REPORT: Did Mueller Know All Along There Was No Trump-Russia Collusion?

As the investigators become the investigated more and more are asking what did Robert Mueller know and when did he know it? Specifically, did he in fact determine there was no Trump-Russia collusion but proceeded to then spend millions and months creating an investigation where none was warranted? And if so who was pulling his strings behind the proverbial curtain to make him do so?

Image result for Trump Russia Hoax

Via Fox News:

Almost from the start, Democrats and their media echo chamber have moved the goal posts on collusion. The original allegation – the political narrative that the Clinton campaign, through Obama administration alchemy, honed into a counterintelligence investigation – was that that the Trump campaign was complicit in Russia’s “cyberespionage” attacks on the 2016 election.

But there was no evidence that candidate Trump and his surrogates had anything to do with the Kremlin’s hacking and propaganda schemes. And no supporting logic. The Russians are very good at espionage. They neither needed nor wanted American help, their operations predated Trump’s entry into the campaign, and some of those operations were anti-Trump.

Nevertheless, in short order, that endlessly elastic word, collusion, was being stretched to the breaking point – covering every conceivable type of association between Trump associates and Russia.

Some of these were unseemly, such as the Trump Tower meeting, an apparently unsuccessful effort to obtain campaign dirt on Hillary Clinton. More of them were routine, such as incoming national-security adviser Michael Flynn’s communications with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the post-election transition. But none of these collusion episodes were criminal. The only “collusion” prosecutors care about is conspiracy; a criminal agreement to violate a federal penal statute – such as the laws against hacking.

There was never any such evidence. There was just unverified, sensational, hearsay nonsense – the Steele dossier generated by the Clinton campaign.

Now that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has concluded that there was no criminal collusion, the question arises: When during their exhaustive 22-month investigation did prosecutors realize they had no case?

Yes, the Justice Department continued to make that allegation to the secret federal court for months after Trump was sworn in as president.

Notably, in June 2017, about a month after Mueller took over the investigation, while he was still getting his bearings, the Justice Department and the FBI went on to obtain a fourth FISA warrant. Yet again, they used the same unverified information. Yet again, they withheld from the court the fact that this information was generated by the Clinton campaign; that the Clinton campaign was peddling it to the media at the same time the FBI was providing it to the court; and that Christopher Steele, the informant on whom they were so heavily relying, had misled the bureau about his media contacts.

You know what’s most telling about this fourth FISA warrant? The fact that it was never renewed. The 90-day authorization lapsed in September 2017. When it did, Mueller did not seek to extend it with a new warrant.

Think about that for a moment. President Trump fired FBI Director Comey on May 9, 2017. Eight days later, on May 17, Mueller was named special counsel. This appointment effectively wrested control of the Trump-Russia counterintelligence investigation from acting FBI director Andrew McCabe, transferring it to the special counsel.

In order to get the FISA warrants, the Justice Department and the FBI had had to allege that there was probable cause to believe former Trump adviser Carter Page was an agent of Russia. Under FISA law, that requires alleging that he was knowingly involved in clandestine activity on behalf of Russia, and that this clandestine activity involved probable violations of American criminal law – offenses such as espionage. Yet, despite the fact that this representation was made four times in sworn “verified” applications, Mueller never charged Page with a crime – not espionage, not false statements, nothing.

When Special Counsel Mueller closed his investigation last week, he almost certainly knew for about a year and a half that there was no collusion case. Indeed, the indictments that he did bring appeared to preclude the possibility that the Trump campaign conspired with the Kremlin.

Yet the investigation continued. The Justice Department and the special counsel made no announcement, no interim finding of no collusion, as Trump detractors continued to claim that a sitting American president might be a tool of the Putin regime. For month after month, the president was forced to govern under a cloud of suspicion.

Why?

——————-

What is becoming increasingly clear is this – Robert Mueller would not have been granted the authority to do what he did for two years without someone very high up on the political food chain to set the stage for what is now rightfully called the Trump-Russia hoax and that someone is most likely the very figure whose administrative appointments infected intelligence agency layers from top to bottom prior to his departing the White House in 2016. It’s also why the Establishment Media has been so aggressive in pushing the hoax. Besides their shared loathing of President Trump they were doing so out of the agreed-upon need to protect a certain former president:

Image result for evil Obama


 

TURNING ON THEIR OWN: James Clapper Tells CNN It Was Obama Who Ordered Trump-Russia Hoax

There needs to be just a bit of reading between the lines here but make no mistake, what James Clapper is doing here is sending out a warning flare that if he’s going down there will be a lot of others he intends to take with him—including a certain former President of the United States. (Really pay attention to how much he emphasizes Obama’s personal involvement in the process from beginning to end.)

This is a Deep State operative clearly rattled by what may soon be coming his way…

Image result for CLapper blames Obama


 

Federal Judge Just Slapped The Anti-Trump Collusion Conspiracy Hoax In The Face…

For months the Establishment Media and its Democrat Party cohorts had breathlessly declared Paul Manafort was going away for “a very long time” while attempting to insinuate Mr. Manafort’s legal troubles were directly linked to his time with the Trump campaign. The truth is they weren’t. Manafort faced trial for matters totally unrelated to President Trump but rather on decades-old financial dealings. And this week a federal judge said as much while also handing out a relatively light sentence that has the far left seething. 

Image result for Manafort in wheelchair

Via: Bizpacreview:

Leftists rage when judge hands down ‘light’ Manafort sentence — that has nothing to do with Russian collusion

The Democrat Party, its left-wing media enablers and special counsel Robert Mueller were all served a veritable smackdown Thursday when the judge presiding over Paul Manafort’s case defied Mueller’s request and handed the 69-year-old political consultant a sentence of only four years.

To impose a sentence of 19-24 years on Mr. Manafort would clearly be a disparity. In the end, I don’t think the guidelines range is at all appropriate,” U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III ruled, citing the special counsel’s demand that President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman spend up to a quarter of a century behind bars for white-collar financial crimes.

“I think what I’ve done is sufficiently punitive — and anyone who disagrees should try spending a day in a federal penitentiary. And he’s spending 47 months,” Ellis continued.

