Did General Flynn Scare The Hell Out Of Robert Mueller?

BACK OFF OR ELSE.

The liberal media spun the NO PRISON TIME recommendation from Special Counsel Robert Mueller regarding former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn as evidence Flynn must be working with Mueller to go after President Trump.

Ah, but are things truly what the Establishment Media would have you all believe?

Image result for Flynn and Mueller

Flynn, the former military general noted for a particularly tough amount of grit in times of crisis, was the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency – an institution that is far more murky and powerful than either the CIA or the FBI. (It is no accident the media has neglected to share this bit of information much with the public. Such an omission is likely at the direction of Mr. Mueller himself.)

Check out this synopsis of the very interesting push and pull likely going on for the last two years between Flynn and Mueller via Zero Hedge:

…Gen. Flynn may actually have the goods on the fraud behind his own prosecution — namely, proof of exactly how he was set up by Mr. Obama, in particular his own tapes of conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that would show something different than the transcripts Mr. Mueller used to entrap him on Lying-to-Federal-Prosecutors rap. That theory raises the question: why did he not use it in his own defense. The answer may simply be that he didn’t want to rack up $2.5 million in billable hours for defense attorneys and chose instead to tough it out for nearly two years until he could use the information he has. And that means he must wait until final sentencing when his case is complete.

Mr. Comey will be making a return visit to the House committee where, last week, he weaseled his way through seven hours of forgetfulness, and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch will make her long-overdue first appearance to do some ‘splainin’ about the fishy confab she held with Bill Clinton on the Tarmac in Phoenix around the time that Mr. Comey was preparing to drop the “matter” involving Mrs. Clinton in July of 2016.

Backstage for the moment, there are two other vectors in motion: whatever Mr. Huber is up to in his mission to examine all those FBI / DOJ ? CIA operations against Mr. Trump, and the parallel inquiry of Mr. Horowitz, the DOJ Inspector general. Mr. Huber will be heard from for the first time this week, and Mr. Horowitz’s report is expected soon, too.

Finally, there is the Trump card, so to speak: the president’s power to declassify reams of documents that will shed light in all of the dark chambers of this fairy-tale castle. Wait for it….


 

ALERT: Congressman Mark Meadows Calls For Rod Rosenstein To “Resign Immediately.”

The #2 at the DOJ who also happens to be overseeing the fake Mueller investigation, Rod Rosenstein, should step down immediately following new information obtained by Congress this week. That is coming directly from Congressman Mark Meadows following a lengthy interview he held with FBI lawyer James Baker. 

In other words—something’s up and Mr. Rosenstein is definitely in the crosshairs. 


 

BREAKING: FBI Agent Confirms The Plot To Remove Trump Is Real

The Deep State Media Complex is working hard to bury this report.

Don’t let them.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

October 09, 2018 – 05:59 AM EDT
Former FBI lawyer: Plot to record, remove Trump not a joke

Don’t tell former FBI general counsel James Baker that those now-infamous discussions about secretly recording President Donald Trump and using the tapes to remove him from office were a joke.

He apparently doesn’t believe it. And he held quite the vantage point – he was on the inside of the bureau’s leadership in May 2017, when the discussions occurred.
Baker told Congress last week that his boss – then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe – was dead serious about the idea of surreptitiously recording the 45th president and using the evidence to make the case that Trump should be removed from office, according to my sources.

Baker told lawmakers he wasn’t in the meeting that McCabe had with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which the subject came up. But he did have firsthand conversations with McCabe and the FBI lawyer assigned to McCabe, Lisa Page, about the issue.

“As far as Baker was concerned, this was a real plan being discussed,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation. “It was no laughing matter for the FBI.”
Word of Baker’s testimony surfaces just days before Rosenstein is set to be interviewed in private on Thursday by House Judiciary Committee lawmakers.

Since The New York Times first reported the allegations, Rosenstein, the No. 2 Department of Justice (DOJ) official, has tried to downplay his role in them. His office has suggested that he thought the discussions were a joke, that Rosenstein never gave an order to carry out such a plot, and that he does not believe Trump should be removed from office.
But making those statements through a spokesperson is a bit different than having Rosenstein himself face Congress and answer the questions under penalty of felony if lawmakers think he is lying

Baker’s account to lawmakers this month clearly complicates an already complicated picture for Rosenstein before Congress, assuming he shows up for Thursday’s interview.
But even more so, Baker’s story lays bare an extraordinary conversation in which at least some senior FBI officials thought it within their purview to try to capture the president on tape and then go to the president’s own Cabinet secretaries, hoping to persuade the senior leaders of the administration to remove the president from power.
Even more extraordinary is the timing of such discussions: They occurred, according to Baker’s account, in the window around FBI Director James Comey’s firing. Could it be that the leaders of a wounded, stunned FBI were seeking retribution for their boss’ firing with a secret recording operation?

