REPORT: Media Lying AGAIN – Dems Set To Lose Up To EIGHT Senate Seats Come Midterms!

There has been a lot of “blue wave” reporting of late which for those who know and understand how the Establishment Media works, is always a sure sign that reality is closer to being the opposite.

This is being proven true yet again as the Midterm Election cycle gets into full swing in the coming months. As of now, Republicans are looking very strong in retaining both the House and the Senate and with the Senate especially, could see some significant gains. This could change between now and then of course, but it is nothing like the media is attempting to spin. There is no blue wave, there is no anti-Trump backlash. In fact, Trump’s true support is likely well above 50% as the media attempts to spin the exact same kind of polling that declared he would lose to Hillary Clinton in a landslide. They think the American public is so stupid they will have already forgotten that.

DON’T LET THEM.

Via AXIOS:

Exclusive polls: Big warning signs for Senate Democrats

Five Senate Democrats would lose to Republican candidates if the elections were held today and three have approval ratings under 50%, according to new Axios/SurveyMonkey polls.

Why it matters: Democrats are defending 10 Senate seats in states that President Trump won in 2016. In six of those states, Trump’s approval is higher than 50% (compared to 43% nationally). These numbers underscore how hard it will be for Democrats to pick up the two seats needed to win the majority…


It should also be noted that Donald Trump remains far more popular personally with voters than does the Republican Party. It is a similar trend that applied to Barack Obama before that saw Democrats lose ground via historic proportions in both the House and Senate during Mr. Obama’s eight years in the White House.

As of now, it appears no such historic loss will take place in the 2018 Midterms. What swings that do take place, be it for one party or the other, will be relatively minor. It this current trend holds it would actually point to Donald Trump being far more successful in holding his party together than Obama was.

That’s yet another tidbit the Establishment Media will be sure to try and bury under its mountains of anti-Trump propaganda.


 

Defiant Trump Battles Globalists Like No President Before Him

It was the tariff comment heard around the world. Global markets staged a predictable temper tantrum as the Establishment Media spun it all as an American president who continues to go “too far” in his America-first approach when Donald Trump dared to do what he said he will do (for the last three decades) and slap tariffs on those nations who have for too long been abusing the system and costing U.S. jobs. 

“Free” trade and open borders are the foundations of the globalist regime. It allows cheap labor, (often under grueling working conditions) and an international corporatist system that increasingly enjoys power beyond that of nations. It is power that is never voted on, so answers to no-one. Everything is bought and paid for – including the politicians who continue to pass the laws that then expand the power of the globalists while lessening the power of the people those politicians pretend to serve.

And then came a billionaire New Yorker who shook his head and said ENOUGH. 

Donald Trump pushed past the Republican Establishment and remarkably did the same against the entire political and media establishment in America to win the White House.

Now he sets his sights on the global establishment – an even more difficult and dangerous task.

Over the last thirty years America’s capacity to truly defend itself has lessened considerably because its factories have closed. Its people no longer make things. We peddle in distraction, convenience, and entertainment, but the ability to sustain itself as was done during World War Two has fallen into dangerous disrepair.

We are a country that now spends more time and resources teaching its students about gender identity than how to use a hammer – or a can opener.

Corporations relocate for one simple reason – it’s cheaper to do so. It is cheaper to build a factory in China or India, or Malaysia, or Mexico than it is to keep that factory here in the United States. Why? Because they then have access to very cheap labor, no unions, no healthcare costs, often no environmental regulations (and those that do exist easily go away via bribes to the government) and on and on and on.

True American liberals should be appalled by the above scenario – but they are not. (Too focused on gender identity perhaps?) Globalization is raping the environment and the people of those nations whose labor is being used to do so.

Donald Trump’s message cuts across political lines. It’s common sense. Create an America that helps to create jobs for Americans. Doing so then expands the tax base to afford things like better healthcare access, a cleaner environment, more opportunity, greater sustainability, and an overall improved quality of life that can be passed from one generation to the next.

