Like a presidential superhero, Donald Trump let Israel know he’s got their back in a series of morning tweets that decimate the still-ongoing anti-Israel bent of communications coming out of the Obama administration of late, including one already infamous example that hadJohn Kerry declaring Israel must stop acting so Jewish!
We cannot continue to let Israel be treated with such total disdain and disrespect. They used to have a great friend in the U.S., but…….
And in typical Trump fashion, given the millions of social media followers the soon-to-be POTUS enjoys, his tweets have already been seen by far more people than will ever watch the collective hand-wringing, pro-Obama reports of the Mainstream Media on the subject of Israel, even as reports of an increasingly petulant Obama White House unhappy about Mr. Trump already assuming far more influence on U.S. policy than the outgoing president, continue to circulate.
It has been years of repeated slights, snide remarks, whispered innuendo, and ongoing nods and winks at the expense of the only democratic nation in the Middle East, a place where women, minorities, and the LGBT community are allowed to live in freedom.
And yet, here is the Obama administration attacking Israel and its people for their Jewish faith.
At the State Department, here is the publicly voiced opinion of current Obama Secretary of State, John Kerry:
“…But here is a fundamental reality. If the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic. It cannot be both. And it won’t ever really be at peace.”
The above is among the most inflammatory, arrogant, and ignorant statements to EVER come out of the mouth of a high-ranking State Department official and in fact lays the groundwork in justifying the very Muslim terrorism that has threatened the safety of Israel for generations.
When has John Kerry, or Barack Obama, or anyone else among the godless turds that make up the current Obama administration condemned a Muslim nation for being too Muslim – of clinging to its Muslim faith? The very same Muslim nations who surround Israel and call for it to be wiped from the face of the earth?
And don’t ignore the implications Mr. Kerry’s statement has upon how the administration views religion here in the United States. Is it any wonder so many of faith feel as if they’ve been under attack for the last eight years when those in charge of the government cannot fathom how a Christian nation can also be a democratic one?
There are 22 days until the Obama White House is no more.
Since entering the White House, Barack Obama has made clear his disdain for Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and any Jew who opposes Mr. Obama’s pro-Islamic world policies, such as the insane Iran nuclear deal of last year that is a direct and imminent threat to the safety and security of the Israeli people.
This past week, that disdain was once again on full display as Mr. Obama sided with the terrorist-run state of Palestine at the United Nations against both Jewish and Christian interests in the disputed lands of the West Bank.
“President Obama and Secretary Kerry are behind this shameful move against Israel at the U.N.,” the official said. “The U.S administration secretly cooked up with the Palestinians an extreme anti-Israeli resolution behind Israel’s back which would be a tail wind for terror and boycotts and effectively make the Western Wall occupied Palestinian territory,” he said calling it “an abandonment of Israel which breaks decades of US policy of protecting Israel at the UN.”
The resolution would allow an Islamic-terrorist state to officially condemn at the United Nations, the state of Israel. For years similar such attempts were blocked by the United States – until now.
Never before in the history of America has a U.S. President been so willing to support terrorist organizations that have long called for and celebrated the elimination of both Israel and the Western World.
And then came the Obama presidency, which has ushered in eight years of apologizing for American democracy, military power, and economic freedoms while simultaneously advocating for Islamic societies that subjugate women, minorities, and homosexuals as second-class or even sub-human, worthy of nothing more than condemnation, imprisonment, and even death.
The Israeli government is said to have already reached out to the incoming Trump administration for assistance on the recent U.N. resolution matter, and Mr. Trump himself has personally indicated that once he assumes office, the relationship between the United States and the United Nations will be vastly different, indicating the U.N. needs America far more than America needs the U.N.
It is a gesture being celebrated by the Jewish people everywhere, as they feel Israel will once again have an ally occupying the White House.
Of course, the above stories are primarily from foreign news agencies and/or alternative news sites because the Mainstream Media worked double-time to ignore and the bury the facts involving the Obama White House coordinating an anti-Netanyahu effort just prior to the most recent Israeli national election.
Netanyahu won and Obama lost.
But now, we see Democrat operatives repeating 24/7 their believe that Russian hackers were responsible for releasing to the public evidence of just how manipulative the DNC was in ensuring Hillary Clinton won the nomination, including many comments from party officials with racial and religious connotations.
These operatives and their Mainstream Media cohort are now declaring how wrong it is for Russia to be meddling in the U.S. election process. (even before any substantiated proof of that meddling has been shown)
It is yet another mountainous portion of hypocrisy that has long been the hallmark of the Democrat party.
When Barack Obama meddles in the elections of other countries it’s just fine, nothing to see here, move on.
When the manipulative and dishonest tactics of the Democrat Party are proven IN THEIR OWN WORDS, it is the possible messenger of those facts who is attacked. Of course, Hillary Clinton has repeatedly made clear that rules and standards are for others, and should never be applied to her.
Last night, Barack Obama gave what was in the seven years of his presidency only the third primetime address to the nation.
And he didn’t want to do it.
Immediately after the San Bernardino terror attack, the President of the United States was said to be initially interested in the events to the point of outright excitement for the opportunity to once again make a call for enhanced federal gun control measures – which he did.
Within hours of the attack it became clear to federal officials that Islamic terror played an integral role.
Once that was known, Mr. Obama’s enthusiasm is said to have “waned considerably.” And then when the L.A. FBI office went public with calling San Bernardino a terrorist attack, both Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett went into “warpath mode.”
