John Brennan Now Claims Possible “Bad Info” Might Have Led To Trump-Russia Hoax

“I’m just a gullible dumb-dumb so nothing is my fault.” 

That pretty much sums up the defense of the former head of the CIA – the single most powerful intelligence agency in the world. John Brennan has been relentlessly beating the Trump impeachment drum for the last two years, adding fuel to the dangerous fires that were the now disproven Trump-Russia collusion hoax. Mr. Brennan is now claiming he might have received “bad information” on the matter, implying then that he shouldn’t be to blame for helping push an attempted coup of a duly-elected President of the United States.

Image result for John Brennan idiot

Via The Washington Times:

Former CIA chief John O. Brennan now says his months of attacks on President Trump may have been based on “bad information.”

One of the president’s harshest critics had a muted tone on Monday as he discussed special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” No evidence was found to support the claim that Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign “conspired or coordinated” with Russia.

Well, I don’t know if I received bad information but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was,” Mr. Brennan told host Joe Scarborough. “I am relieved that it’s been determined there was not a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government over our election.”

Mr. Brennan said in December 2018, for instance, that Mr. Trump should prepare for the “forthcoming exposure of your malfeasance & corruption.”

“We need an actual leader — our Nation’s future is at stake,” he tweeted Dec. 31.

———————-

Brennan’s words come within hours of his Obama-era intelligence agency counterpart, James Clapper’s interview with CNN where he put much of the Trump-Russia hoax at the feet of former POTUS Barack Obama.

The Deep State is circling the wagons and whispers suggest a few sacrificial lambs will be put out there to help insulate the more powerful players who were actually responsible for the attempted coup of a sitting president. They’ll need the help of some Deep State Republicans to do so. See: Lindsey Graham. 


 

SHAME! Democrats & Far Left Media Must Be Made To Answer For Russia Collusion Hoax (VIDEO)

After two long and very expensive years the Mueller report is finished and early indications are it concludes with zero evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. 

Zip. Zero. Nada. 

What few indictments were handed down earlier were procedural crimes and/or tax issues that had nothing to do with the 2016 Election, Donald Trump, his family, or his business. The anti-Trump liberal media has been throwing out claims of collusion, conspiracy, obstruction, and impeachment for months. None of it was true.

Which of course means this same media and its D.C. Democrats cohorts have perpetrated a dangerously divisive hoax upon the American people of epic proportions. It’s why weeks ago Democrats in Congress shifted from the Mueller report to a rash of yet more numerous and expensive investigations launched against the president. They knew the Mueller report was about to be a dead so scrambled to generate yet more fake investigative headlines to distract enough Americans so as to avoid widespread (and rightful) condemnation for what they’ve done. 

Will they get away with it?

That’s up to YOU. 

Via RedState:

For now, we’d like to take a second to put this entire, sprawling story in perspective. Our job on this show is to remember things, to create a record of what’s happened in this country over the past few years, and what’s happened to it. Our grandchildren will want to know. If the left has its way, they will never see the details. It will all be whitewashed, like so much else in our history. So let’s recall, for the record, what the Robert Mueller investigation is about, why we got a special counsel in the first place. The point wasn’t to discover whether the president fudged deductions on his tax returns thirty years ago. It wasn’t to find out whether he wanted to build another hotel in foreign country. From its first day, the Mueller investigation was justified by a single question: Did Donald Trump collude with the Russian government to steal the 2016 presidential election? Did the president betray his country? For close to three years, Democrats have told us that, yes, he did:

BETO: It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that if there was not collusion, there was at least the effort to collude

ADAM SCHIFF: I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight

MAXINE WATERS: There’s more to be learned about it. I believe there has been collusion.

JOHN PODESTA: It’s starting to smell more and more like collusion

NANCY PELOSI: We saw cold, hard evidence of the Trump campaign, the Trump family eagerly intending to collude possibly with Russia.