I doubt this is the power that Congress intended to be exercised when it created the FBI a century ago or the circumstances in which the authors of the 25th Amendment imagined a president’s removal could be engineered.

This wasn’t a president who was incapacitated at the time. He was fully exercising his powers – but in a way the FBI leadership did not like.
And that makes the FBI’s involvement in the tape-record-then-dump-Trump conversations overtly political – even if Rosenstein believed the whole idea was farcical.

Keep in mind, this is the same FBI that, a few months earlier during the 2016 election, had its top counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok talking to Page – his lover and the top lawyer to McCabe – about using their official powers to “stop” Trump in the election and having an “insurance policy” against the GOP nominee. That insurance policy increasingly looks like an unverified dossier created by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele – a Trump hater himself – that was bought and paid for by the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign through their mutual law firm.

“You walk away from the Baker interview with little doubt that the FBI leadership in that 2016-17 time-frame saw itself as far more than a neutral investigative agency but actually as a force to stop Trump’s election before it happened and then maybe reversing it after the election was over,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation.
Baker provided some other valuable insights in his congressional interview. As I reported last week, he revealed that he accepted information in the Russia investigation from a lawyer for the Democratic National Committee.

And my sources also confirm Baker admitted he received a version of Steele’s dossier from left-leaning reporter David Corn of Mother Jones magazine, and then forwarded it to Strzok’s team. Corn says that occurred in November 2016, right after the election.

That transaction is significant for two reasons. First, at the time Steele had just been fired from the FBI probe for leaking to the media and he wasn’t supposed to be further assisting the probe. So Corn essentially acted as a back door to allow information to continue to flow.

Secondly, the FBI was using the news media as an investigative source outside the normal chain of evidence.
Whatever you think of Rosenstein or the Russia probe, the statements Baker made to Congress have implications for all Americans.

The FBI was created to investigate crimes and stop foreign intelligence and terrorism threats. It was never designed to be a broker in the political process of elections or the execution of the 25th Amendment.

SOURCE


 

FBI/Deep State Caught Hiding “Political Embarrassment” Instead Of Telling The Truth On Trump/Russia Docs

It was a full-on cover-up intended to hide the FBI’s direct culpability in pushing and enabling the fake Trump/Russia collusion narrative that had ‘national security’ used as justification for keeping the facts from Congress and the American people so that they could continue to try and damage the Trump presidency and protect the DNC and the Clintons. It is a classic example of Deep State manipulations—and they’ve now been caught red-handed. 

Via The Hill:

FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI have tried to thwart President Trump on releasing the evidence, suggesting it will harm national security, make allies less willing to cooperate, or even leave him vulnerable to accusations that he is trying to obstruct the end of the Russia probe.

Before you judge the DOJ’s and FBI’s arguments — which are similar to those offered to stop the release of information in other major episodes of American history, from the Bay of Pigs to 9/11 — consider Footnote 43 on Page 57 of Chapter 3 of the House Intelligence Committee’s report earlier this year on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Until this past week, the footnote really had garnered no public intrigue, in part because the U.S. intelligence community blacked out the vast majority of its verbiage in the name of national security before the report was made public.

From the heavy redactions, all one could tell is that FBI general counsel James Baker met with an unnamed person who provided some information in September 2016 about Russia, email hacking and a possible link to the Trump campaign.

Not a reporter or policymaker would have batted an eyelash over such a revelation.

Then, last Wednesday, I broke the story that Baker admitted to Congress in an unclassified setting — repeat, in an unclassified setting — that he had met with a top lawyer at the firm representing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and received allegations from that lawyer about Russia, Trump and possible hacking.

It was the same DNC, along with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, that funded the unverified, salacious dossier by a British intel operative, Christopher Steele, that became a central piece of evidence used to justify the FBI surveillance of the Trump campaign in the final days of the election.

