ALERT: Bi-Partisan Effort Squashes Idiotic Attempt At House Impeachment Vote

Today, 137 Democrats voted with Republicans to halt an attempted impeachment resolution against President Trump.

The reason is simple – the president has done nothing wrong. He is working 24/7 to give power back to ALL of America’s people and is succeeding.

Make no mistake, a growing number of Democrats facing tough re-elections in 2020 are getting worried over the radical far-left turn their party has taken as they watch it being hijacked by the likes of socialist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Post image



“QUITE POSSIBLY THE SINGLE BEST BOOK I’VE READ THAT CAPTURES THE ANGER AND FRUSTRATION OF THE FORGOTTEN AMERICAN WHO FEELS PUSHED DOWN AND NEGLECTED BY A POLITICALLY-CORRECT WORLD GONE MAD. IT’S A STORY THAT IS AS SHOCKING AS IT IS BEAUTIFUL. IT STARTS OUT ONE WAY AND ENDS UP IN A PLACE I DIDN’T SEE COMING THAT HAD ME NODDING MY HEAD AND SAYING, “RIGHT ON!”

I STAND WITH MR. DIAZ BECAUSE I AM MR. DIAZ. WE ALL ARE. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF STORIES AMERICA-LOVING READERS MUST SUPPORT TO HELP FIGHT BACK AGAINST ALL THE CRAZINESS THAT’S TEARING OUR COUNTRY APART.

MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE IS TRULY A MUST-READ.” -John K. Simms

Mr. Diaz's Revenge by [Ulsterman, D.W.]

E-BOOK: HERE

PAPERBACK: HERE

REPORT: How Democrat Party Extremism Endangers The Lives Of Women And Children

Women and children are the primary targets of the human trafficking industry and make no mistake, the bizarre open borders push some socialists in the Democrat Party are advocating would make the problem much worse.

It seems when it comes to the safety and security of women and children these Democrat simply don’t care as they choose politics over human lives.

Image result for human trafficking

Via The Washington Examiner:

With no fanfare, ICE works in the shadows to stop sex traffickers

The nation watches as left-wing politicians condemn Immigration and Customs Enforcement for conducting lawful immigration enforcement actions, going as far as calling for the abolishment of the entire agency. While half of the ICE mission is conducting immigration enforcement, the other half of ICE works out of the limelight stopping such heinous criminals as human, sex, narcotics, and arms traffickers.

The media focused on the arrest of multi-media star R. Kelly this past week but left out that the principal investigators were ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations, partnered with the New York Police Department. The partner agencies arrested R. Kelly on a gambit of charges from sex trafficking to child pornography.

ICE trafficking arrests last week did not stop there, with the assistance of the Topeka Police Department, ICE arrested a professional caddie on aggravated human trafficking and attempted commercial sexual exploitation of a child.

A few weeks ago, ICE worked with its international partners to seize thousands of weapons and explosives. According to ICE, “the international operation resulted in a total of 25 arrests and 53 search warrants executed in three countries. Over the course of the operation, law enforcement seized 5,300 firearms and components, 167 explosives/ordinances and 15 silencers from the transnational criminal organization.”

As an ICE special agent, I conducted a multitude of narcotics smuggling investigations in the San Diego area and beyond. Each week thousands of pounds of narcotics are intercepted by the Department of Homeland Security and investigated by ICE. Agents work around the clock to disrupt and dismantle significant smuggling organizations. A tunnel is discovered on the border; ICE investigates. A boat laden with smuggled human cargo is intercepted by Customs and Border Protection; ICE investigates. A computer is seized with gigabytes of child pornography sent from overseas; ICE investigates.

Without media attention, the general public only recognizes ICE for the “Immigration” enforcement portion of their name. The “Customs” enforcement portion of ICE investigates almost every crime with an international nexus, meaning any illicit goods smuggled into the United States and anything, from illegal arms to bulk cash, that exits the U.S..

Immigration law enforcement will be conducted by U.S. agents no matter what title the agency has, whether it’s ICE, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or any other title. The agents of ICE are enforcing the letter of the law as passed by Republicans and Democrats. Abolishing the agency will surely provide unfettered access by all means of traffickers.



“QUITE POSSIBLY THE SINGLE BEST BOOK I’VE READ THAT CAPTURES THE ANGER AND FRUSTRATION OF THE FORGOTTEN AMERICAN WHO FEELS PUSHED DOWN AND NEGLECTED BY A POLITICALLY-CORRECT WORLD GONE MAD. IT’S A STORY THAT IS AS SHOCKING AS IT IS BEAUTIFUL. IT STARTS OUT ONE WAY AND ENDS UP IN A PLACE I DIDN’T SEE COMING THAT HAD ME NODDING MY HEAD AND SAYING, “RIGHT ON!”

I STAND WITH MR. DIAZ BECAUSE I AM MR. DIAZ. WE ALL ARE. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF STORIES AMERICA-LOVING READERS MUST SUPPORT TO HELP FIGHT BACK AGAINST ALL THE CRAZINESS THAT’S TEARING OUR COUNTRY APART.

MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE IS TRULY A MUST-READ.” -John K. Simms

Mr. Diaz's Revenge by [Ulsterman, D.W.]

E-BOOK: HERE

PAPERBACK: HERE


 

Why Are Democrats & Media Already Backing Off The Latest “Trump Is A Racist” Attempt?

Albert Einstein famously said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting a different result.

Well, by that wise man’s measure, Democrats and the media are full-on insane.

This week they rolled out (yet again) another attempt to portray President Trump and his tens of millions of supporters (many of them black, brown, gay, atheist, etc) as racists because the president tweeted how members of Congress who seem so intent on hating America should go live somewhere else. Now, just 72-hours later, this latest media/Democrat attack has all but fallen silent.

What happened?

Post image

A handful of media talking heads began harping over the weekend that President Trump’s recent “love it or leave” message suddenly reunified what was a chaotic and fractured Democratic Party.

NOT TRUE.

What the president’s message and the resulting (and oh-so-predictable) outrage did was shine a much-needed light on the socialist extremism that has overtaken the Democrats to a point the leadership is, behind closed doors, literally screaming at people to shut up and be quiet.

Image result for Nancy Pelosi unhingedImage result for James Clyburn yelling

The primary cause of the Democrat leadership’s alarm is internal polling data that shows a growing anti-socialist backlash that is a direct threat to the party’s 2020 hopes.

American voters are drawing a line in the sand when it comes to the increasingly aggressive anti-American embrace that some members of Congress have taken to promoting.

It’s also a testament to President Trump’s very loyal and powerful support among those same voters. He enjoys historical support among the Working Class regardless of color, gender, or religion, a fact which, despite the far-left media’s 24/7 attack Trump agenda, not only remains intact but is growing every day.

Image result for trump rally

The Democrats and media have gone to the “Trump is a racist” well so many times (in between other times when it was “Trump-Russia”, “Trump unhinged”, “Trump warmonger”, “Trump is Hitler” etc.) that the attack has not only lost its impact, but it’s actually causing more and more to question the authenticity of the entire political-media complex that before Donald Trump rarely had its disinformation questioned.

Image result for fake news

The Democrat Party and its media cohorts have been exposed as the gossiping, middle-school mentality individuals they truly are, and more and more Americans are simply tuning them out.

Some in the party are (finally) realizing this and working to push back such divisively ignorant anti-American figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez into the background. That attempt won’t be easy as members of the socialist “Squad of Four” have become increasingly hungry for the media spotlight.

The president’s “love it or leave it” comments didn’t help to unite the Democrat Party. Far from it.

The party is actually on the brink of outright civil war and total collapse.

THAT’s why the latest “Trump is a racist” attempt has suddenly gone so quiet. The president had drawn their radicalism out into the open, more and more are asking questions, and the Democrat Party as a whole is suffering because of it.

President Trump might be many things but stupid isn’t one of them.

As of right now, he’s winning—AGAIN.



“QUITE POSSIBLY THE SINGLE BEST BOOK I’VE READ THAT CAPTURES THE ANGER AND FRUSTRATION OF THE FORGOTTEN AMERICAN WHO FEELS PUSHED DOWN AND NEGLECTED BY A POLITICALLY-CORRECT WORLD GONE MAD. IT’S A STORY THAT IS AS SHOCKING AS IT IS BEAUTIFUL. IT STARTS OUT ONE WAY AND ENDS UP IN A PLACE I DIDN’T SEE COMING THAT HAD ME NODDING MY HEAD AND SAYING, “RIGHT ON!”

I STAND WITH MR. DIAZ BECAUSE I AM MR. DIAZ. WE ALL ARE. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF STORIES AMERICA-LOVING READERS MUST SUPPORT TO HELP FIGHT BACK AGAINST ALL THE CRAZINESS THAT’S TEARING OUR COUNTRY APART.

MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE IS TRULY A MUST-READ.” -John K. Simms

Mr. Diaz's Revenge by [Ulsterman, D.W.]

E-BOOK: HERE

PAPERBACK: HERE


 

DOH! Democrat Congressman Worries An Honest And Fair Election Will Give POTUS Trump A Win In 2020!

Democrats don’t believe they can win the White House back in 2020 by allowing the American people to decide.

No, they need to impeach him before the election. So says longtime Democrat Congressman, Al Green.

Image result for congressman al green angry

Via Fox News:

Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, is set to launch a fresh bid to impeach President Trump.

…”I will again, this month, bring impeachment to a vote on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives for bigotry in policy, harmful to our society. #RacistPresident #ImpeachNow,” the Texas Democrat tweeted.

Earlier this year, Green said he believes the president will be re-elected if he is not impeached before 2020.

“I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach the president, he will get re-elected,” he said at the time.

————————

And there you have it. Democrats are worried they and their far-left media cohorts are losing the ability to fool most of the people all of the time as President Trump speaks over their heads and directly to the American voter.

