Justice Clarence Thomas Provides Viral White House Pic Of The Day

He went through what he termed a “high tech lynching” back when a group of Democrats attempted to smear his reputation with unsubstantiated claims of sexual harassment. The Democrats’ tactics divided a nation then just as the very same tactics did so more recently. Noone knows more than Clarence Thomas the depths to which the far left will go to try and win. Now joining Judge Thomas on the bench is another who knows this as well – Justice Brett Kavanagh. The below is a photo taken today at the White House for the ceremonial swearing-in of Justice Kavanaugh. The photo is now going viral not only for how happy Justice Thomas looks but for how frail and lost Justice Ginsburg appears. It’s almost as if each is representing the two political parties in America today—one remains strong and virile while the other is just barely hanging on. (As an aside, we do hope Justice Ginsburg actually feels better than she looks here and isn’t in too much discomfort.)

The 2018 Midterms are sure going to be interesting.


 

Democrats Have Angered Mothers, Wives, Sisters, And Friends Of Men All Across America

Far left Democrats and their hyper-partisan media cohorts were counting on women being willing to pressure Republicans into dropping the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh.

They weren’t. Now, women all across the country are angry at the indirect 24/7 attacks on men in America, men who represent their sons, their husbands, brothers, uncles, and friends.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

Image result for angry women

Via USA TODAY:

Democrats’ partisan treatment of Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Brett Kavanaugh shows women just who is really on their side.

…Ford’s claims of sexual assault were not believed because they were not believable.

Beyond Ford, Democrats further harmed the cause of justice for sexual abuse victims by propping up Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick’s charges of sexual misconduct as “serious allegations.” Ramirez, who claimed Kavanaugh exposed himself to her while they were both freshman at Yale, came forward with her allegation only after spending a week chatting with attorneys and thinking over her decades-old memory of a drunken night. And every person with direct knowledge of the supposed assault denied Kavanaugh’s involvement. Swetnick’s ridiculous gang-rape charge advanced by lawyer Michael Avenatti, of Stormy Daniels’ fame, further proved the political motivation behind these unbelievable 11th-hour claims.

Every fake rape claim, from Tawana Brawley’s tale in the late 1980s that four white men kidnapped and raped her, to the fiction Rolling Stone magazine perpetuated when it told “Jackie’s” tale of being raped by University of Virginia fraternity members, increases the public’s skepticism of sexual assault allegations. And skepticism quickly hardens to cynicism when the story screams it is a partisan hit job.

The cynicism, however, will not be limited to high-profile cases with clear political motivations. That is why the Democrats’ failed attempt to keep Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court will also backfire electorally when women flock to the polls next month for midterm elections.

Women see allegations as a risk for families

The extreme left of the Democratic Party may celebrate leaders’ no-holds-bar attempt to derail Kavanaugh’s confirmation, but swing suburban moms are appalled by the Democrats’ ill-use of Ford, Ramirez, and Swetnick.

In Ford, women saw a distraught and damaged woman paraded before the Senate, her privacy in tatters because her sexual assault allegations were leaked to the news media at the most politically opportune moment. And as Ford’s story fell apart following her testimony, women saw the obvious harm the Democrats’ tactic will inflict on real victims of sexual assault.

Moderate women voters also find Democratic senators’ utter disregard for the men affected by false claims of sexual assault terrifying. Women watched as Kavanaugh spoke forcefully to defend his name and honor, and in Kavanaugh, women saw their innocent fathers, husbands, brothers, or sons, falsely accused, condemned and left with a reputation irreparably damaged. And in Kavanaugh’s loving wife, young daughters and distraught mother, women saw themselves and their families.

Women also saw the future of a society that puts politics over the principles of fairness and the presumption of innocence. And they saw Democrats leading that charge.

Democratic politicians, professional protesters and reproductive-rights activists are so blinded by their rage at how President Donald Trump succeeded in appointing a second originalist justice to the Supreme Court, they cannot see the anger they unleashed in the apolitical populace across America. They will see it, though, come November.


 

OH MY: Senate Moves Toward Full Investigation Of Ford Legal Team And Senator Diane Feinstein

As hinted at days earlier here at D.C. Whispers, the Senate Judiciary Committee is now preparing to launch a full investigation into the machinations of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team and the office of Senator Diane Feinstein based upon “…recently uncovered information.” 

It appears that FBI supplemental investigation into Judge (Justice) Brett Kavanaugh that Senator Feinstein demanded has backfired on her – BIG TIME.

Image result for Grassley and Feinstein

Via The Washington Examiner:

Grassley to investigate Feinstein, Hirono press leaks on Kavanaugh

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote a letter to Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers Thursday asking for records and descriptions of communications with the offices of Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Mazie Hirono “in light of recently uncovered information.”

The new request, revealed in a late-Thursday press release sent hours after senators got a chance to read the FBI’s report on its investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations levied against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, was coupled with Grassley’s third attempt to ask Ford’s attorneys Debra Katz, Michael Bromwich, and Lisa Banks to share evidence cited as part of their client’s claim she was sexually assaulted by the judge when they were teenagers.

…”In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter,” Grassley continued in his letter, “in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.”

He did not elaborate further on what “recently uncovered information” might be – the FBI’s file has not been released to the public.

——————

Once again, here is a video of Senator Feinstein taken immediately after she had reviewed that supplemental FBI report in which the senator appears absolutely shell-shocked/guilty:


 

WITNESS TAMPERING: Former FBI Agent & Friend Of Christine Ford Accused Of Pressuring Witness To Change Testimony

Christine Blasey Ford testified before a Senate committee last week that her long ago friend was at the same party where a then 17-year old Brett Kavanaugh was alleged to have tried to make out with her in an upstairs bedroom. Ford stated she was forever traumatized by that event, though, she can’t recall when or where it happened. This friend’s name is Leland Ingham Keyser. Keyser disputed Ford’s claim, saying she had no memory of any such party. Keyser then later told FBI agents that she felt pressured to revise that version in order to support Ford. This pressure is said to have come from Ford’s current friend and former FBI agent, Monica McLean. There are also rumors swirling that McLean was acting on the direction of certain Senate Democrats – possibly Diane Feinstein. Perhaps this is why Senator Feinstein appeared so shaken yesterday morning during a very brief press conference. Has her hand been caught in the witness tampering cookie jar?

Image result for witness tampering

Via Fox News:

…Keyser told the investigators that she was — as the Journal notes — urged to clarify her statement by Monica McLean, a former FBI agent and friend of Ford’s, the paper reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

McLean’s lawyer denied his client tried to influence Keyser to change her account, calling it “absolutely false.”

And here is a video of Senator Diane Feinstein shortly after she reviewed the FBI’s supplemental Kavanaugh report which likely contained the above information:

(turn up volume)


 

Liberal Logic: Beer + Conservative = BAD. Cocaine + Liberal = President.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh stated he liked beer as a student and he still likes beer as an adult. Leftwing media and politicians immediately pushed claims of drunken partying, blackouts, etc. in an attempt to paint Kavanaugh as unsuitable for the Supreme Court.

Where was the same outrage/concern when Barack Obama admitted he was a big fan of cocaine in college? Ah, there was none. 

Perhaps nobody has laid out this stunning hypocrisy better than Donald Trump Jr.: 


 

Democrats Didn’t Even Bother To Read FBI’s Supplemental Kavanaugh Report

Diane Feinstein, who was among those who demanded a supplemental FBI report on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, didn’t even bother to read it once it became available. She admitted as much during a very brief and grim-faced press conference earlier today. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also indicated he had not read it but rather had been “briefed” on the supplemental report’s contents. The reason for their disinterest? They already knew the report would bolster Judge Kavanaugh’s claims he did nothing wrong while proving there is little to nothing out there to substantiate the claims made against him. It was all politics—the life of an innocent man and his family be damned.

Image result for Feinstein Schumer Kavanaugh

The Establishment Media is already rolling out repeated calls for a “more thorough” investigation, claiming the FBI was too limited in the scope of its follow-up questioning even as Mitch McConnell is now pushing for a full confirmation vote for the Supreme Court nominee as soon as this weekend.

Paid protests are set to be unleashed on communities all across the country—protests the FBI’s own information suggests is based on a pile of lies laid out by hyper-partisan Democrats fully engaged in the politics of personal destruction.

The DNC is pushing hard to fundraise off of the manufactured controversy, likely confident Democrat voters prone to bouts of over-emotionalism will only be too happy to fork over money to a deceptive and losing cause.

