Watch Barack Obama Say Publicly That Without Facebook He Might Not Be President

Show anyone who says Facebook was not working hand-in-hand with the Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012 (and the Clinton campaign in 2016) this video.

This week’s Senate and House hearings on Facebook are a hoax meant not to restrict Facebook, but rather to restrict free speech. The Deep State wants more control over all social media platforms – not less. Watch for even more crackdowns against non-Establishment media sources to follow.


 

They’re Scared: Former Obama AG Lynch Gives “Damage Control” Media Interview

On the surface, it appears to be a sit-down interview with a former Attorney General primarily meant to allow her the opportunity to defend the Department of Justice and her own increasingly troubled legacy. In reality, it is an example of carefully crafted damage control with the full involvement and support of NBC.

The Obama and Clinton Machines are pushing Loretta Lynch out there to lay the protective groundwork for their own survival in order to prevent their mutual destruction as POTUS Trump is said to be ready and willing to reveal some shocking details involving Obama, Clinton, Lynch, Comey, and others later this month.

DEVELOPING…


 

Why Did Obama Care So Little About Child Sex Trafficking?

He talked about how much he cared about people but over and over again the actual results of his presidency told a far different story. From tens of millions more enslaved by welfare, to drone bombings of civilians, most of them women and children in the Middle East, to worsening race relations and putting targets on the backs of law enforcement, to a further widening between the haves and have-nots, Barack Obama decimated innocent lives both here at home and abroad.

His record of largely ignoring the plague that is human sex trafficking, much of it involving children, might very well be the most troubling aspect of his many failings:


 

WTH??? Pulse Nightclub Shooter’s Father Was An FBI Informant

Talk about another layer of weird. Pulse Nightclub shooter Omar Mateen was being groomed to be an FBI informant at the time of the shooting AND his father already was an FBI informant.

ABOVE: The father of the Pulse Nightclub Massacre, Seddique Mateen, seen sitting directly behind Hillary Clinton during one of her 2016 political rallies. Mr. Mateen was a longtime FBI information according to recent court testimony and his son Omar was being considered for the same role by the Obama FBI when the Pulse Nightclub shooting took place.

Via The Orlando Sentinel:

Pulse nightclub gunman Omar Mateen was considered by the FBI for development as a possible informant prior to carrying out the 2016 mass shooting, an agent testified today during the trial of Mateen’s widow, Noor Salman.

That revelation came hours after Salman’s defense filed a motion seeking to have the case dismissed or declared a mistrial due to information that Mateen’s father was an informant for the FBI for more than a decade and sent money out of the country in the months before the attack.

Jurors today heard from FBI Special Agent Juvenal Martin, who was responsible for overseeing Mateen’s father, Seddique Mateen, as an informant after Martin transferred to the FBI’s Miami division in 2006.

…Martin said he considered trying to develop Mateen as an informant, like his father, after finding he didn’t have ties to terrorism. Omar Mateen would later claim allegiance to the Islamic State group as he carried out the mass shooting at Pulse nightclub on June 12, 2016.

——————

A well-placed source offers this chilling possibility given this new and shocking information:

Omar Mateen could have carried out a religious massacre at the behest of Islamic representatives with ties to the then-Obama Deep State for the sole purpose of political help to Hillary Clinton in the critical swing state of Flordia. He was programmed to believe he was doing “Allah’s will.” If true it wouldn’t be the first time and it won’t be the last. You would think this information would be just a little more important than who the President may or may not have slept with twelve years ago. Right?


 

Did AG Sessions Empanel Grand Jury To Investigate The Clinton Email Scandal Coverup? It Sure Looks That Way…

Multiple reports are now coming out suggesting Attorney General Jeff Sessions has impaneled a grand jury to review the entirety of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. This grand jury review would likely include not only Hillary Clinton, but key Obama FBI, DOJ, and State Department figures, as well as the Obama White House itself.

Some are suggesting the review has been going on since December. 

The review is also rumored to be looking over the highly controversial Uranium One deal that the Obama administration made with Russia:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered federal prosecutors at the DOJ in December to begin interviewing FBI agents about the evidence they collected during a criminal investigation into the controversial Uranium One deal, which directly involved the Clintons.

There are multiple aspects at play in this investigation, from the Obama administration threatening a witness to stay quiet because they did not want him testifying to Congress because it would impact the 2016 presidential election, to the Russian officials who were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering directly connected to the Uranium One deal.


 

**AHEM** Just a reminder that in 2012 the Obama campaign grabbed FIVE TIMES the Facebook data as Cambridge Analytica did in 2016

This current anti-Facebook hysteria has taken quite a turn as liberals who once embraced the social media giant are now demanding it be dismantled because -gasp- its data was used during a political campaign in 2016. And yet where was this same anger when the same thing was being done in 2012 – but at far greater levels? 

…Crickets…

Check this out via a Politico article out today:

…During the 2012 campaign, President Barack Obama’s reelection team built an app that extracted the same types of data in the same fashion as the Cambridge Analytica data in question, with one critical difference: Obama’s team extracted nearly five times the information.

According to Carol Davidsen, a member of Obama’s data team, “Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.” The social graph is Facebook’s map of relationships between users and brands on its platform. And after the election, she recently acknowledged, Facebook was “very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”

—–

What Team Obama did in 2012 with its Facebook data was heralded far and wide as a sign of a truly formidable and cutting-edge political campaign. After Team Trump attempted the same in 2016, to a much smaller degree, that attempt is being vilified and Facebook is being blamed for allowing it to happen.

That’s beyond hypocritical. It’s dangerous. Clearly, there are some in high positions of power and influence in America who feel they and they alone should control the flow of information.

The Cambridge Analytica work in 2016 and Facebook’s part in it should be much ado about nothing but the enemies of freedom and choice in America are making it into something and demanding punishment against Facebook – a platform people choose to be or not to be a part of.

Scary.



IF THE PAST SPOKE TO YOU WOULD YOU LISTEN?

“A highly entertaining Montana mystery. Loved it.”

“Pro-family values and America-first stories are hard to find these days. SAVAGE delivers.”

“SAVAGE is both timeless & contemporary with a paranormal twist. 5 stars.”

E-Book version available HERE Paperback version available HERE

E-Book version available HERE Paperback version available HERE


 

Former FBI Director Goes On Record: “Comey, McCabe, & Brennan All Corrupt & Everything Leads Back To Obama” (VIDEO)

James Kallstrom is no joke. With nearly thirty years in the FBI, several of them as the Assistant Director, Kallstrom knows how the agency functions far more than most. So when he says there was a plot to protect Hillary Clinton from prosecution and to illegally influence the 2016 Election people should pay attention. Kallstrom goes on to call the entirety of the FBI investigation against Donald Trump completely phony. Maria Bartiromo’s own take appears very much to compliment Mr. Kallstrom’s assertions. The Deep State shenanigans run very deep and in 2016 are linked to the Obama White House. 

Barack Obama wanted a third term. His support-system within the FBI, DOJ, State Department, CIA, the Establishment Media, etc., wanted the same and they all broke the law in their attempt to do it. Donald Trump has managed to reveal much of it. The media continues to ignore it because so many of them are implicated in the illegal manipulations of the public as well. That means it’s up to YOU to bypass the media and help to spread the truth of what is really going on.

WATCH. SHARE. EDUCATE.


 

Andrew McCabe’s Anti-Trump/Pro-Hillary Bias So Bad/Negligent He Now Faces Losing His Entire FBI Pension

Andrew McCabe was among the highest-ranking of all FBI officials. He had both power and influence over America’s largest and most influential law enforcement agency.

He now faces termination and the loss of his entire FBI pension.

The reasons are apparently many but most prominent among them are Mr. McCabe’s fervent anti-Trump and pro-Hillary bias that might very well have resulted in the FBI being weaponized (with the likely full approval of former President Barack Obama) during the 2016 Election.

Via NBC News:

WASHINGTON — The FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility has recommended the firing of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who remains on the payroll — a move that could put the veteran official’s pension at risk, according to officials familiar with the process.

The recommendation is now before Attorney General Jeff Sessions. OPR has already determined that McCabe should be fired and it’s now up to Sessions whether to reverse that recommendation or to accept it.

McCabe — who has been attacked by President Donald Trump and other Republicans for alleged anti-Trump bias inside the FBI — is due to retire this weekend. If Sessions were to fire him before then, it would place McCabe’s federal pension at risk.