Really makes one wonder why anyone in their right mind would vote Democrat these days…



“QUITE POSSIBLY THE SINGLE BEST BOOK I’VE READ THAT CAPTURES THE ANGER AND FRUSTRATION OF THE FORGOTTEN AMERICAN WHO FEELS PUSHED DOWN AND NEGLECTED BY A POLITICALLY-CORRECT WORLD GONE MAD. IT’S A STORY THAT IS AS SHOCKING AS IT IS BEAUTIFUL. IT STARTS OUT ONE WAY AND ENDS UP IN A PLACE I DIDN’T SEE COMING THAT HAD ME NODDING MY HEAD AND SAYING, “RIGHT ON!”

I STAND WITH MR. DIAZ BECAUSE I AM MR. DIAZ. WE ALL ARE. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF STORIES AMERICA-LOVING READERS MUST SUPPORT TO HELP FIGHT BACK AGAINST ALL THE CRAZINESS THAT’S TEARING OUR COUNTRY APART.

MR. DIAZ’S REVENGE IS TRULY A MUST-READ.” -John K. Simms

Mr. Diaz's Revenge by [Ulsterman, D.W.]

E-BOOK: HERE

PAPERBACK: HERE


 

Trump DOJ Declares Obamacare Unconstitutional – Declares That ALL OF IT Should Be Stricken Down…

POTUS Trump continues to work hard to keep yet another campaign promise to the tens of millions who elected him by doing all he can to see the disastrous Obamacare healthcare law dismantled and thrown into the scrap heap.

Image result for Kill Obamacare

Via Breitbart:

WASHINGTON, DC – The Trump-Barr Department of Justice (DOJ) informed a federal appeals court on Monday that it agrees with Texas and the other states suing over Obamacare that President Donald Trump’s repealing of the individual mandate renders the entire law unconstitutional, and therefore should be struck down in its entirety.

This all turns on the legal doctrine of severability. Much of the time when a statute is unconstitutional it is actually only partially unconstitutional. Typically a court will strike down that part of the law, but sever it from the rest of the statute and uphold the remainder.

Pundits who have never studied or litigated severability will surely show up on television now posing as experts, and criticizing DOJ’s position. But writing as a former law school faculty member who authored the largest academic work on severability doctrine ever published, permit me to describe the argument and why it should be taken seriously.

President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 when a Democrat-controlled Congress passed that statute without a single Republican vote in either the House or Senate. Various plaintiffs immediately filed suit. In the biggest lawsuit, a majority of states in the nation – along with the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) and several private individuals – filed suit in Florida, arguing that the ACA was unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs raised multiple constitutional issues. At the heart of the legal challenge is the doctrine of enumerated powers: The Constitution gives the federal government only limited powers, and so every provision of every law Congress passes must be authorized by one of the provisions of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

One constitutional objection to the ACA was that Section 1501 of the ACA – which is the individual mandate that requires Americans to buy health insurance – is unconstitutional, because Congress’s constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution does not include the power to order human beings to buy something, thereby entering into the commercial realm where the government can regulate them.

Section 1201 of the ACA is the preexisting condition provisions of “guaranteed issue” and “community rating,” which ensures that no person attempting to purchase insurance can be denied coverage, and that a person cannot be charged more because of preexisting conditions. Section 1501 mandates that everyone buy insurance to offset the effect of the multi-billion-dollar costs arising from Section 1201.

President Trump has had a major impact on the Fifth Circuit through his judicial appointments. Proven constitutional conservatives like Judges Don Willett, Jim Ho, Andy Oldham, and Kyle Duncan now sit on that court, under the mentoring of the fearless originalist Edith Jones and the libertarian-leaning Jerry Smith.

Regardless of how the Fifth Circuit rules in the case, the fact remains that the fifth vote to win at the Supreme Court is still Roberts. Many believe that his reasoning was such a stretch to save Obamacare the first time that he would find another rationale to do so now.

While that might be true, it does not need to be true. It is possible that the chief justice could play it straight from his 2012 reasoning, in which case the ACA should be struck down without the tax authorization.

It is also possible that President Trump will fill another Supreme Court vacancy before this case is decided by the Supreme Court – a decision that could come in 2020 but is more likely to come in 2021 – in which case Roberts’ vote might not even be necessary.

Suddenly, Obamacare is back in the legal crosshairs. If it falls under this legal challenge, President Trump would have a clean canvas on which to design fundamental market-based reforms to provide healthcare security and freedom for millions of Americans.

The case is Texas v. United States, No. 19-10011 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

—————————-

Those last few paragraphs above outline something very important regarding the Trump White House. It has managed to reorganize much of the federal government in a way that gives a great deal of power back to the people. The president has done so almost entirely on his own. Democrats oppose him. Many Republicans oppose him. And certainly the far left media opposes him. But in the end, he continues to outmaneuver them all to such a degree of success that even his supporters are amazed.

