Deep State Tries To Stall Clinton & Obama -Linked Anti-Trump Dossier Investigation

High-ranking figures within the U.S. government were actively working against the Donald Trump campaign for POTUS. This effort took place over several months, including illegal surveillance of private citizens as well as widespread collusion with influential Establishment/Social Media figures.

And now the Deep State is trying desperately to cover its tracks.

Via The Washington Examiner:

Showdown looms over Trump dossier; FBI misses third deadline to turn over subpoenaed documents

A third deadline has now passed for the FBI and Justice Department to give the House Intelligence Committee subpoenaed documents related to the Trump dossier. And for a third time, the bureau has not produced the material.

…The Russia allegations were compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, who was commissioned by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which is thought to have been paid for the work by wealthy supporters of Hillary Clinton. The FBI reportedly considered taking over the dossier project in the fall of 2016, when the campaign was at its height, leading Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley to say the dossier matter raised “questions about the FBI’s independence from politics.”

…Both Grassley and the House Intelligence Committee have been interested in learning if the FBI ever used the “salacious and unverified” dossier as a basis for requesting surveillance on anyone in the Trump circle. Those questions only intensified this week with reports that the FBI wiretapped Trump associate and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort during the transition period.

Four weeks ago, on Aug. 24, the House Intelligence Committee subpoenaed the FBI and Justice Department, seeking all internal FBI reports “incorporating, relying on, or referring to” information provided by Steele, his sources, or Fusion GPS. The committee also asked for documents on any FBI or Justice “efforts to corroborate, validate, or evaluate” Steele’s information. And the subpoena sought any surveillance applications that included any information or were based on any information, provided by Steele.

Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes originally set a Sept. 1 deadline for production of the dossier documents. The FBI did not comply. Nunes then extended the deadline to Sept. 14. The FBI did not comply. Then Nunes extended the deadline again, to Sept. 22. Now, again, the FBI has not complied.

————–

The reason for the delay is simple. The fabricated “Trump dossier” represents a direct link between the anti-Trump factions within the U.S. government, the Hillary Clinton campaign, and the then-Obama White House. Some very powerful forces want this evidence buried – forever.

The will of the voters was nearly supplanted by a small group of powerful elites. Those elites have since retreated back into the shadows and want nothing to do with the light of truth shining upon them. The entirety of the false Trump-Russia narrative has been little more than providing cover for their criminal wrongdoing.

—————

REPORT: NSA Offered To Give FBI All Of Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails. Comey Said NO.

The New York Post’s John Crudele had an interesting column outlining how the bogus Democrat/Media/Deep State instigated Trump investigation is backfiring on Democrats as the American people grow increasingly weary of repeated allegations without actual proof.

Beyond that fatigue is something even more concerning for Democrats. The investigation is actually shedding light on wrongdoing by figures like Hillary Clinton and James Comey – NOT Donald Trump.

Check it out:

————

There’s a lot going on in the Hillary Clinton/Donald Trump/Russia investigation that all the highfalutin’ newspapers that cover politics are still trying to ignore.

Well, investors had better know this stuff before it bites them in the assets. So here goes.

Numerous reports coming out of the Senate Judiciary Committee last week said that former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer Clinton for prosecution long before he even interviewed key witnesses, including Hillary.

Remember, the Republicans now control this committee. So bad news isn’t going to be stifled anymore.

Clinton, you probably remember, “lost” her private emails, which she’d been storing on a personal computer server. Comey chastised her harshly in a televised speech but then said there was a unanimous decision not to recommend prosecution.

Clinton’s emails, which were stolen by the Russians, have never been found. But as I’ve mentioned numerous times, the messages are still in the possession of the National Security Agency (NSA), which offered to give them to the FBI.

Comey turned down that offer, according to a source who has been very reliable.

I’ve also mentioned that Comey fibbed when he said his agents unanimously agreed that prosecution was unnecessary. In fact, my source says that FBI agents were irate about the decision not to go after Clinton.

The controversy got pretty intense, which may be why Comey forced agents who worked on the Clinton matter to sign additional nondisclosure agreements.

There was another important development last week when a federal judge ordered the FBI to disclose more details about how it handled the Clinton investigation. That could put Comey in a hotter spot than he’s already in.

What’s this got to do with the investigation of Trump and any influence the Russians may have had over the last presidential election? Absolutely nothing.

But as I’ve said before, any investigation of Trump was likely to backfire when investigators started to look at the Democrats and their dealings.