The OPR recommendation that he be thrown off the payroll follows an internal report from the DOJ inspector general that concluded McCabe was not fully forthcoming in answers about whether he talked to a reporter about the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

McCabe is a civil service employee who can’t be fired without evidence of wrongdoing.


 

POTUS Trump Preparing To Rip Up Obama Iran Nuke Deal

Word is Donald Trump is getting very close to throwing away the horrendously bad Obama Iran nuke deal that gave the #1 state sponsor of terrorism in the entire world the green light to move forward with its nuclear capability program. It was also the same deal that had Obama shipping hundreds of millions of dollars to the Islamic terror state under cover of darkness and without any Congressional oversight.

Trump appears to see things very differently from Mr. Obama where Iran is concerned.

Via Zero Hedge:

…After loudly criticizing the Iran deal as one of the “worst deal ever”, the Trump administration is planning to move ahead with its plans to reimpose sanctions, Axios reports that Trump told Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu that he will demand “significant changes” to the deal in his negotiations over possible modifications as the different parties try to come to a “last chance” compromise to keep it intact.

President Trump told Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in their meeting at the White House last Monday that he won’t show flexibility in the negotiations with France, Germany and the U.K. on amending the Iran nuclear deal, two senior Israeli officials told me.

The officials say Trump told Netanyahu that until now the three European powers only proposed “cosmetic changes” that he doesn’t find satisfactory. Trump said he demands “significant changes” in the Iran deal itself and not simply the addition of a supplemental agreement between the U.S. and the European countries, according to the officials.

The bottom line: Trump stressed that if his demands are not met, the U.S. will withdraw from the deal.


 

REPORT: Media Lying AGAIN – Dems Set To Lose Up To EIGHT Senate Seats Come Midterms!

There has been a lot of “blue wave” reporting of late which for those who know and understand how the Establishment Media works, is always a sure sign that reality is closer to being the opposite.

This is being proven true yet again as the Midterm Election cycle gets into full swing in the coming months. As of now, Republicans are looking very strong in retaining both the House and the Senate and with the Senate especially, could see some significant gains. This could change between now and then of course, but it is nothing like the media is attempting to spin. There is no blue wave, there is no anti-Trump backlash. In fact, Trump’s true support is likely well above 50% as the media attempts to spin the exact same kind of polling that declared he would lose to Hillary Clinton in a landslide. They think the American public is so stupid they will have already forgotten that.

DON’T LET THEM.

Via AXIOS:

Exclusive polls: Big warning signs for Senate Democrats

Five Senate Democrats would lose to Republican candidates if the elections were held today and three have approval ratings under 50%, according to new Axios/SurveyMonkey polls.

Why it matters: Democrats are defending 10 Senate seats in states that President Trump won in 2016. In six of those states, Trump’s approval is higher than 50% (compared to 43% nationally). These numbers underscore how hard it will be for Democrats to pick up the two seats needed to win the majority…


It should also be noted that Donald Trump remains far more popular personally with voters than does the Republican Party. It is a similar trend that applied to Barack Obama before that saw Democrats lose ground via historic proportions in both the House and Senate during Mr. Obama’s eight years in the White House.

As of now, it appears no such historic loss will take place in the 2018 Midterms. What swings that do take place, be it for one party or the other, will be relatively minor. It this current trend holds it would actually point to Donald Trump being far more successful in holding his party together than Obama was.

That’s yet another tidbit the Establishment Media will be sure to try and bury under its mountains of anti-Trump propaganda.


 

Defiant Trump Battles Globalists Like No President Before Him

It was the tariff comment heard around the world. Global markets staged a predictable temper tantrum as the Establishment Media spun it all as an American president who continues to go “too far” in his America-first approach when Donald Trump dared to do what he said he will do (for the last three decades) and slap tariffs on those nations who have for too long been abusing the system and costing U.S. jobs. 

“Free” trade and open borders are the foundations of the globalist regime. It allows cheap labor, (often under grueling working conditions) and an international corporatist system that increasingly enjoys power beyond that of nations. It is power that is never voted on, so answers to no-one. Everything is bought and paid for – including the politicians who continue to pass the laws that then expand the power of the globalists while lessening the power of the people those politicians pretend to serve.