To anyone who thought President Trump was giving up the fight to improve the nation’s healthcare system they haven’t been paying attention. He is a man who doesn’t appear to know the meaning of the word quit.

Related image


 

REPORT: Did Mueller Know All Along There Was No Trump-Russia Collusion?

As the investigators become the investigated more and more are asking what did Robert Mueller know and when did he know it? Specifically, did he in fact determine there was no Trump-Russia collusion but proceeded to then spend millions and months creating an investigation where none was warranted? And if so who was pulling his strings behind the proverbial curtain to make him do so?

Image result for Trump Russia Hoax

Via Fox News:

Almost from the start, Democrats and their media echo chamber have moved the goal posts on collusion. The original allegation – the political narrative that the Clinton campaign, through Obama administration alchemy, honed into a counterintelligence investigation – was that that the Trump campaign was complicit in Russia’s “cyberespionage” attacks on the 2016 election.

But there was no evidence that candidate Trump and his surrogates had anything to do with the Kremlin’s hacking and propaganda schemes. And no supporting logic. The Russians are very good at espionage. They neither needed nor wanted American help, their operations predated Trump’s entry into the campaign, and some of those operations were anti-Trump.

Nevertheless, in short order, that endlessly elastic word, collusion, was being stretched to the breaking point – covering every conceivable type of association between Trump associates and Russia.

Some of these were unseemly, such as the Trump Tower meeting, an apparently unsuccessful effort to obtain campaign dirt on Hillary Clinton. More of them were routine, such as incoming national-security adviser Michael Flynn’s communications with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the post-election transition. But none of these collusion episodes were criminal. The only “collusion” prosecutors care about is conspiracy; a criminal agreement to violate a federal penal statute – such as the laws against hacking.

There was never any such evidence. There was just unverified, sensational, hearsay nonsense – the Steele dossier generated by the Clinton campaign.

Now that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has concluded that there was no criminal collusion, the question arises: When during their exhaustive 22-month investigation did prosecutors realize they had no case?

Yes, the Justice Department continued to make that allegation to the secret federal court for months after Trump was sworn in as president.

Notably, in June 2017, about a month after Mueller took over the investigation, while he was still getting his bearings, the Justice Department and the FBI went on to obtain a fourth FISA warrant. Yet again, they used the same unverified information. Yet again, they withheld from the court the fact that this information was generated by the Clinton campaign; that the Clinton campaign was peddling it to the media at the same time the FBI was providing it to the court; and that Christopher Steele, the informant on whom they were so heavily relying, had misled the bureau about his media contacts.

You know what’s most telling about this fourth FISA warrant? The fact that it was never renewed. The 90-day authorization lapsed in September 2017. When it did, Mueller did not seek to extend it with a new warrant.

Think about that for a moment. President Trump fired FBI Director Comey on May 9, 2017. Eight days later, on May 17, Mueller was named special counsel. This appointment effectively wrested control of the Trump-Russia counterintelligence investigation from acting FBI director Andrew McCabe, transferring it to the special counsel.

In order to get the FISA warrants, the Justice Department and the FBI had had to allege that there was probable cause to believe former Trump adviser Carter Page was an agent of Russia. Under FISA law, that requires alleging that he was knowingly involved in clandestine activity on behalf of Russia, and that this clandestine activity involved probable violations of American criminal law – offenses such as espionage. Yet, despite the fact that this representation was made four times in sworn “verified” applications, Mueller never charged Page with a crime – not espionage, not false statements, nothing.

When Special Counsel Mueller closed his investigation last week, he almost certainly knew for about a year and a half that there was no collusion case. Indeed, the indictments that he did bring appeared to preclude the possibility that the Trump campaign conspired with the Kremlin.

Yet the investigation continued. The Justice Department and the special counsel made no announcement, no interim finding of no collusion, as Trump detractors continued to claim that a sitting American president might be a tool of the Putin regime. For month after month, the president was forced to govern under a cloud of suspicion.

Why?

——————-

What is becoming increasingly clear is this – Robert Mueller would not have been granted the authority to do what he did for two years without someone very high up on the political food chain to set the stage for what is now rightfully called the Trump-Russia hoax and that someone is most likely the very figure whose administrative appointments infected intelligence agency layers from top to bottom prior to his departing the White House in 2016. It’s also why the Establishment Media has been so aggressive in pushing the hoax. Besides their shared loathing of President Trump they were doing so out of the agreed-upon need to protect a certain former president:

Image result for evil Obama


 

John Brennan Now Claims Possible “Bad Info” Might Have Led To Trump-Russia Hoax

“I’m just a gullible dumb-dumb so nothing is my fault.” 

That pretty much sums up the defense of the former head of the CIA – the single most powerful intelligence agency in the world. John Brennan has been relentlessly beating the Trump impeachment drum for the last two years, adding fuel to the dangerous fires that were the now disproven Trump-Russia collusion hoax. Mr. Brennan is now claiming he might have received “bad information” on the matter, implying then that he shouldn’t be to blame for helping push an attempted coup of a duly-elected President of the United States.