If you grew up in this country, it’s hard to shrug off charges like the ones you just heard. Maxine Waters is an irrelevant person, a living sideshow. But Nancy Pelosi is hardly that. She is the speaker of the House of Representatives. She’s third in line to the presidency. Adam Schiff is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He’s privy to the most highly-classified information our government possesses. John Podesta was the Chief of Staff in one White House and a senior advisor in another. Beto O’Rourke has raised more money than anyone else running for president in 2020. These are not peripheral figures. They are the most serious people in the modern Democratic Party. We took them seriously. We felt we had a duty to understand why they were calling the president of the United States a traitor.

There’s a lot more in the 11 minute clip, including breathless media coverage of false stories such as Cohen in Prague and commentators comparing Trump to Benedict Arnold, openly suggesting he should be hung.

None of this was accidental or a mistake. From the moment Donald Trump took office, Democrats and the media have run with a narrative they desperately wanted to be true. They weren’t actually concerned about the country. Instead, it was simply an excuse to get Trump out of office because they didn’t like the outcome of the 2016 election.

Now that the narrative is falling apart, there should be repercussions. Tucker goes on to make that point.

There need to be consequences for this. Once the Mueller report appears and it becomes incontrovertible that, whatever his faults, Donald Trump did not collude with the Russians, the many people who’ve persistently claimed on the basis of no evidence that he did collude with the Russians must be punished. Not indicted or imprisoned, but thoroughly shamed and forced to apologize. If Republicans spent three full years falsely claiming that Barack Obama colluded with the government of Iran, would those who claimed it, ever work in politics or media again? That’s a rhetorical question.

I’m not suggesting they should be forced off the air. But these people should have no credibility after this. Any media member, Democrat politician, or former CIA official that perpetuated this and refuses to admit their mistake should never be taken seriously again. There should also be a real investigation in to how much of what occurred was actually legal and who leaked classified information to feed this farce. If John Brennan and Adam Schiff were leaking to CNN, as has been long suspected, they should be held accountable with the full force of the law. If Obama administration officials used a false pretense and improperly unmasked individuals to force a partisan investigation, there should be real consequences for that. If FBI and DOJ officials lied to a FISA court, that can’t just be brushed aside.

None of this is asking to prosecute political enemies. It’s asking for our justice system to be evenly and fairly applied. This sad episode in our nation’s history has been profoundly damaging. It’s hamstrung foreign affairs, caused incredible division, and even led to violence as #resistance members lashed out in public, egged on by a narrative that never had factual backing. Fully 67% of Democrats believe Trump not only colluded with Russia but that Russia changed vote totals. That’s completely insane and it’s a direct result of people lying on a daily basis about things they had no evidence of.

When the Mueller report finally drops, it’s going to be important to remember who pushed us so close to the edge and to point clearly to their political motivations to do so.

Image result for Russia Collusion hoax


 

“IT WASN’T RUSSIA. IT WAS US.”

By now most reasonable-thinking folks understand the entirety of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax was little more than a multi-billion dollar Democrat-media-Deep State scam meant to discredit the results of the 2016 Election. What the below map also shows is just how truly widespread President Trump’s America-First message is to the nation’s voters. The radical left has spent decades pushing millions into high-population density centers (cities) whereby they become almost completely dependent upon government services in order to survive. This results in more voters for radical left Democrat candidates who repeatedly promise yet more of those services—for free. These millions of urban voters are more easily manipulated and thus become the foundation for the Democrat Party.  They do not represent the entirety of the country, though. Far from it in fact. 

It wasn’t Russia that won the 2016 election. It was us.

Image result for Trump's America

Image result for Trump's America


 

BREAKING: Rod Rosenstein Is Now Under Investigation (VIDEO)

 It was a huge announcement by former U.S. District Attorney and current powerhouse lawyer, Joe DiGenova last night when he announced that Rod Rosenstein, the high-ranking DOJ official at the center of the Trump/Russia hoax, is now under investigation. If true it is confirmation of the long-standing rumors that the Trump White House has quietly been moving against the Deep State with its own investigations and one or more very significant bombshell revelations are about to drop. Rosenstein has been a highly effective Deep State firewall at the DOJ, slow-walking document requests and giving vast powers over to the anti-Trump Mueller investigation.


 

Trump Unloads On Obama, Clinton, & MSM Via Powerful Sunday Tweet Storm

President Trump knows the power of his social media reach. He also knows how frustrated the Establishment Media is when a single tweet from him can decimate a narrative they’ve spent days trying to construct.