The judge, a Navy veteran appointed to the court in 1987 by then-President Ronald Reagan, added that Manafort is to receive credit for time served, meaning he’s only looking at another 38 months before he’s freed and allowed to return home to his wife and kids.

The Democrat Party and its media enablers disagree with the ruling. By Friday morning dozens of “analysis” pieces and columns had been published by the media panning the judge’s decision.

“Paul Manafort gets 47 months. Legal experts and advocates share examples of people who got more time for less,” a headline at CNN reads.

As an example, the notoriously far-left outlet highlighted the case of a convicted felon who illegally voted in the 2016 presidential election — for then-Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, no less — while on parole for a tax fraud conviction, and the case of a crack cocaine dealer.

Similar headlines and narratives can be found at New York magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, USA Today, MSNBC, Business Insider, etc.

———————–

The above comments outline how unhinged Democrats and the media have become in their anti-Trump obsession. That is the real crime in their minds – Manafort worked, however briefly, on the successful 2016 Trump campaign. For all the anti-Trumpers that is as awful an offense as can be imagined and it seems they would not be satisfied until supporting President Trump is a crime punishable by death. Mr. Manafort was made a target, an old lending crime was dug up (one the DOJ has passed on years before) and used to try to intimidate Mr. Manafort into turning against the president. When Manafort refused, Mueller-led prosecutors threatened him with 25+ years in prison. It was not until this week when a federal judge basically slapped the anti-Trump frenzied prosecution of Manafort in the face did some semblance of real justice take place – which now has the far left gnashing their collective teeth in outrage.

You see, they don’t want justice. They want revenge.

Hopefully more and more Americans are paying attention to just how scary the far left media and Democrats have become. They are now openly advocating for a government that can knock on your door, put you in chains, and throw away the key for the crime of being affiliated with someone they politically disagree.

Hitler would approve.


 

Leading Democrats Now Hinting They Won’t Accept The Mueller Report If It Finds No Collusion.

Yet another Banana Republic moment for the Democrat Party. As the Mueller investigation winds down and various leaks from that investigation suggesting it will fall far short of doing any kind of significant damage to President Trump, leading Democrats are now declaring they will likely ignore the Mueller conclusions and continue spending yet more taxpayer dollars to harass and attack the president. Shame on anyone who supports this version of the modern Democrat party.

Image result for Crazy adam schiff


 

Establishment “Rattled” After Two-Year Senate Investigation Says No Collusion Between Trump And Russia

There was never anything there beyond a few innocent meetings and a lot of media-generated rumors and speculation. Now, after multiple reports indicate a nearly two-year long bipartisan Senate investigation into Trump/Russia collusion came up empty, the Establishment enemies of the Trump presidency are showing real signs of concern their efforts to rebuke the vote of the American people is falling far short of accomplishing that goal.

Related image

Via Byron York:

There have been reports recently that the Senate Intelligence Committee, the panel conducting the bipartisan flagship congressional investigation of the Trump-Russia affair, has not found evidence to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to fix the 2016 election.

“If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don’t have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,” the committee’s chairman, Republican Sen. Richard Burr, told CBS last week.

Pressed on his statement a few days later, Burr said, “The only thing I’ve addressed is whether we had facts that suggest there was [collusion]. We don’t have any.”

…The “no collusion” talk set off alarm bells among those who have devoted the last two years to promoting the notion that Trump and Russia conspired in 2016. The Committee to Investigate Russia, established by actor Rob Reiner and including former intelligence chiefs James Clapper and Michael Hayden, sent out an email headlined, “No Direct Link So Far … But So What?”

…Some might be particularly distressed by the prospect that the Senate could reach the same verdict on collusion as House Intelligence Committee Republicans did in a report that was widely derided in some media circles last year.

Image result for angry democrats

The committee’s Republicans, led by then-chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, “found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded, coordinated, or conspired with the Russian government,” the report said. Nevertheless, GOP lawmakers added, “the investigation did find poor judgment and ill-considered actions by the Trump and Clinton campaigns.”

Democrats mocked the report and its no-collusion conclusion. The document was “rife with significant inaccuracies, mischaracterizations, vital omissions of fact and context, and often risible attempts to explain away inconvenient truths,” committee Democrats said in a minority report.

Even more concerning to some Democrats is that the news from Burr came on the heels of stories to the effect that Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller might not charge Trump associates with conspiracy and might not even allege that the much-discussed Trump-Russia conspiracy even occurred. Many House Democrats have been relying on Mueller to give them a roadmap and cover to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president. Now, they face the question of what to do if Mueller does not give them what they want.

The answer could be that House Democrats will have to do the job by themselves. Frustrated by Republican control the last two years, followed, potentially, by the failure of both the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Mueller investigation to provide proof of collusion, bound-and-determined House Democrats will have to rely on themselves to come up with grounds to impeach Trump. That is one reason why the talk in the House today is of new investigations that will go where Mueller could not, and finally uncover evidence of impeachable offenses. If the Senate and Mueller investigations reach a disappointing end, Democrats might have to go it alone.

————–

That last bolded point is a very important one as it goes to the true mindset of the Democrat who now control the House. Despite an earlier House investigation that found nothing and a soon-to-be concluded bipartisan Senate investigation that will apparently come to the very same conclusion, as well as a Mueller report that multiple whispers now indicate won’t find much else either, House Democrats are willing to waste yet more time and money trying to find dirt on President Trump instead of doing the work of the American people.

That isn’t a republic. That isn’t democracy. That’s political thug tactics of the sort you’d see in the socialist hell that is Venezuela. Hopefully enough American voters will see this dangerous nonsense for what it is and vote accordingly come 2020. These leftist loons in Congress need to be shown the door.

Related image


 

Bipartisan Senate Investigation Concludes NO EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY Between Trump Campaign & Russia

Yes, we can all put this in the “DUH” file but you need to take a moment to appreciate how the socialist media is now working so hard to twist the narrative into something else while also praying the Mueller investigation can somehow find something a two-year Senate investigation couldn’t. The entire Trump/Russia collusion/conspiracy was and remains an appalling hoax meant to damage a duly elected president and carried out by the Deep State, media, and the D.C. Establishment.

Shame on all those who continue to support this political witch hunt against a president who has undeniably continues to make America safer and more prosperous for all its citizens.


 

“The Case For Russian Collusion – Against The Democrats”

This story has been pushed down repeatedly by the Establishment Media for nearly two years but of late, it’s starting to surface into the Mainstream. The reason why is simple. Media figures are hoping to report on it just enough to save face should it eventually go big—even as they continue working to prevent that from happening. (And what they REALLY fear is the Russian collusion angle leading to the China collusion angle that is far more pervasive and a far greater threat to America.)

Image result for The Clintons love Russia

Via The Hill:

Now that both the House and Senate investigative committees have cleared Donald Trump of Democrat-inspired allegations of Russian collusion, it is worth revisiting one anecdote that escaped significant attention during the hysteria but continues to have U.S. security implications.

As secretary of State, Hillary Clinton worked with Russian leaders, including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-President Dmitri Medvedev, to create U.S. technology partnerships with Moscow’s version of Silicon Valley, a sprawling high-tech campus known as Skolkovo.

Clinton’s handprint was everywhere on the 2009-2010 project, the tip of a diplomatic spear to reboot U.S.-Russian relations after years of hostility prompted by Vladimir Putin’s military action against the former Soviet republic and now U.S. ally, Georgia.

A donor to the Clinton Foundation, Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, led the Russian side of the effort, and several American donors to the Clinton charity got involved. Clinton’s State Department facilitated U.S. companies working with the Russian project, and she personally invited Medvedev to visit Silicon Valley.

The collaboration occurred at the exact same time Bill Clinton made his now infamous trip to Russia to pick up a jaw-dropping $500,000 check for a single speech.

The former president’s trip secretly raised eyebrows inside his wife’s State Department, internal emails show.

That’s because he asked permission to meet Vekselberg, the head of Skolkovo, and Arkady Dvorkovich, a senior official of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear giant seeking State’s permission to buy Uranium One, a Canadian company with massive U.S. uranium reserves.

Years later, intelligence documents show, both the Skolkovo and Uranium One projects raised serious security concerns.

The evidence shows the Clintons financially benefited from Russia — personally and inside their charity — at the same time they were involved in U.S. government actions that rewarded Moscow and increased U.S. security risks.

Image result for Clinton laughing money

The intersections between the Clintons, the Democrats and Russia carried into 2016, when a major political opposition research project designed to portray GOP rival Donald Trump as compromised by Moscow was launched by Clinton’s presidential campaign and brought to the FBI.

Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS research firm was secretly hired by the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party through their law firm, Perkins Coie.

Simpson then hired retired British intelligence operative Christopher Steele — whom the FBI learned was “desperate” to defeat Trump — to write an unverified dossier suggesting that Trump’s campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the election.

Simpson, Steele and Perkins Coie all walked Trump-Russia related allegations into the FBI the summer before the election, prompting agents who openly disliked Trump to launch a counterintelligence probe of the GOP nominee shortly before Election Day.

Simpson and Steele also went to the news media to air the allegations in what senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr would later write was a “Hail Mary” effort to influence the election.

Congressional investigators have painstakingly pieced together evidence that shows the Clinton research project had extensive contact with Russians.

Ohr’s notes show that Steele’s main source of uncorroborated allegations against Trump came from an ex-Russian intelligence officer. “Much of the collection about the Trump campaign ties to Russia comes from a former Russian intelligence officer (? not entirely clear) who lives in the U.S.,” Ohr scribbled.

Steele’s dossier also relied on information from a Belarus-born Russian businessman, according to numerous reports and a book on the Russia scandal.

Steele and Simpson had Russian-tied business connections, too, while they formulated the dossier.

Steele worked for the lawyers for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and tried to leverage those connections to help the FBI get evidence from the Russian aluminum magnate against Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The effort resulted in FBI agents visiting Deripaska in fall 2016. Deripaska told the agents that no collusion existed.

This past week, we learned from Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) that his committee came to the same conclusion as the House: There is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

But now there is growing evidence — of Democratic connections to Russia. It’s enough that former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) believes a probe should be opened.

There is “obvious collusion the Democrats had through Glenn Simpson and through Fusion GPS, that they were talking directly to Russia,” Nunes told Hill.TV’s “Rising” in an interview to be aired Monday.

Collusion can be criminal if it involves conspiracy to break federal laws, or it can involve perfectly legal, unwitting actions that still jeopardize America’s security against a “frenemy” like Russia.

And there’s irrefutable evidence that her opposition research effort on Trump — one that inspired an FBI probe — was carried out by people who got information from Russia and were consorting with Russians.

It would seem those questions deserve at least some of the scrutiny afforded the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry that is now two-plus years old.


 

How The Media Unwittingly Just Debunked All Of Russia Gate

Most of you likely noticed the shrill cries of “Russia! Russia! Russia!” over the weekend as multiple socialist news media outlets were all clearly reading from the very same script. The gist of the coverage was that after President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey the FBI had “no choice” but to launch an investigation into a sitting president of the United States under the guise of potential Trump-Russia collusion. What really happened, though, is that these same media reports blew apart the entire fake Russia Gate narrative, proving beyond a doubt that the FBI’s move was overtly political and intended to punish America-First, President Trump for having defeated globalist, Hillary Clinton.

Remember, the DOJ #2 at the time, Rod Rosenstein, went to President Trump and recommended Comey be fired. Also don’t forget that just months earlier nearly all leading Democrats and most within the socialist media were calling for the exact same thing.

So, President Trump, on the recommendation of Mr. Rosenstein, fires James Comey.

Rosenstein then immediately uses that firing to push for a Special Counsel investigation into the Trump campaign and Trump administration while at the very same time, the FBI launches its own investigation into the newly elected President of the United States. While this is going on, former Obama and Clinton officials are orchestrating a wave of leaks to their socialist media contacts, ensuring the fake Trump/Russia collusion narrative is quickly formed.

Image result for evil hillary and obamaImage result for James Clapper and Brennan

This is all Deep State machinations of the worst kind and is no way reflective of a republic or a democracy but rather a dictatorship where the votes of millions are potentially wiped out by the globalist establishment hell bent on maintaining the status quo.