Image result for John Brennan idiot

Via The Washington Times:

Former CIA chief John O. Brennan now says his months of attacks on President Trump may have been based on “bad information.”

One of the president’s harshest critics had a muted tone on Monday as he discussed special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” No evidence was found to support the claim that Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign “conspired or coordinated” with Russia.

Well, I don’t know if I received bad information but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was,” Mr. Brennan told host Joe Scarborough. “I am relieved that it’s been determined there was not a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government over our election.”

Mr. Brennan said in December 2018, for instance, that Mr. Trump should prepare for the “forthcoming exposure of your malfeasance & corruption.”

“We need an actual leader — our Nation’s future is at stake,” he tweeted Dec. 31.

———————-

Brennan’s words come within hours of his Obama-era intelligence agency counterpart, James Clapper’s interview with CNN where he put much of the Trump-Russia hoax at the feet of former POTUS Barack Obama.

The Deep State is circling the wagons and whispers suggest a few sacrificial lambs will be put out there to help insulate the more powerful players who were actually responsible for the attempted coup of a sitting president. They’ll need the help of some Deep State Republicans to do so. See: Lindsey Graham. 


 

TURNING ON THEIR OWN: James Clapper Tells CNN It Was Obama Who Ordered Trump-Russia Hoax

There needs to be just a bit of reading between the lines here but make no mistake, what James Clapper is doing here is sending out a warning flare that if he’s going down there will be a lot of others he intends to take with him—including a certain former President of the United States. (Really pay attention to how much he emphasizes Obama’s personal involvement in the process from beginning to end.)

This is a Deep State operative clearly rattled by what may soon be coming his way…

Image result for CLapper blames Obama


 

Check Out The Avenatti Tweet He Sent Out Just One Hour Before Being Arrested

Attorney Michael Avenatti rose to fame via more than 200 appearances on CNN last year spouting fake news about President Trump. Mr. Avenatti even toyed with the idea of running against the president in 2020 – an idea that generated considerable support among the anti-Trump radicals that infect American politics and media. Some warned of Avenatti’s checkered past, his penchant for legal intimidation, etc., but CNN and other anti-Trump media didn’t care. Avenatti spoke against President Trump and that’s all that mattered to them – the truth be damned. So now just 24 hours after the Trump-Russia collusion hoax collapsed, federal officers arrested Avenatti for extortion. 

Could this be but the first of many deserved paybacks to come via the Trump White House?

Image result for Trump My Turn


 

News Organization Apologizes To POTUS Trump For Fake Trump-Russia Coverage

Let the backpeddling begin. Even as some diehard anti-Trumpers such as CNN and MSNBC continue to pathetically try and convince their viewers that maybe kinda sorta there could be other anti-Trump opportunities on the horizon, The Hill, much to its credit, comes right out and apologizes for getting it so wrong for so long and wonders if those who created this dangerous hoax will ever be held to account. (Even if it’s on The Hill’s opinion page at least they allowed it to be printed.)

Image result for apologies to Trump

Via The Hill:

Apologies to President Trump

With the conclusions of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe now known to a significant degree, it seems apologies are in order.

However, judging by the recent past, apologies are not likely forthcoming from the responsible parties.

In this context, it matters not whether one is a supporter or a critic of President Trump.

Whatever his supposed flaws, the rampant accusations and speculation that shrouded Trump’s presidency, even before it began, ultimately have proven unfounded. Just as Trump said all along.

Yet, each time President Trump said so, some of us in the media lampooned him. We treated any words he spoke in his own defense as if they were automatically to be disbelieved because he had uttered them. Some even declared his words to be “lies,” although they had no evidence to back up their claims.

We in the media allowed unproven charges and false accusations to dominate the news landscape for more than two years, in a way that was wildly unbalanced and disproportionate to the evidence.

We did a poor job of tracking down leaks of false information. We failed to reasonably weigh the motives of anonymous sources and those claiming to have secret, special evidence of Trump’s “treason.”

As such, we reported a tremendous amount of false information, always to Trump’s detriment.

And when we corrected our mistakes, we often doubled down more than we apologized. We may have been technically wrong on that tiny point, we would acknowledge. But, in the same breath, we would insist that Trump was so obviously guilty of being Russian President Vladimir Putin’s puppet that the technical details hardly mattered.

So, a round of apologies seem in order.

Apologies to President Trump on behalf of those in the U.S. intelligence community, including the Department of Justice and the FBI, which allowed the weaponization of sensitive, intrusive intelligence tools against innocent citizens such as Carter Page, an adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign.

Apologies also to Page himself, to Jerome Corsi, Donald Trump, Jr., and other citizens whose rights were violated or who were unfairly caught up in surveillance or the heated pursuit of charges based on little more than false, unproven opposition research paid for by Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Apologies for the stress on their jobs and to their families, the damage to their reputations, the money they had to spend to hire legal representation and defend themselves from charges for crimes they did not commit.

