OH MY: Read What Some FBI Operatives Really Think Of Trump Supporters

The words drip with upturned noses, inflated egos, and seemingly unending self-importance. They want(ed) Donald Trump destroyed and they resent all of those (YOU) who made him president. A glimpse into the minds and hearts of the Deep State (and Establishment Media) courtesy of the just-released (albeit still redacted) IG report:

(Make sure to read it all the way to the end.)


 

Mueller Drafted Anti-Trump “Resistance” Members From FBI To Join Special Counsel Investigation

UPDATE: The “FBI Attorney #2” in question has been removed from the Mueller team. Seems this only happens after evidence of collusion by Mueller finally escapes. How much more is he hiding as he attempts to revise the outcome of the 2016 Election?

——-

Ignore the Establishment Media spin that has been at the ready since the IG investigation into the Clinton email scandal began. While leftist pundits declare “nothing to see here” the IG report clearly points to rampant abuses within both the FBI and DOJ, as well as hints at some very serious misdeeds surrounding the ongoing Mueller investigation. For instance, why was Robert Mueller bringing in members of the anti-Trump “resistance” from inside the FBI to be a part of his team? (And as you ask that question you should know many of these incriminating emails were just obtained but a month ago – the FBI and DOJ have been covering up their existence for months.

What is being attempted against President Trump is a Deep State coup – and that coup continues…


 

REPORT: Andrew McCabe Seeks Immunity Deal To Go After James Comey & Others Within Obama Government

Former #2 at the FBI, Andrew McCabe, is said to be willing to sing for federal investigators looking into a vast anti-Trump conspiracy involving high-ranking officials within the Obama government including but not limited to, former Obama FBI Director James Comey. The swamp rats are now turning on each other.

Via True Pundit:

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe has requested the Senate Judiciary Committee provide him with immunity from prosecution in exchange for testifying at an upcoming congressional hearing focused on how senior officials at the FBI and Justice Department handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server, according to a letter obtained by CNN.

“Under the terms of such a grant of use immunity, no testimony or other information provided by Mr. McCabe could be used against him in a criminal case,” wrote Michael Bromwich, a lawyer for McCabe, to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, who has requested McCabe testify next week.

…The stakes for McCabe’s appearance, however, are particularly high. The former No. 2 at the FBI is entangled in a separate criminal investigation stemming from an earlier report from the inspector general’s office that concluded he lied to internal investigators. McCabe has steadfastly denied wrongdoing, but any congressional testimony he provides could have serious implications for his criminal case.

“Mr. McCabe is willing to testify, but because of the criminal referral, he must be afforded suitable legal protection,” Bromwich wrote to Grassley. “This is a textbook case for granting use immunity. . . . If this Committee is unwilling or unable to obtain such an order, then Mr. McCabe will have to no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.”

DEVELOPING…


 

The FBI’s Watergate: What did the bureau know, when did it know it, and how did it learn it?

On point commentary from William McGurn that is well worth the time to read.

Top officials at the FBI, (and other intelligence agencies) both past and present, have been colluding with powerful political and media figures both in America and abroad to topple a duly elected president. Whether the full truth of what is likely the single greatest government scandal in this nation’s history ever comes out remains to be seen. If it does it will likely alter how people view government for generations to come.

William McGurn

June 4, 2018 6:58 p.m. ET

“What did the president know, and when did he know it?” On June 28, 1973, during a hearing before the Senate Watergate Committee, the ranking member, Tennessee Republican Howard Baker, posed the central question of the investigation.

Forty-five summers after Baker uttered those historic words, the same question now hangs over the alleged collusion between Donald Trump and Russia in the 2016 election. But this time the question is directed at the investigators. It runs like this: What did the FBI know, when did it know it—and from whom did it get this information?

