APPALLING: Obama Administration Directly Attacks Israel’s Jewish Faith

It has been years of repeated slights, snide remarks, whispered innuendo, and ongoing nods and winks at the expense of the only democratic nation in the Middle East, a place where women, minorities, and the LGBT community are allowed to live in freedom.

And yet, here is the Obama administration attacking Israel and its people for their Jewish faith.

At the State Department, here is the publicly voiced opinion of current Obama Secretary of State, John Kerry:

“…But here is a fundamental reality. If the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic. It cannot be both. And it won’t ever really be at peace.”

The above is among the most inflammatory, arrogant, and ignorant statements to EVER come out of the mouth of a high-ranking State Department official and in fact lays the groundwork in justifying the very Muslim terrorism that has threatened the safety of Israel for generations.

When has John Kerry, or Barack Obama, or anyone else among the godless turds that make up the current Obama administration condemned a Muslim nation for being too Muslim – of clinging to its Muslim faith? The very same Muslim nations who surround Israel and call for it to be wiped from the face of the earth?

NEVER.

NOT ONCE.

And don’t ignore the implications Mr. Kerry’s statement has upon how the administration views religion here in the United States. Is it any wonder so many of faith feel as if they’ve been under attack for the last eight years when those in charge of the government cannot fathom how a Christian nation can also be a democratic one?

There are 22 days until the Obama White House is no more.

It can’t come soon enough.

—————–

Related article: ‘ISRAEL CAN EITHER BE JEWISH OR DEMOCRATIC’

——————

Obama Globalists Move To Ignore Brexit Vote

It is no secret the Obama White House was both stunned and outraged at British voters’ decision to withdraw from one of the most critical components of globalist governance – the European Union.

Now rumors are rampant that the Obama government has joined forces with its British and German counterparts to effectively ignore the will of the British people and keep the E.U. intact.

ABOVE: Barack Obama stands with Germany’s Angela Merkel and current British Prime Minister David Cameron. To the left is former French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, a conservative who was at best a tepid supporter of his country’s involvement in the European Union. In late 2013,Sarkozy suddenly found himself facing corruption charges (which remain unproven) and he narrowly lost his re-election bid to pro-E.U. socialist candidate, François Hollande.

—————-

Earlier this week, Obama Secretary of State John Kerry informed a panel that the situation was “complicated” while behind-the-scenes whispers suggested Mr. Kerry was in fact working feverishly with British government officials to quickly form a second referendum vote that would effectively nullify last week’s vote. This move is said to have considerable support among other E.U. nations such as Germany and France, among others, and is being strongly suggested/demanded to take place by Barack Obama himself.

It should be noted that British Prime Minister David Cameron has yet to invoke Article 50 – the act which would formally initiate Great Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union. Cameron initially promised this would take place soon after the vote.

It hasn’t, and some are now saying it might never be invoked.

While Cameron is apparently being told by such figures as Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Angela Merkel to simply ignore the will of the people, the now-departing Prime Minister is publicly stating the British people have spoken and their will should be fully represented.

If that is the case, though, why hasn’t Mr. Cameron already invoked Article 50?

Germany’s Merkel has made similar public comments indicating the Brexit vote will stand, while privately working to minimize that vote’s authority as much as possible. Rumors indicate Germany will take an increasingly active role in trying to influence upcoming British elections, hoping it can possibly help to see that a more E.U.-friendly representative is made Prime Minster.

Perhaps it will be up to the British people to once again thwart those plans as well.

DEVELOPING…

————–