Apologies on behalf of those in the intelligence community who leaked true information out of context to make Trump look guilty, and who sometimes leaked false information to try to implicate or frame him.

Apologies from those in the chain of command at the FBI and the Department of Justice who were supposed to make sure all information presented to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) is verified but did not do so.

Apologies from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court judges who are supposed to serve as one of the few checks and balances to prevent the FBI from wiretapping innocent Americans. Whether because of blind trust in the FBI, or out of ignorance or even malfeasance, they failed at this important job.

Apologies to the American people who did not receive the full attention of their government while political points were being scored; who were not told about some important world events because they were crowded out of the news by the persistent insistence that Trump was working for Russia.

Apologies all the way around.

And now, with those apologies handled — are more than apologies due?

Should we try to learn more about those supposed Russian sources who provided false “intel” contained in the “dossier” against Trump, Page and others? Should we learn how these sources came to the attention of ex-British spy Christopher Steele, who built the dossier and claimed that some of the sources were close to Putin?

When and where did Steele meet with these high-level Russian sources who provided the apparently false information?

Are these the people who actually took proven, concrete steps to interfere in the 2016 election and sabotage Trump’s presidency, beginning in its earliest days?

Just who conspired to put the “dossier” into the hands of the FBI? Who, within our intel community, dropped the ball on verifying the information and, instead, leaked it to the press and presented it to the FISA Court as if legitimate?

“Sorry” hardly seems to be enough.

Will anyone be held accountable?


 

POTUS Trump Now Turns To D.C. Swamp And Says, “MY TURN.”

Lots of whispers circulating in and around Washington D.C. regarding a Trump White House that is set to unleash an investigative push back against all those false accusors that have been peddling the dangerous and divisive Trump-Russia hoax for the last two years. 

Word is members of both the Clinton and Obama gang are bracing for impact.

DEVELOPING…


 

BREAKING: Mueller Report Exonerates President Trump – No Collusion. No Obstruction.

The Trump White House is taking a much-deserved victory lap as the Democrat and media-constructed house of cards that was the Trump-Russia hoax has finally come crashing down with a findings report issued by Attorney General William Barr that declared President Trump did nothing wrong. 

Image result for Trump MAGA dance gif

Via The Daily Mail:

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders declared it a 'total and complete exoneration' of the president

Mueller sensationally CLEARS Trump and his campaign of collusion with Russia over election-rigging and leaks of Democrats’ emails and White House claims total exoneration after Attorney General Barr decides there’s not enough evidence to charge Trump with obstruction.

President Donald Trump’s campaign did not collude with Russia in the 2016 election, Robert Mueller found in his long-awaited report, as the White House crowed it was ‘total and complete exoneration’ of the president.

Mueller’s conclusions were announced by Attorney General William Barr in a letter to the House and Senate Judiciary chairmen on Sunday.

‘The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election,’ the letter states.

———————-

House Democrats are already declaring they will be calling AG Barr to explain his views on the Mueller report even as they also continue raising campaign cash by promising voters they will continue working to impeach President Trump even as the Mueller report makes clear that the president is innocent of all of the baseless and highly speculative accusations/lies that have been leveled against him since winning the White House in 2016. 

Image result for unhinged Democrats


 

“Mueller Is Closing In On Trump.”

For the last 2+ years there has been a constant stream of “Mueller is closing in on Trump” promises made by both media and political figures. Over and over they said this despite no proof. Over and over they further divided a country against itself. Over and over they called for a sitting president to be arrested – and worse. 

People better not forget what took place. People better not allow the media to so easily distract. And people better be more determined than ever to not be fooled by these anti-American agents of self-destruction ever again…


 

REPORT: Top 10 Propagandists Who Pushed Russia Collusion Hoax

More than two years and $50 million dollars later even some liberals are now forced to admit the whole Trump-Russia collusion story was a hoax from the very beginning.

And guess what? Those who were most willing to perpetrate that hoax likely knew that fact as well. Talk about REAL treason…

Adam Schiff, Ted Lieu, Hillary Clinton, Benjamin Wittes, Robby Mook, Louise Mensch

Via Breitbart:

…Since the summer of 2016, there were countless pushers of the narrative that President Trump’s campaign had colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election, specifically by conspiring with Russia to steal and distribute stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

This included anonymous current and former officials and those in the media willing to publish their allegations, friends of those officials, Democrat members of Congress, those wanting to promote themselves, and of course, Clinton and her campaign officials.