The answers are essential to a public accounting of what in fact happened during an election in which the FBI was investigating both the Republican and Democratic nominees for president or their campaigns. But unlike Watergate, which the FBI solved, the more we learn about these investigations, the more troubling the FBI’s behavior appears. Unfortunately, rather than make a clean breast of it all, new FBI Director Christopher Wray behaves as though the bureau doesn’t need to answer to the American people’s elected representatives in Congress.

For weeks Washington has awaited a report from the Justice Department’s inspector general on the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Some findings were released in April, concluding that former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lied repeatedly to investigators. The inspector general recommended criminal charges. We won’t know the full depth of wrongdoing until the whole report is made public. But thanks to indiscreet texts between FBI lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, we know that folks in the bureau understood before the FBI interviewed Mrs. Clinton that she would not be charged, notwithstanding the testimony before Congress by former Director James Comey that he hadn’t made up his mind.

While the Russia investigation is a separate affair, the drama features some of the same FBI players. Officially this FBI investigation started on July 31, 2016. But here’s the problem: If the Russia investigation didn’t start until late July, how was it that the FBI’s “top secret” informant, Stefan Halper, had met the Trump campaign’s Carter Page earlier that month at a University of Cambridge symposium that Mr. Halper helped put on?

Mr. Wray wasn’t the director when the FBI started its Russia investigation. Mr. Comey was, and he has testified that news of the investigation was too sensitive to share with the Gang of Eight, which comprises the bipartisan leadership of the House and Senate as well as the chairmen and ranking members of their respective intel committees. Which makes no sense, because the Gang of Eight’s purpose is to provide a way for the intelligence community to share sensitive information with Congress.

Unfortunately, Mr. Wray (along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein ) has resisted clearing everything up by producing the documents still under congressional subpoena. In a Sunday interview with Fox News, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes suggested that if his committee was given the relevant documents, and they confirmed the bureau’s account, by Friday the committee would be able to say “look, the Department of Justice and the FBI did nothing wrong” and wrap up its investigation.

Alas, Mr. Wray (along with Mr. Rosenstein) has been playing a double game, pretending to cooperate with Congress but acting to keep documents away from the committees or produce them only in absurdly redacted form.

No one should be surprised. At a December hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, Mr. Wray suggested he couldn’t share classified information with Congress. The following month, he and Mr. Rosenstein tried to make an end run around the House Intel Committee’s demands for info in a meeting with House Speaker Paul Ryan.

In March, Mr. Wray publicly promised a “transparent and responsive” FBI. To that end he would be “doubling” the number of staff assigned to responding to Congress. It’s the classic Beltway dodge, focusing on inputs over output.

Congress is still waiting for the bureau to make good on Mr. Wray’s promise. Meanwhile, sideshows dominate the headlines, from a silly debate about whether Mr. Halper was a spy or an informant to another over whether President Trump can pardon himself.

Eventually Congress will get answers. Press reports have suggested some rank-and-file FBI agents are itching to speak up about what happened under Mr. Comey. Sen. Chuck Grassley last week urged them to come forward, noting they don’t need to be subpoenaed to tell Congress what they know. More telling details could also come from the FBI officials involved, who are at some point likely to testify, under oath, before the House Intel Committee.

To salvage his own and his agency’s credibility, Mr. Wray needs to come clean about the most fundamental question still remaining about the FBI’s Russia investigation: how and why it began. If the bureau’s been telling the truth, it has nothing to fear.


 

FBI Docs Catch Comey In ANOTHER Lie – Clinton Email Server Compromised By Unauthorized Source.

When he was FBI Director James Comey told Congress and the American people that Hillary Clinton’s (illegal) private email server was not hacked.

That was a lie. Comey’s own FBI said as much. This lie reveals yet further proof of the high-ranking cover-up that was underway on Clinton’s behalf and why the Deep State remains so determined to destroy Donald Trump. It’s this kind of information they don’t want getting out.


 

Don’t Believe The BackTrack – Feds WERE Wiretapping Cohen To Conduct Surveillance On President Trump

The news broke and then both outrage from Trump supporters and glee from Trump detractors, ensued. 