And it was the same law firm that made the payments for the dossier research so those could be disguised in campaign spending reports to avoid the disclosure of the actual beneficiaries of the research, which were Clinton and the DNC.

And it was, it turns out, the same meeting that was so heavily censored by the intel agencies from Footnote 43 in the House report — treated, in other words, as some big national security secret.

What makes this so extraordinary is that the FBI and the DOJ would have Americans believe that a contact with a lawyer for a political party during the middle of the election is somehow a matter of national security that should be hidden from the public.

Well, that argument was proven to be a lie by the very way the interview with Baker played out last Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Baker was not interviewed in a “SCIF” — a “sensitive compartmented information facility” routinely used to discuss super-secret, highly sensitive information. There was no claim of classification over any information he provided Congress that day.

So we can now say with some authority that the earlier redaction in Footnote 43 was done in the name of a national security concern that did not exist.

That means the redaction of Footnote 43 had more to do with political embarrassment than with national security. And that should concern us all.

The Founding Fathers intended government to be open and transparent except when national security was at risk. They never intended national security to be used to hide old-fashioned politics.

So, Mr. President, when you weigh those DOJ/FBI arguments against declassification, please don’t forget the ruse of the redaction that was Footnote 43.


 

OH MY: Senate Moves Toward Full Investigation Of Ford Legal Team And Senator Diane Feinstein

As hinted at days earlier here at D.C. Whispers, the Senate Judiciary Committee is now preparing to launch a full investigation into the machinations of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team and the office of Senator Diane Feinstein based upon “…recently uncovered information.” 

It appears that FBI supplemental investigation into Judge (Justice) Brett Kavanaugh that Senator Feinstein demanded has backfired on her – BIG TIME.

Image result for Grassley and Feinstein

Via The Washington Examiner:

Grassley to investigate Feinstein, Hirono press leaks on Kavanaugh

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote a letter to Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers Thursday asking for records and descriptions of communications with the offices of Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Mazie Hirono “in light of recently uncovered information.”

The new request, revealed in a late-Thursday press release sent hours after senators got a chance to read the FBI’s report on its investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations levied against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, was coupled with Grassley’s third attempt to ask Ford’s attorneys Debra Katz, Michael Bromwich, and Lisa Banks to share evidence cited as part of their client’s claim she was sexually assaulted by the judge when they were teenagers.

…”In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter,” Grassley continued in his letter, “in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.”

He did not elaborate further on what “recently uncovered information” might be – the FBI’s file has not been released to the public.

——————

Once again, here is a video of Senator Feinstein taken immediately after she had reviewed that supplemental FBI report in which the senator appears absolutely shell-shocked/guilty:


 

WITNESS TAMPERING: Former FBI Agent & Friend Of Christine Ford Accused Of Pressuring Witness To Change Testimony

Christine Blasey Ford testified before a Senate committee last week that her long ago friend was at the same party where a then 17-year old Brett Kavanaugh was alleged to have tried to make out with her in an upstairs bedroom. Ford stated she was forever traumatized by that event, though, she can’t recall when or where it happened. This friend’s name is Leland Ingham Keyser. Keyser disputed Ford’s claim, saying she had no memory of any such party. Keyser then later told FBI agents that she felt pressured to revise that version in order to support Ford. This pressure is said to have come from Ford’s current friend and former FBI agent, Monica McLean. There are also rumors swirling that McLean was acting on the direction of certain Senate Democrats – possibly Diane Feinstein. Perhaps this is why Senator Feinstein appeared so shaken yesterday morning during a very brief press conference. Has her hand been caught in the witness tampering cookie jar?

Image result for witness tampering

Via Fox News:

…Keyser told the investigators that she was — as the Journal notes — urged to clarify her statement by Monica McLean, a former FBI agent and friend of Ford’s, the paper reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

McLean’s lawyer denied his client tried to influence Keyser to change her account, calling it “absolutely false.”

And here is a video of Senator Diane Feinstein shortly after she reviewed the FBI’s supplemental Kavanaugh report which likely contained the above information:

(turn up volume)


 

Democrats Didn’t Even Bother To Read FBI’s Supplemental Kavanaugh Report

Diane Feinstein, who was among those who demanded a supplemental FBI report on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, didn’t even bother to read it once it became available. She admitted as much during a very brief and grim-faced press conference earlier today. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also indicated he had not read it but rather had been “briefed” on the supplemental report’s contents. The reason for their disinterest? They already knew the report would bolster Judge Kavanaugh’s claims he did nothing wrong while proving there is little to nothing out there to substantiate the claims made against him. It was all politics—the life of an innocent man and his family be damned.

