WTH??? Pulse Nightclub Shooter’s Father Was An FBI Informant

Talk about another layer of weird. Pulse Nightclub shooter Omar Mateen was being groomed to be an FBI informant at the time of the shooting AND his father already was an FBI informant.

ABOVE: The father of the Pulse Nightclub Massacre, Seddique Mateen, seen sitting directly behind Hillary Clinton during one of her 2016 political rallies. Mr. Mateen was a longtime FBI information according to recent court testimony and his son Omar was being considered for the same role by the Obama FBI when the Pulse Nightclub shooting took place.

Via The Orlando Sentinel:

Pulse nightclub gunman Omar Mateen was considered by the FBI for development as a possible informant prior to carrying out the 2016 mass shooting, an agent testified today during the trial of Mateen’s widow, Noor Salman.

That revelation came hours after Salman’s defense filed a motion seeking to have the case dismissed or declared a mistrial due to information that Mateen’s father was an informant for the FBI for more than a decade and sent money out of the country in the months before the attack.

Jurors today heard from FBI Special Agent Juvenal Martin, who was responsible for overseeing Mateen’s father, Seddique Mateen, as an informant after Martin transferred to the FBI’s Miami division in 2006.

…Martin said he considered trying to develop Mateen as an informant, like his father, after finding he didn’t have ties to terrorism. Omar Mateen would later claim allegiance to the Islamic State group as he carried out the mass shooting at Pulse nightclub on June 12, 2016.

——————

A well-placed source offers this chilling possibility given this new and shocking information:

Omar Mateen could have carried out a religious massacre at the behest of Islamic representatives with ties to the then-Obama Deep State for the sole purpose of political help to Hillary Clinton in the critical swing state of Flordia. He was programmed to believe he was doing “Allah’s will.” If true it wouldn’t be the first time and it won’t be the last. You would think this information would be just a little more important than who the President may or may not have slept with twelve years ago. Right?


 

Anti-Trump Former FBI Agent Andrew McCabe Admits To Being “Confused” During His Alleged False Testimony

It seems the reason the FBI recommended the immediate firing of Andrew McCabe was his lack of honesty during an investigative interview regarding his role in helping to cover up alleged crimes by Hillary Clinton as well as subsequent illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

Mr. McCabe isn’t admitting to lying just yet. Instead, he’s saying he was “confused” when he gave his apparently misleading answers.

Via The New York Post

Ex-FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe admitted Saturday he was “confused and distracted” when he talked to investigators about alleged misconduct during a 2016 investigation of the Trump campaign.

McCabe “lacked candor” in that interview, Attorney General Jeff Sessions determined, and fired him March 16, two days before he would have been eligible for a pension.

“Some of my answers were not fully accurate,” McCabe admitted in a Washington Post op-ed, but insisted, “I did not knowingly mislead or lie to investigators.

“When asked about contacts with a reporter that were fully within my power to authorize . . . I answered questions as completely and accurately as I could,” said McCabe, who was accused of leaking material to the Wall Street Journal.

He added that when he realized that his answers “may have been misunderstood,” he tried to correct them.

“At worst, I was not clear in my responses, and because of what was going on around me may well have been confused and distracted — and for that I take full responsibility,” McCabe said, adding that his misstatements don’t justify President Trump’s “unhinged public attacks on me.”

————–

For Deep State operatives caught red-handed doing something wrong, it’s called being “confused.”

For everyone else, it’s called lying.

Also, note how McCabe neglected to mention it was the FBI’s own investigation into his actions that then suggested he be fired. That wasn’t Donald Trump’s recommendation. Nor was it Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s. It was the FBI itself that called for McCabe to be sent packing. It’s a very important point the Establishment Media continues to ignore.