Because he threatens the status-quo, Mr. Trump has been vilified to the extreme. At every turn, he faces opposition and mockery by those who have been lining their pockets under the globalist regime for a very long time. (Consider this: the Clintons left the White House in 2001 owing money. Seventeen years later they are worth an estimated $60-$100 million dollars. How does that happen? Simple. They became very willing mouthpieces of the globalist agenda. Their wealth was payment for a job well done. Barack Obama is doing the same thing but possibly on an even greater scale. His wealth already sits at nearly $20 million dollars just a year removed from the White House – a 20x increase from before he became President and within just the next five years he will likely be pushing $100 million. Not bad for a politician who spent years speaking out against “the wealthy.” )

Donald Trump is now shrugging off the mountain of criticism he is receiving for his steel and aluminum tariff plan. He is convinced no nation on earth can win a trade war with the United States and soon it will result in a much better trade environment that will put American workers first instead of the pockets of the globalists.

This will only escalate the war against him of course. Watch for Mueller to double his efforts the President’s family and business interests. That shoe is said to be scheduled to drop within the next few weeks.

It has been said before but is worth repeating: No leader of America’s modern era has personally risked so much to try and help so many as Donald Trump has.


 

Hillary Clinton Wants A Third Run At The White House As Old & White Democrat Leadership Clings To Power

Hillary Clinton is an old woman. Not that seventy is old by today’s standards, but she’s an old seventy. The stories of her condition are legion. Her eyes are failing, she worries constantly about falling, is prone to sudden seizures, overdrinking, and if the prescription cocktail she’s on isn’t just right, both memory and mood can quickly devolve into periods of volatile dementia.

None of that is stopping her from demanding a third run at being President though.

Hillary wants it. She wants it bad.

The Clinton Machine is still largely in place and attempting to influence present and future political fundraising efforts – though it remains a distant second to the Obama/Jarrett/Holder triple-headed DNC-controlling beast. (Something which Hillary and Bill are said to be increasingly agitated about.)

The Establishment Media will still give her face time whenever requested, though, and so Mrs. Clinton remains working under the self-belief that she remains not only relevant but a political force to be reckoned with, similar to what Nancy Pelosi is doing in Congress. Old, white, and radical is largely the one-color tapestry that is the Democrat Party in D.C. these days where open borders, promises of yet more free stuff, attacking traditional values, and constant tantrums pass for leadership.

Hillary would be nearly seventy-four should she run for President again. Nobody close to her is said to have the guts to tell her she’s too old. That discussion isn’t allowed unless it’s to discuss Joe Biden’s seventy-five years. It’s believed Biden now regrets not running in 2016 and is seriously considering doing so in 2020 when he would be seventy-nine which has made the subject of Biden a sore subject with Hillary Clinton who rumors say has taken to calling him “F*cking Joe.”  Biden’s response has been to tell others (increasingly often) what a horrible candidate Hillary was in 2016. “She’s horrible. Just too unlikeable, man. She doesn’t have it. Never did. Never will.”

The primary reason for this increasing tension between Hillary and the former Vice President is one that remains all-important to the Clintons – money. The big money has stepped back from Hillary and (somewhat) toward Biden. Hillary blames Obama for this. She’s right to.

Word is Barack Obama is the one who gave Joe the nod to go ahead and consider a 2020 run with the caveat that Joe’s Vice President would be someone of Obama and Jarrett’s approval. This approval, for now, is coming in the form of names like Kamala Harris and Eric Holder. (Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe is on the outside looking in as he tries to balance loyalties to the Clintons with political ambition he knows will require the approval of the Obama Machine.)

Obama wants a Democrat Party to be less old and less white. That would require some house cleaning to remove the likes of Nancy Pelosi and others. (See: Dianne Feinstein)

“Governor McAuliffe is trying to convince Obama that he’s willing to be as far left of a president as Obama wants him to be. Immigration, guns, single payer, cutting military and growing the welfare system, McAuliffe is all-in if it means getting Obama’s approval,” says a longtime D.C. insider. “Obama’s plan is to dispatch Trump in 2020 and continue on from there with a third term to finish his transformation of America. He’s certain that will happen – 100%.”

In the meantime, Hillary Clinton will continue to call in media favors, snipe at Obama’s continued influence, repeat the lie that it was Russia who beat her in 2016 and not Trump, and believe that she deserves more than anyone else to be living in the White House after 2020.

—————–

REPORT: High-Ranking Obama Official Has Lawyered Up – Uses Her Right To Remain Silent.

Check it out. What follows are the answers from former Obama official Susan Rice that D.C. Whispers indicated a year ago was among those the administration was willing to let take the fall for multiple egregious surveillance program misdeeds intended to manipulate the 2016 Election.

Susan Rice has now lawyered up and is refusing to answer even the most basic questions regarding her role in those alleged crimes as the following report outlines. Note as well the emphasis on the Grassley-Graham memo – another thing of importance that was covered by D.C. Whispers first:

THE SILENCE OF SUSAN RICE
By letter to Susan Rice dated February 8, 2018, Senators Grassley and Graham posed 12 numbered questions. I posted the Graham/Grassley letter in “Rice papers the file.” By letter dated February 23, 2018, white collar criminal defense lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler has now responded to the Grassley/Graham letter on Rice’s behalf. I posted Ruemmler’s letter nearby this morning in “Susan Rice responds, sort of,” and am embedding it again at the bottom.

Let’s take an inventory of Rice’s response to the questions: answered, partially answered, answered narrowly, or not answered. I have italicized my accounting below, subject to further thought and analysis:

Question 1. Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email?

Answered.

Question 2. When did you first become aware of the FBI’s investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia?

Not answered.

Question 3. When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?

Partially answered.

Question 4. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

Partially answered.

Question 5. Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?

Not answered.

Question 6. Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?

Not answered.

Question 7. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?

Answered narrowly (“In the conversation Ambassador Rice documented, there was no discussion of Christopher Steele or the Steele dossier, contrary to the suggestion in your letter”).

Question 8. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey describe the status of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?

Answered narrowly (see above).

Question 9. When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?

Not answered.

Question 10. When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele’s efforts?

Not answered.

Question 11. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’s investigation?

Not answered.

Question 12. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Corney, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’ s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Not answered.

Susan Rice has lawyered up. For some reason or other, with respect to several pointed and important questions, she is resting on her right to remain silent.


SOURCE: The Powerline Blog


 

Trump Unloads On Obama, Clinton, & MSM Via Powerful Sunday Tweet Storm

President Trump knows the power of his social media reach. He also knows how frustrated the Establishment Media is when a single tweet from him can decimate a narrative they’ve spent days trying to construct.

This morning Mr. Trump wasn’t holding back and the word in D.C. is that he has his globalist enemies in an uproar and it isn’t just because of what he clearly said but also because of what the words behind the words are insinuating regarding potential upcoming investigations against both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Check it out:

Note the mentions of the multi-billion cash payment to Iran and Whitewater. One is a should-be investigation involving Barack Obama and the other an actual investigation that resulted in the impeachment of a former president. POTUS Trump never mentions such things at random. His long history of calling how things will play out long before they do is no mere happenstance.

The above tweets are the words of a President who appears to be readying a major counter-attack on the D.C. swamp. He’s fired up. He’s confident. And he’s understandably more than a little pissed off.


 

Trump Closing Down Obama-Era Refugee U.S. Invasion Offices

The Establishment Media called them “relocation” offices during the Obama years. They numbered more than sixty and were spread out across the United States though oddly enough, seemingly focused on political swing districts where five or ten thousand “new” Democrat voters might suddenly be able to sway future elections away from Republicans. (Huh. Imagine that!)

Opponents of these relocation offices called them by another name – invasion offices that oversaw masses of undocumented refugees, primarily Muslim, into the United States. Some warned the program was sure to introduce dangerous radical Islamists into the country. Those warnings were repeatedly ignored by the then-Obama administration.

That is all changing now as the Trump State Department just sent a notice to more than twenty of these offices that they are to close their doors. There is a new sheriff in town named Trump and he’s not so keen to continue the fanatically dangerous pro-Islam immigration policies that were the foundation of the Obama years.

In 2017 President Obama set a goal of bringing in 110000 of these refugees. One year later that number has been slashed to less than half with more cuts to come as the Trump administration rightfully explains that it is both less costly and less potentially less dangerous to U.S. citizens to set up refugee centers overseas.

Imagine that.

Barack Obama went with the more expensive and dangerous option. Why? Because he cared less for the American people and more for his globalist dream of a Muslim-dominated world.

Apologists for Mr. Obama will deny that.