To date, after nearly two years of looking, there has been no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. NONE. The socialist media opines about meetings, discussions, and comments by President Trump and those around him as speculative proof that “something” might have been going on. The Mueller investigation, after tens of millions of wasted dollars, has chased and intimidated Trump associates both close and far to try and build a case that was never there. Some now face jail time for matters unrelated to the Trump campaign and/or the Trump presidency such as years-ago tax issues or the big umbrella charge of “lying” to the FBI.

If true justice is to be served, it will involve charges being filed against all those who helped perpetrate these ongoing investigative crimes against President Trump, his administration, and the tens of millions who voted for him and continue to support the work he’s doing—work that has resulted in record low unemployment, wage growth, a stronger military, America-first trade agreements, and potential peace across the globe.

This kind of Deep State abuse of power can never be allowed to happen again.


A teacher on the brink. A father seeking justice.
Their paths are about to cross and their lives will never be the same…

“MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE cuts to the core of what is so wrong with so much in America. From schools that no longer teach within a society that has seemingly lost its ability to listen, it’s a fictional story that in many ways is more real than what is portrayed on the news and that also has something very important to say to those still paying attention. The characters are believable, the action and dialogue riveting, with a message that should appeal to all of us. Read it. Read it now.”

Available in e-book and paperback from Amazon.com HERE


 

TRUMP’S TWEETS FORCE CNN, MSNBC TO FINALLY DISCUSS FLAWS IN THE STEELE DOSSIER

The old Steele Dossier, that pile of baseless allegation bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and then used by the Obama intelligence agencies to (illegally) spy on the opposing political party’s presidential campaign and then later launch yet another (illegal) investigation into a duly elected POTUS. The dossier is the foundation of what is likely the single greatest political scandal in this history of America and President Trump is successfully forcing the Establishment Media to discuss it (almost) honestly for the first time.

Image result for Trump vs dossier

Via The Daily Caller: 

Viewers of CNN and MSNBC were exposed for the first time Tuesday night to coverage that undercuts the core allegations of the infamous Steele dossier, and it’s all thanks to President Donald Trump’s tweets.

Yahoo! News’ Michael Isikoff appeared on both networks to respond to Trump’s tweets thanking the veteran reporter for his recent comments that the dossier’s major allegations are likely false.

…The Cohen claim is perhaps the strongest and most specific allegation of collusion in the entire dossier, which was funded by the DNC and Clinton campaign. But as Isikoff asserted in the podcast, it now appears that both of the allegations “are likely false.”

“When you actually get into the details of the Steele dossier, the specific allegations, we have not seen the evidence to support them, and in fact, there is good grounds to think that some of the more sensational allegations will never be proven and are likely false,” Isikoff said.

Trump’s tweets generated interest in Isikoff’s comments, and the reporter was brought on for interviews with CNN’s Chris Cuomo and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes.

In both interviews, Isikoff said that while he still believes that Steele’s core allegations — that Russia meddled in the election — have panned out, he believes that it’s claims related to the Trump campaign are flimsy at best, and likely false.


 

Donations From Russia To Trump = 0. Donations From Russia To The Clintons = $145,500,000

Just a bit of information you may want to share with others – especially those diehard anti-Trumpers who somehow still think the Russians favored Trump over the Clintons. Such a belief is a total fabrication courtesy of the Establishment Media and a whole lot of ignorance. The facts are clear – Russia invested a ton of money into the Clintons and the Clintons gobbled it up even when that investment came at the expense of America’s national security. 

“All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia.”

-Newsweek report: 2017

Image result for Bill and Hillary laughing money


 

And So It Begins…Media Pushes For Mueller To Indict Donald Trump Jr.

D.C. Whispers warned of it last year and again just days ago. Now, the Establishment Media is confirming those earlier reports. The Mueller investigation appears poised to indict President Trump’s first-born son, Donald Trump Jr. 

Image result for Mueller vs Donald Trump Jr

Here is the headline and report out today via NPR:

Trump Jr.’s 2017 Testimony Conflicts With Cohen’s Account Of Russian Talks

Updated at 11:14 a.m. ET

Donald Trump Jr.’s testimony to Congress about his family’s real estate negotiations with powerful Russians does not comport with the new version laid out by Donald Trump’s ex-attorney Michael Cohen, official transcripts show.

Trump Jr. told the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2017 that although there had been negotiations surrounding a prospective Trump Tower in Moscow, they concluded without result “at the end” of 2014.

“But not in 2015 or 2016?” Trump Jr. was asked.

“Certainly not ’16,” he said. “There was never a definitive end to it. It just died of deal fatigue.”

Trump’s account contrasts with the new version of events given by Cohen on Thursday in a guilty plea in federal court. In that new version, Cohen says the discussions with at least one Russian government official and others in Moscow continued through June 2016, well into Trump’s presidential campaign.

Cohen initially told Congress he reached out to a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin and didn’t hear back. On Thursday, his guilty plea acknowledged that he had heard back and that other negotiations with other Russians went forward.

Trump Jr. told the Senate committee last year that he was “peripherally aware” of these discussions but that he didn’t know that Cohen had sent an email to the Putin aide, Dmitry Peskov.

The timeline

The shift in understanding of the events of 2016 provided by Cohen is important for a few reasons:

First, it called into question the Trump family’s denials about having business dealings with Russians. Second, it confirmed the Trumps had a channel open with powerful Russians at the same time the Russian government was waging a widespread campaign of “active measures” against the United States.

According to Trump Jr. and others who have spoken to Congress, the Trump family was negotiating with Moscow real estate billionaire Aras Agalarov and his family.

Aras and his son Emin also were in the chain of contacts used to convey an offer of help for the Trump campaign from the Russian government to Trump Jr., one that yielded a meeting in New York City in June of 2016. Trump Jr. and other top campaign leaders hosted a delegation they believed would deliver dirt on Hillary Clinton.

The contrast between Cohen’s statement and Trump Jr’s version of events may complicate potential legal problems for Trump Jr. Although seldom prosecuted, lying to Congress is against the law — as evidenced by Cohen’s plea.