The problem for federal investigators is the initial NBC story revealed potential and very significant illegalities in what they were doing. A swift call was made. NBC updated the story and now the Mueller investigation holds its breath hoping it dodged a potential bullet.

IT DIDN’T. 

All evidence as originally detailed by the NBC report points to the federal government using a president’s longtime personal attorney to surveil a sitting president. Such a move is unprecedented. If this had been done during the Obama years the Establishment Media mob would be demanding jail time for the offenders and the Justice Department would be moving double-time to accommodate them.

The Cohen/Trump surveillance wasn’t just phone calls – it was allegedly ALL electronic communications as outlined by NBC – an outline NBC is now desperate to hope people will forget. Note how the information is said to be undeniable fact. Why is that? Most likely because it came from the same Mueller sources that have been leaking to NBC and other media outlets since its illegal investigation into President Trump began: (see below)

The Deep State was caught by its own eagerness to push its anti-Trump media-driven narrative.

If Jeff Sessions were acting anything close to a real Attorney General, he would be calling in any and all associated with the Trump witch hunt and proceeding with a scorched earth shutdown and then following up with charges filed against the investigators – including Robert Mueller.


 

TRUMP vs DEEP STATE: “The War Is On”

A longtime D.C. staffer lays out where the Trump vs Deep State war is at and where it is now likely headed:

 

“…Regarding the silly DNC lawsuit against everyone/everything 2016 Election-related under the sun. They’ve been keeping that in their back pocket for a while now. The fact they played that card shows how desperate they are. The narrative is slipping away from them. They need to keep the truth hidden regarding what they did and what they’ve been doing with our elections for a very long time.”

“…Trump remains vulnerable to attack but he’s built up some impressive defenses and is quick to react. Know this. He has proven to be one tough SOB. Most would have collapsed by now. Trump is an absolute beast. I don’t know how he’s managed to hold on this long and now has the strength to be fighting back so hard. Amazing.”

“…A big background player in all of this is Clapper. Look for his name to suddenly pop up with a lot more frequency in the coming days.”

“…Besides the Trump White House, there are three main camps in all of this: the Clinton machine, the Obama machine, and the Deep State which controls the media narrative. The Deep State appears to be siding with the Obama machine which is leaving the Clintons more exposed than they have ever been. The unknown is who the Trump White House goes after the hardest from here on out. For now, it looks like they are letting their enemies knife one another. Smart. I’ve never once said Hillary Clinton could face charges. Guess what? I’m saying it now. She could. It really is getting that intense. Some in the media know it. They’re doing everything they can to prevent anything like that from happening but if they have to choose they’ll choose Obama over the Clintons and the Clintons know it.”

“…This town is buzzing more than it has in a long time. This war has a whole lot of people looking over their shoulder waiting for a shoe to drop. That puts Trump’s own danger level at its highest level since he took the Oath. For the first time since this war started his enemies are truly scared. That makes them even more dangerous.”

DEVELOPING…


 

ALERT: Comey To Cancel Book Tour As DOJ Investigates His Illegal Classified Info Leaks?

James Comey has gone from supremely smug to increasingly concerned as the long list of alleged crimes he committed during his tenure as FBI Director continues to grow. Perhaps most notable are his repeated leaks of classified information in what was a clearly politically-motivated attempt to do harm to a then-newly elected president. 

Watch the video below as Mr. Comey learned on live television of the legal noose tightening around his Deep State neck…

Comey’s team is said to be considering shortening/ canceling his book tour and limiting all future media appearances. His publisher apparently wants the tour to continue, likely thinking bad press is still good press when it comes to potential book sales. Speaking of which any help in that regard is needed as the book tour has been marked by small turnouts and overall interest by readers toward the Comey tell-all has been minimal.


 

INSANE: FBI Raid On Cohen Office/Home Was Primarily Done To Obtain Information On Access Hollywood Tape

They have nothing on Donald Trump. No collusion with Russia. No campaign foul play. NOTHING.

