State of the Union by Catholic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, should use that august occasion to encourage adoption in the case of unwanted pregnancy and assail the anti-life and anti-Catholic extremism of the new Democratic Party. Most pro-choice voters recoil at the idea of full-term babies dying by lethal injection in the womb. In calling out Democrats, Trump can promote a culture of life and reap the electoral benefits of opposing the growing radicalism of the Party of Death.

———————

Democrat politicians are cheering laws which allow for the ending of a newly born human life even as millions of Democrat voters are first confused that such a thing could really be happening and then understandably outraged that it in fact is happening. What is next? A mass euthanization program for the elderly, the infirm, and all those deemed “unacceptable” to society?

Something has gone horribly wrong with the Democrat Party. Something beyond mere politics.

Call it out of touch, misguided, or even evil, it no longer represents working Americans, mothers, fathers, grandparents. What it does represent is something dark, something wicked, something far beyond any reasonable status quo.

If you are currently a Democrat but also love life, family, children, it is now time to leave the party because in case you haven’t noticed the Democrat Party has, without a doubt, already left you.


 

Pssst …Wanna See The Poll That Has The DNC Pulling Its Hair Extensions/Plugs Out?

President Trump is as popular a presidential candidate AMONG DEMOCRATS as is Bernie Sanders and is within single digits of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.

It’s the poll result that has the DNC screaming WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON HERE!!??

The answer is simple. Despite the ongoing 24/7 anti-Trump media, the Trump economy is doing well and President Trump has proven to be someone who does what he says and a whole lot of Democrats are quietly taking notice. It’s why the president’s approval among black and Hispanic voters is at an all time high for a Republican president. Remember all those polls in 2016 that had Hillary Clinton easily beating Donald Trump? Then we found out Trump’s true polling was a good 10 points higher than what the left-leaning national polls were reflecting. Those same flawed polls have Trump hovering at around 45% approval which means that once again his true approval rating is likely comfortably in the +50% margin and a big reason why is what’s reflected in the graphic below—President Trump and his many successes continue to make serious inroads with Democrat voters.


 

The Democrat Party’s Shocking Turn Toward Open Anti-Semitism

“Shades of Hitler.” So goes the claims of some who are increasingly concerned by the now blatant anti-Semitism that is running rampant throughout the Democrat Party. Presently the one garnering the most attention for their alleged racist leanings is Democrat Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (of the now infamous promise regarding President Trump that she would “impeach the mother******.”)

It is yet another example that exposes the blatant media bias that continues to attempt to portray the Trump White House as divisive when in fact it is so often those opposed to the president who are themselves the most extremist and divisive. President Trump has appointed more women to high levels within his administration than any other president in American history. Black and Hispanic unemployment are at all time lows. Wages for women and minorities are up – big time. The true record of the Trump administration is among the  most unifying of any in modern history – and certainly far better than that of his presidential predecessor, Barack Obama.

Image result for RASHIDA TLAIB angry

ABOVE: One of the new faces of the Democrat Party is reported anti-Semite, Rashida Tlaib.

——————-

Via THE DAILY CALLER:

RASHIDA TLAIB’S TIES TO ANTI-SEMITISM RUN DEEPER THAN PREVIOUSLY KNOWN

Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s ties to anti-Semitism run deeper than previously known, a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation found.

Tlaib, part of a heralded freshman class of House Democrats, has already come under scrutiny over her positions on Israel and ties to fringe figures. But TheDCNF’s investigation uncovered additional ties to anti-Semitism.

Tlaib is a member of the Facebook group “Palestinian American Congress,” where members often demonize Jews. The group’s founder, Palestinian activist Maher Abdel-qader, was a key fundraiser for Tlaib and organized campaign events for her around the country.

In January 2018, Abdel-qader shared an anti-Semitic video that claimed Jews aren’t actually Jewish, and invented their historical claim to Israel and secretly control the media.

The video, which described Jews as “satanic,” also questioned whether 6 million Jews actually died in the Holocaust.

“Research the truth about the Holocaust, and you’ll definitely start to question what you thought you knew,” the video’s narrator says.