Here are ten of the top promoters of the narrative:

(1)CNN — CNN first reported that President Trump was briefed on the “pee dossier,” which prompted BuzzFeed to publish the dossier in full. CNN has also given vast amounts of airtime to analysts, former officials, and Democrat lawmakers pushing the Russia collusion narrative. It has also published a number of stories that advanced the narrative, including several that turned out to be false.
(2)BuzzFeed — BuzzFeed first published the “pee dossier” in full — which released to the public unfounded accusations against President Trump, including the unverified claim that he hired prostitutes to urinate on a bed during a visit to Moscow in 2013. At the time of publish, the dossier remained “salacious and unverified,” in then-FBI Director James Comey’s own words.
(3)The Washington Post — The Washington Post was on the forefront of publishing anonymously-sourced stories suggesting collusion between Russia and Trump campaign officials. It published the intelligence leak that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak that led to his firing later. Flynn ended up pleading guilty to one count of lying. There were no collusion charges.
(4)The New York Times — The New York Times published a front-page, top-of-the-page story on Inauguration Day suggesting that President-elect Trump’s associates had been “wiretapped.” Though the report admitted, “It is not clear whether the intercepted communications had anything to do with Mr. Trump’s campaign, or Mr. Trump himself,” it set the very inauguration of President Trump as part of a Russian conspiracy.
(5)Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) — Schiff, now the House Intelligence Committee chairman, has been the No. 1 pusher of the Russia collusion hoax in Congress. Absent any direct evidence of collusion, Schiff has argued for months that the evidence is “hiding in plain sight.” Schiff has also tried to fundraise off of the hoax.
(6)Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) — Lieu has been a close second to Schiff’s promotion of the Russia hoax in Congress. He once called for a pause in the “entire Trump agenda” until an investigation into the collusion ties was completed.
(7)Benjamin Wittes — Wittes, a journalist who is close to former FBI Director James Comey, was a lead inciter on Twitter of the Russia hoax, infamously tweeting cannon gifs every time a new sensational report came out that advanced the Russia collusion narrative.
(8)Louise Mensch — Mensch, a former British parliamentarian, has become a household name among the anti-Trump resistance in the U.S., with her fantastical tweets about “sealed indictments” and grand juries.
(9)Hillary Clinton — Clinton, the day after losing the election to Trump, wanted to promote the idea that Comey’s reopening of the investigation into her emails and Russia led to her defeat, according to the book Shattered. “She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way,” a Clinton ally told the book’s authors.
(10)Robby Mook — Mook was the first Clinton campaign official to go on record suggesting there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, during an ABC News interview at the Democratic National Convention in July 2016, shortly after stolen DNC emails were released.


 

POTUS Trump Gives Fox News The Cold Shoulder – Calls On OANN Instead…

Fox News is currently in the Trump doghouse due to its temporary ban against the popular Judge Jeanine and the even more recent hiring of 2016 election fraud conspirator (she actually gave debate questions to Hillary Clinton ahead of time)  and former DNC Chair, Donna Brazile. 

While walking past Fox News reporter John Roberts, who appeared very eager to field a question, President Trump shook his head and said, “NO” before then going to OANN reporter Emerald Robinson and taking a question from her. 

President Trump is clearly putting Fox News on notice.

Message received. 

Image result for Trump Emerald Robinson


 

REPORT: Google Search Bias Flipped Seats for Democrats in Midterms

Talk about REAL collusion in American politics. Despite the tech giants repeated denials it appears the facts have nailed down Google as a primary player in voter manipulation during the 2018 Midterms.

Check it out…

Image result for Google vs Trump

Via Breitbart:

New research from psychologist and search engine expert Dr. Robert Epstein shows that biased Google searches had a measurable impact on the 2018 midterm elections, pushing tens of thousands of votes towards the Democrat candidates in three key congressional races, and potentially millions more in races across the country.
The study, from Epstein and a team at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT), analyzed Google searches related to three highly competitive congressional races in Southern California. In all three races, the Democrat won — and Epstein’s research suggests that Google search bias may have tipped them over the edge.

The research follows a previous study conducted in 2016 which showed that biased Google results pushed votes to Hillary Clinton in the presidential election. Democrats and Google executives have disputed these findings.

Epstein says that in the days leading up to the 2018 midterms, he was able to preserve “more than 47,000 election-related searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo, along with the nearly 400,000 web pages to which the search results linked.”

Analysis of this data showed a clear pro-Democrat bias in election-related Google search results as compared to competing search engines. Users performing Google searches related to the three congressional races the study focused on were significantly more likely to see pro-Democrat stories and links at the top of their results.

As Epstein’s previous studies have shown, this can have a huge impact on the decisions of undecided voters, who often assume that their search results are unbiased. Epstein has called this the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME).

According to Epstein’s study, at least 35,455 undecided voters in the three districts may have been persuaded to vote for a Democrat candidate because of slanted Google search results. Considering that each vote gained by a Democrat is potentially a vote lost by a Republican, this means more than 70,910 votes may have been lost by Republicans in the three districts due to Google bias. In one of these districts, CA 45, the Democrat margin of victory was just over 12,000 votes.

The total Democrat win margin across all three districts was 71,337, meaning that bias Google searches could account for the vast majority of Democrat votes. Extrapolated to elections around the country, Epstein says that bias Google results could have influenced 4.6 million undecided voters to support Democrat candidates.

—————————

The gist of the above facts are this: Democrats have long enjoyed massive amounts of influence over undecided voters via what would normally cost tens of millions of dollars in Google advertising is given to Democrats all across the country free of charge. 