 

Former FBI Director Goes On Record: “Comey, McCabe, & Brennan All Corrupt & Everything Leads Back To Obama” (VIDEO)

James Kallstrom is no joke. With nearly thirty years in the FBI, several of them as the Assistant Director, Kallstrom knows how the agency functions far more than most. So when he says there was a plot to protect Hillary Clinton from prosecution and to illegally influence the 2016 Election people should pay attention. Kallstrom goes on to call the entirety of the FBI investigation against Donald Trump completely phony. Maria Bartiromo’s own take appears very much to compliment Mr. Kallstrom’s assertions. The Deep State shenanigans run very deep and in 2016 are linked to the Obama White House. 

Barack Obama wanted a third term. His support-system within the FBI, DOJ, State Department, CIA, the Establishment Media, etc., wanted the same and they all broke the law in their attempt to do it. Donald Trump has managed to reveal much of it. The media continues to ignore it because so many of them are implicated in the illegal manipulations of the public as well. That means it’s up to YOU to bypass the media and help to spread the truth of what is really going on.

WATCH. SHARE. EDUCATE.


 

ALERT: Firing Of Andrew McCabe Said To Be “One of Many” To Follow As POTUS Trump Continues To Drain The Swamp

Though many in D.C. thought it could happen, those many are still shocked it actually did happen.

Twenty-fours away from a nearly two-million dollar retirement package, former FBI #2 Andrew McCabe was fired by Attorney General Jeff Session – effective immediately. 

McCabe’s loyalty to departed/infamous FBI Director James Comey was well known. So too were his equally anti-Trump leanings. McCabe himself has been implicated in abuse of power and related cover-up allegations, all of which are said to have sealed his fate at the FBI.

Word is Mr. McCabe’s firing is to be “one of many” to follow as President Trump continues to push out those in his administration he understandably finds himself unable to trust. The firing is alos believed to be one of the primary motivators for the “Trump scandals” attempt that is now being ramped up by the Mainstream Media that was rolled out in conjunction with special counsel Robert Mueller’s sudden attack on Mr. Trump’s family business.

Further speculation is also pointing to formal charges being brought against McCabe and others for the roles they played in attempting to illegally influence the 2016 Election outcome – influence that is alleged to directly include both Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama.

DEVELOPING…


 

Andrew McCabe’s Anti-Trump/Pro-Hillary Bias So Bad/Negligent He Now Faces Losing His Entire FBI Pension

Andrew McCabe was among the highest-ranking of all FBI officials. He had both power and influence over America’s largest and most influential law enforcement agency.

He now faces termination and the loss of his entire FBI pension.

The reasons are apparently many but most prominent among them are Mr. McCabe’s fervent anti-Trump and pro-Hillary bias that might very well have resulted in the FBI being weaponized (with the likely full approval of former President Barack Obama) during the 2016 Election.

Via NBC News:

WASHINGTON — The FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility has recommended the firing of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who remains on the payroll — a move that could put the veteran official’s pension at risk, according to officials familiar with the process.

The recommendation is now before Attorney General Jeff Sessions. OPR has already determined that McCabe should be fired and it’s now up to Sessions whether to reverse that recommendation or to accept it.

McCabe — who has been attacked by President Donald Trump and other Republicans for alleged anti-Trump bias inside the FBI — is due to retire this weekend. If Sessions were to fire him before then, it would place McCabe’s federal pension at risk.

The OPR recommendation that he be thrown off the payroll follows an internal report from the DOJ inspector general that concluded McCabe was not fully forthcoming in answers about whether he talked to a reporter about the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

McCabe is a civil service employee who can’t be fired without evidence of wrongdoing.


 

REPORT: High-Ranking Obama Official Has Lawyered Up – Uses Her Right To Remain Silent.

Check it out. What follows are the answers from former Obama official Susan Rice that D.C. Whispers indicated a year ago was among those the administration was willing to let take the fall for multiple egregious surveillance program misdeeds intended to manipulate the 2016 Election.