Abdel-qader shared the video both on his personal Facebook page and within the group that now includes Tlaib.

screenshot/Facebook

Abdel-qader wasn’t the only anti-Israel activist with ties to Tlaib during her campaign. Women’s March co-chair Linda Sarsour was an early Tlaib supporter and also attended her swearing-in ceremony in Washington, D.C., earlier this month.

Sarsour and other Women’s March leaders have come under scrutiny for their support of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite who has praised Hitler and described Jews as “satanic.” (RELATED: Maxine Waters Attended Nation of Islam Convention Where Farrakhan Defended Suicide Bombers)

Palestinian-American professor Amer Zahr, a supporter of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, appeared at campaign events and also attended Tlaib’s swearing-in ceremony. Zahr posted a Facebook video he recorded from Tlaib’s office to show that he had re-labeled Israel as “Palestine” on a map hanging in the office.

An article recounting the label change received positive reactions when shared within the “Palestinian American Congress” group that Tlaib belongs to on Facebook.

One group member commented: “They will be wiped off the map soon inshallah [God willing].”

Tlaib previously came under fire after posing for a picture with Palestinian activist Abbas Hamideh, a supporter of Hezbollah who believes Israel shouldn’t exist, at her swearing-in ceremony.

The left-leaning Anti-Defamation League demanded an explanation from Tlaib, who told the Detroit Free Press on Friday that she didn’t know who Hamideh is.

Nine months before the controversy, in April 2018, Tlaib posted a picture of herself and Hamideh on Facebook.

screenshot/facebook

——————

What the above information outlines is chilling proof of the degree of anti-Semitism that now permeates the Democrat Party. A more honest media would be calling this out but instead, repeated excuses are made for what is clearly an agenda of hate that sadly legitimizes the “shades of Hitler” charge some are now making against Democrats. The Democrat Party continues to embrace this agenda of hate. It owes the American people an explanation. Better yet, it needs to disavow figures like Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib NOW not later.


 

REPORT: Why Democrats Fear A Wall Will Work

How is it that in 2006 and 2008 the vast majority of Democrat politicians were talking tough about the need for a wall on the southern border and kicking out of the country those who entered illegally? Hillary Clinton did it. So too did Barack Obama and Chuck Schumer. So, what changed?

Answer: Sheer numbers. Currently in California 1 out of every 4 residents are foreign-born. The once Republican-leaning states like Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico are now becoming Democrat strongholds. Democrats figured out that immigrants, particularly illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central America, are more than willing to help push elections into the Democrat win column. So much so in fact that now even Texas is considered to be in play for Democrats as soon as 2024. And if Republicans lose Texas they will never win another national election again.

Game Over. Don’t think so? Keep reading…

Image result for border wall

Via Providence Journal:

Once upon a time, Democrats such as Hillary and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama talked tough about illegal immigration. They even ruled out amnesty while talking up a new border wall.

In those days, progressives saw illegal immigration as illiberal — or at least not as a winning proposition among union households and the working poor.

Democratic constituencies opposed importing inexpensive foreign labor for corporate bosses. Welfare rights groups believed that massive illegal immigration would swamp social services and curtail government help to American poor of the barrios and the inner city.

So, what happened? Again, numbers.

Large numbers of unassimilated immigrants added up to politically advantageous demography for Democrats in the long run.

A wall would probably reduce illegal immigration dramatically and with it future Democratic constituents. Legal, meritocratic, measured and diverse immigration in its place would probably end up being politically neutral. And without fresh waves of undocumented immigrants from south of the border, identity politics would wane.

A wall also would radically change the optics of illegal immigration. Border guards would be mostly invisible from the Mexican side of the wall. Barbed wire, dogs and tear gas astride the border — the ingredients for media sensationalism — would be unnecessary. Instead, footage of would-be border crossers trying to climb 30-foot walls would emphasize the degree to which some are callously breaking the law.

Such imagery would remind the world that undocumented immigrants are not always noble victims but often selfish young adult males who have little regard for the millions of aspiring immigrants who wait patiently in line and follow the rules to enter the United State lawfully.