Yet even then they were unable to take back all of Congress and were soundly defeated in the 2016 election. That doesn’t mean they’ll stop trying, though. Far from it. Look for Google to ramp up its pro-Democrat platform even more come 2020.


 

New Information Points To Obama-Era Ambassadors Involved In Plot To ‘Take Trump Down’

Yet another sickening layer to the Deep State machinations that worked to delegitimize the votes of tens of millions of Americans and destroy a duly elected President of the United States…

Image result for Deep State vs Trump

Via Zero Hedge:

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) revealed that “sitting ambassadors” were involved in a plot to “take down” President Trump.

Sitting down with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Sara Carter and Gregg Jarrett, Meadows said that the release of new documents will “show” that US ambassadors conspired with the DOJ, reports the Washington Examiner.

“It’s additional information that is coming out that will show not only was there no collusion, but there was a coordinated effort to take this president down,” said Meadows.

“We talk about the ‘Deep State.’ There are players now, even ambassadors, that are sitting ambassadors that were involved in part of this with the FBI-DOJ.”

“As we look at this, it’s time to show that we show the American people what’s out there, declassify some of those documents,” Meadows added. “I think when the American people see what I’ve seen, they will judge for themselves and know that this has all been a hoax.”


 

“IT WASN’T RUSSIA. IT WAS US.”

By now most reasonable-thinking folks understand the entirety of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax was little more than a multi-billion dollar Democrat-media-Deep State scam meant to discredit the results of the 2016 Election. What the below map also shows is just how truly widespread President Trump’s America-First message is to the nation’s voters. The radical left has spent decades pushing millions into high-population density centers (cities) whereby they become almost completely dependent upon government services in order to survive. This results in more voters for radical left Democrat candidates who repeatedly promise yet more of those services—for free. These millions of urban voters are more easily manipulated and thus become the foundation for the Democrat Party.  They do not represent the entirety of the country, though. Far from it in fact. 

It wasn’t Russia that won the 2016 election. It was us.

Image result for Trump's America

Image result for Trump's America


 

REPORT: CNN’s Trump Hatred Results in Double Digit Rating Collapse

CNN’s ratings are in a freefall as the 24/7 anti-Trump opinion network saw a double-digit loss last week. 

Image result for cnn DUMPSTER FIRE

Via Breitbart:

Last place CNN’s already humiliating ratings nosedived by double digits last week.

Even more than usual, some ten days ago the far-left CNN launched a 24/7 jihad against President Trump, going so far as to question his mental health, his patriotism, blaming him for a mass murder in New Zealand, and serial lying about his response to Charlottesville. But this unhinged hate campaign obviously turned off a considerable number of Americans.

When compared to this same week last year, CNN lost -16 percent of its primetime viewers and -17 of total day viewers; young people ran away screaming: In the advertiser-coveted 25-54 age demo, CNN shed an incredible -31 percent of those viewers during primetime and -29 percent in total day.

…To put things in more perspective, in all of cable TV during primetime, Fox News hit number one, MSNBC number three (ESPN was number two), and CNN bottomed out at eleven.

During primetime, as you can see above, CNN cannot even average a million voters in a country of 330 million during a never-ending news cycle that is always turned up to 11.

For all of MSNBC’s flaws, and there are many, at least Democrats are not played for fools by that far-left outlet. Unlike CNN, which insults its audience with its laughable pose as objective, MSNBC makes no secret of its left-wing biases.

And for all of Fox’s flaws, and there are many, the fair and balanced network draws a sharp line between its opinion and news programs.

CNN, however, is a total sh*t show of shrill neuroses, fake news, full-blown lies, violence, and unbridled hate. Watching CNN is like watching an ex-husband seethe about his ex-wife all day and all night. There’s no insight from CNN, nothing interesting is ever passed along, and it certainly isn’t informative. CNN has not broken a consequential story in over a year — at least not one that didn’t turn out to be fake news.

…The network is a national laughingstock and only a total housecleaning could begin to repair the damage.

Related image


 

NICE! Pentagon finds $12.8 billion for POTUS Trump’s border wall.

It appears it really will be another promise made and another promise kept by an American president who continues to confound his enemies and delight his tens of millions of supporters both in the United States and around the world.

Related image

Via The Washington Examiner:

The Defense Department has identified $12.8 billion in possible funding that it could use to fulfill President Trump’s call for a border wall.

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., released the 20-page spreadsheet on Twitter Monday night.

Trump last month declared a national emergency at the border, and said he wants to use $3.6 billion for border wall projects. The Pentagon’s list said it has found possible funding sources that are “in excess of the amount needed.”

Congress has passed a resolution to disapprove of Trump’s push for emergency funding, but Trump vetoed it, and lawmakers are not expected to have enough votes to override him. Opponents of Trump’s move are still hopeful that court challenge might prevent Trump from spending the money.

——————–

President Trump continues to outmaneuver the D.C. Establishment at nearly every turn, something which is driving his political and media enemies absolutely bonkers…