And then came a billionaire New Yorker who shook his head and said ENOUGH. 

Donald Trump pushed past the Republican Establishment and remarkably did the same against the entire political and media establishment in America to win the White House.

Now he sets his sights on the global establishment – an even more difficult and dangerous task.

Over the last thirty years America’s capacity to truly defend itself has lessened considerably because its factories have closed. Its people no longer make things. We peddle in distraction, convenience, and entertainment, but the ability to sustain itself as was done during World War Two has fallen into dangerous disrepair.

We are a country that now spends more time and resources teaching its students about gender identity than how to use a hammer – or a can opener.

Corporations relocate for one simple reason – it’s cheaper to do so. It is cheaper to build a factory in China or India, or Malaysia, or Mexico than it is to keep that factory here in the United States. Why? Because they then have access to very cheap labor, no unions, no healthcare costs, often no environmental regulations (and those that do exist easily go away via bribes to the government) and on and on and on.

True American liberals should be appalled by the above scenario – but they are not. (Too focused on gender identity perhaps?) Globalization is raping the environment and the people of those nations whose labor is being used to do so.

Donald Trump’s message cuts across political lines. It’s common sense. Create an America that helps to create jobs for Americans. Doing so then expands the tax base to afford things like better healthcare access, a cleaner environment, more opportunity, greater sustainability, and an overall improved quality of life that can be passed from one generation to the next.

Because he threatens the status-quo, Mr. Trump has been vilified to the extreme. At every turn, he faces opposition and mockery by those who have been lining their pockets under the globalist regime for a very long time. (Consider this: the Clintons left the White House in 2001 owing money. Seventeen years later they are worth an estimated $60-$100 million dollars. How does that happen? Simple. They became very willing mouthpieces of the globalist agenda. Their wealth was payment for a job well done. Barack Obama is doing the same thing but possibly on an even greater scale. His wealth already sits at nearly $20 million dollars just a year removed from the White House – a 20x increase from before he became President and within just the next five years he will likely be pushing $100 million. Not bad for a politician who spent years speaking out against “the wealthy.” )

Donald Trump is now shrugging off the mountain of criticism he is receiving for his steel and aluminum tariff plan. He is convinced no nation on earth can win a trade war with the United States and soon it will result in a much better trade environment that will put American workers first instead of the pockets of the globalists.

This will only escalate the war against him of course. Watch for Mueller to double his efforts the President’s family and business interests. That shoe is said to be scheduled to drop within the next few weeks.

It has been said before but is worth repeating: No leader of America’s modern era has personally risked so much to try and help so many as Donald Trump has.


 

Hillary Clinton Wants A Third Run At The White House As Old & White Democrat Leadership Clings To Power

Hillary Clinton is an old woman. Not that seventy is old by today’s standards, but she’s an old seventy. The stories of her condition are legion. Her eyes are failing, she worries constantly about falling, is prone to sudden seizures, overdrinking, and if the prescription cocktail she’s on isn’t just right, both memory and mood can quickly devolve into periods of volatile dementia.

None of that is stopping her from demanding a third run at being President though.

Hillary wants it. She wants it bad.

The Clinton Machine is still largely in place and attempting to influence present and future political fundraising efforts – though it remains a distant second to the Obama/Jarrett/Holder triple-headed DNC-controlling beast. (Something which Hillary and Bill are said to be increasingly agitated about.)

The Establishment Media will still give her face time whenever requested, though, and so Mrs. Clinton remains working under the self-belief that she remains not only relevant but a political force to be reckoned with, similar to what Nancy Pelosi is doing in Congress. Old, white, and radical is largely the one-color tapestry that is the Democrat Party in D.C. these days where open borders, promises of yet more free stuff, attacking traditional values, and constant tantrums pass for leadership.

Hillary would be nearly seventy-four should she run for President again. Nobody close to her is said to have the guts to tell her she’s too old. That discussion isn’t allowed unless it’s to discuss Joe Biden’s seventy-five years. It’s believed Biden now regrets not running in 2016 and is seriously considering doing so in 2020 when he would be seventy-nine which has made the subject of Biden a sore subject with Hillary Clinton who rumors say has taken to calling him “F*cking Joe.”  Biden’s response has been to tell others (increasingly often) what a horrible candidate Hillary was in 2016. “She’s horrible. Just too unlikeable, man. She doesn’t have it. Never did. Never will.”