The facts say otherwise.


 

The Artist Obama Chose To Paint His Presidential Portrait Also Painted A Black Woman Beheading A White Woman

When the hue of one’s skin allows pure hatred to be called “art” it is troubling enough, but when a former President of the United States purposely chooses that hatred to create the presidential portrait that will hang in the White House, the word “troubling” falls far short of what it really is…

—————————-

VIDEO: Obama Spent Billions Funding Islamic Terrorists Via Iran-Nuke “Deal”

Iran is still pushing ahead with militarizing its nuclear program. So what in the heck did that nearly two BILLION dollars IN CASH that Obama sent to Iran actually pay for?

Anti-America terrorists. In fact, some of that money went to the very groups (the worst of the worst) responsible for thousands of American deaths. (It’s as if Mr. Obama was paying them for a job well done.)

This was warned of years ago by D.C. Whispers and others. Now it’s being undeniably confirmed.

Who is the deadliest terrorist so far of the 21st Century?

This guy:

————

Going After Obama Is The Red Line The FBI, CIA, NSA, Media, Etc., Will Not Cross…

The Clintons’ survival is rooted these days on their ability to convince anyone and everyone thinking of linking them to a multitude of crimes from illegal email servers to pay-for-play Clinton Foundation money laundering schemes, that should they go down, so too will Barack Obama.

He is the red line of which those in power at the highest levels of government, the courts, and the Establishment Media, will not cross…

“Protect Obama.” That is a phrase uttered repeatedly before, during, and now more than a year after, his presidency. Billions were invested in Mr. Obama’s creation. Potential trillions have since been built upon the foundation that is his ongoing legacy – a legacy that is to culminate in the breaking apart of the traditional United States to be replaced by something far-far different.

Case in point. On February 7th Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, went public with stunning evidence of Mr. Obama’s first-hand complicity in both colluding with, and obstructing, the 2016 investigation in Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private server that many have since indicated was meant to hide evidence of the Clintons’ multi-national pay-to-play shakedowns that took place during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as head of the Obama State Department.

The information provided by Senator Johnson outline rampant FBI abuses, confirm former FBI Director James Comey’s likely cover-up complicity, and exposed the lie Mr. Obama told when he stated he had not, and would not, ever attempt to politically influence an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

It was the kind of revelation that should have generated wall-to-wall media coverage It didn’t. In fact, there was NO television news coverage of it outside of Fox News. None of the networks made mention of it. Nor did CNN or MSNBC.

“We don’t report it – it didn’t happen.” That’s the mantra of the Establishment Media and it has never been used it so consistently as when it’s been done to protect Barack Obama. It allowed him to be elected, re-elected, and to stay out of prison.

Instead, this same Establishment Media continues to push the false narrative that Mr. Obama’s eight years in the White House represent a “scandal-free” presidency when in fact it has been proven time and time again to be among the most scandal-ridden administrations in history.

Ah, but when you are involved in the re-writing of history, the false representation of the present, so that you might have a seat at the table of the powerful in the future, why bother with facts, or truth, or reality?

Barack Obama never did – and look where it got him.

Bill and Hillary and their cadre of schemers know this. They are banking on it – to the tune of tens and tens of millions of dollars.

One filthy hand washing the other.

—————————-

Sr. Congressional Oversight Member: EVERYTHING From Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS, & Other Obama Scandals Connected To Corrupt DOJ & FBI

Congressman Paul Gosar didn’t hold back in a recent interview and he’s now begging the American people to pay more attention and demand answers from their political leaders. According to Gosar, the Obama White House micromanaged everything from drone attacks to illegal surveillance on political opponents and was able to do so via very carefully placed DOJ and FBI firewalls that to this day continue to insulate Barack Obama and other Obama-related officials, from justice.

Via Breitbart:

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), a leading conservative member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told Breitbart News Daily on Wednesday that he believes that there is an interconnectivity between various high-profile Barack Obama-era scandals and the latest revelations about corruption at the Department of Justice and FBI.

Gosar was asked during the interview on the SiriusXM 125 Patriot Channel show about the corruption on display in the release of the famed memo from House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) that detailed FISA court abuses by the FBI and DOJ in the lead-up to the 2016 election and in the months that followed now President Donald Trump’s win during the transition and even during his presidency.