So what does Robert Mueller do? He abuses his federal authority to harass, intimidate, and attempt to dig up personal dirt on a president.

This is insane and anyone with an ounce of reasonable intellect would agree. It also adds more fuel to the conspiracy fire that Mr. Mueller is practically begging Mr. Trump to fire him so THAT can be used as ammo against the President.


 

WTH??? Pulse Nightclub Shooter’s Father Was An FBI Informant

Talk about another layer of weird. Pulse Nightclub shooter Omar Mateen was being groomed to be an FBI informant at the time of the shooting AND his father already was an FBI informant.

ABOVE: The father of the Pulse Nightclub Massacre, Seddique Mateen, seen sitting directly behind Hillary Clinton during one of her 2016 political rallies. Mr. Mateen was a longtime FBI information according to recent court testimony and his son Omar was being considered for the same role by the Obama FBI when the Pulse Nightclub shooting took place.

Via The Orlando Sentinel:

Pulse nightclub gunman Omar Mateen was considered by the FBI for development as a possible informant prior to carrying out the 2016 mass shooting, an agent testified today during the trial of Mateen’s widow, Noor Salman.

That revelation came hours after Salman’s defense filed a motion seeking to have the case dismissed or declared a mistrial due to information that Mateen’s father was an informant for the FBI for more than a decade and sent money out of the country in the months before the attack.

Jurors today heard from FBI Special Agent Juvenal Martin, who was responsible for overseeing Mateen’s father, Seddique Mateen, as an informant after Martin transferred to the FBI’s Miami division in 2006.

…Martin said he considered trying to develop Mateen as an informant, like his father, after finding he didn’t have ties to terrorism. Omar Mateen would later claim allegiance to the Islamic State group as he carried out the mass shooting at Pulse nightclub on June 12, 2016.

——————

A well-placed source offers this chilling possibility given this new and shocking information:

Omar Mateen could have carried out a religious massacre at the behest of Islamic representatives with ties to the then-Obama Deep State for the sole purpose of political help to Hillary Clinton in the critical swing state of Flordia. He was programmed to believe he was doing “Allah’s will.” If true it wouldn’t be the first time and it won’t be the last. You would think this information would be just a little more important than who the President may or may not have slept with twelve years ago. Right?


 

Anti-Trump Former FBI Agent Andrew McCabe Admits To Being “Confused” During His Alleged False Testimony

It seems the reason the FBI recommended the immediate firing of Andrew McCabe was his lack of honesty during an investigative interview regarding his role in helping to cover up alleged crimes by Hillary Clinton as well as subsequent illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

Mr. McCabe isn’t admitting to lying just yet. Instead, he’s saying he was “confused” when he gave his apparently misleading answers.

Via The New York Post

Ex-FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe admitted Saturday he was “confused and distracted” when he talked to investigators about alleged misconduct during a 2016 investigation of the Trump campaign.

McCabe “lacked candor” in that interview, Attorney General Jeff Sessions determined, and fired him March 16, two days before he would have been eligible for a pension.

“Some of my answers were not fully accurate,” McCabe admitted in a Washington Post op-ed, but insisted, “I did not knowingly mislead or lie to investigators.

“When asked about contacts with a reporter that were fully within my power to authorize . . . I answered questions as completely and accurately as I could,” said McCabe, who was accused of leaking material to the Wall Street Journal.

He added that when he realized that his answers “may have been misunderstood,” he tried to correct them.

“At worst, I was not clear in my responses, and because of what was going on around me may well have been confused and distracted — and for that I take full responsibility,” McCabe said, adding that his misstatements don’t justify President Trump’s “unhinged public attacks on me.”

————–

For Deep State operatives caught red-handed doing something wrong, it’s called being “confused.”

For everyone else, it’s called lying.

Also, note how McCabe neglected to mention it was the FBI’s own investigation into his actions that then suggested he be fired. That wasn’t Donald Trump’s recommendation. Nor was it Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s. It was the FBI itself that called for McCabe to be sent packing. It’s a very important point the Establishment Media continues to ignore.