The primary reason for this increasing tension between Hillary and the former Vice President is one that remains all-important to the Clintons – money. The big money has stepped back from Hillary and (somewhat) toward Biden. Hillary blames Obama for this. She’s right to.

Word is Barack Obama is the one who gave Joe the nod to go ahead and consider a 2020 run with the caveat that Joe’s Vice President would be someone of Obama and Jarrett’s approval. This approval, for now, is coming in the form of names like Kamala Harris and Eric Holder. (Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe is on the outside looking in as he tries to balance loyalties to the Clintons with political ambition he knows will require the approval of the Obama Machine.)

Obama wants a Democrat Party to be less old and less white. That would require some house cleaning to remove the likes of Nancy Pelosi and others. (See: Dianne Feinstein)

“Governor McAuliffe is trying to convince Obama that he’s willing to be as far left of a president as Obama wants him to be. Immigration, guns, single payer, cutting military and growing the welfare system, McAuliffe is all-in if it means getting Obama’s approval,” says a longtime D.C. insider. “Obama’s plan is to dispatch Trump in 2020 and continue on from there with a third term to finish his transformation of America. He’s certain that will happen – 100%.”

In the meantime, Hillary Clinton will continue to call in media favors, snipe at Obama’s continued influence, repeat the lie that it was Russia who beat her in 2016 and not Trump, and believe that she deserves more than anyone else to be living in the White House after 2020.

—————–

REPORT: High-Ranking Obama Official Has Lawyered Up – Uses Her Right To Remain Silent.

Check it out. What follows are the answers from former Obama official Susan Rice that D.C. Whispers indicated a year ago was among those the administration was willing to let take the fall for multiple egregious surveillance program misdeeds intended to manipulate the 2016 Election.

Susan Rice has now lawyered up and is refusing to answer even the most basic questions regarding her role in those alleged crimes as the following report outlines. Note as well the emphasis on the Grassley-Graham memo – another thing of importance that was covered by D.C. Whispers first:

THE SILENCE OF SUSAN RICE
By letter to Susan Rice dated February 8, 2018, Senators Grassley and Graham posed 12 numbered questions. I posted the Graham/Grassley letter in “Rice papers the file.” By letter dated February 23, 2018, white collar criminal defense lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler has now responded to the Grassley/Graham letter on Rice’s behalf. I posted Ruemmler’s letter nearby this morning in “Susan Rice responds, sort of,” and am embedding it again at the bottom.

Let’s take an inventory of Rice’s response to the questions: answered, partially answered, answered narrowly, or not answered. I have italicized my accounting below, subject to further thought and analysis:

Question 1. Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email?

Answered.

Question 2. When did you first become aware of the FBI’s investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia?

Not answered.

Question 3. When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?

Partially answered.

Question 4. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

Partially answered.

Question 5. Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?

Not answered.

Question 6. Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?

Not answered.

Question 7. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?

Answered narrowly (“In the conversation Ambassador Rice documented, there was no discussion of Christopher Steele or the Steele dossier, contrary to the suggestion in your letter”).

Question 8. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey describe the status of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?

Answered narrowly (see above).

Question 9. When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?

Not answered.

Question 10. When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele’s efforts?

Not answered.

Question 11. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’s investigation?

Not answered.

Question 12. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Corney, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’ s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Not answered.

Susan Rice has lawyered up. For some reason or other, with respect to several pointed and important questions, she is resting on her right to remain silent.


SOURCE: The Powerline Blog


 

Trump Unloads On Obama, Clinton, & MSM Via Powerful Sunday Tweet Storm

President Trump knows the power of his social media reach. He also knows how frustrated the Establishment Media is when a single tweet from him can decimate a narrative they’ve spent days trying to construct.

This morning Mr. Trump wasn’t holding back and the word in D.C. is that he has his globalist enemies in an uproar and it isn’t just because of what he clearly said but also because of what the words behind the words are insinuating regarding potential upcoming investigations against both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Check it out:

Note the mentions of the multi-billion cash payment to Iran and Whitewater. One is a should-be investigation involving Barack Obama and the other an actual investigation that resulted in the impeachment of a former president. POTUS Trump never mentions such things at random. His long history of calling how things will play out long before they do is no mere happenstance.