More importantly, thousands of undocumented immigrants cross miles of dangerous, unguarded borderlands each year to walk for days in the desert. Often, they fall prey to dangers ranging from cartel gangs to dehydration.

The wall would make illegal crossings almost impossible, saving lives.

Latin American governments and Democratic operatives assume that lax border enforcement facilitates the outflow of billions of dollars in remittances sent south of the border and helps flip Republican states to Democratic ones.

All prior efforts to ensure border security — sanctions against employers, threats to cut off foreign aid to Mexico and Central America, and talk of tamper-proof identity cards — have failed.

Instead, amnesties, expanded entitlements and hundreds of sanctuary jurisdictions offer incentives for waves of undocumented immigrants.

The reason a secure border wall has not been — and may not be — built is not apprehension that it would not work, but rather real fear that it would work only too well.

——————–

If you’ve ever wondered why Democrats are fighting so hard to prevent $5-$6 billion being spent this year for President Trump’s border wall proposal within the context of a trillion+ dollar annual budget, you have your answer. Politics. Back in 2006 unions were strongly opposed to illegal immigration and so Democrat politicians beholden to union campaign contributions, demanded something be done about illegal immigration. That tune changed dramatically when political operatives realized the extent to which immigrants, including illegal immigrants, could be utilized to sway election outcomes. The power of these votes was greater even than union worker votes and far more reliable. Where union workers might shift from Democrat to Republican, as they did in such great numbers with Reagan and more recently President Trump, immigrant votes were much more consistently loyal due to those voters being so dependent upon Democrat-supported government programs.

The Democrat sponsored open borders immigration policy is a multi-billion dollar get out the vote operation funded entirely by YOU, the (legal) American voter. Some believe there are now entire voting districts throughout the country where nearly every single Republican vote is cancelled out by an illegal immigrant vote. Democrats (and their media cohorts) strongly denounce any charge of widespread illegal immigrant voter fraud while behind the scenes they are enthusiastically supporting the very fraud they publicly claim doesn’t exist.

The Democrat Party cares nothing for laws. It only cares for itself regardless of the cost to the United States and its laws. In fact, a growing number of Democrats now openly share their disdain for traditional America. They want that America destroyed and fully absorbed within the globalist movement that right now threatens the long-standing practice of sovereignty all across the world and would have a handful of elites regulating the lives of billions.

That’s the real war going on right now all around us and illegal immigration is the front line.

Image result for la raza hates America


 

Yes, It’s True. Democrats Voted Today To NOT Pay Federal Workers During The Government Shutdown.

Nancy Pelosi and other increasingly nervous Democrats in Congress have claimed that President Trump was “holding federal workers hostage” during the government shutdown.

NOT TRUE. 

Today, Democrats were given the opportunity to make sure those same federal workers received paychecks as negotiations continue regarding border security funding and ending partial shutdown.  THEY VOTED NO. This has been and very much remains Nancy Pelosi’s shutdown. Speaker Pelosi is scared to death of the radical left in her own party – the same radical left who has threatened her speakership should she relent to the president’s desire to sit down and negotiate a deal between the two sides. And don’t allow the Establishlment Media to tell you any different. They have been covering for Pelosi and those same radical Democrats, but the American people are starting to see through the ruse. Democrats care little about the Middle Class. They care far more about allowing illegals to enter the country. It’s time more and more voters start to ask themselves why that is.

#2 House Democrat Breaks From Pelosi – Supports Border Wall Because It “Protects People.”

As reported by D.C. Whispers days earlier, more and more Democrats are upset over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s “NO DEAL” stance when it comes to sitting down with President Trump and forging a workable compromise that improves border security and ends the ongoing partial government shutdown. Apparently, some internal polling has recently been completed by the DNC and it’s not looking good for Democrats as more and more voters see them as the party of no solutions. 

ABOVE: #2 House Democrat Steny Hoyer signaled Democrats are ready to compromise on the wall even as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refuses to compromise.

—————–

Via IJR:

‘If It’s Protecting People, It’s Moral’: Top Dem Sidesteps Pelosi Again by Defending the Use of Walls

During an interview with Fox News, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer broke with Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s comments and said he was open to a border barrier.