And that’s exactly what is starting to happen.

Full report: HERE

——————-

Clearly James Comey was involved in covering up for Hillary Clinton while at the same time weaponizing the FBI to be used against Donald Trump – both very serious miscarriages of justice.

Here’s the thing – Comey has already indicated how his actions were colored by input from then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch of the infamous secret snakes-on-a-plane meeting with Bill Clinton.

Loretta Lynch answered only to Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett.

Indeed.

——————

Comey Caught On Tape Straight Up Lying About Hillary Clinton Interview & Investigation (VIDEO)

Here is James Comey testifying under oath that he did not make up his mind about Hillary Clinton’s guilt prior to the FBI interview that took place just days before he announced she had done nothing illegal.

Ah, but that is in direct contrast to the breaking news this week that Mr. Comey had in fact sent out a draft memo to upper level FBI administrators exonerating Hillary Clinton TWO MONTHS BEFORE THE INTERVIEW.

FBI Drafted Letter Exonerating Hillary Clinton TWO MONTHS Before Interviewing Her!

James Comey lied under oath.

James Comey obstructed justice.

James Comey initiated a biased investigation against Donald Trump that has led to an equally biased Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller – who happens to be close friends with James Comey.

This cannot stand. The Deep State continues to try and overturn the results of the 2016 Election. Deep State Republicans like Paul Ryan and John McCain are complicit in this effort.

Paul Ryan is up for re-election in 2018. What a message it would send to have voters remove him from office.

Until then – here’s James Comey lying under oath. He does so at the very first part of the video:

———————-

FBI Drafted Letter Exonerating Hillary Clinton TWO MONTHS Before Interviewing Her!

Talk about a rigged system!

Then FBI Director James Comey concluded Hillary Clinton was innocent two months before he interviewed her and concluded his investigation into a far – reaching mess of private servers, illegal use of top secret information, media collusion, and State Department pay to play – just to name a few!

Via Fox News:

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation,” Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote in a letter this week to the FBI. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

Grassley and Graham said they learned about Comey’s draft “exoneration statement” after reviewing transcripts of interviews with top Comey aides.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton,” the senators said.

They added, “That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”

The bolded section is of particular note. It means that what James Comey did was OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. He was signaling to FBI investigators the outcome had already been predetermined. That early draft was their marching orders to not do anything that might actually pose a legal threat to Hillary Clinton.

With those facts in mind consider this – James Comey admitted to Congress he (illegally) leaked classified information due to concerns he had that POTUS Trump was attempting to influence the Russia investigation. That “influence” was a single and brief comment Trump made to Comey that he thought General Michael Flynn (who Comey was investigating at the time) was a “good guy.”

That was it. That was Comey’s alleged motivation to violate law and use his position as FBI Director to initiate an Independent Counsel investigation into POTUS Trump – the same Comey who put his boot on the necks of FBI investigators looking into far more serious (and actual) crimes of conspiracy and cover-up.

Knowing the above can anyone honestly think the Robert Mueller investigation against the Trump White House is legitimate? It never was. It never will be. That “investigation” is a criminal court working hard to protect its own and going after those (Trump) who now threaten the D.C. status-quo.

—————–

Former FBI Agent Blows Whistle: “There is a cancer inside the FBI.”

A former FBI agent battling Deputy Director McCabe said there is a ‘cancer’ inside the FBI