If the office of special counsel Robert Mueller is looking for prospective criminal charges to level against Trump Jr. and it has evidence from Cohen or others that he was aware of the Moscow negotiations into 2016, that could prove problematic for Trump Jr.

Trump Jr. was advised in his Senate Judiciary Committee interview that although he hadn’t sworn an oath to tell the truth, he was required by law to answer questions from Congress truthfully. He was asked whether he understood that.

“I do,” Trump Jr. answered.

—————-

To be sure, none of the above media-generated hype proves anything legally against Donald Trump Jr. It is speculation, but very dangerous speculation as it is clearly working hand-in-hand with the Mueller investigation. Mueller goes after Cohen, Cohen then offers up a likely Mueller-constructed plea deal that implicates Donald Trump Jr. Media stories are then built around that implication thus laying the groundwork for Mueller’s next move—an indictment.

It doesn’t take much imagination to realize the seismic shock those stunning headlines would generate.

Let us hope President Trump is fully prepared to go to war to save his family and squash this attempt quickly because it appears we are now on the brink of that very conflict.


 

As Reported Earlier, Increasingly Desperate Mueller Goes After President Trump’s Children In Attempt To Damage Him

After legal push-back from Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and Jerome Corsi, all of whom have shown a reluctance to cooperate fully with the witch-hunt Special Counsel, (including an alleged attempt by Robert Mueller to get them to lie in order to implicate President Trump) Mueller has turned his abuse of power machinations against former Trump attorney Michael Cohen who was subjected to more than 70 hours of questioning by the Special Counsel, the results of which the Mueller team is now said to be actively leaking to favored media contacts. That doesn’t mean Mr. Mueller is completely satisfied, though. He was counting on more witnesses to corroborate what Cohen is now willing to admit/lie to in order to minimize his sentencing. That corroboration was to come in from Manafort, Stone, and Corsi. So far, that hasn’t happened even as abuse of power allegations are ramping up against Mueller.

Image result for Mueller vs Donald Trump Jr

Whispers indicate it is Donald Trump Jr. who has been in the Special Counsel’s legal line of fire for the past several months and it is this soon-to-be aggressive implication that Mueller hopes will finally buckle the political knees of the president.

It must be noted that to date that after nearly two years and tens of millions of dollars of investigations there has been zero evidence of any actual wrongdoing by President Trump or his family regarding allegations of Russia collusion. The Special Counsel operation is said to have become increasingly aggressive/volatile in recent weeks as a desperate Mueller works feverishly to organize something that resembles a competent investigation. That’s likely difficult given the entire premise of the investigation was flawed to begin with as it was based upon a ludicrous anti-Trump smear campaign bought and paid for by the Clinton machine and aided by the former Obama government.

With Cohen’s most recent plea deal Mueller would have us believe that while admitting to being a liar, that Mr. Cohen should also be fully believed when it comes to his willingness to suggest then-candidate Trump was doing something shady regarding Russian business dealings in 2016. Cohen has also implicated Donald Trump Jr. and perhaps other members of the Trump family in these alleged dealings. (None of which, even if true, appear to actually be illegal, meaning Mueller is attempting to create optics vs an actual fair and balanced legal investigation.)

Image result for Mueller and Cohen

What’s missing is any corroboration and that is why Mueller is pushing down so hard on Manafort, Stone, and Corsi. He needs at least one of them to break and be willing to go along with the Mueller-Cohen created narrative and then likely use President Trump’s written responses to the Special Counsel to build a case against the president himself. 

Abuse of power. Intimidation. Leaks. Manipulations. Even outright lies—everything is being brought to bear against President Trump, his administration, and even his family.


 

Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff Promises Russia Investigations x1000 If Dems Take The House

Despite multiple Congressional investigations already, and the still ongoing Mueller-led investigation into allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 Election which is costing tens of millions of taxpayer dollars with nothing significant to show for it, Democrat Adam Schiff is urging voters to give Democrats the House so that yet more anti-Trump investigations can be launched on the taxpayer dime. 

Image result for Crazy Adam Schiff

(ABOVE: Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff is promising many more anti-Trump investigations if his party wins control of the House after tonight’s elections.)

—————

Via KTLA 5:

Rep. Schiff: If Democrats Flip House, Renewing Probe on Russia’s Election Meddling Will Be Top Priority

Schiff, ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said he was feeling optimistic about Democrats’ chances of netting the 23 seats they need to take back control of the House. If they succeed, Schiff is widely expected to take over as chair of the committee tasked with investigating Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

“We’re not taking anything for granted,” Schiff said, but laid out his priorities as the committee’s chair if control of the House flips. Reviving the investigation into Russia’s election meddling is at the top of the list, Schiff said, and also probing whether Russia has financial leverage over President Trump through his business interests.

“The president has sought to keep that off limits, but if that’s the leverage Russians pose that’s a real threat to our country,” Schiff told The Times.

—————–

Logic indicates that after nearly two years of multi-million dollar investigations that Congress, Mueller, and/or the anti-Trump media powers would have come up with something substantive.

They haven’t.

So, what does Congressman Schiff offer to an America benefitting from the Trump economic miracle happening now?

To attack that miracle in favor of highly partisan, abusive, and ultimately destructive, politics.


 

FBI/Deep State Caught Hiding “Political Embarrassment” Instead Of Telling The Truth On Trump/Russia Docs

It was a full-on cover-up intended to hide the FBI’s direct culpability in pushing and enabling the fake Trump/Russia collusion narrative that had ‘national security’ used as justification for keeping the facts from Congress and the American people so that they could continue to try and damage the Trump presidency and protect the DNC and the Clintons. It is a classic example of Deep State manipulations—and they’ve now been caught red-handed. 

Via The Hill:

FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI have tried to thwart President Trump on releasing the evidence, suggesting it will harm national security, make allies less willing to cooperate, or even leave him vulnerable to accusations that he is trying to obstruct the end of the Russia probe.

Before you judge the DOJ’s and FBI’s arguments — which are similar to those offered to stop the release of information in other major episodes of American history, from the Bay of Pigs to 9/11 — consider Footnote 43 on Page 57 of Chapter 3 of the House Intelligence Committee’s report earlier this year on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Until this past week, the footnote really had garnered no public intrigue, in part because the U.S. intelligence community blacked out the vast majority of its verbiage in the name of national security before the report was made public.

From the heavy redactions, all one could tell is that FBI general counsel James Baker met with an unnamed person who provided some information in September 2016 about Russia, email hacking and a possible link to the Trump campaign.

Not a reporter or policymaker would have batted an eyelash over such a revelation.

Then, last Wednesday, I broke the story that Baker admitted to Congress in an unclassified setting — repeat, in an unclassified setting — that he had met with a top lawyer at the firm representing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and received allegations from that lawyer about Russia, Trump and possible hacking.

It was the same DNC, along with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, that funded the unverified, salacious dossier by a British intel operative, Christopher Steele, that became a central piece of evidence used to justify the FBI surveillance of the Trump campaign in the final days of the election.

And it was the same law firm that made the payments for the dossier research so those could be disguised in campaign spending reports to avoid the disclosure of the actual beneficiaries of the research, which were Clinton and the DNC.

And it was, it turns out, the same meeting that was so heavily censored by the intel agencies from Footnote 43 in the House report — treated, in other words, as some big national security secret.

What makes this so extraordinary is that the FBI and the DOJ would have Americans believe that a contact with a lawyer for a political party during the middle of the election is somehow a matter of national security that should be hidden from the public.

Well, that argument was proven to be a lie by the very way the interview with Baker played out last Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Baker was not interviewed in a “SCIF” — a “sensitive compartmented information facility” routinely used to discuss super-secret, highly sensitive information. There was no claim of classification over any information he provided Congress that day.

So we can now say with some authority that the earlier redaction in Footnote 43 was done in the name of a national security concern that did not exist.

That means the redaction of Footnote 43 had more to do with political embarrassment than with national security. And that should concern us all.

The Founding Fathers intended government to be open and transparent except when national security was at risk. They never intended national security to be used to hide old-fashioned politics.

So, Mr. President, when you weigh those DOJ/FBI arguments against declassification, please don’t forget the ruse of the redaction that was Footnote 43.


 

Clinton UK Contact For Trump/Russia Collusion Hoax Reported Missing & Presumed Dead

His name is/was Joseph Mifsud, a London-based professor who helped to initiate the fake Trump/Russia collusion hoax via alleged contacts with high-ranking Russian officials, British Intelligence, the Clinton campaign, George Soros, and the Deep State apparatus within the United States.

As of this week, the DNC is publicly stating Mr. Mifsud is presumed dead.

Via The Hill:

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) on Friday raised the prospect that the London-based professor who told former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos that Russia had “dirt” on Hillary Clinton may be dead.

DNC lawyers wrote in court filings Friday that Joseph Mifsud, who spoke to Papadopoulos during the 2016 presidential election, “is missing and may be deceased,” Bloomberg News reported. The lawyers did not elaborate.

The DNC stood by its claim in a statement to The Hill on Friday. The committee indicated that an investigator had been used to find Mifsud, who has been missing for months, and was told the Maltese professor may be dead.

“The DNC’s counsel has attempted to serve Mifsud for months and has been unable to locate or contact him. In addition, public reports have said he has disappeared and hasn’t been seen for months,” DNC spokeswoman Adrienne Watson said.

Mifsud was reportedly teaching at a private university in Rome before he vanished late last year, shortly after his name emerged as a key figure in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The professor had reportedly not been in contact with prosecutors in Italy seeking to question him over allegations of financial wrongdoing and his fiancee told Business Insider earlier this year that she could not reach him.

—————-

What the above report neglects to outline is Mr. Mifsud’s link to the Clintons and his arms-length advocacy of the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign via his ties to Italian Senator Gianni Pittella. (Remember, Mifsud was residing in Italy when he suddenly disappeared.) Pittella had this to say about the 2016 Election and the need to do whatever necessary to make sure Hillary Clinton defeated Donald Trump:

“I have taken the unprecedented step of endorsing and campaigning for Hillary Clinton because the risk of Donald Trump is too high,” Pittella told TIME. “I believe it is in the interest of the European Union and Italy to have Hillary Clinton in office. A Trump victory could be a disaster for the relationship between the U.S.A. and Italy.”

Pittella continued, stating:

“This campaign is special…This campaign is not between Democrat or Republican. It’s between democracy and no democracy in the U.S. It’s between having a relationship between the U.S. and the E.U. and the U.S. and other countries, or not. And Italian citizens, together with the world, have the duty not only to intervene but to act, to support Hillary’s campaign.” (source )

—————-

And guess who else Pittella is said to have close ties to? None other than Mr. George Soros. The DNC is attempting to shrug and declare, “Oh, gee, we really wanted to talk with Professor Mifsud but I guess he’s dead. Oh well.”

Whispers suggest Mifsud might have been willing to cooperate with Trump-friendly intelligence operatives and for that he was promptly silenced by any number of powers who wanted to see him gone and then made an example of.

You talk – you die.

See: Seth Rich


 

Pentagon Whistleblower On Fake Trump/Russia Investigation: “It Was All A Set Up”

It should be the story of the century if the Establishment Media wasn’t in the same pockets as those who perpetrated the hoax/crime in the first place. A select few within the federal government’s Deep State apparatus intended to overthrow the 2016 Election. All the evidence to date points to that now undeniable fact. 

Please read on…

Via PJ Media:

Suspended Pentagon Whistleblower Says FBI’s Russia Probe Was ‘All a Set-Up’

…In the fall of 2016, Adam Lovinger, a former senior official of the Defense Department’s Office of Net Assessment (ONA), stumbled upon evidence that the deep state wanted buried — documents exposing Halper’s role in the frame-up job. He voiced his concerns about what he had found and paid dearly for it.

Lovinger, a DoD analyst turned whistleblower, had his security clearance suspended on May 1, 2017, after he raised concerns about the roughly $1 million in tax-payer funded money Halper had received to write Defense Department foreign policy reports.

“It was a topic of conversation within the office,” Lovinger’s attorney, Sean M. Bigley, told the Washington Times earlier this month. “What is Halper doing, and why is he being paid astronomically more than others similarly situated?”

According to Bigley, Lovinger was suspended shortly after he began asking questions about the suspicious DoD contracts with Halper, as well as a close friend of Chelsea Clinton and others. He was then relegated to a make-work desk job until April 3, 2018, when he was indefinitely suspended from duty and pay.

Lovinger, a husband and father of three, was the primary breadwinner of his family, according to Carter.

“When Mr. Lovinger raised concerns about DoD’s misuse of Stefan Halper in 2016, he did so without any political designs or knowledge of Mr. Halper’s spying activities,” Bigley told SaraACarter.com. “Instead, Mr. Lovinger simply did what all Americans should expect of our civil servants: he reported violations of law and a gross waste of public funds to his superiors.”

Bigley told Carter that they had expected some degree of retaliation for the whistleblowing, but were taken aback by the “ferocity” of it.

…“Mr. Lovinger unwittingly shined a spotlight on the FBI’s secret weapon – Stefan Halper – and threatened to expose the truth about the Trump-Russia collusion narrative being plotted: that it was all a set-up,” Bigley said.


 

‘The Utter Collapse of the Russia Collusion Fantasy’

American Thinker is out today with a must-read for those increasingly frustrated by the anti-Trump fake Russia meme that has dominated the Establishment Media news cycle for the last 18 months. Russian collusion remains a hoax perpetrated largely by Deep State interests and carried out by its media cohorts. It’s two primary goals are to debilitate the Trump presidency while also protecting the Obama and Clinton machines from legal trouble. 

Via AMERICAN THINKER:

The two big stories this week are interrelated: the utter collapse of the Russian Collusion Fantasy and the conclusion of the Manafort case, a case of selective and apparently not very persuasive prosecution which flows from that fantasy.

…Richard Wesley, a lawyer on Manafort’s team, called the government’s bank fraud evidence against his client ‘selective.’

Clearly the goal was to… stack up the counts,’ said Wesley. ‘And to give you a sense that the evidence is so overwhelming to draw one conclusion.’

‘There is not a single bit of evidence that any of these banks came to the government and complained about these frauds,’ added Wesley.

He said none of the banks seemed concerned ‘until the special counsel showed up and starting asking questions.’

Throughout the trial, Manafort’s attorneys have suggested Gates was responsible for falsifying bank and tax records — even implying he forged Manafort’s signatures on foreign bank records. They claimed he did this to cover up for millions of dollars he embezzled from Manafort’s businesses.

In testimony last week Gates said he committed tax and bank fraud crimes under orders from Manafort — but also admitted to embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from his former boss while carrying at least one extramarital affair.

Downing told the jury that Gates was a ‘liar’ who ‘tried to get one over on you.’

‘How [Gates] was able to get the deal he got [with Mueller’s team] I have no idea,’ said Downing. ‘He gets to walk out of here on probation… because [prosecutors] were so desperate to try to make the case.’

…As the selective prosecution of Paul Manafort draws to a conclusion, the villains of the Russian collusion fairy tale that was the impetus for the appointment of a Special Counsel who brought this case, are being further unmasked.

Reputable accounts reveal that former associate deputy attorney general Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie (an undisclosed employee of GPS Fusion) continued to receive reports from Christopher Steele, author of the now discredited dossier. They did so after Steele was terminated as an FBI source because of Steele’s leaks to the press and lying to the agency about them. Ohr and his DOJ and FBI cohorts in this stove-piping operation apparently “operated outside the chain of command, misled their bosses (and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) and concealed evidence from Congressional oversight committees.” And they did this work even after Trump was elected and inaugurated.

The evidence to date suggests that Rod Rosenstein, who is tasked with supervising Robert Mueller and his team, was kept in the dark about Ohr’s continued work with Steele when he signed the last FISA warrant application, post inauguration, in June 2017. The Ohr-Steele exchanges which have made it to public view suggest that Ohr’s boss, now fired but then Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, most likely received the stove-piped reports, okayed this channel of information gathering, and even oversaw it.

The Deep State attacks against Donald Trump over the last two years rightly rank among the most insidious and far-reaching scandals in U.S. political history. Even as those attacks are being exposed as hoaxes, the Deep State continues to push them, increasingly desperate to see Robert Mueller find something, anything, in which to damage/destroy the president. It is a conflict of Biblical proportion pitting the will of the people in the form of a new president against the dark pit of D.C. corruption. Which side ultimately wins this conflict remains to be seen.


“Killing is easy. It’s the forgetting that’s hard.”

The year is 1923 and Prohibition is the law of the land.
Levi Bowman and his four sons struggle to survive and thrive in the remote woods and mountains outpost of Sultan, Washington. It is a time and place governed by the gun and the fist where family comes first, rules are meant to be broken, and enemies put down.

E-book version: HERE
Paperback version: HERE

“Lots of action, mystery, crackling dialogue, and a touch of romance while also having plenty to say about the importance of family, living by a code, and defending what’s yours.” -MobelyReviews
BUY NOW


 

COLLUSION: Boston Herald Lays Out Stunning Connect-The-Dots FBI Collusion Scenario

The article is stunning for two reasons. The first is because few have managed to detail the many parts of the Deep State’s plot to defeat Donald Trump in a way that is easily understood as this week’s article does. Second, it comes from one of the nation’s most respected newspapers – the Boston Herald.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

FISA documents reveal FBI collusion

Our media’s valiant efforts to distract us notwithstanding, information continues to seep out that underscores how badly a housecleaning is needed in Washington, D.C.

Last week saw the release of the applications used to obtain warrants from the FISA court to spy on Carter Page, an adviser to the Trump presidential campaign. Obtained by Judicial Watch, the 400-plus pages of (heavily redacted) documents support the conclusions earlier drawn by the House Intelligence Committee (and denounced by Democrats as hysteria): the FISA warrants were obtained through obfuscation and deceit. (emphasis added)

As various commentators predicted would be proven, the bulk of the information that formed the basis for the FISA warrant applications was the “dossier” of allegations about Donald Trump’s activities in Russia. This dossier was provided to the FBI by British spy Christopher Steele. Steele was hired during the 2016 presidential campaign by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, who was paid by Hillary Clinton’s law firm Perkins Coie, who was paid by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The allegations were scandalous and completely unverified, in violation of federal statutes and FISA court rules.