Image result for Feinstein Schumer Kavanaugh

The Establishment Media is already rolling out repeated calls for a “more thorough” investigation, claiming the FBI was too limited in the scope of its follow-up questioning even as Mitch McConnell is now pushing for a full confirmation vote for the Supreme Court nominee as soon as this weekend.

Paid protests are set to be unleashed on communities all across the country—protests the FBI’s own information suggests is based on a pile of lies laid out by hyper-partisan Democrats fully engaged in the politics of personal destruction.

The DNC is pushing hard to fundraise off of the manufactured controversy, likely confident Democrat voters prone to bouts of over-emotionalism will only be too happy to fork over money to a deceptive and losing cause.

For Judge Kavanaugh now comes the waiting. Will enough Republicans and perhaps a few Democrats do right by their votes or will too many cower in the face of what will likely be intense paid opposition?

Kavanaugh and America will know very soon.


 

Did The Deep State Work Hand In Hand With Christine Blasey Ford? It Sure Looks That Way…

Lots of evidence of Deep State shenanigans now coming out in the wake of the Judge Kavanaugh hearings that shed some serious light on those behind the entire sordid smear campaign that was nothing more than an attempt to halt President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee and subsequently destroy the life of a good man. It now appears that Christine Ford repeatedly perjured herself while giving false testimony to the Senate – and did so at the direction of operatives with direct ties to Deep State government agencies.

Appalling.  


 

Senator Feinstein Demands FBI Report She Demanded On Blasey Ford Allegations Now Be Kept Secret

Well…well…well, the very FBI investigation and report Democrats (and Jeff Flake) demanded to take place is now being kept in the dark as Democrats seemingly scramble to keep the truth from the American people. 

Huh. Wonder what’s in that report that has them all so worried?

Image result for Dianne Feinstein crazy

Via The American Thinker:

Shocker: Dianne Feinstein does not want the FBI report released

Uh-oh! It looks as though DiFi (or as Clarice Feldman calls her, ChiFi) has an inkling that that traps may be springing and witnesses singing in ways that will not help the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee and beyond. Yesterday, she said of the forthcoming FBI report demanded by Judiciary Committee Dems plus Flake, “It would seem to me that if people are going to be identified, this ought to be held very close.”

Wait! I thought the American people had a right to know!


 

CAUGHT ON TAPE: Senator Elizabeth Warren Admits Kavanaugh FBI Investigation A Political Ploy To Delay Confirmation

How many times will Democrat voters allow themselves to be manipulated by the down and dirty, self-serving tactics of the D.C. swamp rats?

Here is Senator Elizabeth Warren admitting that the Democrats are weaponizing the FBI (once again) not to conduct an effort of justice, but to push a purely political agenda regardless of right or wrong, or truth and lies – and smearing a man’s entire life’s reputation in the process:


 

Deep State Moves In Hard To Block Kavanaugh Nomination: “They Got To Him.”

Via Senator Jeff Flake’s squishy request to “pause” the Judge Brett Kavanaugh confirmation vote in order to allow for yet another FBI investigation, the Deep State is now poised to unleash a flurry of anti-Kavanaugh stories (and direct threats to a group of Republican senators) through their multitude of media operatives.

Hold on tight. If you thought it was crazy before, the next 72-96 hours are going to be brutal as the Deep State no doubt is counting on enough Republicans to buckle under the immense pressure that is about to be applied to them. 

Image result for kamala harris and Valerie JarrettImage result for Jeff Flake

Senator Kamala Harris (left), who is a direct link to the Obama-Valerie Jarrett D.C. power circle, led the charge to intimidate outgoing Arizona senator Jeff Flake (right) into pushing for an FBI investigation. Flake, who has been an outspoken Republican enemy of the Trump White House, obeyed the demands of Harris and other leading Democrats, an act which led to fellow Republican senator Lindsey Graham to reportedly tell staff as he was walking out, “They got to him. They got to him.”

Image result for Lindsey Graham

The committee chair, Senator Chuck Grassley, was even more visibly upset as he made his way to a closed-door meeting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “These people won’t stop this nonsense. They’re all nuts.” 

