BREAKING: DOJ Will Not Prosecute James Comey For Leaking Classified Info

Former Obama-era FBI Director James Comey ducked an initial legal hurdle this week when the DOJ announced it will not seek to prosecute him for leaking classified information meant to harm President Trump.

Mr. Comey is not out of legal trouble yet, though, as he faces a second even more potentially serious investigation into his part in the FISA abuse scandal that was initiated by the Obama administration and used to spy on the then-Trump campaign.

James Comey wearing a suit and tie

Via MSN:

The Justice Department declined to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey following a criminal referral from the agency’s independent watchdog, which concluded that Comey had leaked classified information and showed a lack of candor with investigators.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz reached out to prosecutors about one of the memos Comey leaked to a friend, which detailed a conversation he had with President Trump, after he was fired by President Trump in May 2017.

Although prosecutors found the watchdog’s findings compelling, they decided against prosecution under classified information protection laws because of there being too much uncertainty surrounding Comey’s intent, according to the Hill. A month after he was fired, Comey testified to Congress he had leaked his notes to a friend to give to the media, hoping that it would spark a special counsel investigation.

Then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel the day after the New York Times first reported on details from one of Comey’s leaked memos, which claimed Trump pressed his FBI director to drop an investigation into his national security adviser Michael Flynn. That memo was classified as “confidential” — the lowest classification level — after Comey sent the information.

With other investigations focused on the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation underway, one source said the DOJ did not want to “make its first case against the Russia investigators with such thin margins and look petty and vindictive.”

Although the DOJ declined to prosecute in this case, Comey, who has become a vocal critic of the president since his ouster, is not yet in the clear.

Comey is also a possible target of Horowitz’s separate investigation into alleged Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse. He signed three of the four FISA applications targeting former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page before being fired by Trump. Horowitz’s report is expected to be released after Labor Day.

It is also likely that Comey’s actions as FBI director will be scrutinized during the “investigation of the investigators,” a review of the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, being led by Attorney General William Barr and the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, John Durham.


 

Watch Congressman Jim Jordan Eviscerate Robert Mueller For Helping Perpetrate The Trump-Russia Hoax

Whew! This is a fact-based massacre that eviscerates the entire premise of the Democrat-directed Special Counsel investigation into the very Trump-Russia hoax THEY INITIATED.

Watch as Mr. Mueller quickly retreats into “doddering old man” mode as Congressman Jim Jordan lays it out for all to hear. 

A crime of epic proportions was committed against President Trump, his campaign, his administration, and the American people.

WE. DEMAND. JUSTICE.

Image result for Jim Jordan vs Mueller



“QUITE POSSIBLY THE SINGLE BEST BOOK I’VE READ THAT CAPTURES THE ANGER AND FRUSTRATION OF THE FORGOTTEN AMERICAN WHO FEELS PUSHED DOWN AND NEGLECTED BY A POLITICALLY-CORRECT WORLD GONE MAD. IT’S A STORY THAT IS AS SHOCKING AS IT IS BEAUTIFUL. IT STARTS OUT ONE WAY AND ENDS UP IN A PLACE I DIDN’T SEE COMING THAT HAD ME NODDING MY HEAD AND SAYING, “RIGHT ON!”

I STAND WITH MR. DIAZ BECAUSE I AM MR. DIAZ. WE ALL ARE. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF STORIES AMERICA-LOVING READERS MUST SUPPORT TO HELP FIGHT BACK AGAINST ALL THE CRAZINESS THAT’S TEARING OUR COUNTRY APART.

MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE IS TRULY A MUST-READ.” -John K. Simms

Mr. Diaz's Revenge by [Ulsterman, D.W.]

E-BOOK: HERE

PAPERBACK: HERE


 

REPORT: CLINTONS’ DOJ DEAL WITH FBI EXPOSED

Rules for thee but not for me. So goes the sad reality of politics in America. While the Establishment Media attempts to distract with story after story of a college admissions scandal, or a shooting tragedy across the globe, the real news breaking in the U.S. this week involves some serious Deep State shenanigans whereby ruling class members like the Clintons and Obamas are allowed to do what they want when they want without fear of repercussions. 

Image result for Clinton and Strzok

Via SarahCarter.com:

DOJ Deal With FBI on Clinton Foundation

In one of the most explosive parts of Strzok’s testimony, he revealed that the Department of Justice struck a deal with the FBI not to investigate the Clinton Foundation emails.