 

Former FBI Director Goes On Record: “Comey, McCabe, & Brennan All Corrupt & Everything Leads Back To Obama” (VIDEO)

James Kallstrom is no joke. With nearly thirty years in the FBI, several of them as the Assistant Director, Kallstrom knows how the agency functions far more than most. So when he says there was a plot to protect Hillary Clinton from prosecution and to illegally influence the 2016 Election people should pay attention. Kallstrom goes on to call the entirety of the FBI investigation against Donald Trump completely phony. Maria Bartiromo’s own take appears very much to compliment Mr. Kallstrom’s assertions. The Deep State shenanigans run very deep and in 2016 are linked to the Obama White House. 

Barack Obama wanted a third term. His support-system within the FBI, DOJ, State Department, CIA, the Establishment Media, etc., wanted the same and they all broke the law in their attempt to do it. Donald Trump has managed to reveal much of it. The media continues to ignore it because so many of them are implicated in the illegal manipulations of the public as well. That means it’s up to YOU to bypass the media and help to spread the truth of what is really going on.

WATCH. SHARE. EDUCATE.


 

ALERT: Firing Of Andrew McCabe Said To Be “One of Many” To Follow As POTUS Trump Continues To Drain The Swamp

Though many in D.C. thought it could happen, those many are still shocked it actually did happen.

Twenty-fours away from a nearly two-million dollar retirement package, former FBI #2 Andrew McCabe was fired by Attorney General Jeff Session – effective immediately. 

McCabe’s loyalty to departed/infamous FBI Director James Comey was well known. So too were his equally anti-Trump leanings. McCabe himself has been implicated in abuse of power and related cover-up allegations, all of which are said to have sealed his fate at the FBI.

Word is Mr. McCabe’s firing is to be “one of many” to follow as President Trump continues to push out those in his administration he understandably finds himself unable to trust. The firing is alos believed to be one of the primary motivators for the “Trump scandals” attempt that is now being ramped up by the Mainstream Media that was rolled out in conjunction with special counsel Robert Mueller’s sudden attack on Mr. Trump’s family business.

Further speculation is also pointing to formal charges being brought against McCabe and others for the roles they played in attempting to illegally influence the 2016 Election outcome – influence that is alleged to directly include both Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama.

DEVELOPING…


 

Andrew McCabe’s Anti-Trump/Pro-Hillary Bias So Bad/Negligent He Now Faces Losing His Entire FBI Pension

Andrew McCabe was among the highest-ranking of all FBI officials. He had both power and influence over America’s largest and most influential law enforcement agency.

He now faces termination and the loss of his entire FBI pension.

The reasons are apparently many but most prominent among them are Mr. McCabe’s fervent anti-Trump and pro-Hillary bias that might very well have resulted in the FBI being weaponized (with the likely full approval of former President Barack Obama) during the 2016 Election.

Via NBC News:

WASHINGTON — The FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility has recommended the firing of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who remains on the payroll — a move that could put the veteran official’s pension at risk, according to officials familiar with the process.

The recommendation is now before Attorney General Jeff Sessions. OPR has already determined that McCabe should be fired and it’s now up to Sessions whether to reverse that recommendation or to accept it.

McCabe — who has been attacked by President Donald Trump and other Republicans for alleged anti-Trump bias inside the FBI — is due to retire this weekend. If Sessions were to fire him before then, it would place McCabe’s federal pension at risk.

The OPR recommendation that he be thrown off the payroll follows an internal report from the DOJ inspector general that concluded McCabe was not fully forthcoming in answers about whether he talked to a reporter about the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

McCabe is a civil service employee who can’t be fired without evidence of wrongdoing.


 

REPORT: High-Ranking Obama Official Has Lawyered Up – Uses Her Right To Remain Silent.