The above tweets are the words of a President who appears to be readying a major counter-attack on the D.C. swamp. He’s fired up. He’s confident. And he’s understandably more than a little pissed off.


 

Trump Closing Down Obama-Era Refugee U.S. Invasion Offices

The Establishment Media called them “relocation” offices during the Obama years. They numbered more than sixty and were spread out across the United States though oddly enough, seemingly focused on political swing districts where five or ten thousand “new” Democrat voters might suddenly be able to sway future elections away from Republicans. (Huh. Imagine that!)

Opponents of these relocation offices called them by another name – invasion offices that oversaw masses of undocumented refugees, primarily Muslim, into the United States. Some warned the program was sure to introduce dangerous radical Islamists into the country. Those warnings were repeatedly ignored by the then-Obama administration.

That is all changing now as the Trump State Department just sent a notice to more than twenty of these offices that they are to close their doors. There is a new sheriff in town named Trump and he’s not so keen to continue the fanatically dangerous pro-Islam immigration policies that were the foundation of the Obama years.

In 2017 President Obama set a goal of bringing in 110000 of these refugees. One year later that number has been slashed to less than half with more cuts to come as the Trump administration rightfully explains that it is both less costly and less potentially less dangerous to U.S. citizens to set up refugee centers overseas.

Imagine that.

Barack Obama went with the more expensive and dangerous option. Why? Because he cared less for the American people and more for his globalist dream of a Muslim-dominated world.

Apologists for Mr. Obama will deny that.

The facts say otherwise.


 

The Artist Obama Chose To Paint His Presidential Portrait Also Painted A Black Woman Beheading A White Woman

When the hue of one’s skin allows pure hatred to be called “art” it is troubling enough, but when a former President of the United States purposely chooses that hatred to create the presidential portrait that will hang in the White House, the word “troubling” falls far short of what it really is…

—————————-

VIDEO: Obama Spent Billions Funding Islamic Terrorists Via Iran-Nuke “Deal”

Iran is still pushing ahead with militarizing its nuclear program. So what in the heck did that nearly two BILLION dollars IN CASH that Obama sent to Iran actually pay for?

Anti-America terrorists. In fact, some of that money went to the very groups (the worst of the worst) responsible for thousands of American deaths. (It’s as if Mr. Obama was paying them for a job well done.)

This was warned of years ago by D.C. Whispers and others. Now it’s being undeniably confirmed.

Who is the deadliest terrorist so far of the 21st Century?

This guy:

————

Going After Obama Is The Red Line The FBI, CIA, NSA, Media, Etc., Will Not Cross…

The Clintons’ survival is rooted these days on their ability to convince anyone and everyone thinking of linking them to a multitude of crimes from illegal email servers to pay-for-play Clinton Foundation money laundering schemes, that should they go down, so too will Barack Obama.

He is the red line of which those in power at the highest levels of government, the courts, and the Establishment Media, will not cross…

“Protect Obama.” That is a phrase uttered repeatedly before, during, and now more than a year after, his presidency. Billions were invested in Mr. Obama’s creation. Potential trillions have since been built upon the foundation that is his ongoing legacy – a legacy that is to culminate in the breaking apart of the traditional United States to be replaced by something far-far different.

Case in point. On February 7th Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, went public with stunning evidence of Mr. Obama’s first-hand complicity in both colluding with, and obstructing, the 2016 investigation in Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private server that many have since indicated was meant to hide evidence of the Clintons’ multi-national pay-to-play shakedowns that took place during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as head of the Obama State Department.

The information provided by Senator Johnson outline rampant FBI abuses, confirm former FBI Director James Comey’s likely cover-up complicity, and exposed the lie Mr. Obama told when he stated he had not, and would not, ever attempt to politically influence an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

It was the kind of revelation that should have generated wall-to-wall media coverage It didn’t. In fact, there was NO television news coverage of it outside of Fox News. None of the networks made mention of it. Nor did CNN or MSNBC.