Then-majority general counsel Zachary Somers asked Strzok if the “the Clinton Foundation was on the server.”

Strzok said he believed that it was “on one of the servers, if not the others.” However, he noted that there was an agreement between the DOJ and Hillary Clinton that the FBI was not allowed to search Clinton Foundation emails for that information.

———————

The signficance of the above testimony cannot be overstated. The Clintons were allowed to dictate terms to the FBI and the DOJ and that could not have happened without the approval of the Obama White House. Evidence was destroyed by the Clintons, secret tarmac meetings, undeniable proof of a Deep State attack against an incoming President of the United States (who remains far removed from the D.C. Deep State machine) on and on and on this sordid tale of political corruption at the very highest levels of our government goes. 

Related image


 

The Clinton Machine Braces For Incoming Over Secret Tarmac Meeting With Obama AG Lynch

The facts of the scandal are undeniable. Yes, the far left media will continue to attempt to ignore, deflect, and distract, but with the release of the under oath testimony of former FBI official Lisa Page this week that outlined how charges against Hillary Clinton were imminent in 2016 only to then suddenly and inexplicably ‘disappear’ and be transformed into an elaborate Deep State investigation/hoax against the #1 political enemy of globalists like the Clintons and the Obamas, that secret tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch is now receiving a fresh wave of scrutiny. 

Image result for secret tarmac meeting Clinton Lynch

A few in D.C. right now are calling for a new investigation into the details of that now infamous meeting which some believe was, in fact, a former president, Clinton, detailing some significant threats toward a then sitting president, Obama, regarding the state of the investigation against Hillary Clinton.

Did Bill Clinton go scorched earth on Loretta Lynch (whose career she owes to the Clintons) and Barack Obama? Given that the evidence disclosed this week shows how the investigation into Hillary Clinton was subsequently cut short and dismissed with that odd press conference performance by then FBI Director James Comey, it certainly seems plausible. So much so that here is a recent headline from the Washington Examiner:

Lisa Page testimony means DOJ might want to re-open case against Hillary Clinton

Lock her up?

More and more, it appears the Justice Department should have tried to do just that to Hillary Clinton and that only nefarious interference kept the attempt from occurring.

…Minus the interference, based on a plain reading of the law, Clinton should have been indicted.

By some (admittedly debatable) interpretations of the law and the applicable statute of limitations, she still should be.


 

Did You Know James Comey’s Former Special Assistant Now Works For CNN? Might Explain Today’s Morning Raid Coverage…

Just a coincidence, right? The FBI conducts an early morning raid on Roger Stone’s Florida home and the only news organization who happens to be there to film it all in Zero Dark 30 style is CNN. Remarkable. Well, that is until you realize the direct link between former FBI head James Comey and a man who is currently employed by CNN. Mr. Comey is an already admitted leaker of classified information to the media. (Yet has never faced prosecution for that crime.) Is it really a stretch to say his hands are all over this CNN “scoop” of the Roger Stone raid? 

Josh Campbell worked for James Comey until February of last year. He was then quickly hired on by CNN as a “law enforcement analyst.”

Uh-huh.

People are noticing. Not yet enough to make CNN have to come clean – but they are noticing:

I guess it’s just a coincidence that Comey’s former assistant Josh Campbell works for CNN and they just happened to have a van at #RogerStone’s house at 6am.
— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) January 25, 2019

DEVELOPING…


 

How The Media Unwittingly Just Debunked All Of Russia Gate

Most of you likely noticed the shrill cries of “Russia! Russia! Russia!” over the weekend as multiple socialist news media outlets were all clearly reading from the very same script. The gist of the coverage was that after President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey the FBI had “no choice” but to launch an investigation into a sitting president of the United States under the guise of potential Trump-Russia collusion. What really happened, though, is that these same media reports blew apart the entire fake Russia Gate narrative, proving beyond a doubt that the FBI’s move was overtly political and intended to punish America-First, President Trump for having defeated globalist, Hillary Clinton.

Remember, the DOJ #2 at the time, Rod Rosenstein, went to President Trump and recommended Comey be fired. Also don’t forget that just months earlier nearly all leading Democrats and most within the socialist media were calling for the exact same thing.

So, President Trump, on the recommendation of Mr. Rosenstein, fires James Comey.