Jarrett’s displeasure was apparently first to make itself known. She was outraged the FBI had done so without first getting prior approval from her. Jarrett was said to be particularly concerned with the proximity of the FBI’s terror designation and the president’s quick words on calling for more gun control measures soon after the actual San Bernardino terror attack.
“They’re making us look like fools!”
The focus of the White House’s ire soon became FBI Director, James Comey.
At one point, the president is said to have flung several papers onto the floor of the Oval Office as he sat behind his desk stewing over Director’s Comey’s now-infamous terrorist attack remarks.
“This was supposed to be a gun issue for us, not some anti-Islamic bullsh*t!”
Jarrett then dispatched an order for Director Comey to meet in person with the President. It was at that meeting the already existing fracture between Comey and the White House on such issues as the Black Lives Matter/anti-law enforcement movement, which Director Comey already spoke out against, was said to have worsened considerably following the San Bernardino attacks. Comey is alleged to have refused to fully capitulate with the White House’s demands he lessen the “terrorist attack” rhetoric.
When Director Comey went ahead with a planned press conference on the issue, Jarrett sent Attorney General Loretta Lynch there to oversee the Director’s statements on the San Bernardino attack. Included in that press conference was a moment the Mainstream Media then attempted to hide as Jarrett operatives terminated the Director’s public comments when he moved away from his Jarrett-approved script via an attempt to open the press conference to questions from the media.
A video of that unsettling moment is still available below. You can witness it at approximately the six-minute mark:
Ultimately it was Valerie Jarrett who apparently informed the President he would be giving a primetime address on Sunday evening. This decision was based almost exclusively on fears the White House was quickly losing control of the narrative, and was in fact suggested by a handful of trusted Mainstream Media figures devoted to the Obama White House’s well-being.
A small battle was waged by several White House advisers and consultants regarding both the tone and content of the President’s Sunday evening commentary. In the end, as usual, Jarrett’s opinion is said to have won out. There would be brief mention of terrorism, ISIL, and the President’s ongoing efforts to keep Americans safe. Then the speech would focus almost entirely on the need for gun control and a caution to Americans not to engage in anti-Muslim rhetoric or action. (a warning that had been outlined earlier by Attorney General Lynch who called anti-Muslim sentiment her “greatest fear”)
Mr. Obama was willing to swallow the bitter pill of admitting a terrorist attack had taken place inside of the United States, but only after Valerie Jarret had the call for gun control and pro-Islamic rhetoric be made the more dominant part of the relatively brief primetime address.
During the intense back and forth among speech writers and Jarrett, was a moment where Barack Obama is said to have pointed defiantly at Jarrett and declared, “This is just as much an Israel problem as it is a gun problem! Nobody wants to say it, but it’s true!”
At least one who was there to witness that outburst must have been troubled enough by it to then leak it to others on staff who were outside the Oval Office at the time it is alleged to have been spoken. Why the President would include a reference to Israel in regards to San Bernardino is unknown.
What is known by almost everyone involved with last night’s primetime address to the nation by President Barack Obama is he went to that podium kicking and screaming nearly the entire way.
It was not a speech he cared to give and he very much resented having events require he do so.
UPDATE: Some of the mystery regarding the President’s anti-Israel comment in relation to the San Bernardino terror attack might have been revealed just this morning. Multiple reports now indicate that one of the two terrorists, Syed Farook, was “negatively obsessed with Israel.” This information was given by Farook’s own father who lives in Italy.
It seems quite likely Barack Obama was already aware of this fact in the hours prior to his Sunday night address to the nation. More troubling is that an American president appears to share an equally negative obsession with Israel as did a recent and undeniable, Islamic terrorist.
Spector confirmed 12/7. Follow up tonight.
“ARE YOU PREPARED TO PROTECT FAMILY & FRIEND FROM A WORLD GONE MAD?”
GET THE FIRST TWO EPISODES OF THE EPIC RACE WARS SERIES FOR FREEHERE
Whispers suggest Hillary Clinton hung out the current president and her former boss in what was an almost desperate plea to secure potential millions in donations from the still-powerful Jewish political donor class by trying to convince them she will be “better for Israel” than Mr. Obama regarding U.S.-Israeli relations.
Will it work?
Rich and influential Jewish donors are apparently split regarding such things as the possibly-imminent Iranian nuclear deal. Some support its culmination while others feel it is a direct threat to Israeli security.
Clinton is said to be telling both sides what they want to hear.
“There are some influential Jewish political leaders both here in America and in Israel who have compared notes after coming away from discussions with Mrs. Clinton and the message among them is that she’s willing to say just about anything to get their support. That’s nothing new to politics of course, but given the current stakes, it’s been off-putting to at least some of them.”
She is apparently doing the very same thing regarding widespread perceptions of an Obama administration that has consistently been less than friendly to Israel. Mrs. Clinton wants both to distance herself from the administration to those who are unhappy with Barack Obama’s Israeli record, while also appearing to defend the president to those who remain supportive of the Mr. Obama.
“All politicians like to have it both ways but Hillary Clinton is taking that to a whole new level. She has a lot more than just two sides of the same mouth and more and more longtime Democratic supporters are starting to ask themselves if she can be trusted for the long haul which is leading to the kind of support for a campaign that’s pretty half-hearted. This won’t be anything like what we saw for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, that’s for sure.”
This week the Clinton campaign announced it has raised a record-breaking $45 million in the three months since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy. The vast majority of that money is said to have come from wealthy Jewish donors.