This morning Mr. Trump wasn’t holding back and the word in D.C. is that he has his globalist enemies in an uproar and it isn’t just because of what he clearly said but also because of what the words behind the words are insinuating regarding potential upcoming investigations against both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Check it out:

Note the mentions of the multi-billion cash payment to Iran and Whitewater. One is a should-be investigation involving Barack Obama and the other an actual investigation that resulted in the impeachment of a former president. POTUS Trump never mentions such things at random. His long history of calling how things will play out long before they do is no mere happenstance.

The above tweets are the words of a President who appears to be readying a major counter-attack on the D.C. swamp. He’s fired up. He’s confident. And he’s understandably more than a little pissed off.


 

REPORT: It Was The FBI That Illegally Meddled In The 2016 Election NOT Russia (MUST READ)

The last eighteen months of the “Trump/Russia Collusion” operation has been one of the greatest political hoaxes of our time – and potentially one of the most dangerous to both national and personal security, as well. 

So says a just-released report from IBD. Check it out:

—————

…The text messages sent between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, which became public on Wednesday, provide a rare and illuminating window into just how rabidly partisan putatively nonpartisan law enforcement officials can be.
In the exchanges, they called Trump an “idiot,” a “loathsome human,” an “enormous do-che,” and said “this man cannot be president.

…When Hillary accepted the party’s nomination in July, Strzok texted “Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major party! About damn time!” During one of the presidential debates, he texted: “Oh hot damn. HRC is throwing down saying Trump in bed with Russia.” In one of Page’s texts, she said Hillary “just has to win now.”

(It should be noted the “just need to win” reference sounds very much like a high-level operative admitting they have purposely set up the 2016 Election for the candidate of their choosing, not the American people. Classic Deep State arrogance right there.)

…On their own, these texts might not be a big deal, even if the two are career government employees. Everyone is entitled to their opinions.
But Strzok and Page weren’t just a couple of bureaucrats crunching numbers in a windowless office at the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Strzok was a key player in the FBI’s investigation into whether Clinton had broken the law by using a private, unsecured email server to handle highly classified documents. He interviewed several of the people involved, including Clinton herself.

He was also the person who watered down the language in the statement used by Comey to exonerate Clinton, changing it from “gross negligence” to “extremely careless,” which as we noted in this space was critical to Comey’s claim that Clinton didn’t break any laws.

Remember, too, that when Strzok was busy airbrushing Clinton’s email crimes, he would have known that, had the FBI done the right thing and indicted her for putting national security at risk, it would have crushed her campaign, and helped elect the man Strzok clearly felt should never be president.
In other words, Strzok had motive, means and opportunity to sabotage that investigation.

…So did these FBI agents act on their fervent anti-Trump beliefs in ways that might have compromised the integrity of both investigations?
The text exchanges suggest they very well may have. Consider:

Strzok texted Page saying that while he wanted to believe “that there’s no way he gets elected” he was “afraid we can’t take that risk,” then added cryptically that “it’s like an insurance policy.” The text doesn’t make clear what the “it” was, but does suggest the topic was discussed with the deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe.

In August, Page told Strzok he should stay where he is because “you’re meant to protect the country from that menace,” meaning Trump. She then sent a link to a David Brooks column in The New York Times which argued that, with Trump, “There comes a time when neutrality and laying low become dishonorable. If you’re not in revolt, you’re in cahoots.” To which Strzok said “of course I’ll try to approach it that way … I can protect our country at many levels.”

Days after the election, Page texted to say she bought “All the President’s Men,” a book about Nixon’s demise from the Watergate scandal, because “I needed to brush up on Watergate.”
One of the texts also suggests that both knew they should be careful when discussing Clinton. In April 2016, Page texted “you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced.”

At the very least, these messages cast still more doubt on both the Clinton email and the Russia investigations, and lend more credence to claims that both were driven primarily by a desire by federal officials to protect Clinton’s election chances, and hurt Trump in any way possible.

———————-

The above is the Deep State partially exposed. The efforts to destroy Trump have been relentless for months and don’t doubt it doesn’t continue at the very highest levels of this Deep State government.

We are at war.

———————-