Rosenstein then immediately uses that firing to push for a Special Counsel investigation into the Trump campaign and Trump administration while at the very same time, the FBI launches its own investigation into the newly elected President of the United States. While this is going on, former Obama and Clinton officials are orchestrating a wave of leaks to their socialist media contacts, ensuring the fake Trump/Russia collusion narrative is quickly formed.

Image result for evil hillary and obamaImage result for James Clapper and Brennan

This is all Deep State machinations of the worst kind and is no way reflective of a republic or a democracy but rather a dictatorship where the votes of millions are potentially wiped out by the globalist establishment hell bent on maintaining the status quo.

To date, after nearly two years of looking, there has been no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. NONE. The socialist media opines about meetings, discussions, and comments by President Trump and those around him as speculative proof that “something” might have been going on. The Mueller investigation, after tens of millions of wasted dollars, has chased and intimidated Trump associates both close and far to try and build a case that was never there. Some now face jail time for matters unrelated to the Trump campaign and/or the Trump presidency such as years-ago tax issues or the big umbrella charge of “lying” to the FBI.

If true justice is to be served, it will involve charges being filed against all those who helped perpetrate these ongoing investigative crimes against President Trump, his administration, and the tens of millions who voted for him and continue to support the work he’s doing—work that has resulted in record low unemployment, wage growth, a stronger military, America-first trade agreements, and potential peace across the globe.

This kind of Deep State abuse of power can never be allowed to happen again.


A teacher on the brink. A father seeking justice.
Their paths are about to cross and their lives will never be the same…

“MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE cuts to the core of what is so wrong with so much in America. From schools that no longer teach within a society that has seemingly lost its ability to listen, it’s a fictional story that in many ways is more real than what is portrayed on the news and that also has something very important to say to those still paying attention. The characters are believable, the action and dialogue riveting, with a message that should appeal to all of us. Read it. Read it now.”

Available in e-book and paperback from Amazon.com HERE


 

The Deep State’s Desperate Attempt To Hide Barack Obama’s Secret Emails At All Cost…

Yes, the Deep State wanted to protect Hillary Clinton, but that protection was primarily motivated by its overwhelming desire to shield the Obama Machine, including Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett. Here is an exchange during the recent James Comey congressional testimony that confirms this fact. Note how Mr. Comey admits he knew of both private emails being used by Mrs. Clinton and Barack Obama while one was Secretary of State and the other President of the United States. Two secret emails. (Obama used a pseudonym for his email account and also lied publicly about having knowledge of Clinton’s even though he emailed her multiple times.) Why has the Establishment Media (and most politicians) said almost nothing about Obama’s secret email account? Because the Deep State has ordered them not to. Imagine what those secret Obama emails might uncover. Oh, just imagine…

The secret Obama emails are out there somewhere. The media has said nothing. Lawmakers have said (almost) nothing. And the Deep State, well the Deep State has allowed just enough “get Hillary Clinton” distraction to then use that time to likely bury those emails deep-deep-deep from any potential prying eyes. Why are former high-ranking Deep State officials like Clapper and Brennan so openly and aggressively attacking President Trump? Because POTUS Trump is the single greatest threat to getting to Barack Obama and the entirety of the Obama Machine, including Valerie Jarrett. That same Obama Machine is slated to make BILLIONS in the coming years via media licensing, foreign “investment”, kickbacks, etc., and there are a great many hands waiting to get their fair share of that multi-billions pie.

Image result for Obama, Comey, mueller

ABOVE: Barack Obama, James Comey, and Robert Mueller – all deeply connected to the current manufactured investigations intended to protect Obama and cripple the Trump presidency.

Related image

Image result for Valerie Jarrett daughter cnn

Image result for Valerie Jarrett daughter cnn

Image result for Valerie Jarrett daughter cnn

Image result for Valerie Jarrett clapper obama


 

 

Did General Flynn Scare The Hell Out Of Robert Mueller?

BACK OFF OR ELSE.

The liberal media spun the NO PRISON TIME recommendation from Special Counsel Robert Mueller regarding former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn as evidence Flynn must be working with Mueller to go after President Trump.

Ah, but are things truly what the Establishment Media would have you all believe?

Image result for Flynn and Mueller

Flynn, the former military general noted for a particularly tough amount of grit in times of crisis, was the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency – an institution that is far more murky and powerful than either the CIA or the FBI. (It is no accident the media has neglected to share this bit of information much with the public. Such an omission is likely at the direction of Mr. Mueller himself.)