For Judge Kavanaugh now comes the waiting. Will enough Republicans and perhaps a few Democrats do right by their votes or will too many cower in the face of what will likely be intense paid opposition?

Kavanaugh and America will know very soon.


 

You Don’t Think The Clintons Played A Part In The Kavanaugh Attacks? Check Out This Memo From 1998…

Bill and Hillary Clinton despise Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Anyone who doubts that need only read the following memo by Brett Kavanaugh regarding Bill Clinton’s actions against a young woman who was at the time nearly the same age as Clinton’s own daughter, as well as the attempted coverup, misuse of federal agencies, etc.

The Clintons don’t forget. Ever. And how just like the Clintons to help orchestrate a character smear against Judge Kavanaugh for things that never happened because Mr. Kavanaugh was in 1998 adamant that then-President Clinton answer for things that actually did take place.

(scroll down to read memo)

SOURCE


 

Did The Deep State Work Hand In Hand With Christine Blasey Ford? It Sure Looks That Way…

Lots of evidence of Deep State shenanigans now coming out in the wake of the Judge Kavanaugh hearings that shed some serious light on those behind the entire sordid smear campaign that was nothing more than an attempt to halt President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee and subsequently destroy the life of a good man. It now appears that Christine Ford repeatedly perjured herself while giving false testimony to the Senate – and did so at the direction of operatives with direct ties to Deep State government agencies.

Appalling.  


 

BREAKING: Christine Blasey Ford’s Testimoney Falling Apart Under Increased Scrutiny

Either she’s crazy or she willfully lied to Congress under oath. It has to be one or the other. That appears to be the conclusion of a just-published report by RealClearInvestigations that blows a major hole in Mrs. Ford’s credibility.

Image result for Crazy Dr. Ford

Renovation Records Undercut Ford’s Exit-Door Account

Real estate and other records undercut a key part of Christine Blasey Ford’s account of why she finally came forward with charges of attempted rape against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh after some 30 years.

Ford testified last week that she had never revealed the details of the alleged attack until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. She said the memories percolated up as they revisited a disagreement they’d had over her insistence on installing a “second front door” when they had remodeled their Palo Alto, Calif., home.

The need to explain a decision her husband “didn’t understand,” Ford testified, pushed her to say she wanted the door to alleviate symptoms of “claustrophobia” and “panic attacks” she still suffered from an attempted rape allegedly perpetrated by Kavanaugh in high school during the early 1980s.

“Is that the reason for the second door — front door — is claustrophobia?” asked Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. “Correct,” Ford replied.

Ford never specified when the renovation took place, leaving a possible impression that it and the therapy session happened around the same time.

But documents reveal the door was installed years before as part of an addition, and has been used by renters and even a marriage counseling business.

“The door was not an escape route but an entrance route,” said an attorney familiar with the ongoing congressional investigation. “It appears the real plan for the second front door was to rent out a separate room.”

The discrepancy raises fresh doubts about Ford’s candor and credibility amid other inconsistencies, congressional and other knowledgeable sources say, including her purported “fear of flying.” Ford initially refused to submit to an interview with the committee because of an alleged airplane phobia, but investigators established that she had taken a number of flights back East this summer, and had previously flown to Hawaii, Costa Rica, French Polynesia and other South Pacific islands.

Palo Alto city records show that a building permit for an additional room and exterior door was issued to Ford and her husband on Feb. 4, 2008 — more than four years before the May 2012 therapy session where, she says, she first identified Kavanaugh as her attacker.

All the remodeling, including a new bathroom, was completed by February 2010. The only additional permits issued to Ford at her Palo Alto address are for “solar panels” on the roof, a “solar hot water system” in the garage, and an “electric vehicle charge station” for the driveway — all of which were issued after 2012.

Other documents, including health care-provider registration records, reveal that a marriage counselor listed Ford’s home address as her place of employment, ostensibly using the extra room and door for her clinical practice. That marriage therapist, Sylvia Adkins Randall, sold the home to the Fords in 2007, but continued to maintain the address for her business.

Contacted by phone, Dr. Randall expressed concern about her real estate transaction and prior relationship with Ford being reported.

“I don’t want it to be mentioned,” she said. “It’s personal.”

Randall is a licensed therapist who specializes in treating “disturbing memories from the past.” She supports Ford and described her allegation against Kavanaugh as “credible.”