Susan Rice has now lawyered up and is refusing to answer even the most basic questions regarding her role in those alleged crimes as the following report outlines. Note as well the emphasis on the Grassley-Graham memo – another thing of importance that was covered by D.C. Whispers first:

THE SILENCE OF SUSAN RICE
By letter to Susan Rice dated February 8, 2018, Senators Grassley and Graham posed 12 numbered questions. I posted the Graham/Grassley letter in “Rice papers the file.” By letter dated February 23, 2018, white collar criminal defense lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler has now responded to the Grassley/Graham letter on Rice’s behalf. I posted Ruemmler’s letter nearby this morning in “Susan Rice responds, sort of,” and am embedding it again at the bottom.

Let’s take an inventory of Rice’s response to the questions: answered, partially answered, answered narrowly, or not answered. I have italicized my accounting below, subject to further thought and analysis:

Question 1. Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email?

Answered.

Question 2. When did you first become aware of the FBI’s investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia?

Not answered.

Question 3. When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?

Partially answered.

Question 4. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

Partially answered.

Question 5. Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?

Not answered.

Question 6. Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?

Not answered.

Question 7. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?

Answered narrowly (“In the conversation Ambassador Rice documented, there was no discussion of Christopher Steele or the Steele dossier, contrary to the suggestion in your letter”).

Question 8. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey describe the status of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?

Answered narrowly (see above).

Question 9. When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?

Not answered.

Question 10. When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele’s efforts?

Not answered.

Question 11. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’s investigation?

Not answered.

Question 12. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Corney, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’ s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Not answered.

Susan Rice has lawyered up. For some reason or other, with respect to several pointed and important questions, she is resting on her right to remain silent.


SOURCE: The Powerline Blog


 

REPORT: What is the FBI hiding in its war to protect Comey?

A must-read report coming from The Hill regarding the ongoing firewall the Deep State has built around former FBI Director James Comey.

EXCERPT:

Comey now looms large over a burgeoning constitutional crisis that could soon overshadow Watergate at its worst. To deepen the crisis even further, it now appears some of Comey’s former FBI and Justice Department colleagues continue to protect him from accountability.

Three suspicious activities stand out, all intertwined: The so-called Comey Memos, Comey’s controversial testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee and Comey’s book deal.

(note: the book deal was first reported by D.C. Whispers last year)

The day before Comey’s testimony, Fox News reported: “A source close to James Comey tells Fox News the former FBI director’s Senate testimony has been ‘closely coordinated’ with Robert Mueller…”. Comey may have violated the law in leaking his official FBI memos to the media, and it would be a scandal if Comey coordinated his Senate testimony with Mr. Mueller’s special counsel office.

That we have had to sue in federal court to discover the truth speaks volumes. The FBI has built a protective stonewall around Comey by refusing to release the Comey Memos and refusing to disclose records of communications between the FBI and Comey prior to and regarding Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intel Committee.
Since his forced departure from the FBI, Comey signed a book deal in August 2017, set for publication in April 2018, for which he reportedly received an advance in excess of $2 million. Given the fact that the FBI appears to be letting Comey get away with stealing and leaking official government documents and colluding with the special counsel to get Trump, even a trusting person must be suspicions about his book deal.

The FBI has fanned those suspicions by, you guessed it, adding a new layer to the protective stonewall around Comey. Again, Judicial Watch has been forced to sue a recalcitrant FBI for records, including but not limited to forms Comey was required to complete relating to prepublication review of the book by the FBI. Did Comey’s cronies give the fired FBI director a pass on this long-standing requirement? Is that why they are stonewalling the Judicial Watch FOIA?

Based upon Comey’s performance to date, this book likely will be an elaborate exercise in self-apotheosis. That’s why the American public deserves to know if Comey’s former colleagues — many of whom we now know aided in his exoneration of Hillary Clinton and have participated in the contrived investigation of Donald Trump – scrutinized his literary claims or simply green-lighted his every word.

There is no doubt that the deep state is in deep cover-up mode. The FBI, Justice Department and the special counsel all are stonewalling our requests for Comey documents. The more they stonewall, the deeper the suspicions grow about Comey’s complicity in the entire attempt to use the bogus Trump dossier to prevent the election of Donald Trump, and then use it to undermine his presidency once he was elected to office. In my experience in Washington, when people refuse to come clean, it is usually because they are hiding dirty laundry.


 

Going After Obama Is The Red Line The FBI, CIA, NSA, Media, Etc., Will Not Cross…

The Clintons’ survival is rooted these days on their ability to convince anyone and everyone thinking of linking them to a multitude of crimes from illegal email servers to pay-for-play Clinton Foundation money laundering schemes, that should they go down, so too will Barack Obama.

He is the red line of which those in power at the highest levels of government, the courts, and the Establishment Media, will not cross…

“Protect Obama.” That is a phrase uttered repeatedly before, during, and now more than a year after, his presidency. Billions were invested in Mr. Obama’s creation. Potential trillions have since been built upon the foundation that is his ongoing legacy – a legacy that is to culminate in the breaking apart of the traditional United States to be replaced by something far-far different.

Case in point. On February 7th Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, went public with stunning evidence of Mr. Obama’s first-hand complicity in both colluding with, and obstructing, the 2016 investigation in Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private server that many have since indicated was meant to hide evidence of the Clintons’ multi-national pay-to-play shakedowns that took place during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as head of the Obama State Department.

The information provided by Senator Johnson outline rampant FBI abuses, confirm former FBI Director James Comey’s likely cover-up complicity, and exposed the lie Mr. Obama told when he stated he had not, and would not, ever attempt to politically influence an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

It was the kind of revelation that should have generated wall-to-wall media coverage It didn’t. In fact, there was NO television news coverage of it outside of Fox News. None of the networks made mention of it. Nor did CNN or MSNBC.

“We don’t report it – it didn’t happen.” That’s the mantra of the Establishment Media and it has never been used it so consistently as when it’s been done to protect Barack Obama. It allowed him to be elected, re-elected, and to stay out of prison.

Instead, this same Establishment Media continues to push the false narrative that Mr. Obama’s eight years in the White House represent a “scandal-free” presidency when in fact it has been proven time and time again to be among the most scandal-ridden administrations in history.

Ah, but when you are involved in the re-writing of history, the false representation of the present, so that you might have a seat at the table of the powerful in the future, why bother with facts, or truth, or reality?

Barack Obama never did – and look where it got him.

Bill and Hillary and their cadre of schemers know this. They are banking on it – to the tune of tens and tens of millions of dollars.

One filthy hand washing the other.

—————————-

Weird. Read FBI Texts Of Agents Hating On Trump While Supporting Illegal Immigration

These are/were high-ranking FBI officials charged with responsibilities like counter-intelligence and yet when you read their communications you are struck by how dumb/immature they are. They are left-wing, yes, but also oddly adolescent in how they view the world around them. Spoiled, petulant, and thinking their version of morality is all-important.

They helped orchestrate the sham investigation into the very real crimes of Hillary Clinton and then were deeply involved in the real investigation into the false crimes they have attempted to manufacture against POTUS Trump.

It’s hard not to roll one’s eyes as you read such idiocy until you remind yourself these are the ones running the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency. They appear more than willing to say anything or do anything, to get their way and are the embodiment of the Barack Obama era of law enforcement in America.

SEE FULL SIZED VERSION

FBI Lawyer Lisa Page goes on a tirade on how amazing illegal aliens "overcame serious odds" to become valedictorians and steal from the American Taxpayer. Peter Strzok initially puts up an argument, then cucks out like the beta he is. from The_Donald

——————–

Sr. Congressional Oversight Member: EVERYTHING From Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS, & Other Obama Scandals Connected To Corrupt DOJ & FBI

Congressman Paul Gosar didn’t hold back in a recent interview and he’s now begging the American people to pay more attention and demand answers from their political leaders. According to Gosar, the Obama White House micromanaged everything from drone attacks to illegal surveillance on political opponents and was able to do so via very carefully placed DOJ and FBI firewalls that to this day continue to insulate Barack Obama and other Obama-related officials, from justice.