Check out this synopsis of the very interesting push and pull likely going on for the last two years between Flynn and Mueller via Zero Hedge:

…Gen. Flynn may actually have the goods on the fraud behind his own prosecution — namely, proof of exactly how he was set up by Mr. Obama, in particular his own tapes of conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that would show something different than the transcripts Mr. Mueller used to entrap him on Lying-to-Federal-Prosecutors rap. That theory raises the question: why did he not use it in his own defense. The answer may simply be that he didn’t want to rack up $2.5 million in billable hours for defense attorneys and chose instead to tough it out for nearly two years until he could use the information he has. And that means he must wait until final sentencing when his case is complete.

Mr. Comey will be making a return visit to the House committee where, last week, he weaseled his way through seven hours of forgetfulness, and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch will make her long-overdue first appearance to do some ‘splainin’ about the fishy confab she held with Bill Clinton on the Tarmac in Phoenix around the time that Mr. Comey was preparing to drop the “matter” involving Mrs. Clinton in July of 2016.

Backstage for the moment, there are two other vectors in motion: whatever Mr. Huber is up to in his mission to examine all those FBI / DOJ ? CIA operations against Mr. Trump, and the parallel inquiry of Mr. Horowitz, the DOJ Inspector general. Mr. Huber will be heard from for the first time this week, and Mr. Horowitz’s report is expected soon, too.

Finally, there is the Trump card, so to speak: the president’s power to declassify reams of documents that will shed light in all of the dark chambers of this fairy-tale castle. Wait for it….


 

ALERT: Congressman Mark Meadows Calls For Rod Rosenstein To “Resign Immediately.”

The #2 at the DOJ who also happens to be overseeing the fake Mueller investigation, Rod Rosenstein, should step down immediately following new information obtained by Congress this week. That is coming directly from Congressman Mark Meadows following a lengthy interview he held with FBI lawyer James Baker. 

In other words—something’s up and Mr. Rosenstein is definitely in the crosshairs. 


 

BREAKING: FBI Agent Confirms The Plot To Remove Trump Is Real

The Deep State Media Complex is working hard to bury this report.

Don’t let them.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

October 09, 2018 – 05:59 AM EDT
Former FBI lawyer: Plot to record, remove Trump not a joke

Don’t tell former FBI general counsel James Baker that those now-infamous discussions about secretly recording President Donald Trump and using the tapes to remove him from office were a joke.

He apparently doesn’t believe it. And he held quite the vantage point – he was on the inside of the bureau’s leadership in May 2017, when the discussions occurred.
Baker told Congress last week that his boss – then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe – was dead serious about the idea of surreptitiously recording the 45th president and using the evidence to make the case that Trump should be removed from office, according to my sources.

Baker told lawmakers he wasn’t in the meeting that McCabe had with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which the subject came up. But he did have firsthand conversations with McCabe and the FBI lawyer assigned to McCabe, Lisa Page, about the issue.

“As far as Baker was concerned, this was a real plan being discussed,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation. “It was no laughing matter for the FBI.”
Word of Baker’s testimony surfaces just days before Rosenstein is set to be interviewed in private on Thursday by House Judiciary Committee lawmakers.

Since The New York Times first reported the allegations, Rosenstein, the No. 2 Department of Justice (DOJ) official, has tried to downplay his role in them. His office has suggested that he thought the discussions were a joke, that Rosenstein never gave an order to carry out such a plot, and that he does not believe Trump should be removed from office.
But making those statements through a spokesperson is a bit different than having Rosenstein himself face Congress and answer the questions under penalty of felony if lawmakers think he is lying

Baker’s account to lawmakers this month clearly complicates an already complicated picture for Rosenstein before Congress, assuming he shows up for Thursday’s interview.
But even more so, Baker’s story lays bare an extraordinary conversation in which at least some senior FBI officials thought it within their purview to try to capture the president on tape and then go to the president’s own Cabinet secretaries, hoping to persuade the senior leaders of the administration to remove the president from power.
Even more extraordinary is the timing of such discussions: They occurred, according to Baker’s account, in the window around FBI Director James Comey’s firing. Could it be that the leaders of a wounded, stunned FBI were seeking retribution for their boss’ firing with a secret recording operation?

I doubt this is the power that Congress intended to be exercised when it created the FBI a century ago or the circumstances in which the authors of the 25th Amendment imagined a president’s removal could be engineered.