“Look I think physical barriers are a part of the solution,” Hoyer said.

This is not the first time that Hoyer has admitted that Democratic lawmakers are not fully opposed to a wall, pointing out that they have been supportive of stronger border security in the past.

“We’ve supported substantial restraints,” said Hoyer in a previous interview. “We’ve supported fencing. We’ve supported other technologies. So my own view is that this is not an issue of morality. A wall is immoral if it tries to imprison people who shouldn’t be imprisoned. A wall is — that protects people is not immoral.”


 

Two-Time Obama Voter Denounces Today’s Fascist Democrats After Fake News Attack On Catholic School Kids

It’s a letter that is now going viral, penned by a (former) Democrat and two-time Obama voter who has seen and heard enough from the socialist/leftist/fascist mob that they feel has become the modern Democrat Party and Establishment Media in America today. It’s a poignant “Enough is Enough” moment that is likely shared by millions across America following the dangerous and heinous attacks against a group of Catholic students who did nothing wrong while waiting for a bus to take them home following a trip to Washington D.C.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

——————-

Hello everyone. My name is … well my name isn’t important. What I’ve decided is.

I admit it. I was a Democrat. I voted for Barack Obama. Twice. I hated Trump. And voted libertarian in 2016. But over the last year or so, as I’ve watched the nation completely lose its way and with it all sense of decorum, civility, and compromise, I’ve witnessed a president who refuses to give up on campaign promises.

This is a man who will not be cowed and pushed. He will not give in when an issue is important. He truly is an outsider and will not succumb and be absorbed by the political establishment. His republican colleagues did all they could to hinder his election. They hated him and feared him. Now they fall in line like the good little spineless politicians they are. Trump doesn’t hate them because the opposite of love isn’t hate – it’s indifference. And that’s how Trump is to those who don’t matter (and there are a bunch of people who do not matter – no real unique and special snowflakes exist). These establishment types are simply soldiers to the president. And soldiers are nothing but a great leader’s tool.

I may not agree with him always. But I don’t doubt him any more. Not after what I’ve seen. Not after what I’ve experienced.

The other side doesn’t want equality. They want totality. I saw signs of this in the 90s but I fell in line like a good little Democrat. When they came for the family life, I didn’t say anything because I did not realize the severity of what would happen to the next generations.

When they came for free speech, I didn’t say anything because I was too busy rolling my eyes at the notion of Barry being anything but a good guy who plays basketball and loves his kids.

When they came for everyone’s backbone and replaced it with trigger warnings and safe spaces (phrases I shudder to know have now forever entered our lexicon) I didn’t say anything because I was fooled into believing these were isolated incidents and there was no way the silliness could spread so far, wide and deeply ingrained into the soul of so many.

But then one day, not all of the sudden because the eyes were slowly being opened to the ways of the modern left without me even knowing, I finally asked myself “do you see?”

Do you see what they think of men with their #metoo and seething calls of “toxic masculinity” with their witch hunts and razor commercials?

Do you see what they think of capitalism and their hatred for the hundreds of thousands who fought and died to make America the light of hope for millions around the world?

Do you see what they they think of self-reliance and ingenuity as they serves as pimps and drug dealers to over half the population? Getting them hooked and dependent on the government and unable – unwilling – to care for themselves.

Do you see what they think of the symbols that used to define us and unite us? They celebrate kneeling during our songs, burning our flag, and tearing down the reminders of our history – both for good and for ill – as did the Nazis before them and the Huns of old.

Do you see how they make the people hate the very ideals of the nation that gave them the power to do all these things?

Do you see how they divide the races and try to make us even more at odds with one another than we were during those sad days during the Civil Rights Movement despite all of the roadblocks that have been torn down? They tell the ones who are dependent on them that White people are all evil, that white men are satan. They make an strawman enemy to last a lifetime.

Do you see what they think of the constitution and the bill of rights? They love all of them. Except the second. And now the first. Say what you think, they tell you. But whisper, “so long as it is the same as us.”

Do you see?

Because I do.

And when they finally came for an innocent kid from Kentucky, one who was likely on the trip of a lifetime from his small town and now could have a lifetime of ridicule over “fake news”, I decided I was not going to stay silent any longer. I was going to say something.