Image result for Chuck Grassley

Democrats, on the other hand, were openly elated by Flake’s move, knowing full well the media-generated anti-Kavanaugh barrage that is about to be unleashed.

Image result for booker harris kavanaugh


 

Democrats Scramble To Halt Trump Order To Declassify FISA docs – “They Are Absolutely Terrified.”

Seems the Democrats (and likely some Republicans) are wailing in fear over President Trump’s recent order to declassify FISA docs related to the Trump/Russia collusion hoax. Consider this: If the president had a DOJ working for him instead of against him, those responsible for perpetrating that hoax and attempting to subvert democracy in America would likely already be in jail.

As it is, Mr. Trump has had to largely go it alone in D.C. as he continues to work very hard to drain the swamp on behalf of the American people.

COLLUSION: Boston Herald Lays Out Stunning Connect-The-Dots FBI Collusion Scenario

The article is stunning for two reasons. The first is because few have managed to detail the many parts of the Deep State’s plot to defeat Donald Trump in a way that is easily understood as this week’s article does. Second, it comes from one of the nation’s most respected newspapers – the Boston Herald.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

FISA documents reveal FBI collusion

Our media’s valiant efforts to distract us notwithstanding, information continues to seep out that underscores how badly a housecleaning is needed in Washington, D.C.

Last week saw the release of the applications used to obtain warrants from the FISA court to spy on Carter Page, an adviser to the Trump presidential campaign. Obtained by Judicial Watch, the 400-plus pages of (heavily redacted) documents support the conclusions earlier drawn by the House Intelligence Committee (and denounced by Democrats as hysteria): the FISA warrants were obtained through obfuscation and deceit. (emphasis added)

As various commentators predicted would be proven, the bulk of the information that formed the basis for the FISA warrant applications was the “dossier” of allegations about Donald Trump’s activities in Russia. This dossier was provided to the FBI by British spy Christopher Steele. Steele was hired during the 2016 presidential campaign by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, who was paid by Hillary Clinton’s law firm Perkins Coie, who was paid by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The allegations were scandalous and completely unverified, in violation of federal statutes and FISA court rules.

In other words, the FBI used oppo research paid for by the Democrats as justification for government spying on a political opponent and other Americans.

But there’s more. In another incredible coincidence, Fusion GPS had hired scholar and professor Nellie Ohr as a “paid Russian expert.” Nellie Ohr happens to be married to Bruce Ohr, deputy attorney general in the Justice Department. Bruce Ohr is alleged to have passed his wife’s anti-Trump research to the FBI. He was demoted for failing to disclose not only his wife’s employment with Fusion GPS, but also his own meetings with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson.

The FISA court was never told any of that. They were never supposed to know. None of us was ever supposed to know.

When thousands of DNC emails were leaked to the public through Julian Assange’s organization WikiLeaks, we learned that Hillary Clinton had abused the primary process, nearly bankrupted the DNC and effectively stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders. We also learned the press played favorites with Clinton, getting her approval before running stories and forwarding debate questions to Clinton in advance. (emphasis added) (The official line is Russians hacked the DNC computers and gave the emails to WikiLeaks. Assange and former U.S. and U.K. intelligence officials vehemently deny this, and maintain it was an inside “leak,” not a hack. The DNC refused to turn over their servers to the FBI for inspection.)

And then there is Hillary Clinton’s misuse of a personal email server to handle classified State Department information. We now know that then-FBI director James Comey decided not to prosecute Clinton before the investigation was even concluded. We also know that FBI attorney Peter Strzok rewrote Comey’s initial report to change Comey’s description of Clinton’s conduct from “grossly negligent” — which was a violation of the applicable federal statute — to “extremely careless.”

This is the same Peter Strzok who expressed his loathing for Donald Trump in many of the tens of thousands of texts he exchanged with his lover and fellow FBI attorney Lisa Page. Strzok infamously assured Page that they had an “insurance policy” and that they “would stop” Trump from becoming president. At a congressional hearing two weeks ago, Strzok arrogantly insisted that his bias did not affect his job performance.

He must think we’re all idiots.

But then, we were never supposed to know any of this.