This wasn’t a president who was incapacitated at the time. He was fully exercising his powers – but in a way the FBI leadership did not like.
And that makes the FBI’s involvement in the tape-record-then-dump-Trump conversations overtly political – even if Rosenstein believed the whole idea was farcical.

Keep in mind, this is the same FBI that, a few months earlier during the 2016 election, had its top counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok talking to Page – his lover and the top lawyer to McCabe – about using their official powers to “stop” Trump in the election and having an “insurance policy” against the GOP nominee. That insurance policy increasingly looks like an unverified dossier created by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele – a Trump hater himself – that was bought and paid for by the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign through their mutual law firm.

“You walk away from the Baker interview with little doubt that the FBI leadership in that 2016-17 time-frame saw itself as far more than a neutral investigative agency but actually as a force to stop Trump’s election before it happened and then maybe reversing it after the election was over,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation.
Baker provided some other valuable insights in his congressional interview. As I reported last week, he revealed that he accepted information in the Russia investigation from a lawyer for the Democratic National Committee.

And my sources also confirm Baker admitted he received a version of Steele’s dossier from left-leaning reporter David Corn of Mother Jones magazine, and then forwarded it to Strzok’s team. Corn says that occurred in November 2016, right after the election.

That transaction is significant for two reasons. First, at the time Steele had just been fired from the FBI probe for leaking to the media and he wasn’t supposed to be further assisting the probe. So Corn essentially acted as a back door to allow information to continue to flow.

Secondly, the FBI was using the news media as an investigative source outside the normal chain of evidence.
Whatever you think of Rosenstein or the Russia probe, the statements Baker made to Congress have implications for all Americans.

The FBI was created to investigate crimes and stop foreign intelligence and terrorism threats. It was never designed to be a broker in the political process of elections or the execution of the 25th Amendment.

SOURCE


 

FBI/Deep State Caught Hiding “Political Embarrassment” Instead Of Telling The Truth On Trump/Russia Docs

It was a full-on cover-up intended to hide the FBI’s direct culpability in pushing and enabling the fake Trump/Russia collusion narrative that had ‘national security’ used as justification for keeping the facts from Congress and the American people so that they could continue to try and damage the Trump presidency and protect the DNC and the Clintons. It is a classic example of Deep State manipulations—and they’ve now been caught red-handed. 

Via The Hill:

FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI have tried to thwart President Trump on releasing the evidence, suggesting it will harm national security, make allies less willing to cooperate, or even leave him vulnerable to accusations that he is trying to obstruct the end of the Russia probe.

Before you judge the DOJ’s and FBI’s arguments — which are similar to those offered to stop the release of information in other major episodes of American history, from the Bay of Pigs to 9/11 — consider Footnote 43 on Page 57 of Chapter 3 of the House Intelligence Committee’s report earlier this year on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Until this past week, the footnote really had garnered no public intrigue, in part because the U.S. intelligence community blacked out the vast majority of its verbiage in the name of national security before the report was made public.

From the heavy redactions, all one could tell is that FBI general counsel James Baker met with an unnamed person who provided some information in September 2016 about Russia, email hacking and a possible link to the Trump campaign.

Not a reporter or policymaker would have batted an eyelash over such a revelation.

Then, last Wednesday, I broke the story that Baker admitted to Congress in an unclassified setting — repeat, in an unclassified setting — that he had met with a top lawyer at the firm representing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and received allegations from that lawyer about Russia, Trump and possible hacking.

It was the same DNC, along with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, that funded the unverified, salacious dossier by a British intel operative, Christopher Steele, that became a central piece of evidence used to justify the FBI surveillance of the Trump campaign in the final days of the election.

And it was the same law firm that made the payments for the dossier research so those could be disguised in campaign spending reports to avoid the disclosure of the actual beneficiaries of the research, which were Clinton and the DNC.

And it was, it turns out, the same meeting that was so heavily censored by the intel agencies from Footnote 43 in the House report — treated, in other words, as some big national security secret.

What makes this so extraordinary is that the FBI and the DOJ would have Americans believe that a contact with a lawyer for a political party during the middle of the election is somehow a matter of national security that should be hidden from the public.

Well, that argument was proven to be a lie by the very way the interview with Baker played out last Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Baker was not interviewed in a “SCIF” — a “sensitive compartmented information facility” routinely used to discuss super-secret, highly sensitive information. There was no claim of classification over any information he provided Congress that day.