Former FBI Supervisory Agent Robyn Gritz remembers grueling days and long nights tracking terrorists, terror networks and searching for American hostages taken by enemy actors. Her 16-year career resume reads like a Tom Clancy spy novel, with the twist that it’s a female FBI agent taking the lead in some of America’s most public terrorism and national security cases.
But Gritz, who long considered the people she worked with family, said her life was turned upside down by senior FBI management when she moved up the ranks in the bureau. She was one of the bureau’s top intelligence analysts and terrorism experts but found herself in the crosshairs with some of the bureau’s top officials. One of those officials is current Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who served as acting FBI Director until he was replaced in July after the confirmation of Christopher Wray.
Five years later Gritz is still waiting for resolution.
In her first on-camera interview about her situation, she described relentless retaliation from her supervisors and alleges the last year of her employment left her physically ill.
In her formal complaint filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission she alleges the “defamation of character through continued targeting by Andrew McCabe in official documents, and continuous patterns and instances of severe and excessive hostile behavior/attitude toward complainant.”
Neither the FBI or McCabe would comment for this story.
AP_17131535384954.jpg
Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe listens on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 11, 2017, while testifying before a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on major threats facing the U.S. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
She was a rising star
Gritz, who joined the FBI in 1997, isn’t a household name but many of the cases she worked on were well known, like the kidnapping and death of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl and Robert Levinson, who went missing in Iran.
Early in her career and only days after the September 11 attacks, she was assigned with the task of investigating the terrorists who crashed American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon. She was also part of the team investigating the 2001 Anthrax case. From 2009 to 2012 she was the Executive Strategy Unit chief for the Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate.
Gritz worked her way to becoming one of the top counterterrorism agents in the bureau and was detailed to the CIA, where she was given commendations.
Documents obtained by Circa support Gritz’s claim of her outstanding work performance reviews, letters of commendation and awards for service.
“There’s a cancer there”
…One of her biggest supporters was President Trump’s former national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who then was head of the Defense Intelligence Agency and offered to testify on Gritz behalf, as first reported by Circa.
Early this year, a highly classified leak revealing Flynn’s name and an apparent conversation with the former Russian ambassador prompted his removal from the White House and part of the FBI’s investigation into Russia. McCabe played a central role in the Russia investigation.
In June, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Charles Grassley, sent a letter after to the Justice Department raising questions regarding possible conflicts of interest with McCabe and the FBI’s investigation into Flynn.
“When I heard Michael Flynn was being brought under investigation, I wondered if they would go after him,” said Gritz, recalling the letter Flynn wrote on his Department of Defense stationary. “I still believe McCabe should have recused himself from the investigation into Flynn.”
But Flynn wasn’t her only supporter. Other top military officials also testified on behalf of Gritz, including Gen. Stanley McChrystal, Gen. Keith Alexander and retired Navy Rear Admiral B. L. Losey, who served both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama as the White House’s National Security Council Director for Combatting Terrorism. They all wrote letters on her behalf.
…There is also an ongoing Justice Department Inspector General investigation that was prompted by Grassley, who alleged McCabe may not have properly disclosed the roughly $700,000 in campaign contributions to his Democratic wife on his ethics report and should recuse himself from the Clinton server case.
Chuck Grassley
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, joined at left by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, leads a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 26, 2017, on attempts to influence American elections, with a focus on Russian meddling in the last presidential race. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Gritz is hoping she will have resolution on her case soon but more importantly she said “I just want the bureau to get back to where it should be.”
——————–
Full story: HERE
——————–

What the FBI Raid On Paul Manafort’s Home Really Means (Hint: Trump Family Next?)

Paul Manafort has been cooperating with the bogus Russia election meddling probe since day one. He has turned over hundreds of requested documents, and willingly met with Senate intelligence committee investigators. A day after that meeting the FBI conducted a highly unusual “no knock” raid of Mr. Manafort’s Virginia home. That is a literal break-down-the-door type of raid. It is both rare and highly aggressive, particularly in cases of the political kind.

The raid took place last month but is just now being reported on. Several of those same reports suggest the raid was initiated at the request of controversial Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Mueller, who has deep ties to the D.C. establishment, including a long friendship with ousted former FBI Director James Comey, has garnered a small army of investigators, (most of them Democrats) since being appointed to oversee the Russia probe.

Manafort was abruptly fired last summer from his position as the Trump campaign chairman after it was discovered he had business dealings with both Russian and Ukrainian interests. Since that time Manafort has remained relatively quiet even as Mueller closes in. Some think Meuller is hoping to sway Manafort to turn against the Trump White House, thus the use of such aggressive force during last month’s raid. Mueller might very well believe the raid will intimidate the longtime political operative.

Further reports suggest Manafort will be used as leverage against former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. Ah, but the intrigue doesn’t come close to ending there.

Some whispers indicate Mueller’s actual intent is to then utilize both Flynn and Manafort to make life very-very difficult for the Trump family itself – namely Donald Trump Jr.

You see, this “investigation” has little to do with facts and/or actual wrongdoing.

It’s personal. 

The Deep State/Establishment/Globalists had their worlds rocked by the Trump 2016 victory. Such things are not  to be allowed – certainly not without significant punishment against those who would dare wage war against the status quo.

Donald Trump and his supporters are to be made examples of to ensure a “NEVER AGAIN” aftermath.

Make no mistake, members of the Trump family are now wondering if and when it will be their door that is getting kicked in. If that happens, POTUS Trump’s enemies likely believe that will finally be enough to permanently break him.