——————–

LINK

——————-

Now consider this. Today, trial proceedings began for former Trump campaign manager, Paul Manafort, on charges brought up against him via the Mueller investigation/witch hunt regarding financial dealings from many years earlier wholly unrelated to Donald Trump or the Trump campaign. These financial dealings were actually investigated and found acceptable by the current head of the Mueller investigation and #2 at the DOJ, Rod Rosenstein, years earlier. (watch for that stunning truth to finally be brought to light by Manafort’s defense team very soon.) You see, Rosenstein already had the Manafort/Ukraine/Russia lobbying information on hand from that investigation years earlier. He simply handed it over to Mueller and directed Mueller to now use it to arrest Manafort and (they hope) get him to turn on Trump.

In short, the entirety of the Mueller special counsel isn’t about finding a crime but creating one against President Trump and covering up one perpetrated by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, the Deep State, influential Establishment Media figures, etc.

That is the only logical conclusion one can make after reading what the Boston Herald outlined above.

Now it is up to YOU to share this truth with others.


 

Feds Leak Yet More (Illegally Obtained) Info To Trump-Hating Media In Hopes Of Finding A Scandal That Will Stick

Taped conversations between Donald Trump and his then-attorney Michael Cohen were among items seized by the federal government during a no-knock search of Mr. Cohen’s office and properties. This evidence is now being leaked to the Establishment Media by operatives within the federal government and likely approved by Robert Mueller himself. So says a longtime D.C. staffer who also believes the Feds knew of those taped conversations months earlier via an illegal surveillance operation against the Trump 2016 campaign – an operation set up by the Obama administration with the implied full knowledge and approval of the Clinton Machine. 

“What’s coming out today are leftovers from an operation most likely personally directed by Peter Strzok and his FISA scheme that was given the nod by the Obama White House. (High Rog. Yeah, I see you.) They knew about the tapes way back when because they were listening in on Donald Trump’s private conversations with his attorney. The justification for that shocking intrusion of privacy was the fake Russia sh*t. It’s total abuse of power by the Obama government, Mueller, etc. The next level would be to put a gun to the head of the one they perceive to be the biggest threat to their plans and pull the trigger. And you know what? They’ve had that conversation. Anyone who doesn’t think so is living in a world that doesn’t exist. They’ve done the sex scandal before. Didn’t work. They moved to gun control. Didn’t work. Ramped up the Russian collusion nonsense. Didn’t work. Manufactured a border crisis. No go. Went crazy with the Trump Putin crap and then did some internals and saw that wasn’t playing either. So, here we are back to the sex scandal garbage. Trump had an affair twelve years ago. The woman describes it as loving and consensual. Trump had his lawyer try to make sure the story isn’t used by his political enemies right before the election. Oooh. Wow. What a scandal! Give me a break. The American people don’t give a sh*t about this stuff. They really don’t.

“They better be careful because this info leak/drop points right back to the illegal surveillance thing. They have to know that but they’re getting more and more desperate as the 2018 Midterms approach and Trump’s SC nomination goes live. Here’s the real deal and plenty in this town know it. The Obama government was as abusive and dangerous as anything in our lifetimes – super aggressive political cancer with almost no treatment options outside of total revolution. Fact. And that government, a whole slew of those people involved, are still in the government and/or enjoying a big fat media contributor contract. Anyone who wants to dismiss that statement as crazy conspiracy stuff only have to read Strzok’s own words. How much more proof does anyone need? The guy is a complete loon who was openly calling for the overthrow of a president. Again, TRUTH. And he was the one who headed up both the Hillary illegal server investigation and the Trump/Russia collusion investigation. The fact he’s still drawing a government paycheck and not stamping license plates is proof positive just how messed up the whole system is. And you know what? If I were a Russian or Chinese operative who wanted to inflict serious damage on the United States this is exactly how I would have done it. Get someone like Barack Obama elected, fill the government with snakes like Strzok and Brennan and Clapper, and watch it burn slow and hot until all that’s left are ashes.”


 

FBI Director Comfirms The Following: Russia Has NEVER Hacked A U.S. Election & China Is A Far Greater Threat To America

FBI Director Christopher Wray said something this week that the Establishment Media is purposefully ignoring. The first is that Russia has never hacked a U.S. election. This means that when media and politicians and others use the term “hack” to describe what is in fact meddling, they are being dishonest. There was and never has been a hack of the U.S. election system. Second, China is a far greater geopolitical threat to the United States than Russia. While Vladimir Putin is certainly a bad actor, he is also a minor one when compared to China’s influence and capabilities. Why is is it then that the Establishment Media (and Democrats in general) seem so determined to protect China? Please watch and share the following video of Mr. Wray’s comments. They begin with his detailing how there has yet to be a hack of the U.S. election system. At the 22:30 mark he goes into greater detail explaining the threat China poses.