Since the second front door was installed, moreover, students from local colleges have lived in the additional room with the private door. In fact, under congressional questioning Thursday, Ford testified she has “hosted” various other residents there, including “Google interns.”

The attorney said the tenants call into question Ford’s claims about why she installed the additional exterior door in her home.

“Renters and a business operating out of Dr. Ford’s home would explain the added door,” he said. “Clearly, there were business purposes [for it], not just ones related to her anxieties.”

Also casting doubt on Ford’s story is the fact she installed no such escape door at a second home, which property records show she and her husband own in Santa Cruz, Calif., less than five blocks from the beach.

Yet she recently told a close friend, according to media reports, that she has resisted purchasing a home without a second exit from the master bedroom. Without it, she said she would never feel safe.

“Obviously, something happened that traumatized her so much that she’s afraid of being trapped,” her friend Jim Gensheimer, a photojournalist who worked for the San Jose Mercury News, told the Los Angeles Times on Sept. 19.

Property records show Ford and her husband, Russell Ford, bought the beach house in 2007. This July – the same month Ford sent a letter to Feinstein accusing Kavanaugh of attacking her — Ford applied for permits to build a front porch and new decks at the home, located on Seaside Street in Santa Cruz. There is no application for a second front door, however, and the recent permits are the only ones applied for since 2007.

No evidence has emerged of any other exterior door construction at either of Ford’s homes, authorized or not.

“If she rents out the room to Google employees, how does she get access to the second door to escape a perceived attacker?” noted the attorney, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “Renting out the room is completely contrary to her stated reason of why she wanted the second front door.”

Randall said she is not the therapist who counseled Ford in 2012. She said “it’s just a weird coincidence” that the two are connected through the property and share the same profession. Ford is a research psychologist.

Two other marriage counselors who worked for Randall’s now-defunct Palo Alto clinic — Couples Resource Center — also shared an address with Ford’s home.

A Senate Judiciary Committee spokeswoman said that Ford’s lawyers have provided neither the therapist’s notes nor the therapist’s name to committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), even though they have furnished that information to Democrats on the committee.

“Democrats won’t share it,” she said, just as they withheld the July 30 letter Ford sent to Feinstein for almost two months.

The aide said that Grassley’s office is following “a ton of leads” to learn the identity of the therapist, and offered that Ford’s story about her therapy session and the so-called escape door is a critical part of the investigation into her allegations.

“The investigative side of the committee thinks it’s a good lead,” she said, “and they are pursuing it.”

Ford’s attorneys did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Ford, a registered Democrat who has marched against Trump policies, claims she’s not “political” and that Kavanaugh first “came up in counseling” in May 2012 strictly because of the door.

But something else was going on at the time, and it apparently caught Ford’s attention.

Just weeks earlier, the national media reported that GOP presidential frontrunner Mitt Romney was planning to tap Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court if he won the White House.

In a March 26, 2012, article in the The New Yorker, for example, legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin warned that Kavanaugh was on Romney’s short list. Toobin said Kavanaugh would pose a threat to the Affordable Care Act and other Obama policies. He also slammed Kavanaugh’s work as a federal prosecutor during the investigation of President Clinton over the Lewinsky scandal, noting that he wrote “startling” sections of a report for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, including that “the President fondled and kissed her bare breasts …”

Striking an ominous tone, Toobin concluded: “If a Republican, any Republican, wins in November, his most likely first nominee to the Supreme Court will be Brett Kavanaugh.”

Ford, who is liberal, seemed aware at the time that Kavanaugh was in the running.

“I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda, Md.,” she testified, recounting her May 2012 therapy session. “My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.”

Still, Democrats point to her 2012 therapy session as evidence her charges are not motivated by politics. They falsely claim she related her accusation to her husband and therapist “long before” Kavanaugh was in the news as a Supreme Court pick.

Asked by a Democratic senator if there is “a political motivation for your coming forward with your account of the assault by Brett Kavanaugh,” Ford responded, “No.”

Republicans aren’t buying it.

“So, after telling no one her story about Kavanaugh for decades, she suddenly remembered and spoke about it in couples therapy, triggered by a spat over a door, in 2012 — which also happens to be when her fellow Democrats were worrying about the possibility that Mitt Romney could win the presidency and appoint Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court? Call me skeptical,” a senior GOP congressional staffer said. “There’s obviously more to the story than just a door.”

Romney lost the 2012 presidential race, and the Kavanaugh threat passed.