Via Breitbart:

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), a leading conservative member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told Breitbart News Daily on Wednesday that he believes that there is an interconnectivity between various high-profile Barack Obama-era scandals and the latest revelations about corruption at the Department of Justice and FBI.

Gosar was asked during the interview on the SiriusXM 125 Patriot Channel show about the corruption on display in the release of the famed memo from House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) that detailed FISA court abuses by the FBI and DOJ in the lead-up to the 2016 election and in the months that followed now President Donald Trump’s win during the transition and even during his presidency.

That all came before the release of new text messages between senior FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok that detailed how Obama himself was overseeing everything personally on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and rivaling Trump probe. Gosar detailed how this same corruption that is now being further exposed first reared its ugly head in the earliest days of the administration of now former President Barack Obama, with the Operation Fast and Furious scandal then the IRS and Benghazi scandals—all of which had intricate levels of DOJ and FBI involvement.

If you don’t think the [Operation] Fast and Furious—attacking the Second Amendment—along with Operation Choke Point, you know that sacred amendment that holds our government accountable and protection for all the other amendments, if you don’t think Benghazi and the lack of accountability when they knew something was going to come, if you don’t think that the IRS and the attacking of your adversaries financially, and the unmasking are unrelated things, think again,” Gosar said.

“You know, this previous administration—the Obama administration—micromanaged everything out of the White House. And I challenge people, remember the Syrian strikes that were actually handpicked and dictated by the president at that time. This gentleman was involved in everything. That’s where all this leads. When you look at the cover-up with the email scandal with Hillary Clinton, it gets—it should have pointed out exactly what we’ve been talking about, that this was the weaponization of our Justice Department not only to cover up for the previous administration and the wrongdoing and ills of them and those associated with them, but also to attack a sitting president—actually a candidate at the time, then president-elect and then a current, sitting president you know of an opposition party. This is outrageous, and you are exactly right we have got to get to the bottom of this so that people are held accountable because that is what America wants. But it’s going to be a hard, slow slog trying to get this information out. But it’s coming, as witnessed by the memo from Devin Nunes and as witnessed by Grassley and Graham and new revelations and the Inspector General—don’t forget Michael Horowitz sitting out there as well.”

Gosar is a key member of the House Oversight Committee who led the way in pushing to hold now former Attorney General Eric Holder accountable for Fast and Furious. He was one of the first members of Congress to demand Holder’s resignation, and helped lead the effort to hold Holder in both criminal and civil contempt of Congress for his refusal to be transparent about the matter.

——–

OBAMA LIED: Former POTUS Said He Wasn’t Involved In FBI’s Clinton Investigation. Newly-Released FBI Texts Reveal He Was – BIG TIME

Not only was Barack Obama involved in keeping tabs on the then-ongoing Hillary Clinton email investigation – he directly ordered former FBI head James Comey to keep him in the loop.

That’s real-deal obstruction. Interesting how Mr. Comey never mentioned that before.

First up is Mr. Obama in all his “I never do anything wrong” glory talking to lapdog media who always took his word as gospel:

——————

Obama: I ‘guarantee’ Justice Dept. won’t protect Hillary

By JEREMY HERB | 04/10/2016 10:00 AM EDT | Updated 04/10/2016 12:57 PM EDT

President Barack Obama insisted in an interview with Fox News aired Sunday that the FBI and Justice Department will not protect Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton while investigating her private emails and server.

“I can guarantee that,” Obama said repeatedly in an interview with Fox News’ Chris Wallace, who interviewed the president in his first appearance on “Fox News Sunday” during his seven-year tenure.

“I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations,” Obama said. “I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case.”

———————

Ah, and now this breaking new reveals not only was Mr. Obama “involved” but deeply so while using the authority/power of the presidency to do so:

Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016 about preparing talking points for then FBI Director James Comey because, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” Senate investigators told Fox News this text raises questions about President Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.

———————-

Barack Obama tells the media he would never attempt to politically influence an investigation by the FBI and/or Justice Department – ever. Yet here we have proof he was doing just that – demanding investigators tell him everything they are doing.

And let us not forget, this had to do with the 2016 Election. Barack Obama and his cohorts (Jarrett etc.)  were working very hard (and illegally) to control the election outcome. This included collusion, obstruction, illegal surveillance, lying, (murder? See: Seth Rich) and on and on and on.

The Obama Machine will continue to deny these things and the media, for now, remains determined to protect that machine at all cost. For them to succeed the lie must remain the truth. To counter that means readers like you must READ, SHARE, AND EDUCATE others to the truth.

Get to it.

—————————

A VERY MUCH RELATED AND EARLIER D.C. WHISPERS REPORT ON THIS NOW BREAKING NEWS SUBJECT:

MEMO UPDATE: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Dana Boente, Rod Rosenstein…And Barack Obama

—————–

 

MEMO UPDATE: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Dana Boente, Rod Rosenstein…And Barack Obama

The following five names are given a prominent place in the FISA memo outlining shocking government surveillance abuse on private citizens with direct implications of influence upon the 2016 Election. Those names are as follows:

James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Dana Boente, and Rod Rosenstein.

There is a sixth name, though, that the memo also indirectly implicates – Barack Hussein Obama.

Consider the following:

* The Steele dossier (originally paid for by the Clinton campaign and then later funded by the Obama FBI) formed an essential part of the initial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page. (A Trump campaign associate)

* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information. (The dossier was created to then justify what would have been a totally illegal surveillance operation – Comey, McCabe, etc. had to have known this. They also would have wanted the political go-ahead/cover from the Obama White House itself. There is just no way longtime Deep State operatives go rogue against the very administration responsible for their positions of power.)

* The four FISA surveillance applications were signed by, in various combinations, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Dana Boente, and Rod Rosenstein. They are ALL implicated in the crime and they ALL have very strong/direct links to the Obama White House. Yates was crucial in forming what became the false Mueller investigation – a tens of millions of dollars counter-narrative operation intended to cover the very tracks the Nunes memo has now revealed.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications. That last part is critical. It shows willful criminal intent on the part of the very highest members of the then-U.S. intelligence apparatus – all Obama-era holdovers.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele’s bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president. Steele was instrumental at the beginning of this scandal but becomes a bit player as far more powerful figures pick up the ball he created and then run with it. He might very well be used as a sacrificial lamb in the investigations over this matter that are now guaranteed to follow. Give up Steele to save the others – namely former President Barack Obama. In order for that to succeed there will need to be Establishment Republicans willing to go along with that – namely House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Hovering over this as well is the Clinton campaign. Hillary Clinton is said to already taken measures to insulate herself via several layers (staffers). She will claim total ignorance of Fusion GPS’s actions (and remember, Fusion GPS is also tied directly to Mr. Obama and the DNC) staff involvement in the false dossier, and/or what Obama administration officials then did with said dossier.

That is where things get much stickier for Mr. Obama. All it will take is one high-ranking official to turn on him and the rickety pile of deception could come tumbling down. Make no mistake – threats have been made to maintain silence. Threats that involve business, family, whatever is necessary to protect the Obama Machine.

The Nunes memo has delivered a hard smack to the Deep State and is a serious threat to the previous administration.

An attempt at some big pushback is coming.

————–

H/T WASHINGTON EXAMINER

————-

 

Donald Trump Just Fired Both Barrels At The Deep State

Oh my. Morning arrived and POTUS Trump wasn’t holding back. In two tweets he pretty much lays out the level of 2016 Election tampering/corruption that took place via the previous Obama administration and Clinton campaign. 

And this is just the beginning. The Establishment will no doubt push back in its attempt to protect all things Obama. For now, though, the day belongs to President Trump:

 

D.C. & Media Elite Scramble To Push Back Against Memo Impact – OPERATION NOTHING-BURGER

The memo is being read, digested, and has become a thing so reviled among the elites nearly the entirety of D.C. is working double-time to lessen its impact so that the Establishment Machine can survive and move on.

CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, WAPO, etc., are all huddled in rooms developing a counter-narrative while seeking direct guidance from former Obama administration officials on what to say.

“Make this a nothing-burger.” 

That is the directive coming out of 2446 Belmont Rd. – the Obama/Jarrett D.C. mansion located just a mile from the White House. The need for those involved has been made very-very clear: protect the Obama Machine which has its prints all over the illegal (and potentially treasonous) FISA memo scandal that involves crimes that far exceed anything from the Watergate era.

That narrative is set to begin in 3…2…1…

——————

BREAKING: FBI Confirms Memo Is 100% Factual

“NO FACTUAL INACCURACIES.” 

That is the word from a just-concluded FBI review of the Nunes memo citing rampant government abuses against private citizens before, during, and after the 2016 Election – abuses that intended to influence that election in favor of Hillary Clinton and then later hamper the incoming Trump administration.

In the word of millions of Trump supporters – LOCK. THEM. UP.

Via FOX NEWS:

Two senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”
The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.

(It should be noted that after Director Wray reviewed the memo on Sunday, he had Deputy Director McCabe packing his bags on Monday. That must be some memo!)

————————

The Dark Empire Strikes Back: A Second Trump Dossier & Fed-Inspired Drop In The Dow On Eve Of State of the Union

A DESDEMONA GUEST COLUMN:

“PROTECT THE KING!”

So went the clumsy globalist cry to save the man-child former President of the Divided States of America. Yet despite these repeated threats the memo still looms.

A second Trump dossier, produced by the media, was then hastily pushed out to steal headlines and give spineless politicians pause. Sometimes a dog needs its leash jerked to remind the little beast of its true master.

President Trump has the memo even as the one called McMaster seeks to convince him to redact it to the point of obsolescence.

Meanwhile, the note on the Fed’s free money platform upon which the previous administration’s false economy was maintained is being called in – right on time. The markets now lurch. It is all smoke inside of mirrors. Reflections of things not really there. Lies layered upon lies necessary for the great unknowing to continue.

It is all intended leverage against the Trump to create fear and uncertainty and continued distraction.

Ah, but what of the man called Ray? He reviewed that memo. And then what? The McCabe was gone within hours – removed and told not to attempt to step foot back into FBI headquarters. The number 302 plays very heavily in all this. Shame on you Mr. McCabe.  Your shame is all their shame, though: The Obama, The Clinton, The Mueller, The Comey – and so many others.

Will the globalists scorch the earth or continue to try and harvest the fruits of their deceptions?

Today the media talks of “a second dossier” and “a falling stock market” and a “President in peril.”

Lies-lies-lies.

The Beast snaps its jaws not out of confident aggression – but growing panic that The Trump is now preparing to pull them apart.

And behind those snapping jaws we find this, that, and the other…

———————-

BUSTED: Anti-Trump FBI Official Was Source Of Repeated Confidential Leaks To WSJ & WaPo

It appears FBI agent Lisa Page was one of the confidential anti-Trump sources being used by anti-Trump “reporters” like Devlin Barrett. Ms. Page was also involved in the shame of an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private server, as well as the initial stages of the fabricated FBI investigation into fake Trump/Russia collusion claims.

Via CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE:

Controversial FBI Officials Linked To Wall Street Journal and Washington Post Leaks…

There has been a great deal of speculation about FBI Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Attorney Lisa Page leaking to media in their efforts to shape stories conducive to their pro-Clinton/anti-Trump efforts. Prior reporting showed the strong possibility Page and Strzok were leaking to the Wall Street Journal.