That all came before the release of new text messages between senior FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok that detailed how Obama himself was overseeing everything personally on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and rivaling Trump probe. Gosar detailed how this same corruption that is now being further exposed first reared its ugly head in the earliest days of the administration of now former President Barack Obama, with the Operation Fast and Furious scandal then the IRS and Benghazi scandals—all of which had intricate levels of DOJ and FBI involvement.

If you don’t think the [Operation] Fast and Furious—attacking the Second Amendment—along with Operation Choke Point, you know that sacred amendment that holds our government accountable and protection for all the other amendments, if you don’t think Benghazi and the lack of accountability when they knew something was going to come, if you don’t think that the IRS and the attacking of your adversaries financially, and the unmasking are unrelated things, think again,” Gosar said.

“You know, this previous administration—the Obama administration—micromanaged everything out of the White House. And I challenge people, remember the Syrian strikes that were actually handpicked and dictated by the president at that time. This gentleman was involved in everything. That’s where all this leads. When you look at the cover-up with the email scandal with Hillary Clinton, it gets—it should have pointed out exactly what we’ve been talking about, that this was the weaponization of our Justice Department not only to cover up for the previous administration and the wrongdoing and ills of them and those associated with them, but also to attack a sitting president—actually a candidate at the time, then president-elect and then a current, sitting president you know of an opposition party. This is outrageous, and you are exactly right we have got to get to the bottom of this so that people are held accountable because that is what America wants. But it’s going to be a hard, slow slog trying to get this information out. But it’s coming, as witnessed by the memo from Devin Nunes and as witnessed by Grassley and Graham and new revelations and the Inspector General—don’t forget Michael Horowitz sitting out there as well.”

Gosar is a key member of the House Oversight Committee who led the way in pushing to hold now former Attorney General Eric Holder accountable for Fast and Furious. He was one of the first members of Congress to demand Holder’s resignation, and helped lead the effort to hold Holder in both criminal and civil contempt of Congress for his refusal to be transparent about the matter.

——–

Viral Text Exposes Obama Lies: “POTUS (Obama) WANTS TO KNOW EVERYTHING WE’RE (FBI) DOING”

He told the media he would never-ever influence an ongoing law enforcement investigation while at the very same time he was ordering then-FBI Director James Comey to tell him everything about an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

That is the Obama Way: Lie to the American people over and over again while doing the very thing that lie says you would never do. #obamaknew #obamanixon #obamagate

PROOF:

——————————

REPORT: Obama/Clinton Landmines Are Now Detonating – On Democrats

Since his departure from the White House the Establishment Media has been heralding Barack Obama’s “scandal free” presidency. It’s an absurd declaration of course given the rampant waste, fraud, and abuse that ran amok for all of the eight Obama years that included pay for play schemes, the use of the IRS as a political weapon, Benghazi, the creation of ISIS, and many-many more.

And now comes the Nunes memo which reveals some of what was a widespread and stunningly abusive overreach of federal surveillance by the Obama administration.

Via The City Journal:

The Nunes Memo: Just an Opening Act

Landmines left behind by the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign might soon start detonating—on Democrats.

The publication yesterday by the House Intelligence Committee, under the leadership of chairman Devin Nunes, of a four-page summary memo regarding FBI surveillance of a Trump campaign advisor in 2016 is the long-awaited opening act of an extended drama about the Obama administration’s abuse of power—which, when all is revealed, might yet outdo that of the Nixon administration.

Obama concealed his sharp-edged, Chicago-style machine politics under the rhetorical cover of progressivism. He was protected by a press corps that first enlisted in his administration and then fought to stop Donald Trump. But now that Obama is out of office, his ability to intimidate is much diminished. This past week, a 2005 picture of a beaming Obama next to a bright-eyed Louis Farrakhan surfaced, after having been held back for more than a decade at the behest of a member of the Congressional Black Caucus. Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey, who had been tried for corruption by Obama’s Justice Department after he refused to toe the party line about the “peace-loving” mullahs of Iran, has now seen the charges against him dropped. Z Street, a hawkish nonprofit supporter of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government in Israel, had been tied up with IRS matters since 2009; it has just been released from its legal chains. Democrats are holding to the line that the prophet of hope and change ran a pure administration, virtually free of scandal. But the memo is probably just the beginning; we’re likely to see many more revelations come out.