What they are doing to that young man is wrong. It’s depraved. The creators, purveyors, and perpetuators do not just deserve punishment in this life but also in the next. Too harsh? No. For they are so blinded by hate they cannot see what they have done to this nation.

Truly we have become Rome. We are crumbling. We are dying. Can we rebuild? Can we overcome the forces of muck and grime and swamp that have slowly and quietly eaten away at our foundations? For decades these vile beings came quietly on the backs of calls of “change”. That change came alright but once the Pandora’s box was open all kinds of perversions spewed forth. The dam broke. The nation was flooded.

Can we rebuild? Can we resow?

I do not know. But I am silent no longer. Not when they came for that boy from Kentucky. And not when they come for anyone else going forward.

Congratulations to the modern left. You lost another one. I imagine there will be many, many more 18 months from.

Edited: thank you all so much for the kind words. I just needed to get my thoughts out there for myself. While I have gotten tons of support, I’ve also gotten a bunch of horrible personal messages. I just don’t understand the hate.

SOURCE

Image result for AND THEN THEY CAME FOR THE KIDS

————–

Number Of Anchor Babies In California Alone = TWICE The Entire Population Of Wyoming…

It’s a massive shift in the makeup of the U.S. population courtesy of illegal immigration. And if anyone doesn’t think the Democrat Party isn’t aware of this you’re either foolish, blind, or both. The entire electorate of the United States is being manipulated via promotion of coming to this country illegally. That’s not an immigration policy – it’s welcoming an invading force. And while many of those people are genuinely seeking better lives, they are doing so by breaking the law. And where they come, many-many of humanity’s worst are following, endangering neighborhoods, businesses, and law enforcement. 

Anchor Babies

Via Breitbart:

The number of United States-born children of illegal aliens in the sanctuary state of California is about twice the entire population of Wyoming, data reveals.
The U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are commonly known as “anchor babies,” as they anchor their illegal alien and noncitizen parents in the U.S. when they are granted immediate birthright citizenship. There are at least 4.5 million anchor babies in the country, a population that exceeds the total number of annual American births, as about 300,000 anchor babies are born every year, exceeding the total number of American births in 48 states. Currently, the U.S. and Canada are the only developed nations in the world that offer unrestricted birthright citizenship.

Data compiled by the Migration Policy Institute finds there are at least 1.2 million anchor babies under the age of 18 residing in the state of California with their illegal alien parents. This is about twice the entire population of Wyoming, where about 570,000 residents live.

——————–

The above scenario is how the state of Florida will soon be pushed permanently in voting for Democrats during a national election cycle and not too long after that, Texas will follow and a non-Democrat candidate will never win the presidency again.

Image result for turn texas blue

That’s the Democrat Party plan – one that was escalated during the Obama years and continues to be even more aggressively defended against a Trump administration that is trying to halt it.

Democrats are giving up the self-determination of the country for votes, be they illegal or other. Is such an act treason? That’s for you to decide. What is undeniable is that the Democrat Party and its Establishment Media cohorts are encouraging millions to enter the United States illegally, get on taxpayer-funded government assistance, and then vote in our elections.

How frustrating it must be for those immigrants who came to this country legally, went through the process, and worked hard to have a chance at the American Dream only to see millions cut the proverbial line, bring crime and violence with them, which in turn too often snuffs out the light of that dream and leaves far less opportunity for the next generation of legal immigrants who would follow. And make no mistake, if the vast majority of these illegal immigrants were then voting Republican, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer would be front and center right now declaring a national emergency.

We are either a nation of laws or we are not.

It’s long past time for all of us to decide, including all those contributing to the stifling stench of political climate change within the halls of Congress.


 

Watch Congressman Dan Crenshaw Make Fools Of The Democrats Anti-Border Security Political Stunt

The partial government shutdown could end NOW if Democrats would practice just half the common sense on display here by Republican Congressman (and Navy SEAL war veteran) Dan Crenshaw. What President Trump is proposing is both common sense, and money well spent. What Democrats are doing is thinking they’ll get some more illegal votes come election time, the safety and security of American citizens be d*mned. The president is proposing less than $6 billion be spent on building new and sorely needed physical barriers along the southern border. Democrats wish to ignore the problem – one which is costing the U.S. taxpayer $100 billion or more PER YEAR. 