So we can now say with some authority that the earlier redaction in Footnote 43 was done in the name of a national security concern that did not exist.

That means the redaction of Footnote 43 had more to do with political embarrassment than with national security. And that should concern us all.

The Founding Fathers intended government to be open and transparent except when national security was at risk. They never intended national security to be used to hide old-fashioned politics.

So, Mr. President, when you weigh those DOJ/FBI arguments against declassification, please don’t forget the ruse of the redaction that was Footnote 43.


 

OH MY: Senate Moves Toward Full Investigation Of Ford Legal Team And Senator Diane Feinstein

As hinted at days earlier here at D.C. Whispers, the Senate Judiciary Committee is now preparing to launch a full investigation into the machinations of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team and the office of Senator Diane Feinstein based upon “…recently uncovered information.” 

It appears that FBI supplemental investigation into Judge (Justice) Brett Kavanaugh that Senator Feinstein demanded has backfired on her – BIG TIME.

Image result for Grassley and Feinstein

Via The Washington Examiner:

Grassley to investigate Feinstein, Hirono press leaks on Kavanaugh

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote a letter to Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers Thursday asking for records and descriptions of communications with the offices of Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Mazie Hirono “in light of recently uncovered information.”

The new request, revealed in a late-Thursday press release sent hours after senators got a chance to read the FBI’s report on its investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations levied against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, was coupled with Grassley’s third attempt to ask Ford’s attorneys Debra Katz, Michael Bromwich, and Lisa Banks to share evidence cited as part of their client’s claim she was sexually assaulted by the judge when they were teenagers.

…”In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter,” Grassley continued in his letter, “in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.”

He did not elaborate further on what “recently uncovered information” might be – the FBI’s file has not been released to the public.

——————

Once again, here is a video of Senator Feinstein taken immediately after she had reviewed that supplemental FBI report in which the senator appears absolutely shell-shocked/guilty:


 

WITNESS TAMPERING: Former FBI Agent & Friend Of Christine Ford Accused Of Pressuring Witness To Change Testimony

Christine Blasey Ford testified before a Senate committee last week that her long ago friend was at the same party where a then 17-year old Brett Kavanaugh was alleged to have tried to make out with her in an upstairs bedroom. Ford stated she was forever traumatized by that event, though, she can’t recall when or where it happened. This friend’s name is Leland Ingham Keyser. Keyser disputed Ford’s claim, saying she had no memory of any such party. Keyser then later told FBI agents that she felt pressured to revise that version in order to support Ford. This pressure is said to have come from Ford’s current friend and former FBI agent, Monica McLean. There are also rumors swirling that McLean was acting on the direction of certain Senate Democrats – possibly Diane Feinstein. Perhaps this is why Senator Feinstein appeared so shaken yesterday morning during a very brief press conference. Has her hand been caught in the witness tampering cookie jar?

Image result for witness tampering

Via Fox News:

…Keyser told the investigators that she was — as the Journal notes — urged to clarify her statement by Monica McLean, a former FBI agent and friend of Ford’s, the paper reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

McLean’s lawyer denied his client tried to influence Keyser to change her account, calling it “absolutely false.”

And here is a video of Senator Diane Feinstein shortly after she reviewed the FBI’s supplemental Kavanaugh report which likely contained the above information:

(turn up volume)


 

Democrats Didn’t Even Bother To Read FBI’s Supplemental Kavanaugh Report

Diane Feinstein, who was among those who demanded a supplemental FBI report on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, didn’t even bother to read it once it became available. She admitted as much during a very brief and grim-faced press conference earlier today. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also indicated he had not read it but rather had been “briefed” on the supplemental report’s contents. The reason for their disinterest? They already knew the report would bolster Judge Kavanaugh’s claims he did nothing wrong while proving there is little to nothing out there to substantiate the claims made against him. It was all politics—the life of an innocent man and his family be damned.

Image result for Feinstein Schumer Kavanaugh

The Establishment Media is already rolling out repeated calls for a “more thorough” investigation, claiming the FBI was too limited in the scope of its follow-up questioning even as Mitch McConnell is now pushing for a full confirmation vote for the Supreme Court nominee as soon as this weekend.

Paid protests are set to be unleashed on communities all across the country—protests the FBI’s own information suggests is based on a pile of lies laid out by hyper-partisan Democrats fully engaged in the politics of personal destruction.