Obama isn’t directly mentioned in the memo. But he’s nonetheless implicated through his appointees’ apparent efforts to clear Hillary Clinton in her State Department email scandal while undermining her opponent, Trump, through the veneer of legality provided by FISA (the Foreign Intelligence Security Act) warrants, justified solely by the so-called Steele Dossier. The dossier was paid for by Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee; it was created by former MI6 agent Christopher Steele, who despised Trump, and the “research” firm Fusion GPS. The FISA Court, supervised by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, was never told about the unverified dossier’s origins.

As for matters of Russian collusion: Fusion GPS was tied to Vladimir Putin’s associates in the Kremlin, who wanted to undermine the Magnitsky Act, a U.S. law that sanctions Russian officials believed to be connected with the murder of anti-Kremlin lawyer Sergei Magnitsky. The “journalists” at CNN made much of Donald Trump Jr.’s 20-minute meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower in 2016, while ignoring her meeting, before and after that one, with Fusion’s cofounder, former Wall Street Journal reporter Glen Simpson, who was working to overturn the Magnitsky Act. Simpson slimed Hermitage Capital’s Willian Browder, who had helped pass the Magnitsky legislation and authored the important book Red Notice.

Wonder of wonders, the liberal press, long opposed to prior restraint when it comes to publishing material on American intelligence, is howling about the release of the Intelligence Committee memo. They’re suddenly concerned, we’re supposed to believe, about damage to national security and the institutional well-being of the FBI. Democrats and their media allies, notes Roger Simon, have pushed themselves into a corner. They can’t decide whether the best approach is to insist that the memo is a “nothing-burger” or a mortal danger to the country.

So far, not one Democrat has broken ranks. They will surely find procedural problems with the House memo. They will continue to wage their fight, a la Hollywood congressman Adam Schiff, on behalf of “the resistance.” But a resistance is not an opposition. The numerous landmines Obama and Clinton left behind them, intending to waylay the initially awkward Trump administration, are starting to detonate—on Democrats.

The vulgar Trump isn’t constrained by convention. He won’t go soft on politicians who saw no problem in issuing FISA warrants in the midst of a presidential campaign and then keeping them operational into his first term in office. As the information comes out, the Democrats’ FISA subterfuge will be seen by much of the country as a soft coup attempt. There’s no other way to put it.

————————

Journalist Calls Out “Clinton/Obama Mafia” As It Relates To Shocking Abuses Of Power Outlined In Nunes Memo

While Valerie Jarrett’s reported “make this a nothingburger” directive was in full force over the weekend (that exact phrase was actually repeated multiple times by Democrats and media elite within twenty-four hours after D.C. Whispers published Jarrett’s order) not all journalists are following orders. Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business and formerly a longtime member of the CNBC crew, let it be known how she views what the memo revealed with a scathing tweet against the corruption that has run rampant throughout D.C. for far too long:

RELATED: 

D.C. & Media Elite Scramble To Push Back Against Memo Impact – OPERATION NOTHING-BURGER

 

Donald Trump Just Fired Both Barrels At The Deep State

Oh my. Morning arrived and POTUS Trump wasn’t holding back. In two tweets he pretty much lays out the level of 2016 Election tampering/corruption that took place via the previous Obama administration and Clinton campaign. 

And this is just the beginning. The Establishment will no doubt push back in its attempt to protect all things Obama. For now, though, the day belongs to President Trump:

 

REPORT: Are You A Conservative? Then Chances Are The Obama Government Was Spying On You.

Conservative author, filmmaker, and proud Indian-American, Dinesh D’Souza, who was among the most vocal in warning America about the rampant abuses by the Obama government, was then sentenced to prison for what amounted to a relatively minor political contribution violation. D’Souza claimed Barack Obama had deep-rooted fascist leanings. (Where was ANTIFA then to go to war against Mr. Obama?) Soon after, the Obama government proved those fascist leanings by allocating $100,000 dollars to investigate and ultimately charge D’Souza for an alleged $20,000 campaign contribution violation.