“We don’t report it – it didn’t happen.” That’s the mantra of the Establishment Media and it has never been used it so consistently as when it’s been done to protect Barack Obama. It allowed him to be elected, re-elected, and to stay out of prison.

Instead, this same Establishment Media continues to push the false narrative that Mr. Obama’s eight years in the White House represent a “scandal-free” presidency when in fact it has been proven time and time again to be among the most scandal-ridden administrations in history.

Ah, but when you are involved in the re-writing of history, the false representation of the present, so that you might have a seat at the table of the powerful in the future, why bother with facts, or truth, or reality?

Barack Obama never did – and look where it got him.

Bill and Hillary and their cadre of schemers know this. They are banking on it – to the tune of tens and tens of millions of dollars.

One filthy hand washing the other.

—————————-

Sr. Congressional Oversight Member: EVERYTHING From Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS, & Other Obama Scandals Connected To Corrupt DOJ & FBI

Congressman Paul Gosar didn’t hold back in a recent interview and he’s now begging the American people to pay more attention and demand answers from their political leaders. According to Gosar, the Obama White House micromanaged everything from drone attacks to illegal surveillance on political opponents and was able to do so via very carefully placed DOJ and FBI firewalls that to this day continue to insulate Barack Obama and other Obama-related officials, from justice.

Via Breitbart:

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), a leading conservative member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told Breitbart News Daily on Wednesday that he believes that there is an interconnectivity between various high-profile Barack Obama-era scandals and the latest revelations about corruption at the Department of Justice and FBI.

Gosar was asked during the interview on the SiriusXM 125 Patriot Channel show about the corruption on display in the release of the famed memo from House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) that detailed FISA court abuses by the FBI and DOJ in the lead-up to the 2016 election and in the months that followed now President Donald Trump’s win during the transition and even during his presidency.

That all came before the release of new text messages between senior FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok that detailed how Obama himself was overseeing everything personally on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and rivaling Trump probe. Gosar detailed how this same corruption that is now being further exposed first reared its ugly head in the earliest days of the administration of now former President Barack Obama, with the Operation Fast and Furious scandal then the IRS and Benghazi scandals—all of which had intricate levels of DOJ and FBI involvement.

If you don’t think the [Operation] Fast and Furious—attacking the Second Amendment—along with Operation Choke Point, you know that sacred amendment that holds our government accountable and protection for all the other amendments, if you don’t think Benghazi and the lack of accountability when they knew something was going to come, if you don’t think that the IRS and the attacking of your adversaries financially, and the unmasking are unrelated things, think again,” Gosar said.

“You know, this previous administration—the Obama administration—micromanaged everything out of the White House. And I challenge people, remember the Syrian strikes that were actually handpicked and dictated by the president at that time. This gentleman was involved in everything. That’s where all this leads. When you look at the cover-up with the email scandal with Hillary Clinton, it gets—it should have pointed out exactly what we’ve been talking about, that this was the weaponization of our Justice Department not only to cover up for the previous administration and the wrongdoing and ills of them and those associated with them, but also to attack a sitting president—actually a candidate at the time, then president-elect and then a current, sitting president you know of an opposition party. This is outrageous, and you are exactly right we have got to get to the bottom of this so that people are held accountable because that is what America wants. But it’s going to be a hard, slow slog trying to get this information out. But it’s coming, as witnessed by the memo from Devin Nunes and as witnessed by Grassley and Graham and new revelations and the Inspector General—don’t forget Michael Horowitz sitting out there as well.”

Gosar is a key member of the House Oversight Committee who led the way in pushing to hold now former Attorney General Eric Holder accountable for Fast and Furious. He was one of the first members of Congress to demand Holder’s resignation, and helped lead the effort to hold Holder in both criminal and civil contempt of Congress for his refusal to be transparent about the matter.

——–

Viral Text Exposes Obama Lies: “POTUS (Obama) WANTS TO KNOW EVERYTHING WE’RE (FBI) DOING”

He told the media he would never-ever influence an ongoing law enforcement investigation while at the very same time he was ordering then-FBI Director James Comey to tell him everything about an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

That is the Obama Way: Lie to the American people over and over again while doing the very thing that lie says you would never do. #obamaknew #obamanixon #obamagate

PROOF:

——————————