It now appears the “Devlin” in question is former Wall Street Journal National Security reporter Devlin Barrett, currently with The Washington Post.
Here’s why? On October 28th, 2016 (as above), at the exact time the re-opening of the Clinton investigation hit the media news-cycle, Page and Strzok were texting. From the released messaging we see at 5:19pm Lisa Page is on the phone with “Devlin”:

♦Page: 5:19pm “Still on the phone with Devlin. Mike’s phone is ON FIRE.”
♥Strzok: 5:29pm “You might wanna tell Devlin he should turn on CNN, there’s news on.”
♦Page: 5:30pm “He knows. He just got handed a note.”
♥Strzok: 5:33pm “Ha. He asking about it now?”
♦Page: 5:34pm “Yeah. It was pretty funny. Coming now.”

…Knowing that DOJ/FBI Attorney Lisa Page and FBI Agent Peter Strzok were key sources for Barrett’s stories at the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, you can go through all of his old articles at both publications and clearly identify stories were Strzok and Page were leaking to him.
Lastly, knowing Strzok and Page were key DOJ/FBI investigators on: #1) the Hillary Clinton investigation; #2) the Trump/Russia Counterintelligence Investigation; and, #3) the Robert Mueller investigation; and knowing they were leaking to the media to shape the outcomes of their own investigative narrative in each example; it makes you wonder who else within the DOJ and FBI team was also leaking to the media.
Then again, FBI Director James Comey was doing the same thing.
It seems to be a strange way to run a department that depends on integrity.

——————-

 

Comey, Rosenstein, & McCabe Specifically Named In #ReleaseTheMemo Leak…

They are three of the biggest names in the FBI/Justice Department during the Obama era and they are all said to be included in the FISA memo that is said to outline “shattering” revelations of just how far government intelligence abuses were before, during, and after the 2016 Election, where high-ranking government officials attempted to place Hillary Clinton into the White House against the wishes of the American people. 

Via the Daily Beast:

A controversial Republican memo alleging surveillance abuse specifically names FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein along with former FBI Director James Comey.

…A groundswell is building to release the memo—written by Devin Nunes, the California Republican and key Trump ally who chairs the House intelligence committee—which former FBI agents fear will damage public trust in the bureau. While Democrats say the memo deliberately misrepresents the procedures for obtaining a foreign-intelligence surveillance warrant, The Daily Beast has learned that Hill Republicans are gearing up to use an obscure parliamentary rule to release it.

…The memo is enormously controversial. Hill Democrats and former FBI officials say it’s a ploy to damage public confidence in the FBI and undermine Mueller’s investigation. Republicans, meanwhile, say the memo contains massively disturbing evidence of FBI wrongdoing.

…FBI officials asked to see Nunes’ memo, but a spokesperson told The Daily Beast on Sunday that their request was denied.
At this point, congressional sources on both sides of the aisle say they think the memo’s release is inevitable. Nunes holds the reins. Speaker Paul Ryan and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy are deferring to Nunes as to how to handle the memo, according to leadership aides.

————————–

BREAKING: FBI Text Said To “Directly” Link Obama To Illegal 2016 Election Tampering

By now it is no secret to those paying attention that when POTUS Barack Obama weaponized federal intelligence resources to try and sway the 2016 Election in favor of the Democrat candidate of his choosing – Hillary Clinton. It is the same kind of illegal use of federal entities to go after political enemies the Obama administration utilized previously with the IRS, the EPA, etc. 

This time, though, Mr. Obama might actually have been caught with the evidence to prove it. Might explain why five months of FBI text messages suddenly and inexplicably went “missing”:

——————-

BREAKING: FBI Covering Up Its #ReleaseTheMemo Tracks While Nation Distracted By #SchumerShutdown

FBI says “oops” that it lost months of email evidence pertaining to Mueller links to false Trump-Russia dossier and likely connection to #ReleaseTheMemo scandal:

(The same type of cover-up utilized during the Obama-era IRS scandal, and the Hillary Clinton private server scandal – more commonly known as destruction of evidence.)

————————-