And get this – the Obama government had likely been surveilling D’Souza for months and months. The Obama IRS did the same thing to multiple private groups who opposed his socialist version of America. The Obama FBI did it to the Trump campaign. And chances are, if you are conservative and you have shared conservative/libertarian/small government/freedom and liberty/pro-America articles via social media, the Obama government was surveilling you as well. 

——————

Via THE AMERICAN THINKER:

Evidence mounts of Obama involvement in Dinesh D’Souza’s selective prosecution

By Monica Showalter

Would President Obama have been that petty to target a critic for draconian law enforcement over a movie? The way the Soviet KGB might have targeted a dissident?
Well, given the common thread of socialism in both, it shouldn’t be a big surprise that he would.

It now comes to light that apparently, yes, he did. Dinesh D’Souza reports that he seems to have been in that unlucky category, targeted for any violation however minor, after making a couple of richly textured, artistically good and very popular critical movies about Obama. When a minor campaign finance violation was finally found after all that looking, D’Souza got the book thrown at him.

He now tweets that there is evidence for it:

My file—obtained by the House Oversight Committee—shows FBI red-flagged me as an Obama critic & allocated $100 K to investigate a $20 K case
— Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 24, 2018

And that quite a few government resources went into ensuring he got arrested for something, anything. Here’s what he thinks might have been done, given the taxpayer cash that went into pinning something, anything, on him :

If Obama ordered surveillance on @realDonaldTrump in 2016, I wonder if he ordered it on me in 2012, leading to my selective prosecution
— Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 24, 2018

It’s creepy to think there are lawmen with that little integrity out there to have not spoken out about such a blatant abuse of police power for political purposes. And it suggests that law enforcement agencies are shot through with leftists, which would mean no diversity of thought in the ranks, same as welfare, public defender, and other leftwing agencies.
What this vast expansion of resources – $100,000 for a $20,000 at most violation – also shows that Obama’s claims to “prioritization of resources” such as he claimed when he enabled the open border and its “child migrants” – was spoken with a forked tongue.

There was prioritization all right and it had nothing to do with best use of resources. It had everything to do with what was politically best for himself.
And lastly, it validates the truth about D’Souza’s claims made in his movies that Obma had a fascistic streak. He was not only like Benito Mussolini, he acted like Mussolini, given his “priorities.”

If D’Souza is correct about the documents showing this kind of selective prosecution, it’s no different from the IRS’s targeting of political dissidents. Heads should roll for this, and miscreants should be brought to justice – as far up as justice will go.

—————————

BREAKING: FBI Text Said To “Directly” Link Obama To Illegal 2016 Election Tampering

By now it is no secret to those paying attention that when POTUS Barack Obama weaponized federal intelligence resources to try and sway the 2016 Election in favor of the Democrat candidate of his choosing – Hillary Clinton. It is the same kind of illegal use of federal entities to go after political enemies the Obama administration utilized previously with the IRS, the EPA, etc. 

This time, though, Mr. Obama might actually have been caught with the evidence to prove it. Might explain why five months of FBI text messages suddenly and inexplicably went “missing”:

——————-

#ReleaseTheMemo Update: RINO Republicans Help Democrats To Keep Memo Locked Up

While the Establishment Media continues its fabricated government shutdown hysteria through the weekend, some Republicans continue to demand the public be allowed to see a memo which apparently shows a shocking abuse of power during the Obama administration that, among other things, attempted to unduly influence the 2016 Election outcome. It is a litany of abuses some have suggested would rock the nation to its core, exposing Deep State corruption at the highest levels and providing proof of corruption that is at this very moment, impacting millions of private citizens.

(ABOVE: RINO Republican Peter King is now advocating a memo on Deep State/Obama administration abuses NOT be released due to concerns over “national security”)

Members of Congress like Peter King are right when they say the memo might very well be a threat to security – namely THEIR security as millions of outraged Americans come to realize just how corrupt and deceitful their government has become, and how that corruption was escalated ten-fold during the Obama years.

As of now, the document is being held under guard inside a secure room within the U.S. Capitol building – an odd level of security given Democrats’ claims the memo is much ado about nothing.

Meanwhile, these same Democrats continue to push the fabricated shutdown “crisis” with significant help form their media cohorts in an attempt to make the #releasethememo controversy go away as the Obama Machine is said to be coordinating these efforts personally from its office just a mile from the White House.