After Romney lost the 2012 presidential race, and the threat of Kavanaugh ascending to the high court passed, Ford moved on.

“After that May 2012 therapy session,” Ford said, “I did my best to ignore the memories of the assault, because recounting them caused me to relive the experience, and caused panic and anxiety.”

But she said her attitude changed again in early July 2018, when “I saw press reports stating that Brett Kavanaugh was on the shortlist of a list of very well-qualified Supreme Court nominees.” So she decided to come forward with her story.

“I thought it was my civic duty to relay the information I had about Mr. Kavanaugh’s conduct so that those considering his nomination would know about this assault,” she said.

Ford went public with her claim in a Sept. 16 Washington Post story.

Dr. Randall said she does not believe that the door was just a pretext to hide a political motive.

“Part of her trauma was feeling trapped, and that stayed with her,” she asserted.
Randall, who specializes in sexuality, depression, anxiety and fears and phobias, says that Ford’s failure to tell anyone for some 30 years about the high school incident stemmed not from “repressed memory syndrome” but from the simple fact she was “15 years old at the time and couldn’t tell anyone about it.”

“She didn’t want her parents to know she was drinking at a house without parents there,” Randall said. “There was a lot of shame involved.”

But the far more recent story of the “second front door” also seemed to recede in Ford’s memory banks, only to pop up after speculation about her political motives grew.

She did not mention it in her original letter to Feinstein in July, or the statement she made for a polygraph exam in August, or a personal letter to Grassley last month. The tale of the door emerged, suddenly, on the eve of her testimony before Congress.

SOURCE


 

MUST READ: This Is How Astonishingly Stupid The Allegations Against Judge Kavanaugh Truly Are…

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

Image result for bLASSEY FORD CREEPY

Want to know why Democrats and the Establishment Media are now focusing on Judge Kavanaugh’s college drinking habits and speaking out that “for the good of the country Judge Kavanaugh should step aside”? It’s because the allegations leveled against him are so ludicrous, without merit, and pure political hackery that even liberal voters are now shaking their heads over how disgusting and dishonest D.C. politics can be. 

Here’s a twitter thread that sums it up perfectly:

—————

Woman walks into a police office.

“I’d like to report a sexual assault.”

Officer: Okay, tell me about it.
When did it happen?

Woman: I don’t know, but it was around 35 years ago.
Officer: Um, okay. Where did it happen?

Woman: I don’t know.

Officer: How did you get there?

Woman: I don’t know.

Officer: How did you get home?

Woman: I don’t know.
Officer: Did you report it then?

Woman: No.

Officer: Did you tell anyone about it at the time?

Woman: No, I waited 30 years to tell someone about it.
Officer: You didn’t even tell your husband about it before then?

Woman: No. I waited 30 years to tell anyone about it.

Officer: Were there any witness?

Woman: Yes, four. Here are their names.
. . .

Officer: We’ve spoken with all four of them, and all four deny it. Several denying even being there. They signed sworn statements, under penalty of felony.

Woman: Well, they’re all drunk or troubled.
Officer: Why is it you can’t remember any of the details?

Woman: Trauma.

Officer: Well, who did it?

Woman: Brett Kavanaugh. I’m 100% certain it was Brett Kavanaugh.

Officer: How can you be certain it was Brett Kavanaugh?

Woman: Trauma.
Woman: Oh, and I took a polygraph.

Officer: Who paid for the polygraph?

Woman: I don’t know.
Officer: Would you come to DC to tell your story to Congress?

Woman: No, I’m afraid of flying.

Officer: How did you get here today?

Woman: I flew. I fly all the time. I love travel.
Officer: When did you decide to go public with this?

Woman: A few days ago.

Officer: When did your employer scrub your bio, and when did your high school yearbooks all mysteriously disappear form the Internet?

Woman: Weeks ago.
Officer: I’ve had an experienced sex crimes prosecutor from Arizona review all your materials, and she says no reasonable prosecutor would pursue your case. It’s less than a “he said, she said” matter because your witnesses actually refute you.

Woman: But Safeway!
Officer: Do you understand that this all adds up to a highly suspect, and possibly demented, accusation against a person held in high esteem throughout his career, who already underwent 6 FBI background checks?

Woman: Safeway! Safeway!
Officer: Given that you can’t remember even major details about this traumatic event in your life, do you even know what memory is?