And what of Mr. Trump’s millions of supporters? The Deep State and its Mainstream Media cabal are confident they might whine and cry for a while, but in the end, they’ll sit down and shut up.

Perhaps they’re right.

Then again…

————————–

FBI Indicts Two Democrat Swing State Mayors For Corruption

The pay-to-play crap is nothing new. Democrats have been doing this kind of thing for decades. Read the up front story, though, and then consider the possibility of these two mayors representing a small part of what is and continues to be a massive voter fraud machine that has been put in place by Democrats and utilized to great effect each and every election cycle – particularly in critical swing states like Pennsylvania. 

As POTUS Trump would say – “It’s true.”

BREAKING : FBI Indicts 2 Democrat Mayors in Pay-to-Play Corruption Probe

Well well well, once again crooked Democrat politicians  have been caught red handed.

From FoxNews

Two Democratic Pennsylvania mayors were indicted Wednesday as part of a wide-ranging FBI corruption probe.

The mayors of Reading and Allentown – the state’s third-largest city – were named among the defendants in the five-person indictment.

Acting U.S. Attorney for Eastern Pennsylvania Louis Lappen said Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski (D) was charged with 14 counts relating to running a pay-to-play scheme, and other offenses.

——————-

Remember – FBI Requested Access To Hacked DNC Servers. DNC REFUSED That Request.

On one side of its mouth the DNC (and Hillary Clinton campaign operatives) were screaming out the Russian narrative regarding hackers accessing and then leaking damning DNC docs during the 2016 Election. (DNC staffers were caught making fun of minorities, poor people, Bernie Sanders supporters, etc.) And yet, when the FBI requested access to the DNC servers in order to try and locate the source of the hack – the DNC refused that request.

Why would someone claiming to be a victim of a crime then not allow investigators access to the alleged crime scene?

Why indeed.

The Mainstream Media has since the beginning called the DNC email scandal a “hack” while offering no proof of such an act.

What has and remains far more likely is that those DNC docs were in fact LEAKED by a DNC insider. This fact then decimates the carefully constructed “the Russians did it” narrative that the Mainstream Media and Democrat operatives continue to promote. If true, it means they have been willfully lying to the American people all along.

Consider this headline from January on this subject:

Comey: DNC denied FBI’s requests for access to hacked servers

“The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.”

The above scenario is so critical to exposing the great DNC hack lie. While the DNC and the entirety of the then-Obama administration were repeating the false Russian narrative, that same DNC and Obama administration were denying the FBI access to the purported crime scene – indicating there was no crime but rather a cover-up by the DNC/Hillary/Obama machine.

With the above scenario outlined, now consider this D.C. Whispers headline from today:

Investigator Says Police Told To “Stand Down” Following DNC Seth Rich Murder (Hillary Related)

“At the time of his death, Rich was also involved in what some reports have described as a “highly important voter registration program” for the DNC. (See below) The DNC has not been forthcoming since Mr. Rich’s death regarding what that program might have been – though some have suggested he was preparing to blow the whistle on what was and likely remains, a massive voter fraud program:”

Is it possible part of the DNC’s motivation for creating the false Russia narrative regarding an alleged hacking was to cover up its implication in the murder of a staff member? That is speculation of course – but given how the DNC refused the FBI’s request to look at their servers, it certainly places a shadow over the entirety of the DNC’s motivations.

And note too how feeble then Director Comey’s response to his request being refused. There were members of Congress declaring that Russia’s alleged attempts to manipulate the 2016 Election was an act of war – and yet the FBI meekly goes away when the DNC refuses them access to the very servers that would provide the most critical proof of that “act of war”?

It doesn’t add up – UNLESS what you are adding up is a cover-up.

Then it makes perfect sense.

It also reveals the media and political establishment’s unhinged obsession with destroying the Trump presidency. Mr.Trump is a true D.C. outsider who is far too close to potential information that could more fully reveal the size and scope of corruption that has fueled our government for decades.

They cannot afford to have President Trump succeed. Their own survival demands he be destroyed.