———–

“Obama Doesn’t Have “Plausible Deniability” And Stupidity Isn’t A Defense” #RELEASETHEMEMO #OBAMAGATE

Whispers indicate there is a flurry of activity in BOTH the Obama and Clinton camps today. Both are reaching out BIG TIME to trusted media advocates to try and make certain this scandal is contained.

Mr. Bongino doesn’t seem to think that will prove successful…

————————————-

RELATED:

Roadmap To The #ReleaseTheMemo Obama-Clinton-FBI Scandal: SEE IT HERE

—————————-

Roadmap To The #ReleaseTheMemo Obama-Clinton-FBI Scandal: SEE IT HERE

Want to know why the Democrat leadership is suddenly so desperate to try and force a government shutdown? (along with some high-ranking GOP folks who were at least partly in on this whole mess of a scandal as well) 

Because the following information is barely being kept contained by the Establishment Media and the Deep State from the masses. They are buying time to try and discredit what is now coming out in order to lessen the impact, isolate and keep safe the highest-profile players (Obama/Clinton) and ultimately survive and move on so that they might continue dismantling the American system as we know it. THE SHUTDOWN IS A DISTRACTION.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

Larger Version: HERE

RELATED:

(see below)

Barack Obama Promises Supporters He’ll “RIP TRUMP A NEW ONE” During the 2018 Midterms

——————-

Barack Obama Promises Supporters He’ll “RIP TRUMP A NEW ONE” During the 2018 Midterms

Obama’s current office, which is run by former de facto President Valerie Jarrett, is just a mile or so from the White House. It is at that location one sees a daily procession of donors, political operatives, party affiliates (BOTH Democrat and Republican) media friends (of which there are many) and more shadowy figures representing a myriad of foreign interests. 

And each day this office and its two primary inhabitants – Obama and Jarrett, are asked the same question:

WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT TRUMP? 

Obama being Obama, with his solar-system-sized ego intact, has been promising to do plenty. The Obama Machine has in recent months been raking in tens of millions in preparation for a significant 2018 Midterm war effort – primarily through an LLC called Citizen 44, run by Paulette Aniskoff , a longtime Obama staffer who answers directly to Jarrett. Citizen 44’s primary purpose is to keep the 2008 and 2012 Obama campaign machine intact, continue to build up its state-by-state influence, and use it as an election entity that will rival the influence of the DNC itself. In short, any Democrat of importance who hopes to rise in rank will have to kiss the ring of Citizen 44 first. Presently, the LLC’s #1 “project” is former California Attorney General and current Senator, Kamala Harris. Senator Harris was handpicked by Jarrett several years ago, and has been groomed “for greater things” ever since – much like Jarrett did with Barack Obama all those years ago in Chicago.

Even more recently, Mr. Obama is said to be promising his fellow elites that he will “Rip him (Trump) a new one” come 2018.

The prospect of a Midterm Election ass-whooping against the current President has the political and media globalists salivating. They continue to view Mr. Trump as a virus that threatens everything. In their collective view, it must be eradicated.

As for Valerie Jarrett, she continues to do what she has always done – the actual (dirty) business upon which the Obama empire was, and continues to be, built upon. This includes a long list of Deep State contacts, a near-constant media machine that continues to push out the carefully crafted image of the former POTUS and First Lady, daily contact with DNC managers Tom Perez and Eric Holder, and presenting ongoing reminders to D.C. political leaders that (in her mind) the Trump era will be (very) temporary and that all would be wise to stay on the good side of Obama Inc.

Among Obama, Jarrett, and their minions, impeachment is apparently a common theme. All they need is control of the House and there will be articles of impeachment drawn up. Whether the Senate would actually confirm that impeachment matters not. They simply want to be able to say, “Trump was impeached” in order to link him historically to Nixon (who actually wasn’t impeached – but Bill Clinton was) and make millions of Trump supporters regret their votes so that a shock-to-the-system outsider presidential victory never happens in America again.

Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Now it’s Trump vs Obama in 2018.

Mr. Obama appears very confident of the outcome. Then again, he was equally confident Trump would be soundly defeated by an epic political landslide in 2016.

How’d that work out for him?

————————–