Woman: Epinephrine codes memories into the hippocampus, and so the trauma-related experience is locked there, whereas other details kind of drift.
Officer: Okay, so you do actually know some things. Why can’t you remember the most basic details about this event?

Woman: Safeway! Mark Judge went pale! Sen. Hirono leaked my letter to the media! Oopsies! (in coached baby-girl voice that sounds ridiculous for a 50 yr old woman)
Officer: We’ve checked, and the Safeway you keep going on about wasn’t even built until 1986. You’ve said the incident happened in 1982.

Woman: (Keeps looking over at the Democrat committee staffers)
Officer: Oh, and the first cell phone wasn’t invented until several years after the alleged incident, and cost $5,000. Dr. Ford, did you have a $5,000 cell phone 4 years before it was invented?

Woman: (Senator Hirono?)
Officer: I can only conclude that Judge Kavanaugh should be investigated by the FBI for a seventh time.

Woman (doubles down on baby girl voice, smiles at Sen. Hirono): Squee!

Officer: Did you say Squi?

Woman: Nevermind. I got what I wanted (checks Go Fund Me accounts).
Woman (texting husband): Honey, I’ve looked at the Go Fund Me balances, and now we can have as many front doors in our house as we want!

LADY JUSTICE: Catches the last train for the coast.
OBJECTIVE MORAL VALUES (Calls out to LADY JUSTICE): Hey, wait for me! Don’t leave me here alone!

@SamHarrisOrg: Don’t worry, everything will be fine. We don’t need either of those two.

@jordanbpeterson: Um, no.
mentions: I have mitochondria. That’s all I need. Objective moral values come from mitochondria.

@jordanbpeterson: No, that’s not right at all. We need all the wonderful things from religion while still denying their truth claims.

@SamHarrisOrg: Well, RELIGION left, too.
mentions: But without RELIGION, LADY JUSTICE and OBJECTIVE MORAL VALUES there’s nothing standing between us and HELL!

@roddreher (smiles and rubs his hands together)
Woman (calls husband): Honey, I’m headed to the airport.

Husband: You can quit with that stupid voice now.

SOURCE


 

BREAKING: Senator Jeff Flake States “We Can’t Have That (Kavanaugh?) On The Court.”

Oh my. It appears the progressive hooks are now deeply embedded in the future of outgoing Arizona Senator Jeff Flake. After being questioned on Tuesday about his thoughts on the Kavanaugh nomination, Senator Flake said this:

“We can’t have that on the Court.”

Via THE ATLANTIC:

Updated on October 2 at 12:32 p.m. ET

As the Senate awaits the results of the FBI investigation into the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Jeff Flake, one of the lawmakers who spurred the inquiry, criticized the judge Tuesday for his recent appearance in the upper chamber.

Speaking with Jeffrey Rosen, the president of the Constitution Center, and Democratic Senator Chris Coons at The Atlantic Festival on Tuesday morning, Flake called the judge’s interactions with lawmakers “sharp and partisan.”

“We can’t have that on the Court,” said the Arizona senator, who didn’t elaborate on which interactions he was referring to.

Flake’s “gentleman’s agreement” with Coons, from Delaware, led to the FBI reopening its investigation into Kavanaugh late last week. The bureau is examining the sexual-assault allegations of Christine Blasey Ford, who also testified on Thursday.

—————-

Earlier this week Flake attended a George Soros funded progressive rally in which the senator joked onstage about the staged confrontation in a Senate elevator that he used as an excuse to then ask for a supplemental FBI investigation into the baseless allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh – allegations legal experts have repeatedly asserted would never be taken on by any competent prosecutor.

Rumors are now swirling that Senator Flake has already been promised a “good boy” package by Soros operatives that will comfortably feather his post-Senate nest in the coming years.

In Washington D.C. it appears no bad deed goes unrewarded…


 

CAUGHT ON TAPE: Senator Elizabeth Warren Admits Kavanaugh FBI Investigation A Political Ploy To Delay Confirmation

How many times will Democrat voters allow themselves to be manipulated by the down and dirty, self-serving tactics of the D.C. swamp rats?