———————-

FBI Director Hints That Barack Obama Was Source Of Illegal Leaks (VIDEO)

The Mainstream Media is once again scrambling to cover for Barack Obama. During the hearing yesterday between members of Congress and FBI Director James Comey, Mr. Comey made clear there has been ZERO evidence of collusion between the Russian government and the then-Trump campaign. What Director Comey did suggest is that Barack Obama himself (which would of course involve Valerie Jarrett as well) was a likely source of some, if not all, of the classified information leaks that now continue to plague Washington D.C.:

Congressman Trey Gowdy sets up the Obama-as-the-source scenario at the start of the video when he asks Director Comey if he personally briefed the then-President Michael Flynn/Russian-tied surveillance, etc. Comey refuses to answer. Then later in the video, we see Congressman Tom Rooney detailing just how dangerous to national security these Obama-era leaks have become. Comey follows this up by indicating the leaks coming out of D.C. now are “unusually active.”

The above video reaffirms there is ZERO evidence of any collusion between the then-Trump campaign and Russian officials. Those are the FACTS – facts the Mainstream Media continues to ignore as it works to try and damage the Trump administration and protect the previous Obama administration – and Barack Obama himself.

There is far more evidence to suggest the Obama White House orchestrated the leaks in question, and has Obama-era government officials who to this day, continue to engage in that same activity. Remember, nearly every major Establishment Media outlet was pushing the Russia-Trump narrative just prior to the November election. Hillary Clinton herself was more than hinting at the story. Here is her tweet from October 2016:

All of the above information would have to be obtained via classified information.

Second, the “link” between the Trump Organization server and the Russian bank appears to have been nothing more than spam, as detailed in this Daily Mail report:

FBI bows to Clinton supporters’ demands to probe Trump links with Russia – but comes up blank

 

  • Federal law enforcement officials combed over possible links between Donald Trump and the Russia and came up with nothing
  • The FBI found no evidence that Trump was involved in Russian hacking of Democratic Party officials’ emails 
  • A server at the Trump Organization that supposedly communicated with a Russian bank in secret was a dead end
  • None of the queries Hillary Clinton’s campaign pushed for turned up evidence that the billionaire, or his company, is working with Russia
  • A computer scientist says he found exchanges between Russia’s Alfa Bank in Moscow and the Trump Organization, but the FBI believes it was spam 
  • Alfa Bank and Trump’s campaign deny using the servers to communicate

Now here is where things get particularly interesting. What if the Obama government was the one to initiate the spam linking the Trump Organization’s server with the Russian Alfa Bank and then used that link to initiate surveillance? From there, it leaked information to the Clinton campaign, favored media sources, etc. – all in serious violation of the law.

With that in mind, it becomes very clear why so many in the media have no interest in pursuing the potential truth regarding this situation – that truth would involve their own complicity in violating the law and putting national security at risk.

Add that scenario to a D.C. Whispers report from yesterday:

James Comey Just Explained How Establishment Media Legally Creates Fake News

The ruse becomes even more clear as does the likelihood it was the Obama White House, working side-by-side with the Clinton campaign and using government operatives within the U.S. Intelligence agencies, to create a Trump-Russia story meant to help secure Election Day victory for Mrs. Clinton. That victory was denied, but the fake Russian story continues as a now-frightened media (and some politicians who were also involved) become more desperate to cover their own tracks.

Donald Trump wasn’t supposed to win. He wasn’t supposed to be President and have the power to investigate THEM.

As for Barack Obama, the entire episode is yet another example of his true legacy. A man who cares little for national security and far more about highly divisive and dangerous ideological politics.

——————————–

 

James Comey Just Explained How Establishment Media Legally Creates Fake News

Check out this quote from FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to Congress today:

“…It’s perfectly legal for someone attending a classified briefing to LIE TO THE PRESS about what they heard in that meeting. The FBI cannot go out and correct the record because then they’d be “commenting on Classified information…”

The New York Times or the Washington Post, or CNN, etc., come out with an anti-Trump story based on “government sources” which bolster the anti-Trump slant, and/or attempts to discredit the Trump White House’s take on events such as the bogus investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Election.

That very scenario has been happening time and time again and James Comey just admitted to Congress the FBI cannot come out and correct the record because they would then be in violation of publicly speaking about classified information.

The media is protected because it is spinning a lie, and therefore NOT classified information, even as that lie becomes fact in the minds of the media’s audience. Once again, here are FBI Director James Comey’s words on that very subject as spoken to Congress today:

“…It’s perfectly legal for someone attending a classified briefing to LIE TO THE PRESS about what they heard in that meeting. The FBI cannot go out and correct the record because then they’d be “commenting on Classified information…”

Don’t listen to anything the Establishment Media is telling you. They are not doing the bidding of truth. Rather, they are the willing denizens of the lie.

—————————