RELATED:

REPORT: FBI Director Christopher Wray Says Russia Has NEVER Hacked A U.S. Election – Then CNN Lies About It

REPORT: FBI Director Christopher Wray Says Russia Has NEVER Hacked A U.S. Election – Then CNN Lies About It

Given months and months of a false narrative pushed out there by Trump hating media and politicians that Russia “hacked” the 2016 Election, the recent declaration by FBI Director Christopher Wray that Russia has actually NEVER hacked a U.S. election should be very big news. Instead, most in the media are ignoring it and if you’re CNN, well, you just flat out lie about what Director Wray actually said.

Here is what Director Wray said on the subject of Russia election hacking according to a local Fox 31 Denver report:

He said that while U.S. officials have not yet seen an effort by Russia to target specific election systems, it is aggressively engaged in influence operations to sow discord and divisiveness in America. “To me, it’s a threat that we need to take very serious and respond to with fierce determination,” Wray said.

He said the Russians identify divisive issues, and through covert and overt operations, fake news and propaganda, they “spin people up on both sides of an issue and then kind of watch us go after each other.”

Russia isn’t the only country threatening the U.S., Wray said.

He said he thinks China, from a counterintelligence perspective, represents the broadest and most significant threat America faces. China wants to replace the United States as the most powerful economic engine in the world and is infiltrating American businesses to get an edge.

So there are a few very important points to note about what FBI Director Wray communicated:

-Russia has NEVER hacked a U.S. election.

-Russia’s election “meddling” amounts to winding Americans up so they will argue with one another/become more divided/disillusioned/etc.

-China is a far greater threat to America than Russia.

Now here is how CNN reported on the above from Director Wray:

In his interview, Wray said that the intelligence community has not observed an effort by Russia to target specific election infrastructure as it did in 2016, but “we could just be a moment away from it going to the next level.”

Note the bolded part. CNN included that itself – it didn’t come from Director Wray. CNN purposely attempted to play down the most important point regarding Russia meddling – it has never actually hacked a U.S. election. CNN also neglected to include Director Wray’s opinion that China poses a much greater threat to the United States than Russia.

This leaves one to have to ask – what does China have on CNN to make it lie so much in China’s favor? Is CNN guilty of treason? Is it compromised? Should it be required to hand over transcripts of its news editor meetings?

It appears CNN isn’t just fake news – it’s Chinese & Russian propaganda.

——————

UPDATE: The video of Director Wray’s comments have been included. Note again how he never says “as it did in 2016.” Those words were inserted by CNN – irrefutable proof of a highly partisan propaganda group posing as real news. Also, note at 22:35 of the video is where Wray discusses how China, not Russia, is the most significant counterintelligence threat to the United States – a comment CNN’s propoganda version neglected to include.

 


 

Did Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama Get Americans Killed Due To Illegal Server Use?

Whispers are mounting in and around D.C. regarding a widespread cover-up that directly involves both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama – both who were guilty of communicating on illegal private servers during their time in government. (An act which Mr. Obama lied about repeatedly when he was president.) Could it be the entirety of the Trump/Russia narrative is nothing more than a “look over here” hoax perpetrated by a Deep State desperate to protect some of its most valuable assets – namely Obama/Clinton? 

And is that also why the Establishment Media has done so little to investigate what appears to be real collusion among high-ranking U.S. government officials and foreign powers?


 

Senator Rand Paul On Obama-Era CIA Director John Brennan: “Most Biased, Bigoted, Unhinged CIA Director We’ve Ever Had.”

John Brennan has been acting very strangely of late. His outlandish attacks on a sitting President of the United States is quite unique and troubling for a former head of the CIA. Could it be the rumors of actual collusion between Brennan, Obama, the Clintons, etc. with foreign powers that has him so aggressively attacking President Trump? Senator Ron Paul seems to think so and here is saying as much:


 

The Blood On The Hands Of The Establishment Media: Obama, Hillary, DNC, Etc…

There was a time when the American people could expect the media to aggressively seek out and report on political corruption. 

Not anymore. The war against Donald Trump and his millions of supporters is the single greatest political scandal in this nation’s history.

They are ALL guilty. 

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.