Here is Senator Elizabeth Warren admitting that the Democrats are weaponizing the FBI (once again) not to conduct an effort of justice, but to push a purely political agenda regardless of right or wrong, or truth and lies – and smearing a man’s entire life’s reputation in the process:


 

West Virginia Voters Warning Senator Joe Manchin – “Vote For Kavanaugh Or We Won’t Vote For You” In 2018

West Virginia loves Donald Trump. He won the state over Hillary Clinton by an astonishing margin of nearly 70% to 26%. 

Those same voters are now warning Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat, to support the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court – and Manchin appears to be listening.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 28: Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) speaks during a Senate Energy Subcommittee hearing discussing cybersecurity threats to the U.S. electrical grid and technology advancements to maximize such threats on Capitol Hill on March 28, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Via Breitbart:

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) was told by passers-by at Sunday’s West Virginia Pumpkin Festival in Milton, WV, to vote in favor of confirming Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court.
Manchin has abstained from committing to vote one way or another, claiming to want more time to consider Kavanaugh’s nomination.

One festival patron told Manchin, “If you don’t vote for him, I won’t vote for you.” Manchin replied, “I get that a lot.”

Another shouted, “Vote Kavanaugh!” to which Manchin responded, “I hear you.”

A Public Opinion Strategies poll published last Friday shows a majority of West Virginia voters supporting Kavanaugh’s confirmation. The Judicial Crisis Network, which commissioned the poll, released its breakdown:

Overall, West Virginia voters want Brett Kavanaugh confirmed with a margin of 58% – 28%

This includes the majority of independent voters with a margin of 59% – 26%

This includes the majority of women voters with a margin of 52% – 35%

President Donald Trump held a rally in Wheeling, WV, on Saturday in support of Manchin’s Republican opponent and current West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey. He told rally-goers, “a vote for Morrisey is a vote for me … [and a vote for] West Virginia values and keep[ing] America great.” He also described Manchin as a supporter of “mass amnesty” who sides with “radical open-border” Democrats.

During the rally, Morrisey described Manchin as a “dishonest Washington liberal,” while promising to “advance Trump’s agenda” if elected to the Senate.


 

DISGUSTING: Senator Jeff Flake Attends Soros-Sponsored Globalist Festival With Democrats (VIDEO)

He is a senator soon to be out of a job because the voters of Arizona were disgusted by his refusal to support then-candidate Donald Trump and now President Trump. Jeff Flake is certainly living up to his namesake. Here he is yesterday standing shoulder-to-shoulder with “good friend” and fellow globalist senator, Chris Coons at a George Soros-sponsored “Global Citizen Festival” where Flake makes a joking reference to the elevator confrontation that he says made him request a one-week FBI investigation into allegations against Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. The women who confronted him in that elevator were paid Soros operatives. The entire thing was a sham, a set-up, and now Mr. Flake himself appears to be directly on the Soros payroll. 

They don’t call it the D.C. swamp for nothing…

Image result for Jeff Flake idiot


 

ALERT: Judge Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Said To Be Going Down Under Weight Of Deep State Manipulations

Outgoing Arizona Senator Jeff Flake gave Democrats what they wanted most—more time.

-More time to fundraise off of the anti-Kavanaugh nomination movement.

-More time to dig up/make up further allegations against Kavanaugh.

-More time to threaten/harass/intimidate any members of the Senate who are thinking of supporting Kavanaugh. 

-More time to collaborate with CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, etc…

Rumors are at this very moment swirling via congressional staffers that Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation is in great peril as a handful of Republicans are backing away from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desire to hold a vote sooner rather than later. In short, these rumors are confirming what many have feared for days—that the Deep State fix is in.

The Trump White House is engaged in a flurry of communications with Mitch McConnell’s office. What, if anything, can be done to stop the Deep State’s most recent and considerable push back against Kavanaugh’s confirmation remains to be seen but speculation is turning increasingly negative at this time.


 

Deep State Moves In Hard To Block Kavanaugh Nomination: “They Got To Him.”

Via Senator Jeff Flake’s squishy request to “pause” the Judge Brett Kavanaugh confirmation vote in order to allow for yet another FBI investigation, the Deep State is now poised to unleash a flurry of anti-Kavanaugh stories (and direct threats to a group of Republican senators) through their multitude of media operatives.

Hold on tight. If you thought it was crazy before, the next 72-96 hours are going to be brutal as the Deep State no doubt is counting on enough Republicans to buckle under the immense pressure that is about to be applied to them. 