Image result for dan crenshaw


 

How The Media Unwittingly Just Debunked All Of Russia Gate

Most of you likely noticed the shrill cries of “Russia! Russia! Russia!” over the weekend as multiple socialist news media outlets were all clearly reading from the very same script. The gist of the coverage was that after President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey the FBI had “no choice” but to launch an investigation into a sitting president of the United States under the guise of potential Trump-Russia collusion. What really happened, though, is that these same media reports blew apart the entire fake Russia Gate narrative, proving beyond a doubt that the FBI’s move was overtly political and intended to punish America-First, President Trump for having defeated globalist, Hillary Clinton.

Remember, the DOJ #2 at the time, Rod Rosenstein, went to President Trump and recommended Comey be fired. Also don’t forget that just months earlier nearly all leading Democrats and most within the socialist media were calling for the exact same thing.

So, President Trump, on the recommendation of Mr. Rosenstein, fires James Comey.

Rosenstein then immediately uses that firing to push for a Special Counsel investigation into the Trump campaign and Trump administration while at the very same time, the FBI launches its own investigation into the newly elected President of the United States. While this is going on, former Obama and Clinton officials are orchestrating a wave of leaks to their socialist media contacts, ensuring the fake Trump/Russia collusion narrative is quickly formed.

Image result for evil hillary and obamaImage result for James Clapper and Brennan

This is all Deep State machinations of the worst kind and is no way reflective of a republic or a democracy but rather a dictatorship where the votes of millions are potentially wiped out by the globalist establishment hell bent on maintaining the status quo.

To date, after nearly two years of looking, there has been no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. NONE. The socialist media opines about meetings, discussions, and comments by President Trump and those around him as speculative proof that “something” might have been going on. The Mueller investigation, after tens of millions of wasted dollars, has chased and intimidated Trump associates both close and far to try and build a case that was never there. Some now face jail time for matters unrelated to the Trump campaign and/or the Trump presidency such as years-ago tax issues or the big umbrella charge of “lying” to the FBI.

If true justice is to be served, it will involve charges being filed against all those who helped perpetrate these ongoing investigative crimes against President Trump, his administration, and the tens of millions who voted for him and continue to support the work he’s doing—work that has resulted in record low unemployment, wage growth, a stronger military, America-first trade agreements, and potential peace across the globe.

This kind of Deep State abuse of power can never be allowed to happen again.


A teacher on the brink. A father seeking justice.
Their paths are about to cross and their lives will never be the same…

“MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE cuts to the core of what is so wrong with so much in America. From schools that no longer teach within a society that has seemingly lost its ability to listen, it’s a fictional story that in many ways is more real than what is portrayed on the news and that also has something very important to say to those still paying attention. The characters are believable, the action and dialogue riveting, with a message that should appeal to all of us. Read it. Read it now.”

Available in e-book and paperback from Amazon.com HERE


 

Dems Party With Lobbyists In Puerto Rico During Government Shutdown.

Democrats don’t care about some federal workers not getting paid because of the partial government shutdown. Proof of that is the story out this weekend showing thirty Democrat members of Congress partying down in the sun and sand in Puerto Rico with more than 100 lobbyists. So when you hear a Democrat pretend to cry about the poor government workers who aren’t getting paid, remember the following pics and how they refuse to negotiated with President Trump to fund border security and re-open the government. The president is awaiting their return so a deal can be forged while Democrats would rather soak up the sun and get drunk and shmooze with lobbyists who are buying their votes.

Via The Washington Examiner:

Some 30 Democratic lawmakers left the government shutdown behind Friday on a chartered flight to Puerto Rico for a winter retreat with 109 lobbyists and corporate executives during which they planned to see the hit Broadway show “Hamilton” and attend three parties including one with the show’s cast.

…The event is taking place in a seaside resort where rooms go for $429 a night. Food is being provided. 

Image result for democrats party in puerto rico