Yet another example of just how insanely biased the Establishment Media coverage was (and continues to be) for former POTUS Obama and against current POTUS Trump.
Walking around with Obama dolls to help one cope?
It’s true. It’s creepy. And it’s oh so very sad. Remember, these are the people who think they are most worthy to decide what and how news is to be reported to the public. They’re unhinged.
“…Enter The New York Times’ former executive editor Jill Abramson, who wrote that she carries an Obama doll in her purse to help her cope in the Trump era (via The Guardian):
It’s easy to look at what’s happening in Washington DC and despair. That’s why I carry a little plastic Obama doll in my purse. I pull him out every now and then to remind myself that the United States had a progressive, African American president until very recently. Some people find this strange, but you have to take comfort where you can find it in Donald Trump’s America.
Yeah, this is yet another example of liberal media bias, a list whose length could probably circle the Earth multiple times.
Carlos Slim wants out of his New York Times investment and is set to dump half his ownership stake in the coming months according to a report just out via Bloomberg. It was Slim who many credit with saving the struggling publication during the Obama administration. Like Obama, though, that is old news. Now, Slim wants out as he prepares to dump a quarter-billion dollars worth of NYT interest.
Slim told media he still considers his bailout of the Times “a good investment.” (That bailout included the Times having to pay him a 14% interest rate on the money he loaned the company.)
With more layoffs reportedly scheduled, and the increasing strength of alternative media sources that are so quick to point out Establishment Media bias, the NYT’s struggles are likely far from over.
Five special elections, each one heralded by the media as backlash “referendums” against Donald Trump.
Mr. Trump and the Republicans won every single of those elections indicating that the only referendum the American voters have been indicating is FOR President Trump. In fact the last Georgia special election saw the Republican defeat the Democrat by an even wider margin than Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
And yet, here is how the New York Times chooses to sadly and dishonestly spin an 0-5 record of defeat into a absent-all-reality version of winning: