Freedom Is The New Rebellion

The Democrat Party loathes freedom. It is a party ruled by liberal fascism that would have day to day decisions of one’s life dictated by centralized mandates coming from government. Kids have been taught at a very young age to accept this. They do so willingly, thinking their modern-era contraptions like smartphones and related social media allow them freedom while not realizing those things are already so highly regulated (and used to spy on them) they are in fact the antithesis of real freedom. They are not only being told what to do, but what to think.

From this comes an updated version of rebellion – a growing movement of freedom, liberty and self-determination that is attracting seemingly disparate factions among White, Black, Brown, Young, Old, Gay, Straight, those of Faith, and those happily faithless. It is a war for the soul of America. A war for the soul of all humanity. 

It is a war with battles waged and won called Brexit, and the 2016 presidential election here in America that saw the first true political outsider emerge victorious against the political machines of both parties and the Mainstream Media. Those same two parties and that same media are still working to destroy Donald Trump. They will not stop until either they succeed, or Americans no longer allow them to do so. (Which will it be, America?)

The Freedom Rebellion is now underway in France where a “Make France Great Again” politician named Marine Le Pen, a 47-year old conservative who is defiantly proud of her national identity and her nation’s long and storied history. She will likely face a daunting challenge in overcoming the forces of globalism so entrenched in her county, but to see her vying for the position of France’s next president is testament to how sweeping the Freedom Rebellion has become across the globe. Ten years ago a figure like her would never be so competitive in a national election.

There is no irony in the story this week of hearing one of the loudest/snarling voices of the counter-culture some forty years ago now declaring his admiration for the Brexit vote and Donald Trump. Johnny Rotten despises conformity. Liberal fascism demands that conformity from all of us. The Freedom Rebellion says NO to such conformity. Let us think for ourselves, thank you very much. One of the architects of Punk recognizes that figures like Trump and Le Pen are the political rebels of this age, pushing back against soul-sucking group-think and centralized authority.

The Whole World Is Watching.

And We’re Taking It Back.

————————-

House Intelligence Chair Calls Out Obama-Govt. For (Illegal) Surveillance Of Trump (VIDEO)

House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes is not backing off his claims that government agents during the Obama administration engaged in an intensive surveillance program of the Trump campaign – surveillance which Nunes alleges was apparently done off the books without Congressional oversight. 

Watch his comments below:

RELATED: 

Panicked Democrats Threaten House Intelligence Chair For Supporting President Trump

Panicked Democrats Threaten House Intelligence Chair For Supporting President Trump

The behavior of Congressional Democrats (and some Establishment Republicans) has become downright bizarre even by their normally bizarre standards. Yesterday, House Intelligence Chair Devin Nunes, a Republican, spoke publicly about information he had obtained which indicated members of the Trump campaign had been surveilled and their conversations recorded. this claim appeared to substantiate, at least in part, President Trump’s earlier statements that he had been “wiretapped” by the previous Obama administration.

That declaration by Congressman Nunes has since sent D.C. into an all out scramble mode, a situation that includes Congressman Elijah Cummings, a Democrat, now calling for an investigation to be launched against Congressman Nunes. 

Cummings’ complaint is that Nunes spoke out of turn, going directly to the American people with his thoughts on how the Obama administration did in fact oversee some sort of surveillance against Donald Trump and/or the Trump campaign – a situation that would push the boundaries of normal presidential practice far beyond acceptable.

It should be noted that to date, there has been NO evidence of collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign prior to the November Election, and yet Cummings and other Democrats (and some Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham) have had no issue with repeating their “concerns” over a situation the facts state never existed.

At the same time, the House Intelligence Chair comes forward indicating facts show the Obama administration DID in fact know of surveillance of Trump/and or the Trump campaign – and for that, Cummings believes Congressman Nunes should be silenced via threats of an investigation against him.

The D.C. Establishment appears increasingly panicked over having their Shadow Government exposed. Remember the days when Democrats railed against the increased powers then President George W. Bush granted to the U.S. intelligence community following the 9-11 terrorist attacks? Cummings himself voted no on allowing electronic surveillance without a warrant in 2007, when Bush was President, then voted to EXPAND those federal surveillance powers in 2011 when Obama was President.

Cummings represents so many of the D.C. politicians, regardless of party affiliation, who have grown drunk on the powers of the federal intelligence agencies of which they believe they have oversight powers over.

What Congressman Nunes confirmed this week is what so many Americans who have been paying attention have long believed – we are being surveilled in this country at every turn. What was once illegal for the federal government to carry out has now become all too common practice, and figures like Elijah Cummings have willfully allowed that expansion of surveillance powers over U.S. citizens.

The Nunes disclosure on the surveillance being conducted against Donald Trump and his campaign is likely just a quick glimpse behind the dark curtain of D.C. corruption and abuse of power. Cummings would see Nunes punished for that.

We the People must make certain Congressman Nunes knows he has our gratitude.

——————————

BREAKING: House Intelligence Chair Says YES, Trump Team Was Recorded While Under Surveillance

“Nunes Says Trump Team Conversations Caught in Surveillance.”

That is the now-breaking headline via a just-published Bloomberg Report that supports an earlier scenario outlined here at D.C. Whispers weeks agoREPORT: Obama Used Foreign Agents To Spy On Donald Trump

The gist of the revelations is this: By using foreign agents, Obama circumvented U.S. surveillance protocols. 

Above: Chairman Nunez stated he was “alarmed” by the discovery of surveillance being conducted on members of the Trump campaign.:

“I’m actually alarmed by it,” Nunes, a California Republican, told reporters at the Capitol. “Details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in an intelligence community report,” he said. He said he didn’t know if Trump’s “own communications were intercepted.” The disclosure may bolster Trump’s effort to back up his disputed claim in Twitter postings that the Obama administration “wiretapped” him, which he later amended to say that his team was under surveillance. FBI Director James Comey testified before the House committee this week that “I have no information that supports those tweets.”

“I do think this is a startling revelation,” White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told reporters.

The implications are both clear and very serious. A sitting U.S. President avoided American surveillance requirements by utilizing the services of foreign spy agencies to go after a U.S. citizen candidate for POTUS of an opposing political party. That surveillance information was then (illegally) widely disseminated among members of the Hillary Clinton campaign, Democrat members of Congress, and Mainstream Media figures such as the New York Times.

It also makes current FBI Director James Comey’s assertion that the FBI did not receive a “wiretap order” from then-President Obama truthful. Mr. Obama’s White House was benefiting from surveillance via foreign agencies – not the FBI. (Or the CIA) And because that surveillance source was from a foreign entity, it didn’t require an actual order from a sitting president or approval for a warrant from a U.S. judge, making the spy method the epitome of Deep State Shadow Government machinations.

————————-

Glenn Beck Now Apparently Wants MORE Muslim Immigration Into America

Just a few years ago he was selling a book declaring the dangers of the Muslim faith. Now, with President Donald Trump calling for a temporary 90-day ban on immigrants from a handful of countries known to be hotbeds of terrorist activity, Beck is declaring to CBS that Trump’s immigration policies are “dangerous” and that America cannot abide another year, let alone another four, of a Trump presidency.

Here is Beck a few years earlier warning Americans about the dangers of Islamic immigration and the threat it poses to Western Civilization – the very same immigration he now supports here in America:

And here is the 2015 Beck book titled, It IS About Islam

It IS About Islam: Exposing the Truth About ISIS, Al Qaeda, Iran, and the Caliphate (The Control Series Book 3) by [Beck, Glenn]

From the book’s own description:

“…From the barbarians of ISIS to the terror tactics of Al-Qaeda and its offshoots, to the impending threat of a nuclear Iran, those motivated by extreme fundamentalist Islamic faith have the power to endanger and kill millions. The conflict with them will not end until we face the truth about those who find their inspiration and justification in the religion itself.”

So, what happened to change Mr. Beck’s mind regarding the dangers of Muslim immigration  from the above book’s publication in 2015 to now? Could it be the reported financial difficulties of his Blaze media company? The numbers of radio stations who have dropped his program? The reduction in advertising profits? His decision to support Hillary Clinton for President in 2016?

Who knows.

What is more clear is that Glenn Beck was once among the loudest voices opposed to globalism.

That is no longer true.

————————————

FBI Director Hints That Barack Obama Was Source Of Illegal Leaks (VIDEO)

The Mainstream Media is once again scrambling to cover for Barack Obama. During the hearing yesterday between members of Congress and FBI Director James Comey, Mr. Comey made clear there has been ZERO evidence of collusion between the Russian government and the then-Trump campaign. What Director Comey did suggest is that Barack Obama himself (which would of course involve Valerie Jarrett as well) was a likely source of some, if not all, of the classified information leaks that now continue to plague Washington D.C.:

Congressman Trey Gowdy sets up the Obama-as-the-source scenario at the start of the video when he asks Director Comey if he personally briefed the then-President Michael Flynn/Russian-tied surveillance, etc. Comey refuses to answer. Then later in the video, we see Congressman Tom Rooney detailing just how dangerous to national security these Obama-era leaks have become. Comey follows this up by indicating the leaks coming out of D.C. now are “unusually active.”

The above video reaffirms there is ZERO evidence of any collusion between the then-Trump campaign and Russian officials. Those are the FACTS – facts the Mainstream Media continues to ignore as it works to try and damage the Trump administration and protect the previous Obama administration – and Barack Obama himself.

There is far more evidence to suggest the Obama White House orchestrated the leaks in question, and has Obama-era government officials who to this day, continue to engage in that same activity. Remember, nearly every major Establishment Media outlet was pushing the Russia-Trump narrative just prior to the November election. Hillary Clinton herself was more than hinting at the story. Here is her tweet from October 2016:

All of the above information would have to be obtained via classified information.

Second, the “link” between the Trump Organization server and the Russian bank appears to have been nothing more than spam, as detailed in this Daily Mail report:

FBI bows to Clinton supporters’ demands to probe Trump links with Russia – but comes up blank

 

  • Federal law enforcement officials combed over possible links between Donald Trump and the Russia and came up with nothing
  • The FBI found no evidence that Trump was involved in Russian hacking of Democratic Party officials’ emails 
  • A server at the Trump Organization that supposedly communicated with a Russian bank in secret was a dead end
  • None of the queries Hillary Clinton’s campaign pushed for turned up evidence that the billionaire, or his company, is working with Russia
  • A computer scientist says he found exchanges between Russia’s Alfa Bank in Moscow and the Trump Organization, but the FBI believes it was spam 
  • Alfa Bank and Trump’s campaign deny using the servers to communicate

Now here is where things get particularly interesting. What if the Obama government was the one to initiate the spam linking the Trump Organization’s server with the Russian Alfa Bank and then used that link to initiate surveillance? From there, it leaked information to the Clinton campaign, favored media sources, etc. – all in serious violation of the law.

With that in mind, it becomes very clear why so many in the media have no interest in pursuing the potential truth regarding this situation – that truth would involve their own complicity in violating the law and putting national security at risk.

Add that scenario to a D.C. Whispers report from yesterday:

James Comey Just Explained How Establishment Media Legally Creates Fake News

The ruse becomes even more clear as does the likelihood it was the Obama White House, working side-by-side with the Clinton campaign and using government operatives within the U.S. Intelligence agencies, to create a Trump-Russia story meant to help secure Election Day victory for Mrs. Clinton. That victory was denied, but the fake Russian story continues as a now-frightened media (and some politicians who were also involved) become more desperate to cover their own tracks.

Donald Trump wasn’t supposed to win. He wasn’t supposed to be President and have the power to investigate THEM.

As for Barack Obama, the entire episode is yet another example of his true legacy. A man who cares little for national security and far more about highly divisive and dangerous ideological politics.

——————————–

 

James Comey Just Explained How Establishment Media Legally Creates Fake News

Check out this quote from FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to Congress today:

“…It’s perfectly legal for someone attending a classified briefing to LIE TO THE PRESS about what they heard in that meeting. The FBI cannot go out and correct the record because then they’d be “commenting on Classified information…”

The New York Times or the Washington Post, or CNN, etc., come out with an anti-Trump story based on “government sources” which bolster the anti-Trump slant, and/or attempts to discredit the Trump White House’s take on events such as the bogus investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Election.

That very scenario has been happening time and time again and James Comey just admitted to Congress the FBI cannot come out and correct the record because they would then be in violation of publicly speaking about classified information.

The media is protected because it is spinning a lie, and therefore NOT classified information, even as that lie becomes fact in the minds of the media’s audience. Once again, here are FBI Director James Comey’s words on that very subject as spoken to Congress today:

“…It’s perfectly legal for someone attending a classified briefing to LIE TO THE PRESS about what they heard in that meeting. The FBI cannot go out and correct the record because then they’d be “commenting on Classified information…”

Don’t listen to anything the Establishment Media is telling you. They are not doing the bidding of truth. Rather, they are the willing denizens of the lie.

—————————

Maddow & Media’s Epic Fail Over Trump Tax Return “Story”

It began with a “breathless” tweet from MSNBC personality, Rachel Maddow promises her show had acquired copies of “Trump tax returns.” This tweet then went viral as other media figures waited in anticipation for the much-hyped blockbuster.

It’s now less than 24-hours later and this same media, and certainly Rachel Maddow, were exposed as fools who actually bolstered Donald Trump’s standing as a successful man who more than paid his fair share in taxes.

The backlash against Maddow for here non-story was fierce, much of it coming from her own viewers:

Those 2005 tax returns had already been released by the Trump White House and were reported on by the Wall Street Journal last year. When people realized the crap Maddow was pulling, they were understandably upset:

The only thing revealed by this failed MSNBC non-story was just how motivated the media is to find anything to try and disrupt and/or discredit the Trump White House. After Maddow explains how Donald Trump paid nearly $40 million dollars in federal taxes on more than $150 million dollars in income, this is how White House correspondent April Ryan responds:

Mrs. Ryan appears to think an annual income tax return is supposed to reflect an individual’s entire wealth. (It only reflects on year of income, not assets, investments, etc. More than $150 million in annual earnings sure as heck is the rarefied air of billionaire income.) Remember, this is a woman who’s job it is to ask questions of the President of the United States. Once again, Twitter erupted in condemnation of such stupidity from someone who no doubt thinks they are smarter than most and must do all they can to destroy President Trump in order to “save” the little people of America:

The Mainstream Media’s Fail Train continues to approach the cliff full speed ahead…

————————————

 

The Art of the Deal Comes To Washington: Trump’s High-Energy Style Engages Lawmakers

Donald Trump is winning converts to his cause at a remarkable rate. Multiple meetings/sit-downs/social gatherings with D.C. lawmakers have those same lawmakers leaving with vastly improved impressions of the new president.

“He was on top of it. He was energetic.”

That description came from Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma, a critical vote in the upcoming Obamacare reform legislation. It is a common theme for those lawmakers getting to really meet Mr. Trump for the first time, or, for those lawmakers getting to know him better after a tough GOP primary battle.

Such was the case with a dinner President Trump and the First Lady had with former political rival, Senator Ted Cruz and Mrs. Cruz. Senator Cruz will be a valuable source of support among the small but influential conservative faction within the U.S. Senate that also includes Senator Rand Paul. President Trump and Senator Paul have become particularly supportive of one another of late with both men seeming to genuinely admire and respect the other.

It is a kind of presidential outreach that is vastly different from the hands-off legislative approach utilized by former President Obama, who rarely met with lawmakers. Where Trump is increasingly viewed as personable and engaged in the process, Obama remained distant and detached from the work of governing. He was happy to show up for a bill signing ceremony in front of the cameras, or to give prepared speeches on various subjects, but rarely rolled his sleeves up and did the hard work of actual negotiation.

Not so with Mr. Trump who seems even more energized at the prospect of D.C. negotiations. It is a work ethic that the Establishment Media continues to ignore in favor of stories of administration infighting and political conflict. The reality is that the Trump White House, like any transitional phase of a new administration, had some hiccups, but Mr. Trump himself remains focused on the job of Making America Great Again, and is putting in an astonishing amount of time working toward that end.

—————————–

Trump Jobs Boom – 100,000 MORE Jobs Created Last Month Than Projected

Donald Trump promised voters he would “bring out jobs back” and it appears less than two full months into his presidency, he’s doing just that. Last month, U.S. companies added nearly 300,000 new private sector jobs to the economy. Economists had predicted less than 200,000 were going to be added. It is also nearly DOUBLE the number of jobs created in Barack Obama’s final month as president.

Over the course of his presidency, Mr. Obama’s administration averaged just over 100,000 jobs created per month. (which doesn’t even keep up with population growth) As of now, Donald Trump’s jobs numbers place him ahead of any other president of the modern era, including both Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.

There’s a long ways to go of course, but it has been a remarkable start to a presidency the Establishment Media continues to try and paint in far less accomplished colors. The primary threat to the economic boom already emerging via Mr. Trump’s “America First” principles, is a Congress which lacks the willingness to push forward on the President’s promises to fully repeal and replace Obamacare, cut taxes, reduce regulations, and re-negotiate disastrous trade deals.

Whispers indicate having settled in, the Trump White House is now working 24/7 with leading members of Congress to make certain that work gets done and those promises to the American people are in fact kept.

————————————-

RELATED: Trump’s first full month in office brings massive employment boom as U.S. companies added whopping 298,000 new jobs in February

————————————-

BREAKING: Clinton Campaign Manager Confirms D.C. Whispers Trump Wiretap Scenario

Well…well…well, today Hillary Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook admitted to knowledge of Trump-related wire taps during the taking place during the presidential campaign. This surveillance, according to Mook, was initially to monitor Russian operatives, not the Trump campaign. This is the exact excuse/scenario outlined in an earlier D.C. Whispers report:

Obama Administration Was Using Russian Spies To Monitor Trump Campaign?

“It is an interesting and plausible premise. The Obama government needs no court approval to monitor communications of foreign agents. One or more Russian operatives who were already being monitored, were then instructed to repeatedly communicate to Trump campaign associates. Those communications could then be monitored and none would require court approval. “

And here is a report on Mr. Mook indicating to Fox News something very similar to the nefarious plan outlined above:

Basically, Mook and others are now blaming the Russians for the wiretapping of a political opponent in the middle of a presidential election. (It seems the Russian are to blame for everything these days, at least in the minds of Democrats and the liberal media) There is also another very important problem here. Those wiretaps, whether they are being used against Trump and his campaign, and/or Russian operatives, would be classified.

With that fact in mind, how in the heck is someone like Robbie Mook have knowledge of them? How much classified information was being purposely disseminated by the Obama government in an attempt to sway the election?

Obamagate is getting messier and messier…

————————-

Obama Administration Was Using Russian Spies To Monitor Trump Campaign?

That was the suggested scenario offered up today by Fox Business contributor, Charlie Gasparino during a segment with Neil Cavuto. (awaiting video)

It is an interesting and plausible premise. The Obama government needs no court approval to monitor communications of foreign agents. One or more Russian operatives who were already being monitored, were then instructed to repeatedly communicate to Trump campaign associates. Those communications could then be monitored and none would require court approval. 

Might this scenario be the origination of all the Trump-related “wiretapped” information cited earlier by such publications as the New York Times? (It is believed this was the method used to push General Michael Flynn into resigning his position as Trump National Security Adviser and might also be the same tool used against current Trump Attorney General, Jeff Sessions. Remember, it was the Obama White House that actually set up the first of two meetings between then-Senator Sessions and the Russian ambassador.)

Did NYT Make Up FBI’s Comey Wiretap Denial?

Late yesterday, a New York Times report indicated FBI Director James Comey asked that a statement be made from the DOJ to repudiate President Trump’s claims that Mr. Trump’s home and offices were under surveillance by the Obama government during the 2016 Election. The NYT claim was then quickly repeated by other Mainstream Media outlets in order to turn a claim into a fact.

That’s how fake news works, because guess what? As of this writing, James Comey has actually said no such thing. At least not publicly.

The NYT piece cited “senior U.S. officials” as the source for their quickly assembled story to provide push-back against the president’s claims of Obama wiretapping.

There was no actual statement or quote from Director Comey himself. In fact, both the FBI and the DOJ refused to comment.

What the New York Times did was cite anonymous sources, create a headline that made it appear Comey had said his comments publicly, and then push it out to its fellow leftist news organizations so that by Monday morning, the “Comey denies Trump claims of wiretapping” becomes fact in the minds of the people.

That is NOT fact. That is fake news courtesy of the New York Times and all others who repeated the misrepresentation of comments Mr. Comey never actually said. (certainly not publicly/officially)

The Trump White House is now actually encouraging Mr. Comey to come forward to share what he knows regarding the Obama surveillance of then-candidate Donald Trump:

Additionally, The Hill reports that Trump aide Kellyanne Conway also called for Comey to share any information he might have on Trump’s allegations.

 
 

“If Mr. Comey has something he’d like to say I’m sure we’re all willing to hear it,” Conway said on Fox News. “All I saw was a published news report. I didn’t see a statement from him. I don’t know what Mr. Comey knows.

 

“If he knows, of course he can issue a statement,” Conway said. “We know he’s not shy.”

————————

OBAMAGATE: “An extraordinary, politically motivated abuse of presidential power.”

That is the description of Obamagate given today by former former assistant U.S. attorney, Andrew McCarthy, a man with years of experience within the inner-workings of the Department of Justice. It’s a scathing rebuke of the Obama Machine’s attempt to deflect blame for its attempted tampering of a then-ongoing 2016 election.

Here are some highlights of Mr. McCarthy’s thoughts on the matter:

“…FISA applications and the evidence garnered from them are classified – i.e., we would not know about any of this unless someone had leaked classified information to the media, a felony.”

(Was the Obama DOJ the source of the attempted anti-Trump leaks?)

“…In any event, the FISA court reportedly turned down the Obama Justice Department’s request, which is notable: The FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct national-security surveillance…”

(Meaning the Obama DOJ’s initial request to wiretap Trump and Trump associates was so broad, so without merit, even the FISA court was unwilling to sign off on it.)

“…given the explosive and controversial nature of the surveillance request we are talking about – an application to wiretap the presidential candidate of the opposition party, and some of his associates, during the heat of the presidential campaign, based on the allegation that the candidate and his associates were acting as Russian agents – it seems to me that there is less than zero chance that could have happened without consultation between the Justice Department and the White House.”

(The Obama denial of having “ordered” the wire tapping is important. It should be noted the Obama camp has not denied such wire tapping took place. It’s merely stating it didn’t order it. That’s correct. The FISA court actually issues the order – which is the result of a DOJ request. Team Obama is playing a word game here, something they did often throughout the eight years of the administration.)

“…that brings us to a related point: FISA national-security investigations are not like criminal investigations. They are more like covert intelligence operations – which presidents personally sign off on.”

(Again, a very important point of distinction. Team Obama denied having ordered the Trump wiretap. It hasn’t denied having approved of the Trump wiretap. See the difference?)

“…it would be a scandal of Watergate dimension if a presidential administration sought to conduct, or did conduct, national-security surveillance against the presidential candidate of the opposition party. Unless there was some powerful evidence that the candidate was actually acting as an agent of a foreign power, such activity would amount to a pretextual use of national-security power for political purposes. That is the kind of abuse that led to Richard Nixon’s resignation in lieu of impeachment.”

(McCarthy is correct. If the Obama administration conducted these wiretaps based upon a flimsy “the Russians” connection, it would be a violation beyond what toppled Nixon. And given the Mainstream Media has been pushing Team Obama’s Russian narrative since the summer, it seems likely it was a plan hatched many months ago both as a means of getting FISA approval, as well as giving the Obama administration an excuse that the wiretaps had to be conducted as a matter of national security.)

“This appears to be extraordinary, politically motivated abuse of presidential power.”

(Indeed it does.)

——————————

Read the full McCarthy article: HERE

——————————

OBAMAGATE:Trump Wire Tap Ordered After Clinton Met In Secret W/Obama AG On Tarmac

Today (Sunday) Obama operatives were out in full force, as predicted, spinning deflection to a compliant Mainstream Media. The gist of this deflection was that Obama would NEVER (knowingly) order wire taps on a political opponent and that President Trump’s recent accusations regarding that possibility are beyond the pale.

Even as those denials are being voiced, though, an Obamagate timeline is forming.

Late yesterday, reports began to circulate that the source of the Trump wire tap was initiated by former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch. The same Loretta Lynch who met privately inside a government plane with former President Bill Clinton at the very same time the FBI was investigating then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Via the always-good GATEWAY PUNDIT:

“…We now know that the meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch occurred at about the same time that the Obama administration filed a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers.

The request, uncharacteristically, was denied.

Fast forward to October 2016.  Wikileaks began releasing emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals.  These emails were virtually ignored by the mainstream media who were in the bag for Democrat Hillary Clinton but were spread widely by websites that chose to share the truth like this one.

At the same time, The Obama administration submitted a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks.

No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continued, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes.

The Obama administration was monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.”

——————————-

BREAKING: Trump Meets W/AG Sessions. Obama Wiretapping: “INDICTMENTS”

Various sources have indicated President Trump is meeting this evening in Mara-a-Lago with Attorney General Jeff Sessions to discuss the blockbuster breaking story of former President Barack Obama’s misuse of federal authority to tamper with the 2016 presidential election. Earlier today, intelligence expert Lt. Colonel Tony Schaffer called the revelations a game-changer, and one that might very well lead to indictments against a former president and members of his staff.

What Mr. Obama’s administration allegedly did in wiretapping the home and offices of a presidential candidate was, in the words of Schaffer, something we would have seen from a communist dictatorship. Multiple reports today have already confirmed that wiretapping DID take place. Now it is a matter of finding out who authorized it. If that process finds its way to higher-ups in the former Obama  White House, this could prove to be the single greatest political scandal in American history.

There is little doubt the Obama Machine is circling the wagons and readying for war while its media cohorts are doing all they can to bury the story. Whether or not they are successful is up to you.

——————————-

AMERICAN COUP: No Former President Has Actively Plotted The Overthrow Of His Successor – Until Now

For those needing to get up to speed, please go HERE , HERE and HERE .

The essence of the above links is this: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, and others associated with the former Obama administration, are now coordinating the overthrow of the current U.S. government.

Sound far-fetched you say? A thing of imagination over reality? Think again.

Take this commentary today from AMERICAN THINKER:

“…Political correctness remains so dominant in language and culture in the U.S., that no one dares utter the word “sedition.” Unbeknownst to most Americans, Barack Obama is the first ex-president in 228 years of U.S. history to structure and lead a political organization, a shadow government, for the explicit purpose of sabotaging his successor — duly elected President Donald Trump. The primary vehicle of this campaign is Organizing for Action (OFA), legally founded in January 2013 by First Lady Michelle Obama and her husband’s 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina, with input from David Axelrod. 

…For instance, immediately following President Trump’s late January executive order temporarily banning refugees and visitors from seven lawless states that harbor terrorists, OFA kicked into action, mobilizing people to “spontaneously” demonstrate, causing utter chaos at nearly a dozen of the busiest airports across the country. Hardly spontaneous, it was in fact staged, courtesy of ex-president Barack Obama. Ditto for what happened in late February with members of Congress town hall meetings across the country. A week before the town halls started, OFA released its “Congressional Recess Toolkit,” a training manual for activists and demonstrators, invoking them to go in groups and get to meeting halls early and “spread out… throughout the front half of the room, [which] will make the perception of broad consensus a reality for your member of congress.” So perception drives fake news which is intended to drive reality.

…As Paul Sperry writes in the New York Post, “Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.” Obama’s OFA Washington HQ is now the nerve center that coordinates 250 offices nationwide, which together with its Chicago-based sister organization, the Community Organizing Institute (COI), are planning to facilitate the “training [of] more than 2 million youths in Alinsky street tactics” and carry out plans “to stage 400 rallies across 42 states to attack Trump and Republicans over ObamaCare’s repeal.”

The use of protests, violence, and repeated intimidation goes far beyond political disagreement.

When coordinated by a former president and his close associates, it is sedition – political provocation of the most dangerous kind. Barack Obama’s true importance was not as the first black President of the United States. What truly makes him a historic figure was that he was the first openly hostile to America President of the United States. He was the product of decades of anti-Americanism come to power, and it is now clear that power has no intention of going gently into that good night. Night is to become nightmare.

Some in the media are working diligently to get this information to the public. It is yet another uphill battle as the Establishment Media and various political cohorts ignore and distract. Don’t let them get away with it. Help to educate others to the this dangerous truth.

We are in the midst of an attempted coup to overthrow the current government.

—————————-

Related stories: Insiders: Obama Holdover ‘Shadow Government’ Plotting to Undermine Trump

Limbaugh: ‘Deep State’ is Obama’s ‘Shadow Government’

Valerie Jarrett Moves into Obama’s DC Home to Run Shadow Government

EXCLUSIVE: Barack Obama’s close confidante Valerie Jarrett has moved into his new DC home, which is now the nerve center for their plan to mastermind the insurgency against President Trump

———————————

Trump Breaks Speech Record – The Whole World Was Commenting

President Trump doesn’t merely move the political needle. He IS the needle.

No more clear proof of that is Twitter’s announcement that the president’s address to Congress last night was the most commented/tweeted speech of its kind – EVER.

And the most re-tweeted comments from last night’s speech were the following:

For weeks the Establishment Media and far-left Democrats have been working overtime trying to convince others that President Trump is too divisive and unpopular to lead the nation.

Last night, within the span of a one-hour speech, Mr. Trump decimated those efforts to diminish him, leaving his critics silently stunned and now scrambling for cover.

————————

A Most Remarkable Speech: The Trump Era Has Begun

Even his detractors were collectively stunned at how powerfully presidential Donald Trump’s address to Congress was last night. As some Democrats in attendance booed and gave the president repeated thumbs down, a nation nodded its approval. President Trump emerged bigger while Democrats appeared small, petty, and dysfunctional.

It was perhaps the single most remarkable presidential speech in a generation.

Making the moment even more remarkable was Mr. Trump’s ability to continue pushing for the very same America First agenda that both got him elected and created such opposition among the country’s far left. He hit on the goals of immigration reform, tax reform, a stronger military, expanding education opportunities for all, repealing and replacing Obamacare, and repeated calls for unity within the country.

It was a speech of such vast scope yet delivered with a calm strength, even some humor, that the president won gushing accolades from his supporters and grudging respect from his political enemies:

Not that some Democrats so out of touch and caught in a hate-Trump loop were yet aware of the moment happening all around them in real time. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was in particularly sour-faced form:

Old, tired, and bitter appears to be the face of the Democrat Party today.

Meanwhile, President Trump delivered what was perhaps the most touching testimony to a soldier’s sacrifice the American people have heard in some time. It came in the form of words directed to the widow of fallen Navy SEAL Ryan Owens. There has not been this kind of unifying applause within the halls of Congress for many years – and certainly not during the divisive administrations of Barack Obama and George W. Bush.

America is starting to feel like America again:

————————

GOP Globalist Lindsey Graham Vows To Kill Trump Budget

“DEAD ON ARRIVAL.”

That is what a smirking Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican, said to media in response to the pro-military Donald Trump proposed budget.

Graham is said to be concerned over President Trump’s desire to shrink the size and scope of the State Department, including millions given in foreign aid. The reason is simple. Graham exerts far more influence-peddling the more American tax dollars are thrown to other nations. He chairs the State Department  and Foreign Operations subcommittee, meaning his primary purpose in threatening the president’s proposed budget is to protect his own status-quo standing:

 

Graham’s anti-Trump comments follows weeks of his continually pushing the Fake News Trump campaign/Russia story.

For President Trump, with Republicans like Graham, who needs enemies?

——————————

RELATED:

Dems Prepare To Disrupt President Trump’s Address To Congress

————————————