Check it out. What follows are the answers from former Obama official Susan Rice that D.C. Whispers indicated a year ago was among those the administration was willing to let take the fall for multiple egregious surveillance program misdeeds intended to manipulate the 2016 Election.

Susan Rice has now lawyered up and is refusing to answer even the most basic questions regarding her role in those alleged crimes as the following report outlines. Note as well the emphasis on the Grassley-Graham memo – another thing of importance that was covered by D.C. Whispers first:

THE SILENCE OF SUSAN RICE
By letter to Susan Rice dated February 8, 2018, Senators Grassley and Graham posed 12 numbered questions. I posted the Graham/Grassley letter in “Rice papers the file.” By letter dated February 23, 2018, white collar criminal defense lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler has now responded to the Grassley/Graham letter on Rice’s behalf. I posted Ruemmler’s letter nearby this morning in “Susan Rice responds, sort of,” and am embedding it again at the bottom.

Let’s take an inventory of Rice’s response to the questions: answered, partially answered, answered narrowly, or not answered. I have italicized my accounting below, subject to further thought and analysis:

Question 1. Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email?

Answered.

Question 2. When did you first become aware of the FBI’s investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia?

Not answered.

Question 3. When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?

Partially answered.

Question 4. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

Partially answered.

Question 5. Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?

Not answered.

Question 6. Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?

Not answered.

Question 7. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?

Answered narrowly (“In the conversation Ambassador Rice documented, there was no discussion of Christopher Steele or the Steele dossier, contrary to the suggestion in your letter”).

Question 8. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey describe the status of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?

Answered narrowly (see above).

Question 9. When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?

Not answered.

Question 10. When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele’s efforts?

Not answered.

Question 11. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’s investigation?

Not answered.

Question 12. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Corney, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’ s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Not answered.

Susan Rice has lawyered up. For some reason or other, with respect to several pointed and important questions, she is resting on her right to remain silent.


SOURCE: The Powerline Blog


 

REPORT: What is the FBI hiding in its war to protect Comey?

A must-read report coming from The Hill regarding the ongoing firewall the Deep State has built around former FBI Director James Comey.

EXCERPT:

Comey now looms large over a burgeoning constitutional crisis that could soon overshadow Watergate at its worst. To deepen the crisis even further, it now appears some of Comey’s former FBI and Justice Department colleagues continue to protect him from accountability.

Three suspicious activities stand out, all intertwined: The so-called Comey Memos, Comey’s controversial testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee and Comey’s book deal.

(note: the book deal was first reported by D.C. Whispers last year)

The day before Comey’s testimony, Fox News reported: “A source close to James Comey tells Fox News the former FBI director’s Senate testimony has been ‘closely coordinated’ with Robert Mueller…”. Comey may have violated the law in leaking his official FBI memos to the media, and it would be a scandal if Comey coordinated his Senate testimony with Mr. Mueller’s special counsel office.

That we have had to sue in federal court to discover the truth speaks volumes. The FBI has built a protective stonewall around Comey by refusing to release the Comey Memos and refusing to disclose records of communications between the FBI and Comey prior to and regarding Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intel Committee.
Since his forced departure from the FBI, Comey signed a book deal in August 2017, set for publication in April 2018, for which he reportedly received an advance in excess of $2 million. Given the fact that the FBI appears to be letting Comey get away with stealing and leaking official government documents and colluding with the special counsel to get Trump, even a trusting person must be suspicions about his book deal.

The FBI has fanned those suspicions by, you guessed it, adding a new layer to the protective stonewall around Comey. Again, Judicial Watch has been forced to sue a recalcitrant FBI for records, including but not limited to forms Comey was required to complete relating to prepublication review of the book by the FBI. Did Comey’s cronies give the fired FBI director a pass on this long-standing requirement? Is that why they are stonewalling the Judicial Watch FOIA?