The DNC is pushing hard to fundraise off of the manufactured controversy, likely confident Democrat voters prone to bouts of over-emotionalism will only be too happy to fork over money to a deceptive and losing cause.

For Judge Kavanaugh now comes the waiting. Will enough Republicans and perhaps a few Democrats do right by their votes or will too many cower in the face of what will likely be intense paid opposition?

Kavanaugh and America will know very soon.


 

Did The Deep State Work Hand In Hand With Christine Blasey Ford? It Sure Looks That Way…

Lots of evidence of Deep State shenanigans now coming out in the wake of the Judge Kavanaugh hearings that shed some serious light on those behind the entire sordid smear campaign that was nothing more than an attempt to halt President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee and subsequently destroy the life of a good man. It now appears that Christine Ford repeatedly perjured herself while giving false testimony to the Senate – and did so at the direction of operatives with direct ties to Deep State government agencies.

Appalling.  


 

Senator Feinstein Demands FBI Report She Demanded On Blasey Ford Allegations Now Be Kept Secret

Well…well…well, the very FBI investigation and report Democrats (and Jeff Flake) demanded to take place is now being kept in the dark as Democrats seemingly scramble to keep the truth from the American people. 

Huh. Wonder what’s in that report that has them all so worried?

Image result for Dianne Feinstein crazy

Via The American Thinker:

Shocker: Dianne Feinstein does not want the FBI report released

Uh-oh! It looks as though DiFi (or as Clarice Feldman calls her, ChiFi) has an inkling that that traps may be springing and witnesses singing in ways that will not help the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee and beyond. Yesterday, she said of the forthcoming FBI report demanded by Judiciary Committee Dems plus Flake, “It would seem to me that if people are going to be identified, this ought to be held very close.”

Wait! I thought the American people had a right to know!


 

CAUGHT ON TAPE: Senator Elizabeth Warren Admits Kavanaugh FBI Investigation A Political Ploy To Delay Confirmation

How many times will Democrat voters allow themselves to be manipulated by the down and dirty, self-serving tactics of the D.C. swamp rats?

Here is Senator Elizabeth Warren admitting that the Democrats are weaponizing the FBI (once again) not to conduct an effort of justice, but to push a purely political agenda regardless of right or wrong, or truth and lies – and smearing a man’s entire life’s reputation in the process:


 

Deep State Moves In Hard To Block Kavanaugh Nomination: “They Got To Him.”

Via Senator Jeff Flake’s squishy request to “pause” the Judge Brett Kavanaugh confirmation vote in order to allow for yet another FBI investigation, the Deep State is now poised to unleash a flurry of anti-Kavanaugh stories (and direct threats to a group of Republican senators) through their multitude of media operatives.

Hold on tight. If you thought it was crazy before, the next 72-96 hours are going to be brutal as the Deep State no doubt is counting on enough Republicans to buckle under the immense pressure that is about to be applied to them. 

Image result for kamala harris and Valerie JarrettImage result for Jeff Flake

Senator Kamala Harris (left), who is a direct link to the Obama-Valerie Jarrett D.C. power circle, led the charge to intimidate outgoing Arizona senator Jeff Flake (right) into pushing for an FBI investigation. Flake, who has been an outspoken Republican enemy of the Trump White House, obeyed the demands of Harris and other leading Democrats, an act which led to fellow Republican senator Lindsey Graham to reportedly tell staff as he was walking out, “They got to him. They got to him.”

Image result for Lindsey Graham

The committee chair, Senator Chuck Grassley, was even more visibly upset as he made his way to a closed-door meeting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “These people won’t stop this nonsense. They’re all nuts.” 

Image result for Chuck Grassley

Democrats, on the other hand, were openly elated by Flake’s move, knowing full well the media-generated anti-Kavanaugh barrage that is about to be unleashed.

Image result for booker harris kavanaugh


 

Democrats Scramble To Halt Trump Order To Declassify FISA docs – “They Are Absolutely Terrified.”

Seems the Democrats (and likely some Republicans) are wailing in fear over President Trump’s recent order to declassify FISA docs related to the Trump/Russia collusion hoax. Consider this: If the president had a DOJ working for him instead of against him, those responsible for perpetrating that hoax and attempting to subvert democracy in America would likely already be in jail.

As it is, Mr. Trump has had to largely go it alone in D.C. as he continues to work very hard to drain the swamp on behalf of the American people.