Image result for kamala harris and Valerie JarrettImage result for Jeff Flake

Senator Kamala Harris (left), who is a direct link to the Obama-Valerie Jarrett D.C. power circle, led the charge to intimidate outgoing Arizona senator Jeff Flake (right) into pushing for an FBI investigation. Flake, who has been an outspoken Republican enemy of the Trump White House, obeyed the demands of Harris and other leading Democrats, an act which led to fellow Republican senator Lindsey Graham to reportedly tell staff as he was walking out, “They got to him. They got to him.”

Image result for Lindsey Graham

The committee chair, Senator Chuck Grassley, was even more visibly upset as he made his way to a closed-door meeting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “These people won’t stop this nonsense. They’re all nuts.” 

Image result for Chuck Grassley

Democrats, on the other hand, were openly elated by Flake’s move, knowing full well the media-generated anti-Kavanaugh barrage that is about to be unleashed.

Image result for booker harris kavanaugh


 

Democrat Voters Appalled By Democrat Party’s Extremism…

Democrats put on a shockingly divisive, abusive, and ultimately destructive, display before, during, and after the Judge Brett Kavanaugh hearings that has not only Republican voters disgusted but a growing number of Democrat voters feeling the same way.

Will it impact the 2018 Midterm Elections? We shall see.


 

Media Rips 3rd Kavanaugh Accusor And Her Porn Star Attorney

It seems mud-raking attorney to the porn stars,  Michael Avenatti, was worried he was being overlooked in the lead up to the Judge Brett Kavanaugh hearings this week. Lo and behold, a woman emerged from the shadows to declare a then-sixteen-year-old Brett Kavanaugh was involved in numerous “gang rape” high school parties more than thirty years ago. The woman, Julie Swetnick, was an adult allegedly attending these high school parties and went back to them repeatedly despite what she now alleges was happening there. The media are now looking at both Avenatti and Swetnick with increased skepticism as both appear poised to jump the shark on this entire politically-driven fiasco. 

Image result for Avenatti and Swetnick

Via The New York Post:

Seven questions for Julie Swetnick and Michael Avenatti

Swetnick’s accusations against the Supreme Court nominee raise seven questions:

1) Given the seriousness of these allegations, why did Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnick decline to go directly to the police?

2) Likewise, why did Avenatti and Swetnick bypass the press? Did anyone in the press look into this story? What did they find? The New York Times confirms that “none of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.” Why?

3) Where are the witnesses? The charge is of gang rape. Leave aside the question of whether Brett Kavanaugh was involved — and forget for a moment that we’re debating whether he should be on the Supreme Court — surely there are a whole host of victims, perpetrators and witnesses to this monstrous crime. Where are they?

4) Is is not a little strange that there are only two details provided, and that they happen to be public knowledge already? The two names given are Mark Judge’s and Brett Kavanaugh’s. The time given is “BEACH WEEK,” which is listed on the calendar that Brett Kavanaugh released this morning. Why is there nothing new?

5) According to The New York Times, Swetnick left school in 1980, and then went on to college. Swetnick claims that she “attended at least 10 house parties in the Washington area from 1981 to 1983 where the two were present.” That means that, at the time of the alleged incident(s), she was between 18 and 20 years old at the least, and that Kavanaugh and Judge were between 16 and 18 at the most. Why was she, an adult, attending high-school parties with minors?

6) Kavanaugh says that he’s never heard of the accuser. Is there anyone who can testify to the contrary? If so, how did they meet? What relationship did Kavanaugh have with her school, Gaithersburg High? Swetnick claims that she “met Judge Kavanaugh and Mr. Judge in 1980 or 1981.”

Why did she, an 18- or 19-year-old, start hanging out with Kavanaugh and Judge, who were 15 or 16, depending on the year?

7) Why would an adult go repeatedly to parties at which minors were being gang-raped, and, having figured out what was going on, resolve only to “avoid the punch”? Did Ms. Swetnick tell anybody what she had seen? Why did she keep going back?

———————-

Indeed. Swetnick’s scenario would have us believe that an adult woman attending multiple high school parties was involved in a “gang rape” and then not only chose NOT to go to the police but instead continued to attend those same parties, never told the authorities, (she still has not gone to the police perhaps because making a false statement would place her into legal trouble) and only now, more than 35 years later, is coming forward to spread these outlandish allegations. 

America has to be smarter than to put up with this nonsense.