Based upon Comey’s performance to date, this book likely will be an elaborate exercise in self-apotheosis. That’s why the American public deserves to know if Comey’s former colleagues — many of whom we now know aided in his exoneration of Hillary Clinton and have participated in the contrived investigation of Donald Trump – scrutinized his literary claims or simply green-lighted his every word.

There is no doubt that the deep state is in deep cover-up mode. The FBI, Justice Department and the special counsel all are stonewalling our requests for Comey documents. The more they stonewall, the deeper the suspicions grow about Comey’s complicity in the entire attempt to use the bogus Trump dossier to prevent the election of Donald Trump, and then use it to undermine his presidency once he was elected to office. In my experience in Washington, when people refuse to come clean, it is usually because they are hiding dirty laundry.


 

Going After Obama Is The Red Line The FBI, CIA, NSA, Media, Etc., Will Not Cross…

The Clintons’ survival is rooted these days on their ability to convince anyone and everyone thinking of linking them to a multitude of crimes from illegal email servers to pay-for-play Clinton Foundation money laundering schemes, that should they go down, so too will Barack Obama.

He is the red line of which those in power at the highest levels of government, the courts, and the Establishment Media, will not cross…

“Protect Obama.” That is a phrase uttered repeatedly before, during, and now more than a year after, his presidency. Billions were invested in Mr. Obama’s creation. Potential trillions have since been built upon the foundation that is his ongoing legacy – a legacy that is to culminate in the breaking apart of the traditional United States to be replaced by something far-far different.

Case in point. On February 7th Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, went public with stunning evidence of Mr. Obama’s first-hand complicity in both colluding with, and obstructing, the 2016 investigation in Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private server that many have since indicated was meant to hide evidence of the Clintons’ multi-national pay-to-play shakedowns that took place during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as head of the Obama State Department.

The information provided by Senator Johnson outline rampant FBI abuses, confirm former FBI Director James Comey’s likely cover-up complicity, and exposed the lie Mr. Obama told when he stated he had not, and would not, ever attempt to politically influence an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

It was the kind of revelation that should have generated wall-to-wall media coverage It didn’t. In fact, there was NO television news coverage of it outside of Fox News. None of the networks made mention of it. Nor did CNN or MSNBC.

“We don’t report it – it didn’t happen.” That’s the mantra of the Establishment Media and it has never been used it so consistently as when it’s been done to protect Barack Obama. It allowed him to be elected, re-elected, and to stay out of prison.

Instead, this same Establishment Media continues to push the false narrative that Mr. Obama’s eight years in the White House represent a “scandal-free” presidency when in fact it has been proven time and time again to be among the most scandal-ridden administrations in history.

Ah, but when you are involved in the re-writing of history, the false representation of the present, so that you might have a seat at the table of the powerful in the future, why bother with facts, or truth, or reality?

Barack Obama never did – and look where it got him.

Bill and Hillary and their cadre of schemers know this. They are banking on it – to the tune of tens and tens of millions of dollars.

One filthy hand washing the other.

—————————-

Weird. Read FBI Texts Of Agents Hating On Trump While Supporting Illegal Immigration

These are/were high-ranking FBI officials charged with responsibilities like counter-intelligence and yet when you read their communications you are struck by how dumb/immature they are. They are left-wing, yes, but also oddly adolescent in how they view the world around them. Spoiled, petulant, and thinking their version of morality is all-important.

They helped orchestrate the sham investigation into the very real crimes of Hillary Clinton and then were deeply involved in the real investigation into the false crimes they have attempted to manufacture against POTUS Trump.

It’s hard not to roll one’s eyes as you read such idiocy until you remind yourself these are the ones running the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency. They appear more than willing to say anything or do anything, to get their way and are the embodiment of the Barack Obama era of law enforcement in America.

SEE FULL SIZED VERSION

FBI Lawyer Lisa Page goes on a tirade on how amazing illegal aliens "overcame serious odds" to become valedictorians and steal from the American Taxpayer. Peter Strzok initially puts up an argument, then cucks out like the beta he is. from The_Donald

——————–