In other words, the FBI used oppo research paid for by the Democrats as justification for government spying on a political opponent and other Americans.

But there’s more. In another incredible coincidence, Fusion GPS had hired scholar and professor Nellie Ohr as a “paid Russian expert.” Nellie Ohr happens to be married to Bruce Ohr, deputy attorney general in the Justice Department. Bruce Ohr is alleged to have passed his wife’s anti-Trump research to the FBI. He was demoted for failing to disclose not only his wife’s employment with Fusion GPS, but also his own meetings with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson.

The FISA court was never told any of that. They were never supposed to know. None of us was ever supposed to know.

When thousands of DNC emails were leaked to the public through Julian Assange’s organization WikiLeaks, we learned that Hillary Clinton had abused the primary process, nearly bankrupted the DNC and effectively stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders. We also learned the press played favorites with Clinton, getting her approval before running stories and forwarding debate questions to Clinton in advance. (emphasis added) (The official line is Russians hacked the DNC computers and gave the emails to WikiLeaks. Assange and former U.S. and U.K. intelligence officials vehemently deny this, and maintain it was an inside “leak,” not a hack. The DNC refused to turn over their servers to the FBI for inspection.)

And then there is Hillary Clinton’s misuse of a personal email server to handle classified State Department information. We now know that then-FBI director James Comey decided not to prosecute Clinton before the investigation was even concluded. We also know that FBI attorney Peter Strzok rewrote Comey’s initial report to change Comey’s description of Clinton’s conduct from “grossly negligent” — which was a violation of the applicable federal statute — to “extremely careless.”

This is the same Peter Strzok who expressed his loathing for Donald Trump in many of the tens of thousands of texts he exchanged with his lover and fellow FBI attorney Lisa Page. Strzok infamously assured Page that they had an “insurance policy” and that they “would stop” Trump from becoming president. At a congressional hearing two weeks ago, Strzok arrogantly insisted that his bias did not affect his job performance.

He must think we’re all idiots.

But then, we were never supposed to know any of this.

——————–

LINK

——————-

Now consider this. Today, trial proceedings began for former Trump campaign manager, Paul Manafort, on charges brought up against him via the Mueller investigation/witch hunt regarding financial dealings from many years earlier wholly unrelated to Donald Trump or the Trump campaign. These financial dealings were actually investigated and found acceptable by the current head of the Mueller investigation and #2 at the DOJ, Rod Rosenstein, years earlier. (watch for that stunning truth to finally be brought to light by Manafort’s defense team very soon.) You see, Rosenstein already had the Manafort/Ukraine/Russia lobbying information on hand from that investigation years earlier. He simply handed it over to Mueller and directed Mueller to now use it to arrest Manafort and (they hope) get him to turn on Trump.

In short, the entirety of the Mueller special counsel isn’t about finding a crime but creating one against President Trump and covering up one perpetrated by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, the Deep State, influential Establishment Media figures, etc.

That is the only logical conclusion one can make after reading what the Boston Herald outlined above.

Now it is up to YOU to share this truth with others.


 

How Barack Obama & Hillary Clinton Slaughtered 22 Concertgoers In The UK…

The Obama administration under the guidance of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton turned Libya into the most dangerous place in the world. It was an odd thing to see Democrats slobbering for war. Then longtime Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed by U.S.-supported insurgents – leaving Hillary Clinton literally giddy over his brutal death. What followed were years of bloody chaos across northern Africa – chaos that continues to this day largely in the form of an ongoing “refugee crisis” that has millions of Muslims being relocated across Western Europe, bringing yet more violence and chaos to those areas as well. See the below headline just out from the UK:

An Islamic radical was brought from war-torn Libya (courtesy of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton) and placed into London where he soon after blew himself up as part of an ongoing jihad against Western civilization. 22 died – many more were injured. It is but one of many such examples to come out of the Obama/Clinton Libya intervention.

Interestingly, the three global powers who wanted Ghaddafi gone most at the time were Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. Russia due to Ghadaffi’s lukewarm interest in re-establishing a weapons trade with Putin’s government even after Putin waived long-held debts owed to Moscow, Saudi Arabia because of long-standing disputes between Ghadaffi and the Saudi royal family, and Iran due to Ghaddafi’s increasingly close relationship with the French government to initiate a Libyan nuclear program. (Which also greatly annoyed Vladimir Putin. Soon after Ghaddafi was murdered Iran would find a very powerful ally in fast-tracking its own nuclear program – Barack Obama)

Here is the psychotic reaction of Hillary Clinton following Ghaddafi’s death, the resulting and horrific results in Libya, and worsening conditions throughout the Middle East that would soon bleed into Western Europe, including the loss of 22 lives by a Libyan Islamic terrorist transplant:


 

A Must-Read Swamp Road Map Linking Clintons,Comey,Rosenstein, Lerner, Mueller, Kerry, Obama, AND PUTIN’S RUSSIA…

If you read anything this week, this is it. The dots are connected and the motivation for a massive federal government coverup made clear. Even for those who’ve been paying attention, it’s gonna blow your mind.

READ. SHARE. EDUCATE.

H/T: Common Sense Evaluation:

———–

Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?
Lois Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?
None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?
I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front-line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, let’s chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009.

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.

The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to none other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn. The American people got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, none other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid $500k for a one-hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

OK, no big deal, right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this timeframe?
Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland.
None other than, yup, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?
The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?
145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?
None other than, you got it. Lois Lerner.

OK, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover-up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now, this is amazing. Guess who became FBI Director in 2013?
Guess who secured 17 no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six-million-dollar thank you present when he departed his employer.

None other than our pal, James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he, of course, is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” (after, of course, his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and, of course, exonerates her).

Nope couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?
In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton laughs as she celebrates with her husband, former President Bill Clinton at her caucus night rally in Des Moines, Iowa February 1, 2016. REUTERS/Adrees Latif

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016 and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?
It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA abuse, political espionage…. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others were deeply involved in it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clintons.

They are like battery acid. They corrode and corrupt everything they touch.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.

SOURCE:

FBI Corruption… Decades in a Nutshell